When we're thinking about
and we're in the world, and we're in the world,
and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in the world, and we're in
native UCT, things that are familiar to many users.
So yeah, I'm quite happy with the progress.
And I do think that the whole user experience aspect here
Yeah, having that friendly user experience for retail users
and people who are using it, who really, if we're building things
for everyone to use in the world, we don't want it to be that confusing
or the barriers to entry that come into it.
And I think you brought up a good point also about the stables,
having native stables bring some familiarity from the other ecosystems
as well as some things that people can trust to help along with things
like Aave and other DeFi protocols.
Yeah, and I have mixed opinion on this.
Because it makes sense to have the same assets
and kind of like a shared DNA across all these other networks.
And I do think that's good because you might want to use the same stablecoin
and it's simple, you can trust Circle or whatnot.
But at the same time, during this project, I realized that, you know,
having its own, like an ecosystem having its own peculiarities
and differences is actually really cool.
Not just like assets, but also like in terms of opportunities and restrictions
that how you, for example, build on Move and what you can build.
And I think that's really important because that's how also our offering
at Aave can actually differentiate.
So the future versions of Aave, for example,
they don't need to look the same as on EVM.
So we tried to build the Move implementation
in the mind of being as close to the Solidity implementation as possible.
But whenever we had a kind of like a compromise
between the Solidity implementation
and making something that is more aligned for Aptos,
we made that decision to align more with Aptos
because then we can actually kind of like,
we build from the perspective of having a reference
of something we built earlier on Solidity,
but we're building like the best thing we can build for Aptos.
And going forward, we're going to go more towards this way
where the actual implementation might look a little bit different
and the features also might be even different from the EVM implementation.
Stani, it sounds like you're dropping a little bit of future alpha.
I mean, do you have any thoughts on what we could do
with the next version of Aave that have specific features
that could benefit users with Aptos and Move?
I really want to look into the time components quite a lot
and also more better pricing of the interest rates.
I think that's an area where we'll be focusing quite a lot.
I do think that we have to bring Go into Aptos as well
because it's going to be that strong decentralized alternative
to these more centralized stable coins.
But I do think that the element of being able to trade
that kind of like exposure of interest rate is interesting
when you can do that in a very high frequency
and a very wide full of multiplayers.
I can't wait to get that started.
Exciting things coming up in the DeFi space for Aptos
and I'm super excited to see Aave on Aptos in general.
You guys ready to maybe open it up for some questions
from the audience and interact with the other people here?
I'm not the co-host, so someone else will have to let them up,
but I will introduce them as they go
and we'll see how it goes.
Come on up and feel free to raise your hand
or whatever if you want to be able to come up
and ask some questions to the guys.
Meanwhile, I guess, while we're waiting,
it's a little messy with Twitter.
Sometimes it doesn't show them.
Yeah, you might have to unmute block labs.
Yeah, I think he's still muted.
We have cash markets up here, it looks like now.
Twitter, you know, Twitter's bugging me per usual.
So, I'll just fill some time here
with a different question to you guys.
Oh, wait, cash markets showed up again.
I wanted to ask a question.
Yeah, so this question is to Stani,
and it has to do with World Liberty Finance.
I've seen that you guys have been working a lot
with World Liberty Finance
because they're building on top of Aave, I believe.
And I just wanted to know
if they are also thinking about
expanding to other chains beyond Ethereum.
the best people to answer that
will be World Liberty Finance.
But based on my discussions
and understanding is that
And they come from an angle
where they want to use Aave
and their instance is on the Ethereum mainnet,
But that's my take on that.
But their team probably will be
the best people to answer.
So maybe if you try to DM their account
or go to their governance forum,
maybe there's some better answer
Oh, no, Mooveflow came up.
This is Troy from Mooveflow.
So my question is for Stony.
With the recent trend on AI agents,
what do you see Aave's role
in the integration with AI agent?
the emergence of future AI agent economy
would influence the current landscape of DeFi?
Because recently we're seeing the concept of DeFi.
So we'd like to see your opinion.
That's an interesting topic
like financial transactions, right?
like the whole legacy finance.
I think on-chain provides
What's going to be interesting