End of Month Community Update

Recorded: Aug. 29, 2025 Duration: 0:39:48
Space Recording

Full Transcription

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. and then we'll kick things off. Thank you. Thank you. Okay, cool.
We can kick things off.
Gem, Gem, happy Friday.
Pretty much the end of summer.
It's crazy to think that it's already the end of August.
So I know I mentioned in the tweet that went out that we would be taking a look back at the last month,
but I think it would be good actually to take a look back at what summer looked like for Ontology.
I think it was a really busy time.
We did a deep dive into like our social channels,
upgrades on the website,
a bunch of different events.
Some stuff was happening in the back end,
which we'll hopefully have an announcement on soon.
And then collaborations as usual.
And then also recently,
there was a really interesting session held by Humpty and Jeff,
like this wallet corner around Onto.
So it'll be really cool. So let's take a look at that.
So Ontology turned seven, and we hosted this trading, staking, creator campaign.
So this kicked off mid-June.
We had a bunch of different kind of options for folks to
get involved in. We had that creator contest, so we utilized Wide Worlds for this. We had a $600
prize pool for ONT themed creations, obviously posted under this campaign tweet. Would love
feedback on that. I know I kind of say this a lot, I see a bunch of our Harbingers there, but
would also love feedback from Harbingers and the community
around this campaign and around using certain types of platforms.
So if you guys find Wide Worlds to be good,
I mean, I think it's quite beneficial in terms of branding
and for creators as well.
We're always more than happy to host additional campaigns.
Then we wanted to take a look at the trading side.
So this is obviously via Onto Wallet.
So this is four weeks.
So this lasted from June 30th.
There was a $3,000 in ONG.
So this was top 50 by volume share, $2,500.
Then we had 100 random wallets get $5 each.
This was a minimum $10 trade.
And then extra chances via ONT pairs using ONG Gas,
so holding for three plus days, passing a short staking quiz.
So then we had stake to win. So this was $2,000 in ONG staking to round 258. So this is really
interesting to see how many folks got involved across the entire campaign. And then we had a
really cool addition, something obviously we've never done before, but this was the OG trader
recognition. So this was a bounty for earliest on-chain trader,
plus humanity score verification step. So it's really interesting to see who's the first person
that was, who our OG trader was.
These types of campaigns are really important, especially for a project like Ontology that's
been around for so long when we're trying to celebrate these milestones.
So if there's any elements of the anniversary campaign that you didn't like or that you
particularly liked, do let us know.
We'll have another, I believe, another campaign similar to this, possibly coming up in October
or November.
So we're always looking for feedback just to make sure that we can adapt for what the
community needs. Another big update, particularly from my
side, I was really happy to see this was the new Ontology website. I mean it got a
bit of a facelift, we kind of you know improved on branding that was already
there just to make it a bit I guess sleeker, easier for folks to navigate but
it was a big improvement on the back end as well for collecting data and for
posting content too. So I think we really end as well for collecting data and for posting content too.
So I think we really tried to look for what was better for users as well.
So it's a clear kind of who it's for and then what to do next.
So kind of considering this user pathway.
So the homepage now routes people directly to use Ontology. So this is get ONT, ONG.
You've got your Onto wallet nodes and staking, liquid staking, create ont ID, and then your reputation studio.
Obviously, you can access all of your tools, so your bridge, explorer, run a node, and then developers.
So I think the aim here was to have fewer clicks and to allow users to get right into action.
So I complain about UX throughout the space quite often.
about UX throughout the space quite often. I should probably stop doing that. But the point
I should probably stop doing that.
of this was that we were trying to look to improve UX, to have an easier win for newcomers
and builders as well. Obviously from our side that it just makes it easier for folks who want to
engage with ontology as well. So the whole point of this too is this whole at a glance fact kind
of reduces guesswork. So you have to be very careful with copy so high performance low cost
so it allows for guidance and then obviously then we can kind of add additional information to this
as well as like simple explainers about like what ONT and ONG exactly are so again anybody
that's new. We also had the addition of the AI assistant. So this was like this
AI smart assistant that's part of kind of OntoWallet 2025 roadmap. So please do go ahead
and use this on the ontology site. It is quite useful if you have any feedback on that as well.
Would really love to know how you're finding it. Is it answering your questions the way that you
would think that it should? If you have any feedback, whether it's positive or negative, again, it's really important for us
to kind of see it from the community and not just from within the team, which is obviously quite
internal. So yeah, so it's really great to see these additions to the new site, like faster
pathways to stuff actually people actually do. Again, like I said, so this is your staking, a bridge,
and then obviously then to build.
And then with the AI assistant,
is to kind of support folks and to support any new folks
as well, like any answers or questions that you might have.
Another topic that was really kind of,
that we focused on quite a lot over the summer
was this kind of gaming deep dive.
So I supported Humpty and Jeff in terms of connecting with a lot of gamers,
like gaming projects, studios, and then the guys hosted them over a number of weeks just to kind of get to know these projects a little bit better
and also to understand what these projects are focused on
and how this could potentially connect to decentralized identity
and like Ant ID in general, or AntID as well.
So we really wanted to understand what gamers actually get from DID and VCs.
So we kind of went with some assumptions and got some feedback, obviously,
after the sessions as well, but this whole idea around portable achievement
and reputation as well.
So it was like a verified achievement, imagine a tournament rank
or like a quest streak I guess and then we can unlock roles early access or drops in the next
title without like re-KYC or starting from zero as well. Also sorry just to add we also had Dave
heavily involved here who I'm sure he's been on a bunch of our spaces but he kind of leads the way
for everything around Orange Protocol and then there was also the mention of anti-bot fairness without doxing. So the consideration
that games or DAOs potentially can require privacy-preserving proofs of real human accounts,
real human and then account age, for example, rather than like public handles, like improving
match quality and airdrop integrity.
match quality and airdrop integrity. So this is kind of where we see Orange fit in.
So this is kind of where we see Orange fit in.
And then say for trading and socials, right?
So imagine DID is linked with messaging and then credentials.
This would reduce impersonation, phishing in guilds and marketplaces as well.
So cross game identity that you own.
So if a studio sunsets, your DID credentials still travel
and then progress doesn't die on a server.
So imagine the decentralized identity lets gamers essentially take their clout, which was a
part of the title of the series, but take their clout with them, help studios kind of
filter bots without collecting passports.
And the games are essentially battling bots a lot, like Smurfs and Fragile Trust as well.
And then decentralized um obviously holds
great potential and letting players carry portable as we've mentioned privacy preserving credentials
achievements um kind of keeping this humanity alive also clean play status um and then furthermore
kind of would verify results without collecting documents um so it's kind of a small start would
be to kind of make ranked queues require humanity plus account age proof,
gate airdrops with three or four social proofs and potentially turn achievements into reusable badges across titles.
So keeping data minimal, like use revocable credentials with expiry.
So I think the overall goal, if you want to consider decentralized identity and being involved with gaming,
is to kind of explain why decentralized identity matters to gamers and studios,
what good looks like essentially, and how to ship an MVP without storing personal identifiable information.
So I think we can all agree, and some of the takeaways definitely from the sessions that the guys had, is the clear pane today.
And this was a big part of what we wanted to learn from ontology.
So we can move forward and ensure that we're addressing this for gamers or for studios or for developers.
So bots and smurfs kind of ruin lobbies, airdrops and leaderboards.
The progress is siloed.
So you can kind of grind in one title and start at zero in the next.
And then obviously trust is fragile.
So we talk about trust a lot.
So this is in trading or social.
So imagine impersonations or rogue marketplaces and then compliance friction.
So again, we're looking at age region, KYC forces document,
uploads and creates kind of data honeypots.
And the point about this is what DID could fix here.
So we're looking at players to be able to own portable credentials,
achievements, tenure, humanity proofs issued by trust parties.
Also games verify results, not documents.
And then also studios could potentially reduce fraud
without doxing anyone and without warehousing
personal identifiable information as well.
So if we were to consider just a high level overview of what we just chatted about, so
if you look at decentralized identity, your cryptographic identifier that you control.
So imagine this like a gamer tag backed by keys, not a company account, and then your
verifiable credential, which is your VC.
So essentially, imagine this as a signed badge about you that you can show without exposing
your email, phone or passport and then selective disclosure or ZK to kind of prove the fact fits a rule
without revealing raw data. So verify the results, not the documents as we've said and
I touched on this last week as well. But some potential use cases around this was really
interesting learning as well. So again we look at anti-bot and anti-smurf lobbies.
So require humanity and account age proof to queue ranked tier lobbies
by reputation badges as well.
So cross game progression.
So we look at achievements, session ranks and reusable credentials.
Also use them to unlock beta access, like cosmetics or tournament seating
or new titles.
And then if we look at marketplace and guild trusts you
could look at the potential of seller show a non-doxing seller history
credentials so fulfill trades dispute rate below a certain amount and then
guild roles and auto grant for credentials so raid clears
attendance leaderships and then airdrops so this is your imagine your Sybil hard
so gate claims and multi-source social proofs, as we've already mentioned, so three out of four.
And then add an optional KYC flag.
And then eSports eligibility and parental controls as well.
I guess this is an area that was really interesting to discuss.
So age, region, band status has minimal disclosures as well.
I realise now that unfortunately I had an extremely busy week but I did not share my update with you guys after last week's call. I actually have the article ready to go and I'm
conscious of time today as well so I'm going to skip through some of the information about gamers
and I'll make sure that it's all included in the article that's going to go out and I'll
post last week's article as well. So also another focus over the
summer months was to look at different types of content. So Jeff put together
really interesting insights when it came to who owns Web3's data. It was just, it
was a thought leadership piece that he kind of curated after
being at ETC Cans. And we posted this across multiple platforms. We actually had a really
interesting conversation. I am kind of focusing on Reddit around stable coins last week as well.
So essentially at ETC, kind of Jeff kept hearing the same, the same kind of
conversation was coming up, right? So projects kind of treating user data as their competitive
moat, I think is how we put it. And I think it's the best way to use it. So in his latest like
outline or article, he definitely argues, and I think it's an extremely valid point that
this repeats Web2's mistakes, right? So undermines Web 3's core promise. Core promise essentially is that it's your
data, your choice, and it's something that we focus on a lot here as well. So he really
put a call out to builders and communities to kind of put decentralized identity and
knowledge proof at the center. Like, let's move on from conversations and start taking action. Again, so this is,
so users, not platforms,
benefit from their data.
With some really interesting questions
for the community.
And if anybody on the call today
would like to send me a DM
or answer these questions
in the comment section,
not comment session,
or under the post, actually,
that would be great.
So imagine this modes versus markets.
So if your competitive edge depends on locking in user data,
are you really building Web 3 or are you just rebuilding Web 2 with tokens?
Think of this as consent by design.
So where and how do users grant view and revoke consent for everyday data use?
Portability, we've just touched on that, but let's go into it in a different context here.
Can users take their identity and reputation to another app today without losing status or access?
Proofs, not dumps. So which flows can switch from raw data sharing to knowledge proofs?
Prove X without revealing Y.
Agent age identity. So as AI agents arrive,
what's the plan for agent identity that's transparently tied to real users' identity
and permissions? I don't think I've seen this answered actually. Value share. If data creates
value, so imagine like better matching, lower fraud. How do users capture a fair share?
Also exit rights.
What's the one click path for users to export, delete or re-permission their footprints?
Would be really great to get input on this and also make sure you check out Jeff's OG piece is on his LinkedIn profile.
This is also being posted on Ontology's page.
It's also on Medium.
It's on our blog. It's in Redditdit so we posted it all over the place there's a really great um thought leadership uh piece that
we really wanted to make sure that um and if everybody had access to uh we also had a really
interesting piece that was written by a partner of ours exelix um so they did a deep dive into
the ontology ecosystem like easier ont and ong swaps with exelix uh So they did a deep dive into the ontology ecosystem, like easier ONT and ONG
swaps with Exelix. We had the folks join us for a community call previously. Would love to invite
them back as well. So it was really interesting to see. Obviously, they took the time to kind of
do a deep dive into this. And then we reposted this on the ontology blog as well. So the guide
that Exelix has created is linked in this blog as well. So the guide that Exelix has created
is linked in this blog as well.
It's under Ont, not update, but it's very easy to find.
So the whole purpose of this was to kind of look at your assets,
your data and your identity.
So we looked at Ontology obviously being our dual token system
and how that plays such a key role in making that possible.
So obviously, ONT represents your stake in the network
and your governance rights. So it's kind of what gives you a voice in ontology. I think that's a really great
way to kind of define it. And then imagine your ONG is your fuel. So essentially this
just kind of keeps everything moving. So it powers stuff. So your transactions, smart
contracts, your DID operations. And so every interaction on the network depends on the right
balance of both. So active participants kind of swapping between ONT and ONG is definitely a normal part of staying engaged.
So you might stake ONT and need ONG for transactions.
You might earn ONG and decide to acquire more ONT for governance or staking.
So it's definitely a smooth, secure and private kind of swap process.
This is something that we look at as essential to kind of keeping everything flowing
without interruption. So the focus of this was around Exelix. So Exelix offers exactly that.
So essentially their new integration allows you to swap ONT and ONG super fast. It doesn't hand
over any custody of your assets or doesn't go through lengthy verification processes. So this
is non-custodial approach. Aligns, obviously aligns very closely with Ontology's vision here. So it was really
great to see that you know kind of partnering with someone like Exelix
allows us to kind of strengthen like a user experience within Ontology, adds to
the efficiency, adds to privacy and also adds to control as well and I think it
definitely reflects a broader shift in the Web3 landscape. So if you want to do a deep dive into this the guide is
highlighted in this article as well. So it's powering the ontology ecosystem
easier ONT and ONG swaps with Exelix.
Another thought leadership piece that was really interesting, again it came from our
very own Jeff, so this is around stablecoin and trust.
So yeah, in the article we kind of had a look at what exactly are stablecoins, we're talking
about a lot more, like are we missing trust from stable coins, essentially?
So I think the key takeaways of this, right,
are most stable coins weren't designed for compliance.
So teams are kind of duct taping KYC per app,
creating centralized data silos and repeated verification.
Also look at a scalable solution,
like decentralized identity plus verifiable credentials,
add-on ZK proof so users can prove facts
without exposing all the raw data. Like this is what we've just talked about a couple of times.
So also with that, like what the ecosystem needs. So obviously better user controlled credentials,
merchant verification without handling private data, and then again cross-chain identity
infrastructure devs can plug into, right? So ontology focuses on that layer.
So DID-based KYC, reusable credentials, and ZK-powered verification
to meet compliance requirements without surveillance.
There's a lot about this, about why this matters now.
So this is interesting.
I mentioned this last week, and it's touched upon in the article,
but the Genius Act and other rules kind of are pushing to advance. So it's going to be interesting to see how trust can kind of
be integrated into this. So trust must be user controlled, obviously, and not outsourced to
third-party databases. So this is a really interesting article. Again, this is everywhere,
all over our socials as well. Would love some feedback and do let me
know if there's any questions that you might have around this. So
consider these questions right. So what's the minimal viable consent and
revocation UX for wallets? What's the best real-world examples of prove don't
share in payments today? And also how would you roll this
out for cross-border merchants and would love your input would love to get those questions answered
as well um so as well with with the summer i mean again we kind of were taking um revisiting our
roadmap um kind of this was going on behind the scenes to make sure that we had a plan to kind of
give you all an update, which is definitely coming.
But we wanted to also do an audit of social and of comms to really check in and
see what exactly was working for Ontology.
So obviously we're very active in X, Twitter and also on Telegram.
We have a huge amount of support from our Harbingers there too.
We have Discord, which is, you know, relative activity, but we stopped hosting
our spaces there or our weekly updates. We just had too many technical, you know, relative activity, but we stopped hosting our spaces there
or our weekly updates. We just had too many technical issues, but I might go back to doing
an update there once a month to maybe get a little bit more interaction and engagement from folks
that like to use Discord over Telegram. But also there's a huge amount of other social platforms
out there. So we're looking a lot at utilising LinkedIn. So I came from originally a Web2 background many, many years ago now at this stage,
but I've always used LinkedIn and I continue to use it actually for anyone
that I work for when it comes to like business development or kind of furthering
developing your network.
It's a really great platform and it has improved a lot over the years.
So we're focusing on making sure that we're active on LinkedIn, reconnecting with folks,
posting articles there as well. Same with Reddit. We just had kind of lost connection with
Reddit, I think. But this is where we really want to do a gritty, deep dive into all of our
conversations there too. Also YouTube. You know, Jeff had kind of started Poets Corner there,
but he's been super busy kind of putting together these much larger strategies. So
we're looking to refocus on YouTube as well and to use our spaces that we're constantly kind of putting together these much larger strategies so we're looking to refocus on
YouTube as well and to use our spaces that we're constantly kind of we're constantly running and
getting those spaces onto YouTube too. So we really wanted to make sure that we're just reaching a
bunch of different folks because I don't think you can really narrow down your channels or your
pathways to where everybody is so imagine if we're going to be focusing on Reddit we're going to have
a lot more Q&A's there we really want to see if we can get more builders involved. So imagine if we're going to be focusing on Reddit, we're going to have a lot
more Q&As there. We really want to see if we can get more builders involved. So I found just from
experience myself, the audience there are definitely curious users and definitely a lot more hands-on.
So I think that we can get really great conversations going if there's weekly threads,
posts that invite feedback as well. And also these FAQs or top questions that I just went through
so we really want to have that kind of honest discussion and get feedback from folks and then
YouTube again this is all very visual so it's like show don't tell so we're looking at visual
learners and folks who kind of want a super fast walkthrough I also know it can be very good for
audiences that want to listen to events as well,
to listen in while they're doing other tasks. But it's also super beneficial for SEO. So we do have a big commitment into getting more content to folks and then to try to get more traffic to the
website through that content. And YouTube is fantastic for that. So we're definitely putting
together a larger strategy there. And then LinkedIn as well. As I just mentioned, look,
this is all about partners. It's all about your your network I've always found it to be to be
really great so we're looking at like product leads your leaders like BD as
I've already said so we're going to be doing more content around like slide
explainer so maybe problem solution a checklist and then also a lot more kind
of opinion pieces at which Jeff has kind of been taking the lead in there. Okay, cool.
And then I know yesterday evening, the guys had connected with my Ether wallet.
So we'd actually connected with them a few years ago, but we reconnected, I guess, is the best way to describe it, to kind of work together and some co-marketing.
So the best way to do this is to invite folks to our spaces.
So everybody knows that there's like a Web3 wandering or a space every Thursday with Humpty and Jeff.
So they had this idea around like a wallets corner.
So they did some chat around Onto and also my Ether wallet.
So we looked at kind of practical aspects of this.
I'd recommend everybody to get involved
and to give your feedback on kind of all the topics
that were discussed yesterday evening.
I always enjoy listening to these spaces,
but obviously we've got our Onto Wallet,
I believe they might be on the call this morning.
So Onto Wallet, mobile and extension.
So imagine self-custody, obviously,
multi-chain assets and dApps and identity features all in one place.
Ontologies, dual token system model
that I've just touched on.
And then it was really interesting
to kind of get updates from the, my... Yeah, I think we can all agree, Stablecoins 2025.
I mean, I host these calls every week and I usually obviously do my own research here.
This is all kind of educational and just from research.
So it's interesting to see that week on week Stablecoins seems to be the new hot topic.
So Stablecoins, let's just kind of quickly touch on them.
So stablecoins, I guess, as we mentioned last week,
are simply kind of digital dollars or euros, right?
So you can move them obviously 24-7 on blockchain.
So they're hot again, which I hate saying,
but because payments are catching up and then new rules have landed.
So I'm going to link like all of my sources into the community call articles.
You guys can go and check all of this out and any questions,
I'll send you all my sources as well.
So essentially what they are in very basic terms of fiat backed one to one cash
T-bill held by an issuer.
So let's consider obviously the issuers to be USDC, USDT.
So crypto collateralized, right? So they're backed
by crypto. Algorithmic, synthetic, so peg buy mechanism and hedging. So for example, same $1
target, different risks. So this is reserves and governance. So for market overviews,
they potentially use a live dashboard before integrating any of this. And then why is this hot now? Why is it so popular?
Why is everybody talking about this, right? So it's the Genius Act that I've mentioned a bunch
of times. So this was signed in July, 18th of July, I believe. So this establishes user categories,
which is really important for this. So it's one-on-one liquid reserves, monthly disclosures,
like bans paying interest to consumers on payment stables,
and then sets like this state and federal oversight path.
So this is obviously towards the US,
but then we have kind of new kind of commissions coming in
in terms of the EU.
So stable coins provisions have been applied since June.
So this is supervisors published clarifications in the end of June, which I'll
link in as well. And then we also have Hong Kong regime effective August 1st. So this saw UK FCA
consultation on issuance custody closed July 31st. So essentially, this just means that like the
total stablecoin value sits in the hundreds of billions and it's led by USDT and USDC with others like
DAI, FDUSD. So I mean this is all a lot of varying sources right. So it's also it was really
interesting to see that Stripe launched stablecoin financial accounts payouts for businesses in 101
countries as well and then also PayPal. PYUSD is on Solana for faster cheaper transfers
apparently so we're just seeing it kind of pop up a lot more and I think it definitely relates back
to the piece that Jeff had published around trust in stable coins and kind of what we're missing and
the fact that it's becoming so popular and a lot we're seeing a lot more we're seeing a lot more content.
So we know obviously that it already works for remittance payroll and kind of merchant checkouts essentially.
So we're kind of considering it being so popular that there's a potential bottleneck.
So it's not TPS or fees, it's this identity and trust. um i'll make sure everything is linked and and i'll
link also all of the content that jeff has published around this or that we've published
as well on on different platforms . So,
taking a look back then obviously it looks, you know, we can all agree that summer, the summer was quite busy for Ontology. And there's still a lot more for us to do. We have the community and update when it comes to our roadmap as well.
So I think in summary, we're definitely looking to reconnect with a lot of folks that we had different collaborations with late last year and the beginning into this year.
with late last year and the beginning into this year.
We had a really interesting kind of connection with my Ether wallet.
So make sure that you guys get a chance to listen to that spaces
that was hosted by Humpty and Jeff.
We also celebrated seven years of ontology.
So that was really cool to see different types of campaigns created
depending on what you're interested in, whether it was trading, staking,
or kind of a little bit more creative
again super open to feedback here would love to hear more from you guys about this also took the
time to update ontology's website to make it easier for users um we took our learnings we
looked at the data and realized that there was um updates to be made uh we're utilizing now an
ai assistant again i'd reach out and just ask you guys to give us feedback on this. Hosted that series
to learn more from like gaming focused projects and gamers
which lasted a number of weeks. We had a lot to take away from that so it's going to be really
interesting to see how we kind of implement that and then we're putting more of a focus on various
types of content. I went through some opinion or thought leader pieces,
but there's other content that's summarized on the site as well.
Kind of those, all of the sessions that I mentioned when it came to gamers,
they've all been summarized in copy.
So they're all on the website as well.
And they also link to CryptoSapiens newsletter.
And this is something that's linked to Humpty.
So if you guys are looking to kind of stay up to date on Web3 or like have your finger on the pulse of Web3,
I'd recommend for you guys to go and check out Crypto Sapiens.
It's a really interesting blog
and we summarized some of their content
and look to link back.
We also had a lot of content coming from Orange
around their kind of use cases when it came to,
when it comes to reputation.
So I went into that a couple of weeks ago
and I'll make sure that you guys have the link.
And I am going to upload the article
from last week's community call today,
and then I'll upload the article using today,
probably over the weekend or on Monday
so that we have everything that we need.
And then there's a bunch of content, as I mentioned.
Don't forget to check out the Exelix ONT and ONG guide
that's there as well.
And then Who Owns Web3 Data, and then DeFi's Evolution as well.
And as I mentioned, we've got that gaming mini series.
So that's called Code, Clout and Crypto,
which you should be able to search for on the site.
But again, I'll make sure that you have links to that as well.
And yeah, you're probably going to see us to be a lot more active on Reddit,
YouTube and LinkedIn.
But do let us know if there's anything that you'd like to see us to be a lot more active on Reddit, YouTube and LinkedIn.
But do let us know if there's anything that you'd like to see us creating in terms of content.
We're always open to that.
And also, I'd like to kind of make another call if there's any projects or folks that you think,
individuals, I guess, that you think that we should be connecting with when it comes to any types of collaborations.
We're super open.
We always kind of like to, you know,
connect with anybody within the community as well.
Also, there's, you know, don't forget to let us know
if there's any updates that you'd prefer to hear from us.
I mean, I just do my own research and, you know,
the team does research and we try to make sure
that we're staying up to date on everything
that's happening in this space.
But if there's something a little bit more granular
or something you've spent time on,
I would be happy to focus on that.
Also, if there's any contributors in the audience today
or that might have a chance to listen to this later,
if you'd like to write content for Ontology or get involved in some way,
feel free to DM me or ping us on X or on Discord as well.
We'd be happy to chat about some potential collaboration there as well.
And make sure you read our piece
when it looks at stable coins and trust as well and then orange protocol is released as i mentioned
a lot of content around use cases and then we also have bella hosting the monthly quiz today
and just with the mention of discord as well as touched on earlier, I think we might try to host one session a month to kind of just do a look back on Ontology and see if we can
get maybe more folks involved in Discord as well.
I used to host them there.
We tried to do it every week, but it was just too difficult.
They just had constant technical issues.
Nobody could hear me.
It was worse than X.
We had very few folks turn up,
actually. We have a lot more engagement with the calls here. So that was really interesting to see
as well. And also, don't forget as well, we have the AntID loyalty quest is still live on Intract.
We should have a reminder post going out about that, but it's pinned in Discord and Anto and
Orange posted about it last week as well so
it's only a few simple quests where you can learn earn loyal nft plus along the way so
make sure that you're going to do that it's like collecting 10 of the loyalty nfts that you claim
50 ong so it would be really great if you guys can be sharing that so that we can you know get
some learning and get some data from that and if it does well then obviously we can plan to kind
of create more campaigns like that as well and as always we still have the on to not campaign live
in the background this is really heavily connected with our harbinger support so if anybody's new to
this space head to discord head to the english telegram channel uh we'll support you on kind of
staking um and anything else you might need there's support in how to download onto wallet how to use
it as well and also we're we're open to feedback there.
And finally, we just had Randy back from WebEx FinTech Expo in Osaka.
So we should be getting some insights into any of the topics that were kind of consistent
throughout that event. And I can go through that with everybody next week.
But it was really great to connect. I hope everybody is going to have a great weekend.
Do let me know if there's anything else that we should be discussing on these calls um
i'm always super open to kind of changing the format and i'm open to having anybody join me as
well um i can put together a few questions and we can chat about something particular
but i'm appreciate everybody's time