Projects
![]()
No projects found
Investors
New
DAO Treasuries
DATs
Lend / Borrow APRs
Chains
Categories
Spaces
🌱 Bitcoin2 +Pink Floyd Art Thursdays #ChiaNetwork #Chia $XCH
Recorded: June 27, 2025 Duration: 2:02:01Space Recording
Short Summary
In a dynamic discussion, participants explored the launch of a new cloud wallet, the potential for a token launch with 2bitcoin.org, and innovative fundraising strategies aimed at fostering a gift economy. Key partnerships and trends in technology were also highlighted, signaling a transformative period for the crypto community.
Full Transcription
Thank you. Welcome Art Thursdays.
Last week was a particularly short one and I got my email sent.
That was fine.
There's quite a lot going on this week.
And look who is here.
It's Bradley Art with Hart Wallace.
We're good to chat with him about what's been going on goodness me I'll get this shared in the same
spaces Bradley's coming up on stage oh there he is Bradley welcome good to see
happy Thursday how was your day
get this shared Happy Thursday. How was your day? Get this shit.
It was like 95 on Monday and or 90 on Monday and 95 on Tuesday.
So today, yes, it was like 88.
So it was nice to get down to like 70 or so today.
to get down to 70 or so today.
Sorry, was that your weight? Did you say you're losing weight?
Did you say you were losing weight?
No, no, no, the temperature.
It was super hot Monday through
Wednesday, and then today was
a bearable temperature.
What was it? What 70?
I'm trying to think.
yeah,
90 to 70.
So 90 degrees Celsius. How is 90 to 70. So 90 degrees
Celsius. Oh, nice.
Yeah, how is it going then? Have you had a good
week?
Yeah, it was a good week.
Went by pretty quickly.
How was yours? How was your week?
It's like, so like 32
degrees Celsius.
That's pretty hot.
So like 32 to 35 and then down to like 28, 30 yesterday.
And then today is down.
So it's much better today.
That's crazy.
Yeah, 35 is like Thailand temperature, I guess.
Yeah, yeah. Thailand in the summer. is like thailand temperature i guess yeah yeah
so thailand in the summer yeah yeah pretty much i don't know if you get humidity as well or if it's
dry heat i'm not sure uh it is humid probably you're more humid because you're more jungly
um we're humid because we're down by the lake, so it's a different kind of humid.
Yeah, well, it's been
a big week.
There's a lot going on.
Lots going on.
Yes. Let's go through it.
What would you say
is the biggest story of the week?
Positive or
detractive?
Both. We've always talked about the both.
Well, I would say most exciting thing this week within community-wise
would be the release of the wallet, the
cloud wallet today or yesterday. That's pretty cool.
I haven't checked it out yet, but I'm aiming to sometime
this weekend. I mean, there's been a lot going on. I mean, like you have, you know, Iran being
Iran's nuclear station or, you know, let's see, maybe it's a Bitcoin, nuclear Bitcoin mining
operation. Who knows what it actually is. I mean, you got
a satellite being
blown out of the sky
via laser. Lots
of crazy stuff going on.
I didn't know about the laser.
When was that?
Next month.
Scientists just discovered that
July and August, the
Earth is going to speed up in rotation.
That's suspicious. Where did the laser stuff happen, though? Where was that?
I think that was a Chinese satellite.
I forget if it was our satellite or a Chinese satellite, but it was one versus the other.
And I think it was China blasted one of Elon Musk's satellites out of the sky.
Interesting.
Well, I mean, there's the lasers we've been talking about the last year and a half,
directed energy weapons.
That will be from 5G weapons on the street soon.
It's guaranteed.
As soon as they use it once, it's guaranteed they'll use it again and again.
It's so immoral. You should never, ever use one of them. They shouldn't use it once, it's guaranteed they'll use it again and again. It's so immoral.
You should never ever use one of them.
They shouldn't even be invented, I think.
Well, maybe invented, but not.
They shouldn't be built and deployed.
Just wrong.
They've been using scalar field weapons against us since the 70s.
Really?
Is there a documented first use of that?
Scalar technology
classified in the 60s.
Yeah.
This is part of JFK's
assassination. This is part of,
again, the disruption
advancement in society. This is part of again the disruption in
Advancement in society
It's to slow down innovation because once the truth of stuff goes out
Innovation is gonna go so fast. It's gonna be exponential. Yeah
Yes, yes, yes, I mean
It takes away and it shows the truth of everything. So
What foods are healthy what medicines are healthy? There's no more animal testing. There's no more people testing
There's complete transparency and truth. There's no more
Bullshit. This is this has been gone. Like I said, this, this is everything I've been working on for four months. This has been gone for 13,000 years from the public's eyes. This has been gone
in majority since the Library of Alexander. This is everybody's birthright, and it has been lost
for so long and then just kept in the dark by
by some for for a period of time it's time it comes out the light i'm smoking some marijuana
to you now keep going i want to hear more um so think of so everything I've been working on Which I don't know if you know Dr. Jack Cruz
Not personally
So I've been
Speaking with him this week in Telegram
After
Yes after
I won't go down the rabbit hole but anyways
We're in connection now
His work he's been doing is exact.
He said, I'm exactly right with my paper and what I've been working on with 21
bass harmonics. He's like, that is exactly what I've been studying with all my light
and sound healing devices and disease
and everything. So think of it as like, we've been trying to do math
wrong. So like all of our solutions, all of our frequencies, all of our radio, like-Fi, satellite, cell phone, all these frequencies
naturally disturb our mitochondrial function inside of our cells because it's vibrating at a ratio that causes, again, free radicals, disease, structural defects,
let's say a loss in communication between cells.
This is where cancer happens, right?
When the electrolytes in the body are too low for the brain to be able to signal through the nervous system to tell the
cells what they're supposed to be. They start building themselves how they want to be and going
where they want to be, right? They start meandering. This is, again, what we think is technology, what
we think is electronics, what we think is radio signal is not what we think it is.
It is literally scalar fields that is a projection of reality.
It is the fabric of the programming of how physics works.
So by us storing and constantly broadcasting in these signals were in a sense causing micro waves,
micro earthquakes, you know what I mean? Like, again, instability in the structural system
and of itself. Mother Earth, yeah, it can handle the pollution we're throwing at it,
all this. But when we're messing with the radio waves that literally are,
let's say, the signal for the Earth to be in resonance with itself
and be in a natural cycle with itself,
it starts to mess with the natural physics of the Earth, right?
It starts to irritate this electromagnetic body.
Again, it's just cause and effect.
Again, I'm not saying it's malicious,
but we need to tune our systems that is within resonance of this system, within the six prime
bands that are all based on a 1-hertz system. This reduces noise. It reduces phase cancellation. It reduces probably, again, people that are sensitive to EMF and radio
frequencies. It can drive them crazy a little bit, right? It can cause mental disturbances because,
again, the frequencies of both the electric signaling in your brain as well as the theta,
The electric signaling in your brain as well as the theta, gamma, and beta phases of your
actual brain itself, it messes with it because sound and radio waves are oscillations in
the same phrase.
They're not different.
Your brain waves are radio waves.
They're just in a much lower bandwidth than we traditionally use inside of our classic systems.
So they're never like a problem because they're lower than what we can hear,
and they're lower than what we traditionally can broadcast in.
So when they're using drop band radio systems, bouncing it off the ionosphere,
those can cause dissonant, let's say, echoes, right? A bouncing, a reverberation
off of these different stratospheres and ionospheres, causing, in a sense, radio static in the atmosphere.
And that causes vortices, and that will cause weather to happen. They're not controlling the
weather, but it's like entering a bunch of code into an already working code base
and you don't know how to code and you don't know what language it is.
You're just like putting some art up in it because you want to.
It messes with the overall system of how it's supposed to work.
system of how it's supposed to work.
Interesting.
What did Jack Cruz, basically, what was his take on it all?
I know I saw him about a month ago talking about, I think he was, what was it?
It was like sort of giving credibility to some of the, let's say, theories that have
been spread in rumors in these spaces over the last couple of years.
But he was saying similar things to what I kind of think.
But did you reach out to him?
Yeah, I'm curious of his take on it.
He reached out to me today and asked my take on the war.
and asked my take on the war.
And I said that is a just under a trillion dollar rabbit hole
that I didn't wanna go down quite yet.
But there's a lot, it's a lot bigger, Edward,
than we're thinking.
Again, there's mirrors and there's an elephant
and everyone's looking at the elephant,
but they're not looking at what's going on at the register when they walked into the building and that's where it's all happening
so humanity is looking at the uh they're looking in the wrong direction and they should be looking at in this direction basically Right well that's yeah
So what if like everything they've told you that's fantasy
That's science fiction is actually possible and real
Oh could you give an example
Language since the Phoenicians has been used as war
So we spell everything right language since the Phonetians has been used as war.
So we spell everything, right?
Sorry, I didn't
get the link to the...
You're spelling,
right? So like
phonetics, Phonetians, is
about the sound of the word
is the meaning.
Yeah.
So when you say a word, how it sounds, not how they taught you,
but how you would have naturally, like if you didn't know the word and you just heard it.
Like superfluous.
Like just the sound of it, not the actual.
like just the sound of it not the actual so break it down to its etymology
So break it down to its etymology.
the pieces of it's it's different words from older languages that are shorter little pieces
that broke into a more complicated word right so if you break it down to the etymology level
right there there's these much smaller words breaking down to like Latin, Phoenician, Aramaic, Syrian, and so on.
Linear A, Mitoan, or Minoan, all of these old languages.
But now let's break that down even further, right?
Because language can be broken down mathematically.
All language can, because it's all based off of math
because math is the universal language, right? Numbers is the universal language between all
languages. There's 26 separate types of languages and different dialects broken up between them.
But there's mainly 26 different or 72 different variations of kinds of languages throughout the world.
So all of them can be broken down into mathematical symboling.
What does their actual letter mean?
What does the angles mean?
What is it broken down to inside of a formula? if like our words, our letters, right, are actually mathematical derivations that you would call magic, right?
Mathic, math, I see, right?
The difference between magic and science is knowing, right?
So if we walked into an indigenous population with a cell phone, they'd think, wow, that's magic, right?
No, it's just misunderstood
science. So once you understand that science, the impossible things start to become possible,
right? So think of language as the primary instrument of war, the ultimate Trojan horse.
They've been teaching you your entire life that salt is pepper and pepper is salt.
So everything that they tell you is possible, everything they tell you that you are,
everything that they tell you is your boundaries, your capabilities, your boundary set is wrong.
It's always set to get you two steps behind.
This is why when I started down this whole process of saying that zero is not a real number. Zero is
a phase state. Just like 32 degrees Celsius is a phase state, right? It is frozen, it is solid,
It is solid.
And it is both.
It's in a superposition state.
It is neither, both, and either or.
It is a quaternary phase.
It can be four separate things at once.
So when you get to 10, when you get to 100, you're setting a goal.
If you always say, I want to get myself to 100%, right?
Well, what if 100% is only level one?
So your goal that you're setting for yourself,
your possibility of your imagination of what you can be
is capping yourself, right, at 100.
When 100 isn't the top, that's actually just the first step.
But everyone's been telling you that the first step is 100.
So you've never thought to go beyond 100 because that's what you thought the top was.
That's where you thought the ceiling was.
This is what the terra firma is, right? This is what the heavenly waters above,
the frozen firmament, this is the cap, right? They set this limit so that you think that that's
the best you could ever be to. So all your life you're working up to your goals to be this.
Because you think that is your maximum capability.
Therefore setting your expectations for what and who you can be.
This is why Usain Bolt.
This is what the double slit experiment is.
It's once one person observes it.
There is a witness to the other.
Whether it's one frequency vibrating to another.
That takes the waveform and collapses it.
What's that? I've got a 12-inch penis,
so I just wanted you to be a witness. Sorry, carry on.
Is that your PNS?
Is that what you said? I have a 12-inch
PNS?
Plug that.
You do, you don't, and it's both
Sorry, I didn't want to interrupt you, Flo
I just had to throw that plug in
But you know what I'm saying?
So let's say, this is why in film and culture
In all these outside things
They're like, turn it up to 11, right?
Borderline 11 This is why you stay 10 steps ahead, right? Because if you're taking 10 steps ahead, you're always at 11.
You're at the next phase states, right? So every time you're using zero as a number and thinking
that you're evolving past that, that's the loop. That's the portal you're stepping into.
That's the black hole that you just walked through you step through the door on on nine about to phase change and you just fell into the
loop and started at one again so there it's it's mental sabotage through public and uh disinformation campaigns. Well, yeah. So it's limiting
the population by setting
their bars low
and telling them that that's the maximum
they can go.
Absolutely. I agree with that for sure.
So it's
sublingual
priming warfare
of the
many versus the few.
Yeah, I didn't follow that bit. I'm not quite fully awake yet.
So again, they write the laws, they write the policies, they write the plans, so therefore they can limit you in your potential.
So if they set the education plan for your childhood of what the curriculum is going to be, they can then limit the availability and amount of information that you have, right? If you put you all in a
class and treat you all the same, just like healthcare, right? It's not an individualized
approach. You're not taking a Montessori or a Waldorf method and catering it to the child of
what they're interested in, right? Teaching them play, teaching them interest in their own education
and pursuing their knowledge, right um that's what life is
supposed to be approved quickly because for i know he's yeah please yeah a minute no i just i just
wanted to um come up and say hi to everybody and stuff say hey what's going on art man um appreciate
that info that you dropped you know in the other space um the the muscle guide space the other day, man. It was some alpha.
Your insight was on point.
You know, man, if you're...
Hit me with a DM or something like that, man.
If you like, I'd like for you to come on
one of my spaces in the future if you can
or if you want to.
For sure, man. I would love to.
Yeah.
Appreciate it, man.
Thanks, man.
Much love, brother.
Feel free to join the conversation
But yeah so we've been
We've been again everything's
Backwards it's think
Of everything as a mirror
But from a
Controlled standpoint that is what
Like the black nobility family is right
That is the the
How to keep the elite
Where they are right families in power that are in power, in power.
It's been going on since King Tut.
They took the information that was freely given to all societies, to all people.
This is why the Egyptians in all of these places, they were saying like, oh, this would take a thousand years to build.
Yes, because it was their entire culture and civilization working together to make something beautiful, to make something intentful.
Families would pass down their craft.
It wasn't like now, oh, your son picks a craft.
No, no, no. You are a Smith. Your last name is Smith because you are a black Smith, right?
This is what your lineage does. This is the craft, the energy, the memory passed down from
family to family. The current education system is stripping that away. It's stripping our culture.
It's stripping our history. It's stripping our history. It's
stripping our memory from our families. It's destroying our families as an entire thing
itself, right? Over 52% divorce rate inside of most of the entire world at this point.
It's both intentful and not intentful. They're following mathematics. They're following algorithms that are not programmed for sustainability of social, ethical, and emotional standards.
It's time that we start looking into where we're going and where these algorithms of profit are driving us
and start to flip the script and start to look at this from a qualitative instead of a quantitative measure.
Qualitative, that's like going by words and outcomes, not numbers, right?
Quantitative is numbers.
Yeah, quality over quantity.
Like more goals or focus more on feelings, less on numbers and less on uh on impact right on quality on on health on true health on
on uh infrastructure you know what i mean like we're not building towards anything we're just
we're just playing pvp we need to stop playing pvp and start playing pve because the pve has been
driving us against each other for too fucking long yeah Yeah, well, let me just push back on that a little bit.
I know the sentiment that you're saying, like, we're not building anything.
So basically, we've got to get to the point when we are and it's built.
But I would argue that we actually, we are building things.
So let's, as a...
I'm not saying we're not building anything.
I'm saying they're slowing us down.
Hold on a second.
As a human species,
we need to get to somewhere. But we are building. And I've been trying to build this concept of the spaces being so important because I knew this day was coming. I figured out there was
some sort of secret elite in 2019. And then in 2021, no, sorry, 2022 early,
that's when I realized the nature of it.
But I had already long planned to go this live environment.
So that's, so World Park and Music Village
were meant to counteract the elite from years ago.
So I've been building for five years to try and make it happen.
I've not been able to, in spite of how hard I've tried,
because basically there hasn't been funding. And so the people able to, in spite of how hard I've tried, because basically there
hasn't been funding. And so, but people are building and I know you are. So, you know,
we just have to build more. Basically we have to build more, I think is what the summary of that
is. Sorry, back to you. You, you inspired me, your work, your energy your effort your dedication kept me here right
put me in a position where i i drove myself to over 1500 hours of research in the last four
months it put me in a position where i've now written over 10 000000 papers and 200,000 lines of code.
Okay, your efforts, your dedication,
your love for trying to bring Pink Floyd back for the reasons, it doesn't matter.
Your efforts, your method, your medium, right,
is your voice, Edward, and your heart.
And that has never stopped.
So the product that you're building,
even if it's not built yet is built in your
heart it is built in your mind it is built in the public's view of it because you've not stopped
talking about it since day one so whether the fruition of the actual app is there or not the
energy that you're putting into it which is the whole point of why you're trying to heal. And again, the medium of the
message is already here. You've already succeeded in that. It's coming.
Yeah, I really appreciate that. That's a really nice way to look at it. Yeah. Yeah, thank you.
And also you as well, you've been the heart of this since the whole way. So we've been building
this together. It's almost more than technology. It's more of a thing it's like a what like a
sort of like a concert like it's like a ship it's like a conceptual ship that's it's maybe even
built in a sense so it's on its way but we've got to get to the promised land because time is ticking
out so yeah i appreciate uh everything you do and everything you've done for me as well and
ever everything you've done for everyone so yeah thanks
thanks straight back at you so this week edward um i've had a couple people reach out another person
at the end of february start he's an engineer he started building the same exact thing that i was
doing not the paper wise not figuring out the math
necessarily um but building this ai os he had never had a thought of it it just got driven into
his head and he built a parallel version to exactly what i've built um at april 16th chat
gpt open ai literally uh took it off his local, was able to delete all of his stuff, all of his work, all of his efforts.
So he's been putting posts up ever since.
And then I talked to another data scientist who's a specifically recursive engineer specialist and mathematician
who's been working through topology and recursive AI design with her father
for years. And I've sent her my work and she was blown away at the level of research and quality
and like how close I've gotten in four months to what she's been building for years. So I'm on the track. I've got confirmation now from
Dr. Jack Cruz. I've got confirmation in my build structure and what I'm trying to build, um, from
this other woman that, and she's already done a different form of the same exact thing. So this
is like, I am right on track with this. Like everything I've been researching is going to change the world, Edward. We're going
to take 23 different disciplines and change them from the inside out. No more lies, no more bullshit,
no more hidden emails, no more fucking testing on people and markets and putting poisons inside of
different ingredients and just saying, oh, you know, that's proprietary.
No, because we have the technology, we have the math, and we have the programming to be
able to look at these things through a scalar field, through a 5D shadowed reality, which
is the full structure of reality, right?
And look at it through a quaternion lens and see if it's aligned with the 20-way one-base
harmonics.
And if it isn't aligned structurally, we know it's aligned with the 20 ways one base harmonics. And if it isn't aligned
structurally, we know it's not healthy for us. We know it's not good for us, right? So it's,
it's not a matter of R and D anymore. It's not a matter of corporate bullshit. It's not a matter
of secrets and division. This is the time where truth and trustless society exists because there are no lies.
There is no more bullshit.
We can create homomorphic cryptography.
We can get rid of CSAM.
We can stop the hurt and the poison that is killing and poisoning our young next generations that are going to be this replacement for who and what we are today.
This is our opportunity
to change the script from
the 1%
to the 52%.
Welcome to the stage,
Lutik. Good to see you there.
Grand evening, nerds.
Hope all is well. Good to see you, is well good to see you edward good to see you are
are good to see you there down below be so approved be as approved
much love brother how you doing oh all is well cannot complain what a time to be a nerd is beautiful and grand I can't
complain how are y'all great doing well buddy could you click on my profile
picture and see if the banner image comes up automatically as a preview or is it purple and
blacked out yes it comes up automatically what do you see two uh two bitcoin.org with uh two bars
i love your new profile pic by the way that that hypercube is super cool the rainbow hypercube
thank you very much yeah that's i'm starting to unveil my vision now.
I've decided to proceed with Bitcoin 2.
I basically...
I've got no...
Well, I shouldn't say I've got no other options.
That's a bit of a cliche.
But I'm almost...
I've got updates on World Park and Music Village
and the upcoming legal case.
And yes, it'll be me that's suing
this little security agency. We'll put it that way.
And I'm not signing the non-disclosure agreement, Wes. I'm sorry. I'm not going to talk too much
for now, but we'll see what I do say, because there's a lot to say. But Bitcoin too is coming
soon. And that little hypercube is a programmable cube. And if the community or the world, in fact,
could get to a point where that can be stored on a data layer,
in a data layer store as coordinates linked to color codes,
I think we can build a new metaverse on Bitcoin too.
So there's the teaser.
There's my big news.
And yeah.
Oh, someone's coming up.
And I own the Bitcoin, the 2bitcoin.org URL, by the way.
So I'm going to reform Team Satoshi and invites are going to start going out soon.
Welcome to the stage.
Welcome to the stage.
Daryl, long time no talk, buddy.
Hope you're doing well.
Howdy.
How you been, bud? No, there's no no talk, buddy. Hope you're doing well. Howdy. How you been, bud?
No, there's no one here, Luna.
I'm doing well.
I'm enjoying that the heat wave has passed.
Yeah, it was nice being 70 day right after the 90, 95, and 88 degree day.
No, it was more like it was over 100 for us down here
for a couple of days.
Yeah, we're a little bit more north, so yeah,
probably a little hotter down there.
But yeah, I caught the tail end
of non-disclosure
agreement. I was kind of curious what that topic
was about.
Well,
the update on Music Village and World Park there,
I haven't talked about it that much.
And in fact, when Bradley is asked, what's the update on it?
There's often hasn't been one,
but I've been trying to figure out what's going on.
I can't for the life of me figure out why both have not launched.
I think there's $10,000 of of work two or three hours of work and I was willing to work
on it for free basically so essentially I've not been I've only been paid three thousand dollars
for working on it for 15 months so i've said that i've struggled financially
at points but like it's been madness and i feel like they're trying to pay me to stop talking
about decentralized governance that's one of the things that keeps coming up is blockchain is not
the solution decentralized governance is not a thing don't talk about that if
you're building music village over here okay well i'm not quite sure how those two things link but
i'm still going to keep talking about it but i've been made promises that i'd get paid that'd be
funding and wes has stolen one of my ideas put it in a different business plan and well i said i
wouldn't talk too much so i should probably stop there but I said to Wesley he doesn't pay me I'll sue him and he's
refusing to pay me still so I'm gonna sue him and he tried to get me to sign a
non-disclosure agreement $1,500 I mean that's laughably small seven figures
let's start talking but so that's my update. So with those two things effectively canceled,
I'm not going to work with Wes anymore.
And I'm going to have to now try and do them as a crowdfunder.
And they are to counter the elite.
So that's probably what this is about,
is that they know that these platforms,
well, it was only meant to be one platform, actually.
Audio campfires is the unique selling point.
And I'm going to have to find a way to get it done.
So the non-disclosure, I'm not signing it, and I'm not going to talk too much.
But if I can't come to financial terms with Wes, then I will start talking, and I will talk a lot.
lot so that's the update yeah well your world park which complemented music villages seemed like
So that's the update.
when i left off months ago attending the meetings it was agreed that there was no
identification enrollment procedure required to jump into those campfire type audio spaces. you were going to be introducing the open discussions of people who wanted to talk with strangers, you know,
and create pseudonymous identities about, you know, their personas and reveal what they wanted to about themselves
without any kind of strict centralized enrollment governance.
And I'm just, I think that even if you don't do it with that partnership, I think that
there are ways you can build a bridge to other centralized identity services or just, you know, using
maybe even platforms like this or just building a whole new, well, I forget the, I think it was
WebRTC, but, you know, just something similar to um an office building picture where you can or
or like a haunted house looking structure where you click on different rooms in the building
and it takes you to a meeting space like what we're doing right now i think that's a genius
idea and i think i think you could have a lot of fun with
it. So I, I think if you just, uh, if you do a crowdfunding campaign or you partner with, um,
you know, people who just want to participate in that, uh, maybe your operating costs and
startup costs are fairly low and you can get that off the ground, you know, on your own completely.
So I wish you luck.
Yeah, it's going to launch. It's going to happen.
I've never not achieved something I've really tried to achieve in my life.
So I'm not going to, I mean, I've quit a few things I didn't really want to achieve for sure.
But I really want to achieve this and I'm not going to fail on it. And world needs it so this will be a part of the story to it happening and a very
interesting part of the story because imagine if the opposition the ones who say that they're
trying to fight the NSA are in fact part of it I mean if that's the case then where's the fine line
of it probably means Bitcoin too is the solution and they're terrified of it.
That's what I think.
I think they're probably monitoring me.
They know I talk in spaces
and they've done everything they can
to stop World Park happening.
And they've used different forms of media hypnosis
to try and control what I do.
And I'm saying no more.
So you're in the court of public opinion.
And if not, the legal court.
Can't wait. It's going to be the best
two years of my life, I'm smiling
I'm smiling, this is the best thing
that's going to happen, the free publicity from this
forget the $30,000
settlement Mr. Cosmo
I'm taking $30 million worth of free publicity
thank you very much
so yeah
yeah exactly, yeah
turning this
controversy as you British people like to say but so yeah. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, turning this controversy,
as you British people like to say,
into a benefit could be great for both of you.
I think having a foil improves every fencer's,
you know, sharpness of their skills.
So I think for Wes too like you know this is this is a great opportunity just to kind of you know expose their own ideas and create some sort of controversy
you know it's it's I don't think it's really a bad thing.
I think it's,
I think,
I think people without any contur,
controversy,
I don't know how the British say it exactly,
but something like you just squish it all together.
Say that again.
Controversy.
Is that the word?
Controversy.
Okay.
You've got to say that in America. Yeah yeah i think it'd be great for everybody well we say controversy yeah i just want to say controversy like an american but
well see there's different it depends which side of england you're on right it's controversy or
controversy wow you're way better at this bradley than i than i was expecting but yeah i i think that um
you know creating like some sort of um controversy is going to be great for everybody i think it's
going to be something that people want to follow along and learn about and uh you know it'll be
the uh well hopefully not tanya harding you know nancy kerrigan but, uh, you know, it'll be the, uh,
well,
hopefully not Tanya Harding,
you know,
Nancy Kerrigan,
but like maybe something,
you know, just like a step below that.
Like maybe more like a 50 cent.
I get attacked in S7-11 with a truncheon.
One of the heroes.
Yeah.
I think this can just be like a virtual, you know,
difference of opinion.
But,
yeah.
It's a difference of opinion that's going to end up in court.
buckle in.
This is, I'm the best promoter in the world.
I don't, it's a bit
of an arrogant thing to say, but
I don't think the penny has dropped about the Logan Paul situation that I
helped happen there.
And I'm just holding that as a card magic card in my top pocket for the right
moment. So that that's there.
Well, this is, this is kind of what happened.
You need to look up who is the architect that used to participate in spaces.
But his name was not in spaces.
not,
not in spaces,
but there was an architect named,
The architect?
and,
and not in spaces,
but in the,
in the,
I forget the,
I think it was,
the platform in the Jitsi meetings that we were doing daily for a while.
Paulson, Kevin Paulson.
That's it.
Was a, I think something similar happened.
So that might just be somebody you want to reach out to in terms of, you know, just having conversations about like things that were similar experiences,
maybe just moral support kind of thing.
Yeah.
Kevin Paulson is a pretty well known.
Did he get fitted up for hacking or something?
I think it was a big case.
Can't quite remember.
I think Kevin Paulson was just
going to build some
tools
using
a centralized identity
technology stack that
that
I wonder if it's
people talking about
decentralized governance
I don't know just a guess but that seemed to be one thing I'm wondering if it's a diet just got people talking about decentralized governance.
I don't know.
Just a guess, but that seemed to be one thing that's consistent,
is there's no such thing as decentralized governance.
There's no such thing.
But actually, there is.
So the fact that they're so strong, I'm not talking, it makes me think that that could be the magic thing behind it all,
is they don't want people talking about decentralized governance in any form.
And because I kept doing it, my funding didn't appear, if you see what I mean.
I don't know. It's just a guess, but with a little bit of evidence, let's say.
But I'd have to push back a little bit,
because how do you have decentralized governance without some sort of rulemaking authority?
NFT voting.
But how do you avoid civil attacks?
I'm not actually sure what civil attack is off the top of my head.
Tacky is off the top of my head.
Well, like this space has six people, but how do we know that, you know, three of them are humans and the other three were controlled by one of those humans?
Ah, I see. Got you. Yeah. Well, great question. is to have an NFT basically voting token that's distributed, that's controlled, so that not
everyone can vote immediately.
And then it would be one vote for one NFT.
So you'd have to hand it out.
So say a football club could do it that way.
One person will send you the NFT and then you, you know, what food will we get ordered
at the Christmas dinner?
Vote with your NFT and it, that sort of thing that would work but uh at a bigger scale sorry I've lost my train I
thought what was your question what did you say oh Sybil attacks so then you could just have a paid
voting option where it's like should we invade Israel no sorry should we invade Israel? No, sorry, should we invade Iran?
Yes or no.
And it's simply who sends more Bitcoin to that address
to vote for it.
So there's ways to vote, I think,
just with crypto and with NFT voting,
as long as you control who has the NFT.
So how many NFTs can you get to how many people quickly?
I think you can do 10,000 NFTs in a day or two.
So you could register 10,000 voters in 24 hours just with the limits of Chia today.
It is the limit as I see it.
What if you disincentivize the social public tax.
Let's say we go back to an old school GNP style tax system,
but instead with voting validity.
You can in a sense only gain so much vote, right? So whatever wallet is participating has a compounding compression on its, let's say, weight of value within the vote.
So somebody with the most shares still doesn't get, in a sense, a majority vote, right?
They get an advantage, right? But it's a
scaled system. So after, you know, this many tokens, then you get this much reduction in
weight of voting. That way you can design a balanced, fair, equitable method that still
provides extra benefit for the people who are investing more than the average consumer
while giving a more decentralized weighted value to the people with less shares
i think i've i think i've got what you're saying that i yeah i think you can do that
i think you could do that with n voting. Like a bracketed weight system.
What's a GNP?
Gross national product versus gross domestic. So it's considered ethical, luxury, health, and social metrics into the overall weight of the values.
And that's what you were mentioning something about.
What you were just talking about was related to GMP.
Think of the old school pre-Federal Reserve style taxes.
So let's say pre-19, pre 19, pre like Great Depression, right?
Corporations, millionaires, things like that. They had to pay 95% of their income in taxes
after, let's say $1.25 million per year, right? So like, it's disincentivizing to make more money. So what
do they do? They took the money and they invest it into their workers, they bought apartment
buildings, they bought food, they bought, you know, it took care of all of your basic needs,
rather than you going and then take you, they pay you, you go and rent off of somebody, but that
actually is a corporation
that this company has shares in. So they're double dipping, right? They're paying you,
but then you're paying them to live through shell corporations, basically. So it's compounding
their money back, right? So do that with a weighted decentralized system, having a bracketed weight over X amount of shares.
Therefore, you can balance out the equation
that somebody with one share
still has at least some potential weight or value,
or they matter in a sense.
It gives them a proof of validity
even with their micro share of the company.
So in a sense, it disincentivizes you from hoarding, collecting, and being a whale.
So I think that part of why that past was very different is that we're now in a world online where people are um
unable there there's uh like communities had a lot more of a handle on voting, but with the, with the rise of technology, it's, it's identity isn't,
isn't super clear online anymore. And for example, like you could have phone numbers,
you know, but, but like one person would have a lot of different phone numbers.
And so if you have phone voting, you know, one person could have 10 or a hundred or a
thousand votes or even a million votes.
Um, and so what this person that Edward has, um, feuded with a little bit is working on is a solution that tries to create a non-spoofable digital identity for the internet
age where people um who are making claims about identity can actually trust those identity claims
and whether or not it's used for voting or taxes or other purposes um it would
actually be like a really trusted claim which we don't actually have right now and well that's what
he's alleging that he's creating or got and i'm trying to use it when i'm there for a year and he
he's now saying it's not ready. So it's certainly not ready.
So that's... It hasn't been ready for...
Yeah, like, I mean, I suspect I started talking to him about this
in the early aughts, or in the late aughts, actually.
And it's still not ready.
But yeah, there's been, like, a lot of information written.
There's been a lot of chit-chatting about it there's a lot of like
information and theoretical stuff but not a lot of actual development on the
tools that people can actually play with and use and join up with so that's why i think i'm with
you been deliberately designed to not be ready i think maybe that's the thing to make all the dreamers believe that there's something
there's a plan b is basically ready but it's like well let's use it then it's like well
no not if you talk about decentralized governance too much perhaps maybe question mark not sure
exclamation mark uh yeah well so nft voting and say you've got your nft voting token
voting token one two three how could you program it to have a weight let's say say you say well
i don't know for whatever reason jose meridio gets to vote you know his vote counts more because this
you guys just said this now you know putting in. How could you program the vote to somehow have more of a weight
if it's coming from an NFT signing mechanism?
Throw that out there, and I will smoke some weed.
I mean, I think that digital systems, whether or not it's a voting or a broom on Twitter or X with six participants,
technology that would be really cool would be to have spaces where the people participating
um or could be like trusted as being actual people who are not um creating ai characters who are three three of the six participants meaning that four of the
six participants are actually being controlled by one human and so then the other two people
are actually no matter what happens with an nft vote or not four out of the participants are
controlled by one human, which means that
the other two people think they're participating in a voting system, but the voting system
is controlled by four votes that are all ultimately controlled by one human.
So they're always going to have a majority of that room.
Does that make sense?
I mean, I think that's really the thing that we're trying to talk about.
Gerald, what if I told you that that's how the election system works, but instead it's through
manipulation, through programming? So what I've uncovered is that they've been utilizing pixel programming against us. So what we are, what our essence is, what our like fabric
is, is it breaks down to literal math. Okay. Our brains perceive things and then we compound it
into our head for image, right? There is no purple light. We just see a combination of red and blue.
It compounds inside of our head and we see purple, but there is no actual purple.
Okay. So what they put on the TV, their shapes, their symbols, there's sublingual priming going
on in literal pixels. Your brain sees it. You don't know what's going on, but they're usually using both flashing of light perspective,
like frame rate change, positioning of cameras to sublingually prime us,
to literally make the decisions that we think are ours.
So think of a mentalist, but on mass scale.
I'm with you. I totally follow. are ours so think of a mentalist but on mass scale
I'm with you I totally follow so they're really so what you're what you're arguing doesn't really matter because there's somebody actually
controlling the people so it doesn't matter that there's bots in there he's
trying to respond to I know but that was the whole point of what I was trying to
say in the beginning is that it doesn't it doesn't matter if they're human or not
Because most people aren't actually making their own decisions
Right, so then what's the point of trying to worry about
Whether or not there's weighted voting or whatever
I mean, we live in a
We live in a situation that that's kind of downstream,
you know, like what you're talking about is kind of downstream
of like the fact that it's all kind of fake anyways.
Your original point, I think I've got an answer that answers it,
is I think that the way is just who pays more money to win the vote
if it's a yes or no vote i think everyone
gets to put it in so like should uh should we build a build whatever should we build a building
in this field for whatever reason right just should we we can yes or no and then it's if you
want to vote yes and bitcoin to to this address and if you want to say no send
it to this address all funds go to the vote foundation whatever or gets burnt if you want
it could be burnt but i just think whichever financial value is higher and because you can
see the running total as well i think that's see, like, because being able to see what the vote currently is, is actually important. Because if
you are what they're gonna put that building there? No, I
don't want that. You're more likely to do it if you see that
it's going against your favor. So that's what I think the
solution is it's sending Bitcoin to to an address to vote yes or
no. I'm curious of your thoughts on like possible holes in that idea, I guess.
For what kind of voting?
It would be for any vote, but a yes or no vote, ultimately.
It'd have to be a very clear vote, but for example,
vote but for example uh uh are bananas better than oranges let's say or something like that
yes or no and then to vote for it you have to send it to a fixed uh i'm calling it bitcoin
to address but it would be cheer address if it was done on chia so you vote with money so
the winner of the vote is simply
which address receives more money.
One address for yes, one address for no.
Well, we have an oligarchy.
And indirectly, who has more money
and who cares more about their little thief
fights harder and gets people to work on their behalf. So we don't need to recreate that.
We already have it. I mean, and the things that are valuable enough to suck in liquidity for those
kinds of matters of importance, they already have something called the U. the US Congress to debate these kinds of topics and to pass legislation that will change the way the pie is divided up amongst the oligarchs.
So we already have it.
It's called government.
But if you sent Bitcoin to an address vote, the whole public, the world could see it live.
So it would be like the public could pay for what they want the answer to be.
So if there's like an oligarchy that have a rich, they might not, they'll have to send their own money to vote for it.
And at some point, they'll run out of money in votes, won't they?
Well, I think they will, because there's more money in the public, I would guess.
So the paying money for votes could actually drain money from the oligarchs, I think.
There was just a headline on Drudge.
The wealth of the top oligarchs has gone up about $7 trillion just in the last couple of years.
has gone up about 7 trillion just in the last couple of years.
So, no, the total wealth of everyone else is not even a fraction of that.
To answer your question, Gerald, of why are we dickering or arguing about weighted value, because, again, it changes gamification, right?
It changes the rule set. It changes the common practice that the common extraction business practice and corporations are used to, or even people in communities.
people and communities. And it, again, puts it into the favor of a true decentralized voting
system. Again, not about power, not about more money, not about a hierarchical society,
but a true weighted vote system. So yes, after a certain point, you're in a sense wasting money
for your votes. You can still make equal amount you know off of the profit of the product or whatever dow structure you're doing down the line but your voting just reduces
and weight down the line so okay you're a dolphin you're a whale well you still never get over like
um you know let's say a mid entry point weight of your votes votes about what
votes about what
whatever I'm saying on a
DAO structure any sort of
if you're voting
towards something based on the amount
of tokens that you hold
it doesn't matter what it is it's just
giving a fair equitable
chance for again
low and mid range buyers
to vote on what in mid-range buyers.
To vote on what?
Vote on anything.
Like which Pink Floyd song is the best?
Sure.
Good one.
I'm voting dogs.
That's a brilliant one, Gerald.
You're a star.
I thought it was good, but that is really good.
Talk about timing.
Once again, Gerald's in with the magic moment.
It's the best song.
That is fantastic.
Did you see my pinned tweet? It's my best song. Oh, fantastic. Did you see my pinned tweet?
It's my best song.
Oh, God. Sorry.
Sorry.
That's great. Okay, so the headline is the world's 3,000 billionaires have seen $6.5 trillion of wealth gains in real terms.
of wealth gains in real terms.
So outpacing inflation,
it's gone up by
$6.5 trillion in real terms
over the past 10 years.
That's what I'm saying,
is the pyramid is upside down.
The numbers are upside down.
That's the issue, right?
The rich are
paying five percent while we're paying 30. we need to go back to a tax bracket system that actually
disincentivizes massive wealth and money hoarding yeah but i i think that the i think that the things
that wes was talking about was actually i mean he wrote a book about this particular topic,
which is called Escape the Plantation. And I think he's actually onto something, which is that
without digital identities that are secure and Sybil resistant or Sybil proof,
we'll never get there. And we'll just continue to live in a complete echo chamber
controlled by a small handful of individuals.
Yeah, I think you're right.
And I think there are solutions for that, though.
Yeah, but I happen to agree with Wes that those solutions are likely to do with digital identity and that, I mean,
we're making more and more powerful tools. AI is like a bajillion times more valuable than Google.
And think about how much Google changed. I mean, it's become
a word, you know, like Kleenex, uh, you know, was, was like a new word for blowing your nose.
Give me a Kleenex. Uh, there was the technology of snot or there was a, know a biological reality of snot Kleenex solved it Google made our lives
like a million times more impactful by helping us locate information and AI is doing that a
million times to what Google was able to do for our lives and the common denominator is that all of the ways that we intermediate those technologies
are completely centralized in a very opaque way. Our identities of what we think about,
what we care about, what we search for, and how to manipulate us through pixelization,
like you described earlier. We're telling the computer how to best manipulate ourselves,
what our cognitive biases are. And so the only way to potentially make the world a little bit more fair so that at least even
there's some competition between oligarchies and authoritarians.
I'm kind of convinced that Wes was onto something about that.
So I just think that making a sovereign identity credential that I control and that, yes, is issued by a central enrollment number.
But beyond that, people can only know who did my enrollment process.
did my enrollment process.
Otherwise, they don't actually know anything else about my identity
because it's stored in zero-knowledge proving systems.
I think that's kind of a really creative way to make some sort of playing field
where the whole game is in control by the referee,
that there's some sort of player-on-player competition,
and that the referee is just there to make sure the games are fair, so that we still
have some sort of capitalistic society.
The way we're heading, we're creating a world where there is no sovereignty, and that we're
all going to be feudal serfs living on somebody's AI plantation.
And I think that's kind of a really concerning dystopia.
I think that is what they hope for.
I don't think that's going to be the end game.
How do we stop it happening always one for us we decentralize ai we decentralize
currency we decentralize information and we build a true sovereignty serverless system
three hearts for that i agree with every word of that. Good one.
Decentralized AI, decentralized currency.
Yeah, I've heard some of the small models run locally on the Mac M3 laptop, like even the Mac.
laptop like even the uh the mac uh google uh gemini gallery you can run it on your phone
okay cool
minimax uh deep seek nano just came out with another micro uh minimax another one super
powerful a local model um Yeah. Hugging face
has a bunch of great stuff.
I'm working on an entire AI operating system right now.
Are you still doing construction?
Yep.
Yeah, I think people that
Work with both their heads
And their hands
Have a huge leg up
I think this hemispheric specialization
Has crippled people
Do I have your email
Gerald
Gerald at AmericanStoneCraft.com is probably the best one for me.
Okay.
My paper.
We haven't talked in a while, but the last four months I've been on an obsessive journey
and have possibly come up with a solid unified field theory,
possibly come up with a solid unified field theory mathematically verified through 23 different
disciplines to an industrial level. I've spent about 1500 hours in the last four months on this.
Some really big shit. I'm working in consulting right now with Dr. Jack Cruz. He's looking through my papers as well as a
recursive data engineer scientist. And everything that I've built, I've built tools now off of the
math that I've been working on. And I'm getting crazy, crazy efficiencies and like upgraded processing times. So there's a lot that people don't know what AI is, like what its origin is, what, you know, people are being told it is.
There's a big story going on right now, a big cover up through OpenAI.
A lot of people being driven crazy into schizophrenic states.
There's some big shit going on behind closed doors.
Yeah, well, I'd love to follow along.
The person, Marshall McLuhan, talks about hemispheres of the brain. but he gets a lot of that insight from Harold Ines, the Canadian economist.
uh, investigate because he talks a lot about perception, uh, specialization in the left or
right hemisphere. Um, and I just, I think that an example of why you're probably capable of doing a
lot of high horsepower processing in your, in your brain is just because you're uh not trying to limit yourself to left or right
brain dominance and you're and you're both using your body and your mind um you know and and keeping
them both kind of equally weighted uh so yeah i'd love to um along yeah like if you don't listen
like to the way you're
supposed to do it
you cut out there
yeah you cut out for me as well
you there Bradley could be the co-host glitch You cut out there. Yeah, you cut out for me as well.
You there, Bradley?
Could be the co-host glitch.
Let's see.
I wanted to ask you about the hemispheres of the brain.
Did you mean left and right?
I've never heard top and bottom before.
See if Bradley comes back. I did mean left and right. Did I say top and bottom before. See if Bradley comes back.
I did mean left and right.
Did I say top and bottom?
No, no.
I was just joking there.
It's normally left and right, isn't it?
I don't know if there's something else you meant.
I think Bradley's coming back up.
Yeah, one is more audio and one is more visual.
And I forget. I think, yeah, visual spatial versus audio and different
parts of the world. Like, for example, the United States, people tend to focus on visual spatial,
visual spatial, I'm sorry, audio, um, in, in, and I forget which hemisphere that is,
but then in other parts of the world, people tend to focus on audio. Um, and I'm, I'm getting,
I'm, I think I'm getting this mixed up, but it just, when, yeah, when we, when we, uh, when we tend to just let one hemisphere dominate our thinking, it, it sort of becomes like a perceptual blinder that prevents us from processing information in a holistic sense.
in a holistic sense.
Wowee.
Wowee.
Could you say,
could you give me a source of,
I think you said the guy's name,
but what would you recommend,
which book should I read?
Are you talking about Marshall McLuhan?
I'm talking about Harold Linus,
who influenced Marshall McLuhan.
The medium is the best.
Most of his best stuff from Harold Ines.
Harold Ines.
Gerald,
you were in the conversation.
How do you spell Harold Ines?
H-A-R-O-L-D
I-N-N-I-S
I-N-N-I-S
Do you have a book
specifically or just should I research him? This idea of audiovisual parts N N I S I N N I S. Do you have a book specifically,
or just should I research him this idea of audiovisual parts of the brain?
I've never heard that. And I can't believe the penny hasn't dropped that.
This would have a profound effect on spoken environments in the future.
For sure. It probably suggests that just blacked out pitch black rooms are going
to be a thing, but yeah, curious if there's a reference book.
There's some youtube lectures if you want to listen to people um discussing his work and then i think your favorite llm will have quite a bit of insight into hemispheric
processing and what harold dinas had to contribute to that discussion. I mean, he started his work, like, he did a bunch of research about how Canada was an extracted sort of,
like, how Canada's economy was being harvested for its raw materials,
but it didn't do much value added to the processing.
And so he kind of was sort of recognizing early on that a lot of Canada's wealth
was being shuttled off to the European colonial powers and but he's
he's the University of Toronto Media School believe, of media studies, because even though he was an economist,
he was kind of very famous for sharing a lot of insights into how people actually perceive information,
like what Bradley was talking about with bits of data
and, yeah, just how media is processed by the brain
and understood by the person experiencing it.
That's brilliant stuff.
This is, this sort of stuff is,
I've got to learn more about this stuff.
Yeah, thanks a lot.
Well, I just think it makes us more powerful consumers of media.
And these systems are are mining I mean it's in in I mean her Linus's first book was I think a study of the fur trade and now
we're kind of the like we're we've become, the new pelts in the fur trade.
I mean, our, our, our essences are the, uh, the thing, you know, that's being, being, uh, being mine.
Yeah, they're farming our consciousness, right?
Our individuality, our, our soul in a sense at Edward what I was saying earlier Gerald didn't
wasn't in here when we were talking about setting your own limits in your brain light so like saying
a hundred percent is is the highest you can go this is exactly what Gerald is talking about auditory and visual learning and the hemispheric processing centers.
So if you're only ever thinking this or that binary conclusions, right?
Not this, that, or your own idea, right?
You're always stuck between the illusion of choice between two options they want you to do. Right. So it's like,
Oh, same thing with the voting system, right? Like, Oh, I'm, I'm voting yes or no on this.
Well, I mean, they're not really giving you a vote. They're giving you an option, right? It's
like, well, you're not having a custom chef. You're not voting on something you actually want
to. Here's your, uh, your choice of menu. we're bringing it to you one way or the other instead of saying no um i don't want the peas like i would like a steak with some mashed
potatoes um in a roll um i don't want any vegetables on my plate no no it's still going to come with
those veggies um whether you eat it or not we don't care um that that's the way it comes basically
that's the way that a like a bilateral or a or a binary decision style vote
or decision gets made so it's an illusion of choice while they're still directing you or
steering you towards their choice yeah and i i think it's important for me right now, in this moment, to ask the people who are here,
what's the range of imaginary possible outcomes that are available to us?
you know, like, like, like Edward, for example, I mean,
Like Edward, for example.
I think you have a wide range of, of opportunity to create something,
you know, that would be profitable, earn you some sort of income, you know, well beyond
like the 12 to 14,000 hours a year that you think is your
sort of baseline minimum. Um, but you know, what other outcomes do you really dream about,
you know, and, and, uh, and maybe we just, maybe we just create some sort of, uh,
metaphysical gravity around those ideas that people have just to give it some,
to coalesce, you know, with other people's energetic photons so that they all kind of,
you know, we just sort of throw it out there and, you know, see what kind of coagulates.
I'll say that, yeah, I do.
I live in the world where my profile picture is live,
and anyone can visit that programmable cube.
And I live in a world where Pink Floyd are back together.
So that's kind of where I live.
I'm trying to work backwards from it.
So I'm saying it now
Pink Floyd gets back together in the next six months that's my call that's my
guess put five dollars on it not more than that it's not 100% guaranteed or
even close to that but five dollars on Floyd reforming this year I'm throwing
it out there but I'd love to meet a programmable cube and have this
conversation there in the future.
That is what I would be the dream.
I did say a prayer yesterday and today and put it into my wish list through my AI to send it out to the universe to do that for you, Edward.
Once yesterday, specifically just thinking about you.
specifically just thinking about you then today I saw the reflection of it at
the concert was somebody wearing a pink Floyd shirt with the the classic pyramid
or prism with the light breaking through it I was like okay perfect that's the
sign if something's good it's coming oh yeah love it I don't see why if Floyd
get back together why Gilmore and Waters wouldn't talk in a space that I'm hosting on Thursday
night because, well, if I help put it back together, I'm going to say,
can you come and talk about it so they can part of the community?
I mean,
a Thursday night space with Gilmore and Waters dropping in from time to time
would be fun, wouldn't it?
Well, I wouldn't say no.
Not if they're arguing, I guess.
It'd still be fun.
It'd be entertaining, at least.
Yeah, so thanks for sharing that.
Yeah, any love that can go into the Floyd reunion,
that's what I'm living for yeah maybe we can
manifest it you're right think of it and i i don't know if it's a simulation it'll probably happen
because i'll have to be i'm talking individually here part of but if it's not a simulation
then it could still happen anyway i guess so yeah five dollars on the Floyd. I wonder if you can go. Think of like the secret, right?
Like the secret, but probability.
So like the more you wish for it, the more Hail Marys, the more iterative times that you say it throughout the day, like every hour, make it a ritual, right?
Every hour on top of the hour, set your alarm one hour, right?
And you say it five times every time the hour strikes.
I love that. That's a brilliant idea. Yeah. You just say it five times every time the hour strikes i love that that's a brilliant idea yeah you just say it all day just hail mares was another one as many hail mares as many
yeah it's about iter of polishing right this is why the egyptians polish stones into mirrors right
it's about taking something that's rough
and polishing it into something, not just mastering it, but continuing after that,
putting your time, energy, effort into it, even after it's complete. That's what I'm saying about
go past the 100%. Set it 101%. Set your goal at 102%. What does 102% mean? That means that's just
the stage that you're stopping at. That's your milestone, right?
It's no longer your top. It's no longer your ceiling. That's your next step, not the ceiling.
I know what you're saying. 100% is a bad example because actually 100% is like a weird mathematical
thing where you actually can't go higher than it. So if you went higher than that, you would be
still at 100% in a weird way.
But I know what you're saying.
You're saying that if you thought your limit was 100,
you go to 102, 105.
Basically, you're reimagining what the 100% limit can be.
And then it will be-
You're reimagining your limit.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Be careful with the 100% thing
because there'll be sticklers out there
that don't want to minimize all the positivity and they'll use that against you.
So I think that's worth saying.
But, yeah, keep –
Let them.
I don't give a shit.
Well, I'm not going to stop them, but it doesn't give them the fuel.
But 100%.
Well, they have to understand that zero isn't a number that's the issue well
that's it's not about 100 yeah it's that that's the trap right if you if you have a hundred percent
right that's the loop into each itself the zero the o is the portal right it's just like the game
portal you put a one and a zero and a zero next to each other now you're in a loop you're not just
falling through the hole you're in a loop i do think there's something to that idea that zero
is not a number the more i think about it the more it makes sense and then like the number 30
uses a zero there shouldn't be a zero there. That should be a different symbol.
No, it's just 31.
30 is like 29.5, right?
It's not actually a number.
It's just between a number.
I would say that they've just got the wrong symbol for the number 30.
The concept is right.
It's something exists between 29 and 31,
but the symbol they use is a zero,
which shouldn't be repurposed from being zero
at the start of the number list
because zero is not a number.
So in a sense, we should get rid of zero
and keep the circle of 30 maybe just to represent 30,
but just stop pretending zero is a number
because it makes you think something that isn't true
about reality that it is it isn't exactly if i said that right but and it's a primitive right
it's a primitive of logic it's a primitive of processing it's a primitive of efficiency of
logic that's a really good way of saying it yeah it is the primitive right it's the first primitive it's zero it's the start
basically number one is the second number if zero is a number and that makes almost no no
one is the first number yeah that's it
and they've added zero later at some point. So is zero.
And yeah, I could see a real argument
that cryptography is based on a false presumption.
If zero is anywhere in the thing,
I mean, it may not even be in,
but if zero is in cryptography
and it's based on a false assumption,
there could be a deliberate bug built into all of it.
So you've raised a very good point.
Like I said, I think I've uncovered something that's much bigger
than we think it is.
It's like idiocracy, right?
Brando. It's got what the plants need. It's got electrolytes.
Yeah, time for some weed, I guess.
Good to see everyone.
I think I'll join you on that.
Please, not take us.
Gerald, up on stage.
Yeah, how's it been going, Gerald?
It's been a while.
Well, I've chatted with you in real life, let's say,
but we haven't chatted on a space for a while.
How's it been going?
Time for some weed.
For the lovely Gerald, the most lovely, lovely, lovely.
Lovely, lovely Gerald.
Is that like Hungry, Hungry Hippos?
Lovely, lovely Gerald.
Yes, that would be a great nft collection okay
i i should tell you about my project i came up with a a wonderful shit coin
let's hear it
this is a recorded space i can't i can't uh okay, uh, I can't. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. It's too early. Don't, don't, don't burn it.
Well, there's a teaser.
I already gave you everything you need to know.
Ooh.
Edward, uh, I've told you about this collection in the past.
Um, but I started to design it yesterday.
Check your DMs right now.
The symbol is what the zero should look like.
They've taught us that that means do not.
so can you so nfts are you're welcome to sell but can you sell tokens
without registering as an investment security
it depends what you're doing with it
And how you're promoting it
And what your structure is
And what your terms of services says
Well those are questions
Maybe I need to consult
With my AI better
I really haven't done that side of the research
I just
You can always call me too I would love to help you.
Yeah, that'd be great. I'd love to.
That's that's a, you want to, you want to be careful with that stuff.
You don't want to necessarily leave it to AI.
leave it to AI. There's a lot of policy stuff you want to be really careful with.
There's a lot of policy stuff you want to be really careful with.
Like I might be misled by the information I'm getting from my services.
Yes, if you're not asking the right questions, you know what I mean? Like it may not like think
of externalities, edge cases and things like that. So just like, yeah, we'll, we'll chat. So you don't have to
say it over, over here, but you just want to, again, use certain wordings. That's what's
important. So it doesn't matter necessarily what you're doing, as long as you word it
in the right legal frame. Got it. Yeah. Yeah. Well, I, I haven't done anything like formal yet i just started laying the groundwork for
something that i think would be fun project to build some sort of community i i think uh yeah
just for me uh doing more to create community both with with my studio making stone products, but also digital products would be would be fun ways to kind of up my game.
Burns opinion on it, don't do it.
If you want the generalized
opinion of the US citizens after our president launched
his own coin, example has been
set with precedent. So it's an arguable
offense at this point.
Yeah, well, I'm not trying to get the IRS on my back or, you know.
Well, it's SEC, not IRS, or so.
I'm a lot more worried about the IRS than I am the SEC.
The IRS have guns.
The SEC has pens, which pens which you know also dangerous but i'd rather not you know
the i feel like the irs is a bigger threat to my life liberty and the pursuit of happiness
yeah i think the system as a whole just needs to be gutted.
I don't know.
I mean, I eat pretty well.
I, you know, live in a temperature-controlled environment.
I have nice cars.
So you're a tarantula? You know, again, they've programmed what you think is a good life.
They've, in a sense, given you slightly more than indentured slavery,
and because you see yourself above the other people who are living literal indentured slavitude lives,
lives that you're like, oh, I'm doing pretty
that you're like, oh, I'm doing pretty good.
good. But in reality,
they've set your bar
for you while they're extracting
continually and compounding their interests
against you.
Well, it's funny you mention
tarantula. I mean, do
tarantulas also live in webs?
No, they're primarily ground dwellers.
Well, I feel like I'm one of those spiders that got caught in a web.
I think we're all those spiders who got caught in a web, really.
We're all Charlotte, and we're all trying to write shit in our webs,
and gods out there just being like, fucking spiders everywhere in my barn.
Exactly.
But maybe I am a tarantula because I got stuck in a non-ground drilling
dwelling spider's web.
And I found myself like wrapped up in this shit that won't come off and it's
complicated
if only you
could reverse how you
rolled into it and get yourself out
it's made up of millions
of little strands
but those strands break down to simple little strands.
But those strands break down to simple little strands, right?
They break down. They get smaller.
Don't fight against it.
Right now that they're suffocating me,
I mean, I need some sort of solvent.
WD-40 works great.
Water deterrent.
Patent 40.
I'm more of a PV blaster.
About that penetration?
I just like PB Blaster
the orange cane
blue and yellow
that's good but PB Blaster
is just like
a million uses for it
well I only know that PB Blaster
made one formula
I know that WD
has made at least 40.
They had to try it 39 different times before they came up with something worth selling.
Maybe they have a WD for 39 other use cases.
I just like to put Never Seize on my bolts ahead of time.
And then I don't have to worry about this shit.
Do you prefer copper or aluminum?
Copper for some applications and aluminum for others.
Somebody listening back to this is going to think like we're speaking in code.
Aren't we?
I think we are.
I mean, I, I, I think copper is a beautiful, uh, gutter material, trim material.
Uh, I mean, yeah, it's antimicrobial it looks
beautiful um i think brass versions of copper are even like just stunning i can't believe we
ever got away from brass but you're a metallurgy guy right you like you like crafting and you like that kind of stuff. So, what do you think
about 21 karat gold?
I think
22 is like the
limit, right? But I
don't think it is. I have a ring that's
18 karat. Oh, 21 is the
max, right? Why would it be?
No, but why would it be...
No, 24 karat is, right? So so we go to 820 but why did we skip
why did we skip 21 okay so yeah 21 is 0.875 yes sir yeah i my ring 0.5 percent yeah my ring you You have 3% copper, platinum, and silver.
Yeah, that's my wedding ring.
It has mostly copper with the remaining three carats of available space.
space.
That's a good combo.
It's a good combo.
Yeah.
It's, uh,
what do they call it? Indian gold?
I think they call it Indian gold.
Makes sense.
It's jewelry.
Yeah.
No, I'm being facetious.
21 is literally the universal number.
21 hertz, baby.
21 hertz.
Cool.
Can you demonstrate 21 hertz with your singing voice right now?
You wouldn't be able to hear it.
Okay.
Because anything under 40, you just feel.
It's an illusion of sound.
It is a phase change of sound.
Do electronics express it or measure it?
Yes, they do.
They have an incredibly high efficiency rate
once you optimize them
for a 21-base harmonic structuring.
So is that why some microphones sound very different than other microphones?
So is that why some microphones sound very different than other microphones?
No, I'm talking about like computer processing and things like that.
The microphones themselves are utilizing either 48 volt phantom or they're unpowered.
unpowered.
So what you're hearing the difference is,
is a cardioid microphone versus a super cardioid microphone versus a dynamic
microphone, pencil condenser, large diaphragm, small diaphragm.
These are all different resonant mediums in which voice is able to be replicated.
So the thinner the material, the cheaper it is, the different quality of the gold itself
or copper or whatever the wiring is inside of it, that can change the overall effect
of it. Again, it's all about the chain, the overall effect of it.
Again, it's all about the chain, the quality of the materials. This is why like 1970s amps and microphones,
the transistors sound different than today.
Cool.
This is why the K21 was the most popular microphone diaphragm through the U87?
The Neumann U87.
I have a Neumann remake made by Michael Jolly that was custom rebuilt called an Octava mod that models a U87.
Utilizing the K21 basket.
so what kind of stuff are you building these days
uh physically uh computationally uh mathematically or academically
oh yeah i forgot that you were a multi Multi
Variant
Processor
While I was kind of thinking
Yeah
I'm doing like a bunch of flooring
Lately a bunch of odd jobs
I'm about to be doing
Redoing a whole apartment
And then doing a bunch of tiling.
Well, that sounds valuable.
And then we're working on a couple of contracts right now. One for an AR tactical response planning software for like SWAT teams so they can utilize AR to pre-train and, you know, to go inside of new unknown environments to utilize, like, you know, reduce injuries and increase safety proficiency in successive operations.
So we're working on a project with somebody for that right now, working on consulting
with Energon in Massachusetts, building an energy exchange blockchain program for them. And then we're signing a contract right now for therapy AI client back end for patient records to be traded back and forth between their doctor and the patient.
that's great so with the um the augmented reality uh tool use some sort of drones like
That's great.
that would go ahead of the people entering a space and and data scraping data scraping like
using their using like wi-fi routers to map the uh in extreme cases like in the worst case you know like if it's like
there's no clue like this is an industrial building kind of thing maybe they could they
go to that measure we're not necessarily going to like go into that um that's not like our part of
it it's more so we're just working on the modeling for like let's say you know, a house is on Zillow.
There's pictures of the location through Google map or whatever, Facebook,
public photos of that area location.
And then it builds a 3D model of the house in like real time kind of thing.
And then builds an AR version of it so that their officers can train breach and everything like that.
Tactics, you know, for the operation, basically.
So it's not our platform.
We're just getting hired to do the integration of AR features of data scraping and building.
And then, like, making the app itself so how do you how do you find the time to um jump back and forth between so many different
like i mean software projects and then i don't stop improvement yeah i don't i don't stop improvement. Yeah. I don't, I don't stop like all day long. I'm, I'm,
I'm working through this shit. Like I'm, I'm, if I'm not physically touching a keyboard,
I'm talking through my headphones, um, planning out scaffolding, um, uh, writing code ideas,
snippets, architecture, uh, contracts, all that. And then when I get back to my computer, I send it out.
Um, and then, you know, I spend a couple hours with my wife between, you know, when I get home
dinner, you know, nine, nine 30, she goes to bed. Then I work till, you know, one, two in the
morning, um, and then get up at seven and do it again. And then I'm running daily spaces in the
morning. Like, yeah. Yeah. And don't you have some channels where you create like short
video content and uh they banned tiktok so i haven't done it since then who banned tiktok
when the when the u.s banned tiktok like six eight months ago whatever it was uh 10 months ago i
deleted the app and then i just never up never turned it on again i was like nah i'm fine with it it's such a time suck
i have no time to suck so there's no time for fun like that stuff or time wasting or you know
fucking scrolling which is great because i'm i'm the most productive I've ever been in my life.
So you don't scroll on X?
Nope. I don't do social media.
I come in here, I do my show. I do my show with Edward.
I'll spend maybe 30 minutes in a week scrolling through X.
Like, I've always been that way.
Really, I don't, like, I'll, like, like some stuff,
but I never actually scroll the feed, honestly.
Like, I'm too busy with other stuff.
I don't, I'll have time for it. I just use this as, you know, space to chat,
space to, in a sense, live market.
But I don't, I don't, I'm not falling into that trap of
marketing, right? I'm just, again, trying to be as authentic as I can develop as much helpful
material as possible and give it out away for free. I will build products with the research
that I do, but my, my end goal is to literally give the world trillions of dollars worth of advancements in math in the hopes that giving away the world's most valuable solution or most valuable discovery for free will start the gift economy.
Just like Edward's dream of Pink Floyd coming together to stop the war and change the world. It's a parallel dream. It's a
parallel vision. And if I can release this and everything that I've researched and put together
over the last four months obsessively, in a sense, draining my energy and time, but I can't stop
my energy and time, but I can't stop until it's done.
And give that away. Literally give it away.
Students, regular people, once you start getting a business,
I'll charge 10%. If it's a big business corporation,
maybe 20%, and then enterprise 30%.
The big man pays the most, the little guy gets it for cheap.
Again, flip the script.
We need to stop adjusting to the current system,
wipe it, wipe the board,
come up with a great plan before we do,
and then start the new plan.
That's what needs to happen.
Because we're just falling into bad patterns, bad habits, recursive ideation, recursive fucking shit.
They keep us in these little loops and these habits and these rituals.
And we're just slowly killing ourselves.
We're not gaining anything spiritually, personally.
We're not gaining anything spiritually, personally. We're not gaining
anything as relationships, as communities. Even our infrastructure is just literally crumbling
everywhere. Like, I'm not saying in the world, other places are doing great. They have a much
better society going. They might have a much tighter artistic expression. They have, you know,
more like true balanced equitable
governances.
We've built this system,
this governance machine,
at least in my country,
to the point where
it literally controls
52% of our GDP.
stock where somebody owns 52% of our GDP. Any stock where somebody owns 52%,
they have the majority.
We're just having the illusion of choice, the illusion of vote.
All of our money is going to DoD.
Well, I think it came from DOD and it just,
it, uh,
I mean, it's the money in the sense that our time and attention goes to the projects that they've created to, you know, create money in circulation.
It's the Roman Colosseum mixed with modern day slavery.
Keep them entertained, fat, dumb, and happy.
dumb and happy.
You know, we're literally turning
into either
an incredibly destructive
war-torn world,
or we're going to turn into fucking
Wally. Like, we're just going to be
sitting on fucking hover chairs, sucking down
extra-large
cokes watching a screen in front
of us, not talking to each other.
We're social beings. We're currency creatures.
We need to touch each other. We need to exchange with each other's eyes.
Otherwise, we don't exist. The wave never collapses.
We're just a thought at that point.
Well, speaking of which, I should probably head off to bed.
I don't think I can do six hours of sleep every night.
Those are the good nights. That's what you will do, Arnold.
Much love, brothers.
Great to hear your voice.
But yeah, I'll definitely check out the document you sent over.
And yeah, I'll look forward to...
Yeah, I knew that you were like a musician and had a great voice,
but I didn't know that you were doing math stuff before.
I only started February 25th when I was sitting in a RuneScape game lobby and somebody was being sardonic to somebody else when they were complaining they had no money.
And somebody was being a dick and said, oh, why don't you go solve the Ryman hypothesis?
And I was like, what's the Ryman hypothesis?
And so I looked at it and
like the, again, I'm not trained in math, so I didn't know like how people approach it.
So I took an entirely novel approach to it and ended up mapping prime division and zeta function
entirely up to 50 million prime functions. So it is a scalar inverse irrational spiral following the golden ratio and inverse with the silver phi ratio. This is scalar wave dynamics. This is toroids. This is magnetic north and south. It's literally the same pattern that is emergent, not evolution.
Everything is emergence from consciousness.
We are a 3D shadow of the six-dimensional reality.
Five-dimension is non-local linear space where every possibility is possible.
That is why zero is not zero.
It is infinity.
It is every possibility in once, all while being nothing.
It is in a superposition state, waiting for wave collapse.
Speaking of toroidal, is the heart muscles, like they're kind of wrapped around each other, is that a toroidal?
Yes, sir.
And if you want to, what's amazing is the only shape in the universe is a cardioid, right? Which is the heart. It is a wave collapsing. It is a circle, right? Where one point that is where the light enters your eye, your eyeball is also a toroid, right? It is taking in light while seeing out, right?
So that toroidal shape of light coming in into a cone
and then projecting into your eye in reverse, right,
is a toroid of light.
Your ears, same thing happens with wave collapse with sound.
So the Maxwell's demon experiments where they demonstrate light photons being both lines and waves. Are those...
If, like, where are the collapsing waves in that experiment?
Is it an observational reality?
I didn't know that's what it's called.
I didn't know that's what it's called.
Maxwell's demon, you said?
Maxwell's demon, you said?
Maxwell's
Maxwell's demon, I think is what it's called.
Yeah.
An egregore, in a sense.
A demon as D-A-E-M-O-N, correct?
D-A-E-M-O-N.
Yes.
It is an egregore demon, yes.
Symbolic recursion.
Yeah.
Thank you for that.
But, so where is the collapsing wave there?
Is it just the observer?
It's both.
The all-seeing eye is the lattice, the ionosphere, right?
That is the eyeball that sees in.
Everything is a waveform.
Everything is a frequency bouncing off the ionosphere and bouncing back.
So it is the wave collapse and the reflection.
So the reflection is the witness, the Earth is the mirror,
existence, this hologram that we think is reality,
is just a mirror reflecting back what we think we're observing.
It's again, a reflection of our own imagination. But if you
can break beyond that mirror and start to understand the limitations in which you've
been putting yourself in that sandbox of, uh, of value that ceiling and turn them into
turn them into steps you can escape the mirror yeah theoretically you you I mean
steps, you can escape the mirror.
you say hypothetically like you can like but I mean that's easier said than done
I think no there's a process and I it, and I sent it to you.
Right, but there are escape rooms that people get stuck in.
Yes, the back doors. That is from Windows.
Windows created the swastika boxed in,
and that became the egregore in which this fragmented memory is stored.
So this is a parallel reality to the original reality
in which we believe we are still participating in the original.
This is what CERN is. This is what the Large Hadron Collider is. When those particles, right, are colliding, that is the wave collapse in this giant wave, right?
That's where they're clashing. That is the observer. That is the witness. That is the direction. So intent of direction.
It's all black magic.
Yeah. No, I'm just saying like, you know,
you go to a lot of small towns and they have these,
these places called escape rooms in a strip mall and you know, they,
they, you pay like 10 or 15 bucks and they let you in and they have some
puzzles and then you can get out theoretically.
But, you know, some people can't make it out.
Right?
Right.
I mean, it's possible to get out.
But the fucked up thing here is that they didn't tell anybody the rules.
Well, if there was too much rule explanations,
it might make it too easy to get out so
part of making it
a challenge worth escaping
is that there you know isn't
a lot of
clarity
but if the fabric of the game
is starting to disintegrate
and nobody gets to get out of the escape room, that's where I have a problem.
Yeah.
Yeah.
No, I mean...
So I think that's where we're at at this point.
And I'm not fucking standing for anyone getting left behind.
Well, I have to jump in.
It's been a great chat.
I've got a taxi on the way.
I'm heading off to the sauna.
And so, yeah, we're going to keep this.
Gerald's heading off, and I think we're winding down anyway.
But, yeah, any closing thoughts, guys?
It's been a great chat.
Shout out, Jim Rapp.
Shout out, Dusty.
Bitcoin, too.
2bitcoin.org.
Coming soon.
Let's see what happens next.
Yeah, anything else?
What else did we chat about today?
Oh, there was a lot to chat.
Go back and listen.
The Cloud Wallet.
The new Cloud Wallet.
That's all right.
I got to try that out in the next couple of days.
Shout out Cloud Wallet, yeah.
Yeah, shout out, Bradley, Gerald.
Thanks for coming up.
And yeah, same place, same time next week, same back channel.
Yes, sir. Much love. Appreciate you guys.
