Marketing in Web3: Tokens, Points, Utility?🎙

Recorded: Jan. 24, 2024 Duration: 2:15:22

Player

Snippets

Good morning, guys.
Good morning, good morning, Fijio.
How are you?
I'm good.
How are you doing, actually?
All right.
I'm all right.
I'm getting ready for this nice little broadcast we're doing.
I've got to be honest, I have some favorites when it comes to points and tokens and utilities.
I've got a couple of favors myself, but I'm curious to see what people think about it.
I'm happy.
I was afraid it might just be me up here talking about meme coins and marketing, but good morning,
Morning, board.
How are you doing?
How are you doing today, boss?
I'm good.
I still have a bit to talk about here, too, so I'm happy you're here.
Yeah, I saw the topic, but I also figured I could actually talk to you.
For those in the audience, if you have some takes or you're interested in the conversation
and want to ask some questions, feel free to come up, hit the request button, we'll let
you up, and I'll set up the framework for the conversation.
I think what happens in Web 3, I mean, I'm sure it happens in every industry, but especially
Web 3 is we tend to focus, we get hyper-focused on every niche move and forget to step back
and see what the larger framework of what's happening is.
It's not necessarily that important if you're just spitballing into every shit coin you
see on some mathematical hopes that one out of a hundred hits, which I'm sure there's
math to it, but I think if you step back and think a little bit deeper into why these
tokens are being launched, who's launching them, really looking into what support they
have and the reasons that they exist and why projects would be launched in the first
place, I think gives you a bit of an edge that you can mix with your mimetic perspective.
So most shit corners, it's not crazy.
If you're betting on meme coins, none of this is financial advice, you're looking at the
tickers essentially, and you're seeing which one is the funniest, which one you think will
catch on the most, which one will make the most memes, because it's really about attention.
So it signals, you see somebody else bought it, you think that because of that somebody
else is going to buy it, so you buy it because they bought it, and that has a ripple effect.
But what we're seeing is, in my opinion, more sophisticated institutions, i.e. for ease,
big chains, not directly supporting, I think for legal reasons, but indirectly supporting
meme coins more and more frequently now.
And their explanation is that it's an easier form of marketing than NFTs are.
They're not quite as sticky, but they still create community, and especially when they're
directly focused on the chain.
So if it's a meme coin that very clearly references either the culture or the technology
or the chain itself, then it's inherently identifying that ecosystem as its identity.
And I think there's a lot of intelligence as to how things get marketed and monetized.
I think what we're seeing, and then I'll pass it to Akti and board.
But you're seeing NFT projects propped up by token ecosystems or token projects, and
then supported by the chain themselves.
So they're essentially using meme coins to funnel in attention towards their NFT communities
and bolster up their NFT communities that was too hard or expensive.
I think D-God is a perfect example of that, where it might be a lot easier to just launch
a shit coin, hype that up, get a shit ton of attention, people actually using your token
as well, and then focus on retaining them in your ecosystem and driving them to the
projects that you want, whether they be NFTs or gambling platforms or functional protocols.
So Akti, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
We could also talk about which tokens you're enjoying.
And if you look at them just as meme shits, or are you looking at if they're generating
What are you looking at?
Well, I'll be completely honest.
And this is why ever since we started Moby Media, we never shied away from fan tokens,
community tokens, meme tokens, shit, whatever you want to call them.
Because at the end of the day, even it's like you said it, even the big dogs now
have figured out that all you need to push something forward is a good supportive community
that's active.
So of course, it's going to be very easy to rally some troops behind some memes.
Because like take last night, for example, right, we had some people over for an AMA.
And it was it was amazing, if you ask me, you know, but having to explain to people
how creating a stable coin backed by delta neutral positions is something that's not
only feasible, but also scalable, and has nice security to it doesn't have the sort
of same ring as telling them, hey, boys, you know, make some memes, you might win some
with some contests, you know, or look at today, we're making memes with dogs tomorrow,
we're gonna make some memes with cats.
And the day after, we're going to have like a different meme contest each day of the
And that will get people interested.
And it's sort of I see it as like a foot in the door strategy, you know, if you get
them interested, just a little bit on a little bit of an aspect of whatever you're trying
to do, then it'll work out, they'll they'll try to dig deeper, or at least the people
that you want to be interested, you know, we'll see the potential.
That's why a lot of a lot of tokens nowadays do focus on airdrops and giving people points.
And we saw like Rabi Wallet just put out their point system for people, and they have
a pretty good cool system, whereas you can't really symbol it too much, because there's
a cap on how many points you can get per day and things like that.
So people are realizing that if they sort of gamify a little bit their their environments
and their ecosystems, people will use it just to get a few more points or just a few
more a few NFTs that might have some value to them might not, you know, you never
And I'm a big fan of this kind of system myself.
I've been using a lot of these platforms, you know, not just for farming the potential airdrops,
because sure, it's easy to follow, you know, Linnea and all these other chains that have
raised hundreds of millions of dollars, and you can assume that they're going to go the
same route.
Well, some of them also confirmed it, right, that they're going to go the same route
that Arbitrum did, and all these other big players, right, that sort of, well, awarded
some tokens to people that use their protocols.
And having brought Arbitrum into conversation, that's probably one of my favorite airdrops,
because when I was using Arbitrum, I wasn't doing it to, you know, get some points or
to get anything like that.
I was just doing it because it was a nice chain.
There was stuff to do there that there were communities forming.
And it wasn't just memes, of course, GMX was a big driver and everything like that.
But there were some memes too, there were some smaller projects that were forming a community.
And by the time the airdrop came, like a lot of people were surprised.
A lot of people, I know some of my friends, they got airdrops, and they had no idea,
like they saw it like a day or two late, because they didn't care about that.
They were all into, okay, this is a nice layer too, and we're using it then.
That's an interesting question, right?
Those two things I think I wanted to talk about, and I'd love to go to board, or I'll go back
to Acti first, which is, what you're seeing is rewarding for past action, trying to incentivize
current action, then with the hope or expectation or promise of rewarding future action, right?
And legally, you get into a questionable area of rewarding future actions.
And so what you're seeing is points, right?
And these will probably turn into something conversation.
So still dancing around the legalities of airdropping, but the industry has gotten comfortable with
the idea.
And you see this with like Gary, you see this with the plague, you're going to see it more
frequently where they're saying, oh, we're now giving equity, right?
And you'll see the language, they said, there's nothing promised, there was nothing
promised, and we're just gratuitously giving that away, right?
That's a legal dance, which at the end of the day, I don't think it's a problem.
The requirement of the Howie test is an investment of money.
So you would expect that an airdrop for past actions where there was no expectation of
money, and skirting around a promise of money in the future, but giving away off-chain
points that may turn into an airdrop, and then dancing along the lines of what were
you expecting is most likely the biggest theme throughout all of crypto, right?
Even in the XRP ruling, the question where XRP thought they won, the judge just simply
said that there wasn't enough facts asserted by the plaintiffs, SEC, to determine that
the people who were buying XRP on the secondary market were doing with the expectation of
value, of profit, based off of the statements of Ripple themselves, and likely in appeal,
if they do assert that, that case will fall apart.
But we're talking about expectations, right, and how you're allocating your marketing funds,
and points and all these things are super interesting in terms of what you would call
in marketing conversion or breakage, which is the act of stickiness, essentially.
And so I'd love to go to board, first of all, what tokens are you messing around with?
And I'd love to hear your thought process as to why you're interested in any specific
I'm going to keep it a buck.
I kind of stepped away from most of the meme coins and whatnot.
I think they're really good for bringing people into the space.
Unfortunately, really good to get people to leave the space as well.
And a majority of these meme coins are just created by like the same people over and
over, washing and repeating their little scheme they have going on.
So I try to stay away from them.
So, board, I'll make the question in your wheelhouse then, seeing as how this is my first
bull in crypto Twitter, meaning being public facing.
And so I'm going to highlight the different kinds of silos or communities of people.
For those who are deep in crypto Twitter, they don't really touch crypto YouTube.
But if I'm not mistaken, YouTube has the biggest impact.
So I'd love to hear your thoughts on like different kinds of marketing and their effectiveness
in different times of our bears and bulls.
And I'm actually interested, who are the YouTube people talking to?
I definitely think that YouTube is the most substantial form of marketing.
People just tend to have a lot more research, knowledge and overall depth to their content
compared to Instagram or TikTok or honestly, even crypto Twitter for the most part.
But when it comes to like who they're talking with, I know like on my end, my influencers,
as of right now, it's a lot of congressmen and politicians, given the campaigns are coming
It's a really important time for not only America, but also for crypto, because whoever
is in office for the next four years is going to directly impact our crypto regulations, right?
I mean, with the cyclical nature of bull run bear cycle, etc, etc.
Like this is my third cycle.
And like the first cycle I was in, there wasn't too much content, there were like four
YouTubers maybe that I could probably put a name to.
I don't even think three of them are around anymore.
But then the second cycle, like 21 that I was a part of, you saw TikTok, Instagram, crypto
Twitter, YouTube, like shit, Facebook, everywhere, everyone was making content trying to elaborate,
expand and just kind of push the agenda and the narrative of Web3 as an industry.
So you saw like a really big influx of content being produced, created, and a lot more people
getting onboarded, right?
I think now in this cycle, a lot of TikTok got burned last cycle due to just people just
throwing a video out without any disclaimers.
I know like a lot of influencers are just getting subpoenas, getting in a lot of trouble.
So I think a lot of the content is going to be funneled through X and YouTube again
in this cycle.
And I see a lot of the other influencers on other platforms kind of falling off, because
I think we've just grown and matured a lot as a space.
But that's not going to discredit that there is a place for these other content platforms
and influencers that do want to do their little shows and everything like that.
Because ultimately, that's an easy way to get people exposed to crypto in a micro fashion.
But once they learn more, I think they're going to go over towards YouTube and crypto
So I always thought of YouTube as being the top of the funnel in terms of, for lack of
a better word, taking advantage of retail.
And I would agree that I have to assume Instagram and Facebook and whatever other social platform
just get more and more shilling.
And we probably look at it as like an inverse of quality of project to sophistication of audience
combined with disregard for the law, meaning promises and shilling and stuff like that.
Would you disagree?
I always thought that crypto Twitter was essentially the last in terms of memetics, but the first
in terms of sophistication and the best place to go for no, Noah, you say no.
I think it would be like a close contest.
But the thing that I'll take from YouTube that I've seen is, compared to like every
other project, it's really easy to just drop a contract address and say, oh, Janet Yellen,
Inu coin, these other tokenomics, this is the contract address.
I think it's going to moon.
It's really easy to get that across the long form nature makes it makes you.
Yeah, because the long form nature, if you're covering a project and it's a real project,
you're not just trying to pump something and you're doing your job and due diligence,
you're going to have some cool aspects to talk about.
You're going to be able to dive deep into the tech.
You're going to be able to help people understand what they're doing and what makes it a good
And that's one of the key identifiers for like knowing who's a real influencer and who's
just there to pad their bags because it's you can't go too deep into a lot of these
mean coins or even like the rug pulls because they're just not well thought out, right?
Like they're they tend to be very quick, simple delivery, the elevator pitch, get people hype,
people buy, boom, your money goes bye bye.
But the real projects that get talked about, it tends to be a reoccurring thing.
It's not a one off on a creator's channel, it's something that we'll talk about multiple
times and multiple videos.
They'll be able to discuss it in depth with other people and they'll be staying up to
date with the community or the team and trying to see how they're able to help help them
because the real projects, again, they give you more to talk about and more to update
your audience on.
And I want to go to Noah but it's funny and this goes into the conversation we often have
about intentional and unintentional rug, right?
A mean coin is nothing, right?
A mean coin is a success if it does get that massive exposure and does get a massive market
cap and then it becomes quote unquote not a shit coin or not a rug, right?
Like we don't consider doge a rug.
So if YouTubers are pumping it but it works, who's to decide what's a shit coin and not
absent honey pots and an obvious on contract rugs?
But it's an interesting concept.
Most definitely and I think one of the main things you have to keep in mind with that
concept is we're really just in the stock market 2.0 when it comes to the whole trading
and the coins, right?
In order to make money, somebody has to lose money.
Money doesn't just appear unless you're the U.S. government and you want to print it.
So oftentimes people are going to lose regardless of what project they get involved in and
people are going to win if it's a mean coin and they got in early and then it gets to
the hundred million market cap and starts getting like a actual sound grip of like,
oh, we're going to build a foundation out because this has legs.
Let's do something with it coming from like the dev and the team and whatnot.
Most people are going to cash out and as that hyper cycle continues and it keeps bolstering
the price, they're going to exit and then people are going to lose money.
It's going to, it's hard to define the rug versus the non rug, but for me, anything
that just blatantly is going to disappear with your money or a team that has no clear
vision or understanding of a the space or what they're even doing.
They just wanted to make some money.
I consider that a rug, but then you get the unintentional rugs, right?
Where the team did everything that they possibly could.
They just showed up every day.
They worked.
Unfortunately, they just didn't get that market share because people weren't interested
I mean, when you start a coin, you're essentially starting a business.
But from my understanding, it's completely illegal to even launch a coin in the United
I don't know if that's correct, Fidge, but you're the lawyer.
That's like the core entire discussion happening in the courts.
Whenever you hear that a token is not inherently a security, what they're saying is and where
I believe the law goes and where it's trending certainly globally is tokens are tend to be
again, not legal advice, tend to be considered securities under the circumstances of which
they're issued.
If I make a token and give you a token, right, the question then becomes by nature, by the
very nature, and this has always been the issue, but the very nature of creating a
token and the decentralized nature of our chain, you find the contract address.
You can get it listed on an exchange, right?
So even though you might not have sold the asset, liquidity can be provided and that token
can be traded in the secondary market.
That's where the question becomes.
It's supposed to be angled at the issuance, which is why you see things like fair launches,
which is why you see things like them being launched by charities that are dows abroad.
They're all trying to get away from the for-profit portion or an exchange of money as well as
making profit.
But I think it's still up in the air and I think it's really interesting.
Noah, I'd love to get your thoughts and welcome Aleko, welcome out of LA.
Nice to see you guys.
I'm interested in these different areas of marketing and the people, and if the government
is cracking down on the shills by celebrities and stuff like that, does that mean that if
you're an influencer on Twitter, that there's room right now and it's appropriate for highly
educated influencers to start building on YouTube and spread that education?
Noah, what are your thoughts?
I think when I get thumbs down to the sophistication thing, I don't particularly find the content
on Twitter to be any less or more sophisticated than YouTube.
I think it's just more abundant and I think that it requires a bit more sophistication
for the average retail investor to navigate Twitter versus finding a YouTube channel and
digesting content.
But at the end of the day, I think it matters how the influencer, quote, unquote, or KOL,
whatever you want to call it, is conveying that information.
So I don't want to bash certain projects, but there's certain tokens that I see shield
across multiple circles and multiple influencers.
Here's a beautiful thing, Noah.
You're not funding it if you talk about it.
Yeah, I mean, I can talk about it.
It's fine.
So one of my favorite YouTubers is virtual bacon, Dennis.
I think he does a great job of actually going into, yeah, the name is silly, but he's
probably the best YouTuber I've seen as far as breaking things down at a fundamental
level and explaining why he likes certain projects and why his portfolio is allocated
in the way that it is.
He's been chilling super a few times over the last, I don't know, I've seen over the
last couple of months, at least, him talking about super.
And I find it kind of odd that when he talks about super, he doesn't go into that same
level of detail that he does for the projects.
And I see a lot of other big YouTubers, Alex Becker, obviously, Elio Traits, Super
is his project.
But I see YouTubers and influencers talk about super, but no one can tell me what
I've so I'm still waiting for someone to tell me what what the point of the project
is, what the goal of the project is.
All I keep hearing is a lot of big backers, Elio Traits is the hard worker and he's
been he's been building this thing out and he knows a lot about tokenomics.
And so I would be careful about kind of these vague explain and sure, it might
pump because, you know, the influencers pump projects, but I'd be very careful
about these kind of vague explanations around projects where you don't really you
have a hard time wrapping your head around it, then it's probably because they're
not doing a good job of explaining it.
But I think like if you want to if you're trying to flip bags, and I think who
is it that was saying was it since I'm since I'm bored, bored was basically saying
a lot of the stuff is greater, greater fool theory, you just selling your bag
to someone else that's coming in willing to buy it for more.
And a lot of these projects are just they're they're rugged.
And so you don't have to physically I mean, I don't need you to literally
rug for me to call you a scam project, right?
I'll call out Klima, for example, I'll call out certain projects.
You very clearly saw for again, your community.
That was a very obvious Ponzi.
So is it still a Ponzi if you know it's a Ponzi?
So I mean, it's well, let's let's think about let's talk about all the time.
Klima own like for those who were those around these were like so so I'll just
give you a quick example.
One of the first jobs as an attorney was representing homeowners in 2008.
And they would come in against foreclosure and they would come in and
complain, you know, they had this their mortgage document was 500 pages.
It was in English.
They only speak Spanish.
But right.
And we'd go through it like, yes, it's incredibly confusing.
And then it would always end up with this odd moment where I'd go.
But just just just a thought.
In what world did you think that you could pay a thousand dollars a month
for a five million dollar home and think that you were paying your
principal, right?
Like there's there's some basic common sense, right?
So to your point, right, like what I was saying is if it's if you know what
you're playing in, is it still what it is?
And that's really the whole thing with crypto, right?
We want to be able to gamble how we want.
So I mean, I think that my issue with some of these projects is that they
claim if you go so you had all these Olympus South Forks Snowbank was an
example and they kind of botched their project.
They actually refunded a certain percentage of like they have a floor
price and they refunded a certain percentage of people's investments.
I remember asking Klima to do the same thing and they claim they're still
building. So I take issue with projects that tell me they're still
building and they're still cooking shit up and you look at their token
price and it's negative 1000X from the top.
So yeah, I would just kind of grabbing up my thoughts here is I would be
care I would be careful about listening too deeply to any influencer, anyone
with the platform, including me or anyone else up here.
But I mean, I don't I don't think that I I don't think any of us really have.
I'm talking about that the Alex Becker is the Elio trades that the big
YouTubers I think they make great content.
But if you go back and you look at February or January of 2022, almost
every influencer was was buying into the supercycle rhetoric, the extended
cycle rhetoric, how we're still going to go up and everyone flopped
flip-flopped really quickly after the FTX debacle.
So the truth is like no one really knows what's going to happen.
But if you I think the best way to kind of predict what the market's going
to do is just buy the different kinds of news that's coming out.
But also just like I don't like to try to predict the future with based
in the past, but these cycles so far, and this is my I guess second
cycle, second and a half cycle, they're very similar.
I have noticed a lot of similarities between where Bitcoin is now and
where it was in early 2022.
So it's going to be I think there's some interesting thoughts here, right?
I think in each sector, right, and three cycles, the what were the
noobs become educated enough to to to not get taken advantage of by
the same by the same assets that are in existence, right?
So I don't think NFTs are going to be the way that that that
noobies are grifted.
So it's interesting.
As the cycles go, each vertical becomes more established.
I think the NFT one is is establishing identity and mutability
in terms of identity.
And then that'll flow pretty naturally into metaverses.
I'm interested in what the next will probably be RWAs.
Well, now it's a drops, right?
And the thing is, is I'm saying I'm seeing all these layer twos
and all these airdrop opportunities and everyone's
aping into them.
And all these layer twos are just like a copy paste of a
previous layer two with copy paste of the same D5 protocols
and you have the same.
Yeah, but but but no, but in order for newbies to take an
advantage of that, they have to be basically shit corning.
And I don't think they're ready to be shit corning.
No, they're not.
I mean, I think. Yeah, I mean, I think I think the
shit corning is probably still going to be very much meme
focused, because they're easy to understand, right?
I don't I think NFTs, I think if you want to talk about
shit corning, memes are superior to NFTs, a fungible token
that's liquid, that I can go dump on an exchange is much
easier to play around with than an NFT that I need to go
list on OpenSea and hope someone buys it for me, right?
That the knife is falling much faster.
That's it.
Yeah, I'm kind of out of it.
I'm going to pass it.
I can tell. Yeah.
How are you doing, by the way?
Those are just recovering.
Good, good to hear.
I'm glad you're okay.
Welcome, Meta.
Nice to see you, brother.
Yo, how are you doing?
I'm doing amazing. Another glorious day.
And we're finally getting teasers of your project.
So slow and steady.
I guess that's the the ordinal way.
Yeah, I mean, you know, for me or just in general in life,
it's like managing expectations is like the most important thing.
You know, I think all the hype driven stuff is just down only.
It's not sustainable.
And, you know, you just want people to be there because they want to be there.
Like, I actually just came off of a like a Chinese space
and they were like super receptive.
And I think we need more like cross-cultural spaces.
You know, I think like people that aren't leveraging that,
like that's one of the coolest things about like being in spaces.
People really take for granted like the alpha that you hear in English.
Right. And if anyone's been familiar with previous cycles, especially this one,
you know, they're always fueled by Asia. Right.
You know, and like especially this one.
So it used to be like hanging out in WeChat groups,
but WeChat actually cut down on like everything crypto.
So now they've all like migrated to Telegram, which like I'm super active on.
But yeah, do you speak Mandarin?
No, I don't.
But if you have Telegram premium and you click one button,
it'll automatically translate everything for you.
And I think pretty soon, you know, we'll have like real real time
AI voice translation to like really cut through that barrier.
Yeah. I mean, just to speak on like what Noah was talking about,
like, you know, I've been following Alex Becker,
Elio trades, you know, like I'm friends with tons of like the Neo Tokyo citizens.
They kind of they treat like Elio, sort of like the the bastard child,
so to speak, of the ecosystem.
You know, I've been following it for a while.
They said they were a gaming studio, then they pivoted and, you know,
even though things seem like scams, I think some of the best performing
coins will be the ones with the worst tokenomics from the most predatory teams.
You know, a lot of these teams basically launched Peak Bear,
and they've desperately been waiting for more favorable conditions
so they could deploy their bag of tricks and do some market manipulation.
You know, I look at like Alex Becker or Elio and, you know,
they're just great counter indicators, usually.
I know Elio like completely flopped, you know, in terms of like he mentioned,
he lost like 30 million or, you know, something to like that effect,
like in like the previous cycle.
For me, I follow more like GCR, who like short of the top of size
and basically called everything.
He's like more of a forecaster.
And then, yeah, I mean, if people like are trying to like find an edge,
you know, look for an edge, you know, like don't just trade.
Like the best thing you could do is become a big fish in a small pond,
you know, because then you control your destiny, right?
Like if you're relying on some stranger on the internet and a PVP situation
to like provide you with an opportunity, it's not going to happen.
You're going to be exit look, but like just build real connections
in the space, be genuine, give without expectations, you know,
and like have patience and conviction and a thesis,
like focus on one specific thing.
I see a lot of people being like rotators and like that's how you get wrecked.
You know, like there's always another opportunity,
but just pick a subsection that interests you,
that you have an edge in and like you'll do incredibly well.
Couldn't agree more.
And thank you.
Some of my favorite people, Meta, Doc, Andrew, Jay, new fans.
Welcome, Kabir and I welcome.
Lot of family, always happy to have you.
I think that's a great thesis.
And it's funny how in life, especially when it comes to money,
sometimes you just need to distill it down, right?
Like it's not complicated.
You're usually good at what you're good at.
So I implore everybody here in the space.
This is something that I've trained myself.
Don't chase and don't feel bad if you miss stuff.
That's how you get wrecked.
It doesn't make a difference what you're in.
Andrew, I think you will echo that tremendously.
How are you doing, Andrew?
Good morning, brother.
Good morning.
Good morning.
I'll just apply this kind of to the airdrop lens.
I think like the biggest mistake I see people making
is, you know, certain airdrops or certain projects, again,
you know, start to get a lot of visibility on the timeline.
And then everybody's like, that's the one.
That's the one.
But I don't think what they're really understanding is
you're now competing with a much larger set of folks,
you know, for the same airdrops.
So therefore, the percentage that you're getting is less.
And so the strategy that I've taken, going back to the last speaker,
is like, I tend to pick things where I'm bullish on the technology,
I'm bullish on the founders, I'm bullish on the vertical.
And there's not a lot of chatter about it.
And maybe there's going to be more chatter, you know, towards the end.
But again, that's my way to kind of get in
and be in a much smaller competition set.
And it's worked for me.
I mean, like there's certain airdrops where I've done extremely well.
And to that point, like that one airdrop may be the same value
as had I been in 10 other airdrops that, you know,
maybe I'm grinding just as hard on.
But again, there's, you know, 100x as many people kind of going after it.
So I do think, again, like pick a lane, focus, look where others are not looking.
I definitely kind of echo and agree with what the last speaker was saying.
I agree, right.
And there are some easier ways to approach shitcoining.
Like if you want to just dab your toe in, right.
At the end of the day, there is a thesis to the idea
that you can look at the people launching the token
and realize that they can't let it fail.
Meaning that you know that it's going to do some sort of sizable numbers
because they wouldn't be launching it without that.
So go ahead, Andrew.
Yeah, I mean, I'll just give you kind of a little strategy.
Like, here's how I approach it.
So, you know, I start with kind of the sector.
Like, am I bullish on Deepin?
Am I bullish on RWA?
Am I bullish on DeFi, right?
Then I look at kind of number two, the founders.
I'll go on LinkedIn.
I'll look at their bios.
I'll see where they're coming from.
You know, are these folks that, you know,
come from real business backgrounds?
Are these, you know, multi-time success founders?
Are these folks that understand mass adoption?
You know, then I'll dig into obviously things like white papers.
I might go and look at, you know, community.
But really, I think at the end of the day, we're so early, right?
And you do have to think of it as, you know,
even if you get an airdrop from one of these projects,
again, if you're bullish on the sector,
if you're bullish on the founders,
if you're bullish on, you know, the technical innovation,
you know, realistically, you want to hold that for the long run, right?
Because we're in such early stages.
And so that's the other thing is, you know,
not every airdrop is created equal.
I think, again, the question becomes,
when you get that airdrop,
what's the long-term potential, you know, for that token?
Not to say you can't get an airdrop
and then swap it into something else
that you're more bullish on long-term.
But ideally, you're just, you know,
again, focused on something from a long-term perspective.
You're trying to get a competitive advantage
from the beginning, right?
You're getting it earlier than everybody else.
And then you're bullish that, you know,
you're going to ride that through the entire bull market.
Yeah, I'm not sure I fully understand the question,
but like, I just look at meme coins in as,
I mean, first off, I like meme coins.
Like, I'm not anti-meme coins.
I think there's a lot of people that are like,
well, meme coins drain liquidity from real projects
and blah, blah, blah.
We're early.
Like, these numbers are all going to go up, right?
But I'm a big believer in the value of meme coins.
The way I look at meme coins is I put them under
kind of the gambling sector, right?
Because at the end of the day,
it's like, really, what you're doing
is you're taking a bet,
and you're taking a bet that, you know,
could go up 1,000 or 2,000X but could go to zero.
And so I, you know, for me at least,
you know, when I'm trading or doing on-chain activity,
I really look at, you know, trading meme coins
the same way I look at using
some of these online decentralized casinos.
So that's my take on meme coins.
I do think meme coins bring culture.
I do think meme coins build community
in a similar way to NFTs.
But again, like, you can't look at a meme coin
the same way you're looking at, you know,
an infrastructure play or like a deep-in play.
It's just a, it's a very different sector, right?
I think I'll put it out.
Maybe I'll put it out now.
But I wanted to see, like,
what general sentiment was around points.
And I have a feeling the sentiment is fairly negative.
My take on points is what I do like about them,
but again, I don't think you have to do it as a points model.
There's other ways to do it,
is it enables you to track your performance.
It enables you to understand, hey,
I've put in X amount of time,
or I put in X amount of resources,
and now I can see the tangible impact of that, right?
So it's a nice response mechanism.
But my concern with points is, again, long-term,
some of these projects, one point may equal one token,
other projects that may not be the case.
And I just worry about, like, sentiment on the back end
if expectations and reality are not aligned in the end.
That's my concern with points.
So then I have to ask you,
and then Aleko, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
What are your thoughts on, you mentioned an alternative.
So it sounds like, how do you make an incentivized alternative
that also accomplishes the tracking?
Because I like the tracking.
But what were you thinking?
Maybe you'll see in coming months, my friend.
I can't give you all the playbooks.
But actually, I'll give you, like, an interesting,
another thing about airdrop hunting
I don't know that everybody thinks about this.
But there are, and I'll use Hashpo as an example,
there are underlying technologies
that a lot of these projects are built on, right?
And when you do certain on-chain actions
on these projects built on top of that infrastructure,
you are effectively generating on-chain actions
on an infrastructure.
So you can look at the eigenlayer recent narrative.
But again, it's not just about,
what am I doing on that project to qualify me for an airdrop?
You want to think about it in two lanes.
Like, is there a project where I can do something
that's going to qualify me for an airdrop?
But because it's built on top of this technology,
is that also qualify me for another airdrop?
And like the example I'll give is,
we just launched a cross-chain on Hashpo
so I can swap from arb to sole natively,
no synthetic assets, no bridges.
Kind of traditional tradify groups
and then they launched Jump Crypto.
So I don't know, I don't know if there's going to be
a wormhole airdrop or anything like that,
but you better believe that I'm doing these cross-chain swaps
because every time I do,
it's generating on-chain activity on wormhole.
And if they do end up having an airdrop down the road,
I'll qualify for that just by doing
my cross-chain trades on Hashpo, right?
So that's a good example of what I call the two-for-one special.
It's kind of like Jumper, the bridge aggregator.
If you use Jumper and you also use Stargate as a route,
you kind of double-qualify yourself.
Yeah, exactly.
So prior to this, I did use Stargate quite a bit
because I'm like, well,
might as well try to qualify for a layer zero airdrop.
And then same thing, bought a little pudgy,
which the cross-chain enablement of little pudgies
was powered by layer zero.
When I took a cross-chain,
I ended up getting a token because I brought it onto BNB.
In my head, I'm like,
that token is probably going to qualify
for some level of airdrop or airdrop incentive bonus.
So is it the language at the end of the day
that we're talking about?
Or we're talking about the nature of value connected
to how points are distributed in correlation
to the actions that are being done.
And do those actions actually generate revenue?
And therefore, it makes sense for revenue or value
to be attributed to any future airdrop.
So I've always wondered that part, right?
Like, for example, Steppen.
Whenever a token is being distributed
for something that doesn't generate money,
how is it ever going to be sustainable?
That's the million-dollar question, my friend.
I mean, it goes back to kind of the big tech web too model.
I mean, you look at companies like Uber
that I believe are still not profitable, right?
And for them, it's, you know, if we can drive more usage,
we can drive more revenue.
But again, like, eventually the clock runs out.
And I think that's the other problem with points
is that if you do this points model
and then in the end, the translation between points
and tokens or points in airdrop is not aligned
with user expectations.
Well, right when that's done,
you're not going to retain any of those users.
So you just went through a pretty significant amount
of time and money to drive a lot of, you know,
on-chain activity, bullish metrics.
And now you're seeing a huge dip
because folks have negative sentiment now in the end,
So I think that at the end of the day is so important,
like, that you think about, you know,
what are your qualifiers, you know,
and also the balance between how much time and money
because time is money, users are spending
to try to qualify for something.
Because again, if they don't get that incentive
on the back that made it worth their time,
they're not going to continue to come back
and you just wasted that money.
So then I'll ask you an interesting question.
How this works in web two is the value of data.
How good is the data collection aggregation
in web three currently in terms of being able
to package that and monetize it?
It's not great.
I mean, I'm advising for a project that's
in the web three data space.
I would say like most of what you see right now
is obviously, you know, on-chain activity.
So you can look at a wallet.
You can see, you know, what's in the wallet.
You can see where is that wallet interacting,
how much are they interacting.
I think the difference is when you look
at like centralized exchanges, you know,
and things that are KYC, you know,
they're operating more on a traditional web two data set.
I think the holy grail, and I do think
it's going to happen in the next year or two,
is when you're able to start to connect web two
and web three data sets together.
Because I think at that point,
you're able to one, more effectively target,
and two, also probably more effectively able
to, you know, segment your users
into, you know, very targeted segmentations.
And I agree.
In order for that to happen, would you foresee,
and I don't know from either a technical
or non-technical perspective,
but more anonymity bled into web two,
whether it be through like ZK technology or otherwise,
whereby even the web two fashion,
you can still get the benefits of quasi anonymity?
I don't know.
If I had to guess, I think it's the opposite.
I think, you know, listen, web two companies,
they're not going to favor decentralization
they still want some level of control.
They value first party data.
I do think like going back to your ZK note,
like that to me is maybe more of the future in web three,
which is, you know, there's one data set here,
there's one data set here,
you're using ZK to basically match the data,
but neither side is being given that data.
I mean, obviously that's more privacy centric,
more, you know, personal information protective.
But no, I don't personally foresee more anonymity
going into web two,
because even with like the cookie deprecation that happened,
you know, with GDPR and things like that,
I mean, most of these brands are now trying to figure out,
okay, what's our alternative to that?
They're not saying, okay,
there's now a more anonymous world,
how do we effectively target and reach these people?
They're basically saying, okay,
we can't get data this way.
You know, what's our alternative way
to get the exact same data,
or at least some level of that data?
Right, so money by definition,
drives against anonymity,
because it increases the value proposition of data,
I suppose.
And so it would more largely leave a very,
probably just the laser eyes,
but some anonymity left,
but yeah, that makes more sense
that it would bleed into web three.
And I think you're seeing that, right?
You're seeing the conversation.
You're always going to see very anonymous focused projects
like take like a tort protocol
or even like tornado cash prior
to the legal proceedings.
I mean, because again,
there is a sector of folks that are,
you know, privacy maxis,
decentralization maxis.
And I think there's always going to be
an opportunity for that stuff.
It's just, it's going to be a more,
it's going to be a more targeted user base, you know?
Yeah, and the argument,
you know, as I think as governments
become more receptive to crypto,
the argument for anonymity
becomes weaker and weaker, right?
It's an interesting thought process
I hadn't really got into.
I haven't heard from you, Aleko,
who would probably be more
of a fidget conversation.
But what are your thoughts?
You should coin,
you involved any projects,
thinking about using any coins
for functional purposes.
Yo, yo, thanks for the call out, man.
I've just been honestly
enjoying the discussion.
But I do agree with one of the points
that was said about like
the shit coins itself.
Like I do honestly,
like view it as a gamble.
I view us like super early
in the ecosystem to a point
where it's really like it,
not really about like
the immediate utility
of the token itself.
Like it's I was one of the early adopters
of like Pepe and Bonk as well.
Pepe on Ethereum and Bonk on Solana.
And it really just started as a joke.
You know what I mean?
I even bought Dogecoin
back in like 2017
and really had no idea
why I was like even buying it.
It was just really more
on the element of like,
okay, this is cool.
It could be like a trending topic.
Let's see what happens, right?
At the end of the day,
it was mainly for market share.
I would say like to increase,
like there's not really
like a functional utility
like of these tokens.
Like in my opinion at the moment,
whether a project raises enough capital
and has enough innovation
in order to be able to offer
like stable use case
and functionality, that's great.
But I honestly like view meme coins
at the current moment is like
kind of just like a complete casino
for my opinion.
Mainly, I would say like
even Web3 at its peak
during like the end of 2021,
like leading into like 2022.
A lot of influencers,
you know, like myself,
like Web3 influencers,
people that kind of got into it early.
They called it a casino
really just based off of like
the amount of liquidity
that was really coming in
and out of the markets
and certain projects at times.
It was kind of the days
where you could, you know,
like get a white list
that has hype around a project
and flip it for, you know,
like 100X based off of
like the mint price that you buy.
But it's all really just like
speculation on hype, right?
Like it's all speculation
on what's being promised.
This like, you know,
like I guess like fictional roadmap,
not necessarily like fictional
in terms of like,
they're not going to do it or not.
But at the point of buying,
it really seems like it's
it's just like this like lucrative promise
from a team really just on like
a speculation of hype
that you're really like
just buying into.
So I kind of view all of these things
in my opinion as gambles.
Like I see us like extremely early,
especially at that time
in the scene where it's almost like
if NFT projects
and Web3 projects,
including tokens at the moment,
like if you're promising
like a full loaf of bread
and you don't really like
offer a slice before people
have to like stake their money.
I kind of view it as like
you're really just basing
your entire investment off of
a wave of hype right now
that could easily just fall and crash
just as fast as it came.
Or you know what?
Like it will die down at some point
because obviously peak hype
only lasts for a certain duration,
but it'll actually slowly make a recovery
most likely to somewhat
of a profitable return.
Yeah, that's kind of like
more so my opinion on just
really buying into like hype
and fomoing into some of these
like shit coins
and really just like Web3 trends
at the moment.
There was another point
that was said,
I believe I can't remember
who said it,
but it was another project founder
in here which I'm pretty grateful
for was don't just build
to build something
and just like have something on
chain just because like you know,
like you're you're fearing
of missing out like on the your
initial like entry point
or something like that.
It's more build something
that's like actually resonates
with you that you have
like valuable skill set in
and you have like a good
understanding for so for example,
like I'm starting an art project
because I'm an artist.
Like I feel like that's
my strong suit.
I network with artists.
You know, I know what they like.
I know what their you know,
resources and utility
that would be valuable to them
providing them files assets education.
You know what I mean?
Tutorials opportunities
within like a creative ecosystem.
So that's something that like
I'm personally quite passionate about.
So I'm building my project around it.
I'm not promising anything
additional than that.
You know what I mean?
And in regards to what it scales,
I'm not promising any I guess,
you know, like 10 X.
It's definitely oriented for creators
and artists that want to learn
and develop their skill sets
within somewhat of an artistic community
and connect with other talented artists
and the I guess in the web three space.
So yeah, sorry to like
kind of just stray off topic,
but I wanted to just like share
like a little bit of like I guess
like a double edged opinion there.
Thanks for having me.
No, I love it.
Of course.
Thank you brother.
I look forward to if you got anything
that you're interested in.
Feel free to pin it up top.
Otherwise, if and when you're launching,
please come back.
I'd love to hear it.
Does it have a name?
Yeah, so the project is actually
called Stoner's funny story.
It started as a cannabis project.
So and the funny thing is, you know,
like we actually changed the image
because we did start as like a cannabis,
like almost like a derivative style project
in January 2022 and the reason why
we actually kind of like switched it
over a little bit more to rather
it was called stoner ape club before,
but we wanted to switch the name
over to like stoners
and shift away from the apes.
And then we even rebranded
because we have like a cannabis logo
and as like, you know,
in our main brand guidelines
and stuff like that was mainly
just because like we wanted to go
something a little bit more mainstream.
Like I wanted to take the word stoners
and shift it towards like more
of a mainstream approach,
whether you're not really somebody
who's very interested in smoking
or you're like complete pothead.
I wanted to cater the brand
to like both audiences in a sense.
So yeah, it's a 3D project.
We're migrating from Ethereum
over to Solana because I feel
that Solana has a better ecosystem
for all sorts of holders
to be able to interact with
after like dealing with whales
and you know, like small holders
who own one or two NFTs
versus people that hold upward
of like 150 NFTs in my community.
I've noticed that like building
on Ethereum is very hard
for at least smaller communities
at the start to have like everything
equally balanced from like an experience
point of view for your holders.
So that was something
that I really like I struggled with
when it came to like,
you know, calculating gas fees
and how many times like people
are going to have to interact
with the contract and burn
and do stuff like that.
So it wasn't I didn't find like
it was like the most fair
and I love the speed of Solana.
I honestly think it's like
just that chain for like underrated
builders to like create like innovation
and then yeah, it'll get eaten up
in a bigger environment
with some bigger capital
but I always like vouch
for the little guys.
That's kind of like my thing.
So yeah, no, we have a space
actually later today.
I believe we invited you.
So we're looking forward to
if you have time to stop by.
I just put the pieces together.
As you said stone and I was like,
I'm doing a space called stoner's club.
Wait a second.
And then I looked at your page
and I looked at Jay's.
But by the way,
I don't want to say the bullish shit
because that's what everybody says.
But the fact that you're that you
and I've heard some other people
are actually thinking about
why they're launching
on certain chains
for both functional
and financial reasons
is I think a really good place
to be at.
I don't know how many times
I want to jump down people's throat.
They're like,
I just love this lot of ecosystem.
I'm like, why?
Well, you know, just the culture.
I'm like, shut the fuck up.
Like, it's so fast and cheap.
I'm like, there's a lot of fast and cheap.
Like, understand what it is
you're saying and why you're saying it.
Okay, they have a culture
that flips more.
That means you're going to have,
if you have, for example,
a more centralized IE,
a lot of holders
or a few holders
with a lot of the NFTs,
maybe if you go to a new chain
that'll encourage increased liquidity,
expand your community
and allow you to curate new users
into your collection
that actually fit with the types
of products and utilities
you're going to be offering.
Maybe when you launched on East,
the people that held then
are no longer the people that hold now
and they're not the audience you want.
Or maybe your product has advanced
with the ecosystem
and it just doesn't make sense, right?
In an ecosystem that moves weeks,
maybe months,
very few projects
are properly built for the future.
So it makes sense
to make these kinds of decisions
when they're thoughtful.
So looking forward to the space
and I appreciate the response.
I do have some more thoughts.
I'll go to Andrew before I do.
Yeah, I think you nailed it.
I think, again, like this
just goes back to marketing 101,
which is like, who's my target audience?
Why are they my target audience?
Where do these people live?
How do I target them?
What's the right messaging?
I mean, that's important.
The other thing that I think
is important to think about also
is narratives.
And what I mean by that is
I wouldn't build on a chain purely
because I think it's a narrative
or there's hype there.
But again, you do want to take
that into consideration.
So like the two things I'll call out
is obviously there's a huge
modular narrative right now
looking at Celestia
and I think Dimensions
also doing some modular stuff.
And then I do think we're going to
also see more of a parallel
EVM narrative start to surface more.
So that's the other thing is
do you want to align with a proven chain
with a large community
that kind of aligns
or do you also want to position
your brand as innovative
and forward thinking
and kind of ahead of the curve
and maybe both, right?
I think at the end of the day,
the future's multi-chain.
Most things will become an omnichain.
But these are just things
you definitely want to think about
in advance.
Yeah, I love seeing
like period projects that are like
we're going to build a game.
And so the simple question is,
okay, what's your transaction
layer going to be?
Yeah, not on Ethereum.
Not on Ethereum.
Like when I see people
on the game on Ethereum,
I'm like, NGMI.
And those are the little things
that you can look at to go,
okay, it's not that hard.
Okay, they're doing 10,000 units.
It's $100 each.
That's a million dollars.
They're built on Ethereum
and they're promising that I bind this
because they're going to build a game
and that's going to be the value.
Well, a million dollars
isn't enough money to build a game
and no game is going to function
on Ethereum.
Well, why don't you choose Polygon?
Keep your mind shut.
It's like, do you want to spend
$500 a month on in-game transactions?
Like probably not.
It's just not going to survive, right?
So like, no one's going to play it.
Except no, nobody.
Then the question becomes,
which cheaper L2
or alternative chain are you using, right?
Like, okay, you launched an Ordinal.
Explain how...
Yes, Meta, this is to you.
Explain how this is going to work
in the ecosystem.
Yeah, exactly.
And I think the other thing
just leaning into gaming for a second
is like, I don't think the winner
of gaming has been crowned yet.
I think certain chains obviously
are the home of DeFi
and training and things like that.
So I think the other thing
these are GameFi enthusiasts.
They're treasure down members, right?
Whereas gamers on Avalanche
may be more interested
in traditional gaming
looking at the launch of shrapnel
and things like that.
So it's really important
to understand kind of,
I think, who your target customer is
so that you can really pick
the right customer base to start.
And I got to say,
I want to go to Meta about it
because so, Andrew,
have you met Panda before?
Yeah, we did a call together.
Oh, yes, we did.
Fuck you.
But I'd love to hear
why you choose Bitcoin
and how do you intend to navigate.
I wanted to throw in before
then two things real quick.
Luckily, you were talking about
gambling and how you accepted it.
I think the closest analogy
that just makes sense is
when you go to a casino,
I don't know about you,
but I think most sane people
don't get upset
when they lose their money, right?
Because you've accepted
that the massive upside wins
is what you're paying
the high likelihood of loss
on a regular basis.
But you're getting the casino,
you're getting the drinks,
you're getting the massage
and NFTs, right?
And shit corns,
you're getting the community,
you're getting the dopamine,
you're getting the excitement,
the interest to do stuff during time.
And so you don't hear like,
I heard a conversation
about Solana shit corns
and they were like,
we expect to get rung.
It's just if you can catch it
before the run,
like that was really the conversation.
So again,
it comes down to like
consumer expectations
and then back to what I said
a moment ago is
once we have kind of enough adoption
where there's enough eyeballs
in each chain,
I look forward to the day
where people are choosing chains
yes, because of the community,
but mostly because of the functionality.
So and then Jay,
you've been awfully fucking quiet.
You too, Motivelli.
No, I mean, I was just gonna say,
I really liked what you guys
were talking about earlier
when I was listening
about like finding your niche
and just like finding
what works for you
when you're trading
because like all you really got to do
is find the basics with like
moving averages
and learn how to read some charts
and just literally chart
some like fibs and things like that.
If you had fibs in your charts
and looked at the daily chart
on Bitcoin,
you literally would have seen the top
of that like last run right now,
like perfectly.
It literally topped out perfectly.
I had somebody the other day
and this is like a,
I'm not gonna say who he is.
He's a very famous person,
very wealthy and we were on the phone
and he's like a fidget.
How did you guess?
How did you know Bitcoin
is gonna be 45k?
I stopped and I didn't want to say it
but in my head I went
because it's fucking obvious.
Like I'm not gonna sit here
and call shit coins
but like the macro markets,
not that hard to call.
Sorry, Jay.
Go ahead.
I'm not a genius.
You're good.
So the other thing
I was gonna say is like,
don't follow like a billion tickers.
You don't have to watch everything.
Watch like five things max 10
that you can know the movement of.
You can tell how those move
and according to ETH and Bitcoin
and some of these other like assets in general
and once you see how those move
relative to the market
and you bring some of those other things
like moving averages
and Fibonacci's
and you know what I mean?
RSI, just some of the basics even.
It's like you can navigate through so much easier
and just make your life a thousand times
like more profitable
and with less risk as well.
And I'll add to that.
This is financial advice.
If your friend just told you
how much money he made off of a shit coin,
you are literally his exit liquidity
if you put any money into that token.
Like this shit doesn't start here.
It doesn't start with your friend, right?
Unless he's the dev.
If he's the dev, you can listen to him.
But other than that,
like just understand
where your information is coming from.
Before I go to Motivelli and Andrew,
I did want to go to Panda
and get your thoughts
as to why you chose Bitcoin
and how you see that
being a functional platform
for the gaming and assets ecosystem
that you're launching.
And this is not a shell.
I love Panda
and I just don't know any of the projects
doing this on Bitcoin.
No, I definitely appreciate it.
So for me, you know,
I started on Bitcoin, right?
Like, you know, when you consider
where NFTs first originated on Bitcoin,
but then they were popularized
on Ethereum, you know,
the earliest on-chain degeneracy
and gambling like with Satoshi dice
again comes back to Bitcoin.
So like when we think about
how you're going to bring in
more people and new demographics
when you say crypto,
the first thing they think is Bitcoin.
You know, the easiest thing for them
to understand is Bitcoin.
But now we're in this renaissance period
where everything that existed
or exists on Ethereum
is now being speed run on Bitcoin.
So like, I think it's first
being able to have that addressable market.
And then in terms of like layer twos
and drive chains,
I think that's where stuff gets interesting
where you can take people
where you have your assets on L1
on the base layer
and then for specific integrations,
gaming, et cetera, you know,
that can live on an L2 and L3 drive chain.
You know, I think it's just as simple
as that and then eventually
become omni chain, right?
Where like it doesn't make sense
to alienate, you know,
everyone else in crypto
because you're like a maxi to one chain.
It's just you have to pick
the ecosystem you start in,
which I think the best one
is obviously Bitcoin.
Just having the opportunity
to build on Bitcoin
in this period is like
incredibly humbling, you know,
to say the least.
I think that's the big leagues
and then, you know,
eventually you can spill over
and things become more cross-chain
obviously like layers of yours
killing it.
But yeah, I mean,
just like to speak
on like the meme coin side,
I think, you know,
I think meme coins are incredible,
you know, for a lot of ways,
like just being able to study,
you know, people psychology,
seeing how they operate,
you know, getting to know
like the players in that space,
you know, because it is
an attention economy, right?
It's all driven by memetics
and, you know, there'll be
a narrative that comes out.
And the same,
the same thing applies to memes
is like, let's say a popular meme
template starts to propagate,
then people now create the antithesis
to that meme template, right?
And now, like the same thing
is with crypto, right?
It started where there was doge
and all these dog coins,
and then now we're going to see
like the emergence of cat coins,
right, in this next cycle.
And, you know, that's just obvious.
But I think everyone should
dip their toes into meme coins
because they are transparent, right?
Like all these other protocols
and, you know, governance tokens
and points that people are doing,
it's all garbage.
It's all, you know, hot potato
for the most part.
But like meme coins
are like just true culture, right?
They're not trying to sell you
anything.
They're being completely transparent
in a lot of ways.
So, you know, I'm not saying
you should fry your neurons
trading meme coins,
but I think just, you know,
delving into it a little,
you can understand
the market participants much better
and like that will allow you
to navigate in a way where it's
like if you just buy the majors
and listen to what other people
tell you, then you're really
not going to have that edge.
Like and also like Jay mentioned,
you know, checking charts.
I mean, me personally,
I'll check a chart quickly.
I'll look, you know,
for like specific patterns,
but I more so look for like
fundamental analysis.
If it's being showed on Twitter,
you know, I'll go into
the telegram groups that I'm in.
I'll see if, you know,
I'll do like a macro search.
I'll see if anyone's showing it.
I'll like even save telegram
usernames of like known scammers.
They're all people
I trust or don't trust.
And I'll see that person
in this group yet, so like there's
a lot of ways to be able
to take the temperature
of a specific coin and, you know,
don't just rely on like charts alone,
especially with meme coins.
Like then, you know, it's like
that's the meme is like if you're
charting a meme coin, right?
With like not enough historical data,
like then you're going to get wrecked.
It's really just gut instinct
and being able to like
navigate that in real time
and getting attention
and you have to be able to like
fundamentally analyze like that token.
You know, obviously some have like legs
to go much further.
And I think if you can master meme coins,
like I mean, you'll do well,
but you know, definitely don't allocate
like a large percentage of your portfolio.
Don't use unit bias where you're like,
oh, this goes to a dollar.
It's not realistic for the most part,
unless you know the guy
deploying it.
Yeah, just like be careful.
Use a fraction of your portfolio
for that, like a fraction.
That's a very good point, right?
Like don't just look at a coin
that's at .00008 and go,
oh my God, if this got to a dollar
or even a cent, I would have made mom.
I would have made 20 million.
Like that's not how it works.
Like so if and this is a problem
I see a lot where you can see
like 10,000X, if you get an early,
like early, early to a CA,
to a contract address,
you can see a million X, right?
So a lot of times I see people
who put in a buck, five bucks,
10 bucks, 100 bucks,
and then a thousand X's
and they're like, holy shit,
I am a meme coin, shit coin, genius.
I'm gonna take all my profits
and I'm gonna hit it over and over.
That's how you get wrecked.
So even if I agree completely
with what Panda is saying,
like you can see for lessons
and experiments,
you can put a couple bucks
into a bunch of different shit coins
or five bucks, 20 bucks,
whatever your appetite is.
Just don't take the time
that you hit it as an example
of you being a master trader.
That's how you will get wrecked.
So thank you, Panda.
Motvelli and then Andrew.
Hey, what's up, Fidgetl?
Actee now.
Good to be here, thanks.
Yeah, I'm staying away
from the shit coins.
I was chasing them.
I had no idea why I was chasing them.
I was just following the hype, admittedly.
And then I stopped completely.
So I'm actually not interested
in the trading or the coin part of it.
But I am very interested
in the utility of the real world assets.
And I've been trying to figure out
what that even means,
what real good, daily, easy utility is.
And I've yet to really find it.
Because I started on Ethereum in 2018
based on the potential
of this world computer,
like the promise of dApps.
And then to me,
that really clicked
because I thought,
oh, well, if you have a dApp
and you have utility,
then you can use those assets
and that carries along
with all the dApps.
That would be the whole point.
We're in this crazy chain world
where you have to make these distinctions
about like you made the case before
about the gas fees on Ethereum,
for example, versus something like Poly.
And then how that would affect a game,
like a Web3 game, right?
And then someone mentioned,
or you made the joke
about being on a specific chain
because of the culture.
And I hit the laugh emoji on that too,
because I think of these things
as utilities, not utility
we think of in Web3,
but utility like the power company.
I wouldn't think like Con Edison
has great culture
and that's why I want to use them.
I'm like, no, no, no.
It's just to get that thing done
that I need to get done.
And we're asking so much of users
to have to dive through all this
and understand all these mechanics.
And I just think it's so unrealistic.
And the last thing I want to add,
because I'm really enjoying the convo
and I want to listen on this one a lot.
And I was trying to figure out
where to jump in was everyone keeps saying
we're early, we're early, we're early.
And like, man, I thought
we were saying that in 2018,
like how long does it take?
This is the internet.
This is supposed to be like,
until Bitcoin is a stable coin.
Until Bitcoin is a stable coin,
we're always early.
Yeah, I know.
But I think early is like a way
that we just forgive ourselves
for shit not happening, right?
There's actually meaning
to what I was saying.
The idea behind the potential
of a fair launch,
meaning that there could be
one token for one person, right?
And I laughed about Bitcoin being a stable coin.
But I think the answer is
until the distribution models
are getting closer to fair
in terms of token distributions globally.
And I mean that Bitcoin
just as an example of several main chains,
we're always going to have new areas
that people want to gamble in.
And even when there's full distribution
for whatever that means,
I think we're a long ways
from the technology
being anywhere near done.
And in that vein,
we have a lot of liquidity to unlock.
And while there's liquidity to unlock,
there's going to be people pretending
that they unlock liquidity for you.
That's fair.
Thanks for the clarification.
I guess like when you put blinders
onto the gambling aspects of the coin
for a second, right?
Do you think that this one's
for you, Fidgetil.
I'm curious.
Do you think that Bitcoin
is going to be used
for goods and services?
The question you're asking me is
do I think it's going to be directly
used for goods and services?
It's the biggest issue.
It doesn't have to be directly
because we already know
like a lot of it's about the gambling, right?
It's a lot of it's about
the meme coin right now.
But I think isn't the dream
for crypto in general?
Is digital currency
for goods and services
as one core component,
one driving component?
Yeah, but Bitcoin and I'd love
to hear Andrew's thoughts
and Noah's thoughts.
For me, my understanding is Bitcoin
is not meant to be
it's a store of value, right?
It's arguably the best store of value,
but it's not meant to be done for
it's meant for peer to peer cash,
quote unquote cash transactions.
But it's not necessarily meant for
the speed and quantity
and size of day to day
what we would call point of sale transactions.
That's why you have stable coins.
That's why you have things
like Ripple that are trying to.
So do I believe that Bitcoin
will then be converted?
The biggest issue has
always been the third party
who absorbs.
It's never going to be
or not for a while
is going to be point of sales
or brick and mortars
that are accepting
the arbitrage volatility
of accepting a crypto
and then it's settling
on their on their dime, right?
It's always been a third party,
whether it be Moonpay
or other liquidity providers
that absorb that.
But when you understand that,
then it's not will Bitcoin ever
it'll be any asset
that you want to use
the question that becomes
do I want to use Bitcoin
as the asset that I'm
transacting in on a daily basis
when I think the upside
and value of holding it
is more than using it.
So I prefer to use a stable coin
and then the question becomes
do I want to keep my money
in stable coins
that I'll be using
or do I want to convert
that into Bitcoin
or another asset
that I see a better upside for.
So I don't think
it's as simple as that,
but the use of crypto
at point of sale
with zero friction.
Yes, that's one of the many dreams
that leads to
it's one of the necessary steps
in the dream towards sovereignty
and self sovereignty
and self governance.
That's fair.
Yeah, no, I do appreciate that.
I think that's fair,
but I think that also
to go back to the topic
of the name of the room,
I think that's why
the marketing concepts of Web3
they're not tracking for people
like people don't understand
what you just said,
like I get it
and I think most people
in the room get that.
I don't think most people get that
and then they're left with the shit coin.
They're left with the rug.
They're left with all that stuff
and they don't see the big picture
the big potential of that stuff
and that's going to be a problem
for marketing whatever
because marketing is traditionally marketing
is about a product
and a service
and an offering
that you think people need
and then you can target them
and then you can communicate to them
so that they can get that thing
that you're talking about
and it completely breaks down
in crypto for me.
Yes, communication, i.e. education
is and has always been
our biggest issue
but it's also often been
kind of like that.
This is especially
like Bitcoin max and stuff.
This is ours, not yours.
So they haven't been super inclined
to educate necessarily.
Thank you, Modavelli.
Andrew, thoughts?
Yeah, I actually wanted to go back
to kind of the J convo
but I'll hit a couple of these things quickly.
So I think from a marketing perspective
and I think I talked about this before
like you have to look at it
as two different audiences.
You have your crypto natives
and then you have your normies
and there's different channels
for different audiences
and I would argue
there are still a number
of traditional web two marketing tactics
that are applicable.
They're just not applicable
my native customers.
I may be leveraging different strategies
and different types of targeting
using blockchain data
but then for web two folks,
I may be leveraging
traditional web two data sets.
I may be doing more
kind of traditional marketing activities
because again,
that's a very different user base
with a very different kind of onboarding.
Let's call it skill set, right?
So that's that one.
In terms of the early conversation,
I don't think it's BS
and I'll give you the example.
So like my I've been a marketer
for like 20 years,
various industries
and I think like
when folks think of me as a CMO,
they think of me
as like the kind of person
that's typically experimenting
with new technology
and new platforms
and that's kind of it.
So like I was early in digital,
social, VR, AI, podcast,
machine learning,
like all these things
and what I saw over the years
it was about 10 years,
some took 15,
some are still not there.
There are some that can crush
in five to eight
but I do think like 10 to 15
tends to be that timeline,
So I do think we're still early
and I do think again
when we start to see more
of the bridge
between like web two
and web three companies and technologies,
like that's when we'll start
to get through
maybe the peak of that bell curve.
In terms of like picking chain
based on community,
I look at it a little differently.
I look at it as
I'm launching a new project,
I need to acquire users
like any web two company,
where is the best place
to acquire those folks, right?
So for example,
if I'm launching a DeFi project,
I'm probably gonna launch it
on Arbitrum
because there's a very large
DeFi user base there, right?
So again,
I think it's less about,
you know,
I like the culture,
I like the vibes
and more about,
you know,
where is there an active user base
that I can potentially acquire
for my product, right?
Same thing on Solana
when Aleko was speaking
and I think he hit the nail on the head.
Like I just look at that
as a very normie friendly chain.
I look at that as a chain
that is very easy
to onboard folks in.
So, you know,
more potential for mass adoption.
I also look at
founder backgrounds from Qualcomm
potential to work
with web two businesses.
So to me,
it makes total sense
that he would go there
because again,
it's an audience acquisition
play for him.
That's the place where he
either believes
that audience is going to live
or where he believes
that audience is going to build
and then be able to convert
into actual,
you know,
users in his projects.
And then,
you know,
it's fish where the fish are
is basically the best way to put it.
And then the last thing is
I want to go back
to kind of what Jay
was talking about,
and I'll walk folks through
kind of how I approach
treating view,
but but 100%
like the chart patterns are,
you know,
something that obviously
takes time to learn.
But at the end of the day,
you do see a lot
of history repeating itself.
So I track about
maybe 30 tokens.
But one of the observations
that I've had over time
because I'm looking at these charts,
you know,
a couple times a day
is when there are significant
bearish events in the market,
I have certain tokens
that always pump, right?
So I know that
these are kind of outliers.
And so sometimes now
when I see,
you know,
a big BTC dip coming,
knowing it's going to impact
knowing it's going to impact alts,
I might literally swap
into those tokens
knowing that as market goes down,
those tokens go up.
And then once those tokens peak,
I might swap back
into the things that I'm more
kind of long term bullish on,
you know,
knowing that what goes down
must come up.
So I think that's a good call out.
And the way I approach
trading view is
I tend to break it down
by ecosystem, right?
So I have like a folder for,
you know,
Arbitrum,
a folder for Ethereum,
for Solana,
those are pretty much
the places I trade.
And then I've got,
you know,
different tokens
at different market caps
tied to different verticals in there.
And so it's also interesting
because I can see,
you know,
I've seen patterns
where, you know,
general market goes down,
Solana ecosystem goes up.
I've also seen patterns
where, you know,
all gaming tokens go up.
But I think again,
like trading view
can be a valuable tool
just to gain insights
in terms of how the market moves
and how market movements impact,
you know,
everything from sectors to chains.
So I just kind of call that out.
And then the other thing
I do on trading view,
which I think I did like a tutorial
on this at one point
is I'm a big fan of the lines.
So I'll create lines for tops.
I'll create lines for bottoms.
I'll create lines for,
you know,
tops and bottoms
within a certain duration.
And then I'm always looking
at kind of where
that movement happens.
And I have a blue line
that says to me,
there's bullish sentiment there.
There's folks buying that dip.
When I see a minimal pullback,
that to me says
there's just not as much demand there, right?
So sometimes I might also
look at those tokens and say,
oh, maybe this is a long term play
because again,
if you're seeing so much dip buying here
that's driving that bottom price up,
like there's clearly a bullish sentiment here.
There's clearly a buying audience here,
you know?
So before I go to Borden,
just last question,
Jay, you and Mike,
I'd love to hear your,
and then Jay,
you and Mike as well.
What's your distribution?
You don't have to say crypto
versus non crypto assets,
but in terms of your portfolio,
how are you distributing?
Just my crypto portfolio.
Yes, I've talked to those before.
I mean, I tend to have two big bags.
I have one on Arbitrum and one on Solana.
And then I'm usually like,
I'll cross chain now with Hasflow between those.
And then typically what I have is,
I've created for myself
more of like this mutual fund model.
I know a lot of folks
prefer to trade a lesser amount of tokens,
but what I found is just by that diversification,
I tend to be significantly up, right?
Like when market dips on one side,
something else goes up.
So yes, I'm not getting maybe those 100X gains,
but I'm consistently going up
and I'm consistently outperforming
the tradify market, right?
And that's really for me, my goal.
Like I don't want super volatility.
And then typically what I do is,
I do like, quote unquote, the small caps.
So anything kind of under 50 million,
I may put like 1000 USDC against that token.
If I'm looking at a large cap,
even though there could be upside potential,
there's less obviously than a small cap.
So I might put 500 into those.
So really at the end of the day,
I've got different amounts based on market cap
and then that's diversified across everything
from AI to gaming to infra to DeFi.
So in a sense, what I have is my own
crypto mutual fund, you know?
And so before Jay, you un-miked and I'll go
and then we'll go to board.
How often?
I cut my two cents back and sorry, cut you off.
Go ahead, go ahead.
I was going to say that's why I like the horizontal
and just the lines in general,
like you were just saying,
because they can really help you map out
some like lines of significance
and especially on the daily and weekly charts.
Like if you put some horizontal lines
on the candle closes,
you'd be surprised how many times
those would end up being like a heavy support resistance
that like I said,
just helps you make your life a little easier.
Yeah, 100%.
The other thing I do too is there's a website.
It's it's coingolive.com slash en slash coin
slash adh dash price.
And then what I also do is,
even if I'm bullish on something like Injective,
for example,
has performed really well for me,
all sorts of tokens in there to see
how far away it is from kind of all time high, right?
So again, if something's 80% of all time high,
I may not put a big bag in there
knowing that there's more downside potential.
But then if there's a token that I discover
that's at one or 10% of all time high,
but again, I'm bullish on it.
I just look at that as like,
regardless of macro market movement,
there's just a lot of upside potential there
as long as the token didn't peak
in like the last cycle.
And since you had your hand up,
I mean, this is interesting.
I do want to ask you,
Andrew, but I'll go afterwards after board.
I'm interested in when you do see something
that hits those conviction,
like plays out of the park,
how much you allocate,
but we go to since first board,
what's up to?
So I've like some some hot takes
and regards to what we just talked about
and primarily kind of goes around
and primarily kind of goes around
the problem of marketing in this space
is we have a lot of undefined regulation, right?
Like for the most part,
most people are here.
And in my head,
I don't really care
what anybody says outside of this.
Most people are here
for a financial benefiting gain.
I think that's kind of like
a really false narrative
that has been instilled in this industry
is the whole generational wealth thing.
That's extremely problematic in my head.
And when you're marketing to things
like to people that are looking
for financial gain,
it's obviously a completely different rule,
completely different game
with a different rule set, right?
Like that's why you see
the SEC getting involved
and you see influencers
not having to put hashtag
adder and disclosing their promotions
or else they get into a lot of trouble.
But on the other half of that,
and this is where my butt
has with a lot of people in here,
we're marketing financial assets
essentially, right,
to people that for the most part,
I don't believe
are financially literate.
A lot of people don't have
those basic financial literacy skill sets
in their life.
Like a lot of people don't have that.
And I've seen this being
a reoccurring problem,
especially like coming from marketing
with a lot of influencers
and some companies
within the crypto ecosystem,
where it's like,
a lot of people
don't know how to write a check.
And that's not even just like
throwing it out there as an example.
It's true.
Like a lot of people don't
have a budget set for themselves,
but they come to crypto
to expect to make a lot of money
because they see somebody else doing it.
But the one out of the 100 people
making money, there's 99 losing.
So I think it definitely creates
a really big rift
in marketing in general.
But I do think a lot of it stems
from the lack of definition
for how we can actually market 100% legally.
And I think there's going to be
some severe changes
in the next five to 10 years
for how to go about doing that,
especially like we talked about
earlier securities
and figuring out what that looks like
once more defined
with more cases and whatnot.
But I do believe a really big issue
with marketing in here
is marketing people
that are financially literate
and not financially literate.
That's the core point, right?
Is in terms of protections is
and that's kind of similar
to the core thesis
in what we're talking about here is
a lot of these laws were written
before we had the internet, right?
And largely risk is allocated
to information
and the access to information.
Just because something's
registered with the SEC
doesn't mean that it's not a fraud.
It just means that if it is a fraud,
they can get in massive trouble.
So that deterrent likely makes it
plus the information that's filed
more likely that you have
more information
make your decisions.
In crypto Twitter,
in web three, let's say,
or in gambling in general,
we're sitting there saying,
let us do what we want
with our money.
And under the circumstances,
we have access to more information
and those laws are antiquated.
But yes, cycle and cycle again,
retail gets wrecked.
So how do we balance the two?
I'd love to hear from Doc
only because you're new to the space.
What has been your exposure
to crypto and kind of
especially because you're an attorney,
you play around in the politics space.
What has been your taste
in your mouth of crypto
that you've heard from people
and wherever you heard that from?
Doc, are you there
or are you just engaging with Army?
You're literally in my house,
you piece of shit.
You're playing with my dog.
How can you not be answering?
Okay, sorry, guys.
Kabir, I've seen you up on the stage.
You haven't spoken thoughts
on meme coins.
I'm not sure we've interacted before.
If we have,
then it's my second fuck up today.
How are you?
Good evening, guys.
How are you doing?
I'm good.
Of you two, I'm good, too.
Do you have thoughts on the topic
or are you just engaged before me?
Actually, I have got to ask.
But the reason that I kept quiet,
I thought the space is about NFT
then I heard you all talking
about cheap coins.
So that is NFTs are shit coins
for the most part.
Yeah, I do.
So it's okay.
Go ahead.
I wanted to talk about
how people are marketing
the NFTs now.
In 2022, I was in NFT space too.
But due to a lot of breaks
and it comes those days.
So I just pulled back
to be trading normal project.
So like what I'm asking,
what did you think is the solution
of all these people
just promoting the most annoying part
is the people that you think you trust
that people are in the game
for a long time.
But at the end of,
they will show you a kind of NFT
when you enter.
It's like the market is waiting
for you to enter.
As you enter, then everything starts to crash.
So that is the question
that I wanted to ask.
Like how can someone
differentiate between a good market
and marketing something
that he knows about it?
Most of these influencers
most, I don't say all,
most they don't even trade.
They are just there for people
to ask them to shield their project
and shield it
and they feed them that is all.
Well, anybody influencer
that is promoting a shit coin
that isn't also holding allocation
is not likely.
So there's more under the cover
than simply showing it, right?
There's like a triple
or quadruple vector approach
that's occurring.
And what's really interesting,
I'll tell you this much.
Whether we like it or not,
the longer you've been in this space,
the more relationships you have
and the more cachet you have
on a simple metric
that would be followers,
the entire industry changes.
We probably shouldn't be
talking about this out loud,
but every phase of your integration
as you get deeper and deeper
into how the system works
is mind-blowing,
at least in my opinion,
about how the flow
of how these things exist,
what goes on behind the scenes
in NFT projects,
mind-blowing sometimes
with token projects.
And we've come a long way
and a lot of it has been,
the fact that it was normal
to allow companies to come in
and get 20%
of a fucking token allocation of VC
and then someone not understand
that they would be manipulating
that token from start to finish,
like just common sense,
but it wasn't common sense.
So there's definitely levels
to this shit.
I'm not going to get
into cabal stuff,
but it's interesting
because it gets presented
as opportunities.
And so there are necessities
in the industry
that simply are what works, right?
I was in a space yesterday
and I go to Andrew
and they were talking about hype
versus fake hype
and using influencers
and they're specifically talking
about grateful and dead
and grateful and dead sold out.
So it worked,
but that leads to rugs.
But I couldn't hear what last
he got, I'll say it.
Oh, I can't repeat
the whole thing.
I'm going to go to Andrew
and then we'll come back to you.
Andrew, what's up?
Hey, what's up?
Yeah, I'll just talk influencers
for a second.
So I think the key thing is
you have to go deeper.
You have to dive deeper.
And what I mean by that
is there are different influencers
at different levels of influence.
And then there's also different influencers
influencing different verticals
and sectors.
And what this has to do
with is the audience, right?
So what usually happens is,
let's say someone's launching
a meme token.
There are certain influencers
where their audience
is shit coin lovers, right?
So that is the perfect person
to shill this.
But you then have to be careful
because if you know
that that's the vertical,
you've got to get out
before the top gets hit
and you potentially get rubbed.
There's other influencers
and I'll give you a couple to follow
who tend to be more focused
on things like infrastructure,
real builders, real teams.
And again, they're looking at it differently
and they have audiences again
that are maybe here
with stronger convictions
or different kind of mindsets.
So like a couple I can throw out
like Stacy Murr, MURR,
she's a great threader.
Zero X finish, he's a great threader.
Dynamo Patrick, he's great
for like general crypto education, right?
And then when you look at kind of traders,
I would say like Kaduna.
Crypto Kaduna is probably
one of the best traders that I know.
You know, a lot of these influencers
are only going to partner with projects
where they actually believe in the project
and they believe in the technology
because to the point,
you know, Fiji made,
they're sitting on a back, right?
And again, if you're a shit coin influencer,
you're sitting on your bag with intent to dump,
obviously on retail.
If you're in some of these more
kind of long-term infrastructure,
you know, type projects,
you know, yes, they're sitting on a bag.
Yes, they want to pump that bag,
but they're also quote unquote
longer term believers
that have done their research
and are bullish for the right reasons.
That's a really good point.
Go to Rome in a second.
But, like, DYOR used to be a joke.
And I guess could be what I didn't fully understand
is actually you can do your own research, right?
Look at an influencer.
Look at their page.
Do they just randomly post for anything?
Then they're probably not going to be
an actual advocate
and they're just getting their paycheck.
Is it a meme coin person
who tends to also hold the token?
Well, then you know at least
that you're tied to a degree.
What Andrew was saying earlier,
researching the founders,
going to LinkedIn,
seeing if they're doxed,
seeing their track record,
seeing if that makes sense.
Does the amount being raised
make sense for the things they're promising?
So there are ways to do analysis
that it's not going to tell you everything, right?
The fact is money makes people
do funny things sometimes,
but at least is better than
what it was before
or just spitballing into,
although shit,
you can spitball into funny tickers
for meme coins and probably make a bag.
But Rome, what's going on there?
Yeah, yo, yo, what's up?
Good morning.
Good morning.
Yeah, man, influencers.
Yo, shout out to my friends
up on stage as well.
Everybody in the crowd.
Yo, it's crazy, man,
because I've done a lot.
I've been in the space
for like two and a half years.
I love space hosting.
I love supporting projects.
And I've been asked to do
a lot of representation or marketing
for certain projects
or tokens of that nature,
just because my enthusiasm
for the space and things of that nature.
The more I looked into
some of these influencers
that reached out to me
or wanted to work with me,
I started to figure out, man,
once I dive deeper,
that some of these influencers
act like they have a team
that is working with them
and they all need to get paid.
But it's really just
the same guy running for accounts.
So like the DYOR, man,
two years ago in February,
the bull was crazy, right?
Projects were minting out at point two.
It was just the hype was crazy.
Then we hit the bear.
And that's where
we started recognizing people,
the actual builders,
not hype projects.
Then you started seeing
who's delivering.
And so that DYOR, man,
I can't stress it enough.
I'm a big futter.
I like my community.
I love my friends
to challenge me and FUD me
because I need to be
the best version of myself.
And I'm definitely not
the smartest person in the room.
And I love that
because I want to vibe off
all of you.
But DYOR, man,
just to get back on topic
and I'll land this plane,
you really got to invest in people
and not hype.
You got to invest in conviction,
not FOMO, right?
So those are the things
that I had to learn the hard way.
Getting rugged,
getting, you know,
the meme coin season
was like eight months ago,
six months.
That was so crazy.
So you start to see people
like just turn on each other
and become vultures as well.
So that's why for me,
my best advice is find an ecosystem
of individuals
that are real people,
men and women
that are here building
for the right reasons
and invest in conviction, right?
It's fun.
Don't get me wrong.
I meme coin, man.
I throw up 50 bucks,
a hundred bucks things
at meme coins
and see if I can make
a little bag here and there.
But, you know,
if you're going to have
some conviction plays,
stick with the winners
because you're eventually
going to become a winner.
Vigil, I appreciate you
holding this space, brother.
Always good content with you, man.
Appreciate the room.
Everybody stack your bags,
diversify and make sure
that you're ready for the bull, baby,
because you don't want to start
having to get that FOMO
and buy on green candles.
So do what you got to do right now,
but definitely, you know,
invest in the people,
invest in the builders,
developers, the creators.
That's who you want to stick with, man.
And, you know, the floor prices
at some of these projects right now
or even some of these utility tokens.
It's a bargain.
It is a bargain.
BTC went down a little bit.
It shook the tree.
The dead leaves are falling.
Once again, the people
that don't have the conviction
are cheating themselves
into the right projects
with the right people.
Let's go.
So thank you, by the way.
And this is not financial advice
by anybody, certainly not for me,
but like certain things
aren't hard plays, right?
And it's funny.
I think I might have been
Docker speaking to somebody.
They're like, Bitcoin's dumping us.
Like I told you
it would go down to 37 or 33.
Unless crypto and Bitcoin
go like disappears,
Bitcoin going back up like.
So am I going to tell you
that it's not going to go lower?
But do I have conviction
that it's going to go up?
Not a hard play, right?
So that's what I would advise
like my girlfriend or my family.
With shit coins,
I agree with Rome in the sense
that this is also an opportunity to
I was speaking to somebody yesterday
who's been around as long
as I have in the space
while the public facing space
two years in crypto Twitter.
And he's like, I think I'm done
with this space, dude.
And I went nothing personal,
but you've gotten beat up
and bruised through the bear.
All of that.
You've been in spaces.
You've been active
and you're leaving now.
Like you've learned your lessons.
And so what I would say
to people is it's not financial advice,
but if you intend
to do anything more in this space,
this is a good time to learn.
The fact is we consider
we consider getting rugged
a sign of respect almost.
It's like it's it's your
it's your resume in this space.
If you haven't gotten rugged,
you're going to get rugged.
Don't down the valley.
It's not a good thing.
It's just if you haven't gotten
rugged, guess what?
It's coming.
And as the bull gets bigger
and you get more cocky,
it's going to be worse.
You're going to get wrecked.
It happens to almost everybody in space.
So I would take this.
Go ahead.
No, I was going to say
that right there is why
we don't have mass adoption.
It's just a fact, dude.
So do you want me to talk in?
You want me talking
Skittles, rainbows and not at all.
Not at all.
I have 600 people here.
Being here is doing research.
Well, putting five bucks
into a shit coin is doing research.
Watch it turn into nothing in five seconds.
Watch it go to five million dollars
and then to ten dollars.
That's a lesson.
Go ahead, Doc.
OK, so I was quiet when you said
that it's it's not a rug pull
or it's not what was the word
that you use for your punsy.
It's not a punsy.
If you know it's a punsy.
Yes, that's right.
For your ex-legal clients
who were screwed over by
by these banks and subprime loans.
That was their fault
that they didn't understand
that they were being rugged
before they were rugged.
And I say quiet about that.
You can't really have a waiver
to fraud, but OK.
Yeah, I guess you could try.
But in terms of what?
Montavi, Montavi.
I'm sorry, Doc.
You can't you can't sue.
You can't sue a knife manufacturer
if you grab the blade
and cut your hand on a knife.
Like that knife is sharp.
But that's not analogous
to someone's finding
it's not analogous.
That's confusing to them.
So I mean, you can make that argument
and the insurance
in the mortgage company certainly did.
But I don't think
it's a compelling argument.
And I would agree
with the previous speaker
that it really inhibits mass adoption
when you're telling people
that being part and parcel
of the space,
whether it's as a developer
or an investor,
that you have to expect
to be screwed over.
And so I do think
that mass adoption is something
that's going to be predicated
on the community dealing with
the rug pools and the degens
and the cut and paste
sort of projects that we see
that have much more likely end results
of screwing over a majority of people.
Yes, it's a learning experience,
but some people will do
as your friend indicated,
which was look,
I'm going to pull out of this
because there's other ways
that I can monetize my time
and invest my money.
So this is why I'm in these spaces
and it's to sort of like
temper the tone
of the degen crowd
in the midst of the first real
major onboarding
for the crypto world with the ETF.
And I'd certainly like to see
the ETH ETF go through as well.
And I think the success of that
and the push behind it
is going to be either supported
or damaged by how the market
receives the ETF here with Bitcoin.
I am one of the ones
who said it was going to dip
on the news.
I was right.
It didn't hit 40 in November.
I was right.
You hold me $10,000.
But beyond all that,
I've learned a lot here.
There's a lot to be learned.
I do think this is the future,
but we have to get rid of this
both the nomenclature,
the jargon and the acceptance
of the degen crowd
as they look at just 10X
and then walk away.
We did that stuff back in the 80s
well, long before that
in the securities markets.
And that's why I stopped working
for Shearson Lehman
because I was tired of
Shearson pumping and dumping
using me and thousands
of other brokers
to support IPO projects
that they were invested in.
And as soon as the lockout period
expired, then they were gone
and there goes the market.
And a lot of times
if you were a smart investor,
you recovered because the product
itself was worthwhile.
But the financial support for it
gets pulled out.
And I see the same thing here,
my limited experience
with Web3 projects
where I first learned
not too long ago
that the developers
weren't being paid
and the way that they got paid
was that there was no lockout period.
And as soon as the candlesticks
blew up, then they were gone
and there goes the market support.
So I think these are
uncomfortable conversations
that we have to have,
particularly in a room
with 600 people.
And if this sort of advice
isn't valuable to people,
then really I shouldn't be here
because this is sort of
my tone on temperament.
I want everyone to run.
I want everyone that's in X
and not just the people
that are developers
or in the community,
but people that come in the community
because that's how
it's going to grow.
So what we're talking about
is the difference between
what we want and what reality is.
And the reality is that
one of the fundamental goals
of this space is mass adoption, right?
And so as we bring on new people,
inherently, they are less
educated in the space
so that what we can do the best
is create tools and ecosystems
and I'll do a show.
You know I'm launching a project
on a new L1 called Rails
and you see new L1s all the time
and we had a whole space on
do you need a new L1?
Do you need a new L2?
Why another token?
Is this just a cash grab?
What does your chain
actually do better than another chain?
And so like for example,
Rails requires anybody who builds
and deploys as well as node operators
to be KYC'd and AML'd.
Meaning if they rug,
you know who they are.
So that's I believe a way
to strengthen trust
and safety in the ecosystem.
Is it perfect?
People can still rug
and then much like
if you breach a contract
or right having laws against murder
doesn't stop people from murdering.
It punishes them if they do
and it disincentivizes them
on a regular basis
for fear of the punishment.
So things like the Rails network
and a lot of other,
as I mentioned earlier,
I'm focused on reputational layers.
So I think that's it.
I think all these things come together.
Enforcement, clarity, transparency,
regulation, reputation.
But again, education.
And that's what we're doing here, right?
We can only we can educate as much as we can.
And you know that I love you
and you know that I got your back.
But in terms of the narrative,
I felt like I needed to pull you back
there a little bit.
And the reality is you're absolutely correct.
But every emerging technology sector has, right?
Just like when they talk about Bitcoin
being used for illicit activities.
Dollars have been used
for illicit activities at mass scale
for time immemorial.
Just because this is harder
for you to track now,
but genuinely much easier
to track in the future.
Doesn't make it the bastion of evil.
So I want to go to Marco,
who's new.
Welcome to the stage, Marco.
And then we're going to Moto Valley.
How are you doing, Marco?
I'm good, Fidgetor.
Thank you very much.
Thanks for letting me up.
And hello, Actee,
my favorite wooden top
and everyone else.
I just wanted to chime in
on something that Doc said.
Maybe contentious,
but I argue that for me,
it's a wake up call.
Or maybe it's a rallying call.
If Web 3 thinks
is going to onboard the masses,
I'm sorry,
but in its current state,
you're very, very mistaken.
Web 2 will onboard the masses.
Now, it doesn't mean to say
it needs to stay that way.
But where we currently sitting,
where we're just using
typically Web 3 for trading,
crypto, NFTs,
that's not sustainable.
That's not a big enough
total addressable market.
Now, you said it in passing,
Fidgetor, and I stay quiet.
But I look at RWAs.
RWAs is a mechanism
for Web 3 to onboard masses.
Tradable real world assets,
that is trillions
and trillions of dollars.
Because at the moment,
we're just playing with,
and I'd say only with,
but a few billion.
Or, you know, a number of billions.
But that's...
And by the way, I agree.
RWAs are inherently
more efficient, right?
If there's locked liquidity,
what I was trying to get at,
and I'll let you continue, please,
is that I believe that RWAs,
because whenever there's
a new asset class
or sector in this space,
it's rife for fraud,
is what I'm saying.
And it's funny how
this almost goes full circle
to the orange trees
for the Howie test, right?
So, please continue.
Okay, I'll just finish with that.
Marco, if you get the exception.
No, I'm not going to say,
apart from the fact that...
Go ahead, Marco.
Three day transactions,
maybe tech them soft note.
That's an emerging technology
that looks quite good.
And on the real world assets,
look at Materium.
What do you mean by that?
They are two companies
that are moving the dial forward
with regards to potentially
mass onboarding people.
And any reason, Materium specifically?
Materium.
So, Materium have built a platform.
Ah, Materium.
Materium, Vinay Gupta.
So, if anyone knows you,
Vinay Gupta is.
He was one of the original people
at the Ethereum Foundation
back in the day.
And he's built a platform
which has done a lot
of the legal work
in many jurisdictions
that will allow tradable
real world assets.
So, I'm just highlighting them
as technologies moving forward.
And the other one I said,
going back to the Bitcoin
everyday transactions,
was tech them soft note.
That's worth having a little look at.
Oh, yeah.
Tech Tim is a partner of Moby Media.
I see them in the chats all the time.
I'll definitely look into that more.
And I'll check out the other one.
If you wouldn't mind messaging me
the other company,
I'd appreciate it
so I can do a deep dive.
I'm, obviously my name is Fidgetl.
So, before the term RWAs became popular,
there was confusion as to
what does Fidgetl mean?
What does RWA mean?
I see a beautiful separation
where RWAs unlocking liquidity
of physical assets.
And I see Fidgetl's as unlocking
the experiential potential via tokenomics
and the technology as its own
really cool value proposition.
So, time versus essentially
time versus instant liquidity.
But yeah, super interested in that stuff.
But I do think that,
much like the metaverse,
metaverse is a real thing, right?
Spending with credit cards
or crypto credit cards
is a real thing now.
Just over time,
before they became real things,
those catchphrases were where
it's like when influencers
find a new chain
and they find a whole new audience
and then they grift.
Sorry, I had a cough.
I was barking in my throat.
But I do think that the RWA thing term
might lead to a lot of fraud
for newbies as like the next sector of
exploitable catchphrases and stuff.
Motivelli, what's going on?
And then we will wrap this
in a couple of minutes.
If you have questions,
please raise your hand.
Otherwise, it's been another banger.
Doc, thanks for having my back, Fidgetl.
I do appreciate you.
And just to be clear,
I am an advocate for this.
I want this to all work out.
But my concern is that
if you remove the entire coin
and the gambling component with NFTs,
Web3 hasn't proven itself
to regular internet users.
And we're not early, right?
This doesn't mean these users
are less educated
or are not capable
of educating themselves.
But they've been taking advantage of it.
They got rugged in the past for somehow
or they just simply don't trust it, right?
So then you say,
okay, well, what's happening
in the world of mass adoption with NFTs?
Now, remove ourselves from X, right?
Because X is its own little echo chamber.
X removed the PFPs for the NFTs.
Instagram had a whole NFT integration.
They removed it.
All the creators that try to market NFTs
on YouTube and TikTok,
it's been difficult
because the comment section is just
creators getting called out
for everything that's happening in the space.
The cliche thing is that
Web3 is becoming a scam.
And that's the kind of thing
that we're trying to prevent,
you know, advocating for
through good marketing
and trustful products
or trustful experiences.
And that's not all rainbows.
That's reality.
So I just want to give you a heads up.
Like I wasn't trying to battle you.
I agree with you.
But I also think like X is its own little echo chamber
And it's not even Web3.
It's Web2.
And by the way,
don't worry, Modaveli.
I learned a long time ago that
I'm not sure if it was a chicken or the egg,
but being a lawyer
makes every conversation combative.
And my mother reminds me of that all the time.
So don't...
Shut up, Fidget.
Don't be quiet.
I feel that.
I'm a brook of the night,
so I'm ready to flip the birds and all that.
There you go.
I will say, first of all,
before I go to Rome,
Andrew put up a...
I put up a tweet from Andrew.
It's a poll.
It says, curious friends,
how are you liking this new points model narrative?
I clicked...
I like points.
They're innovative
just because I'm not sure
that's actually what I think.
But the first comment says,
I like Adam Lee says,
I like it if I retroactively get points
for every like I've clicked on this app.
So if the points have a value proposition
or are given gratuitously,
people like them,
which is kind of a theory
I was thinking about them.
And that's kind of,
I think, Andrew,
I think the answer comes,
how many points programs
have actually converted to value
Friend Tech hasn't yet.
I think it will come down
to how these points to token
to dollars in correlation
to the actions taken,
whether they were,
they were, you know,
posthumous, so gratuitous,
whether they were current
or future promise,
and how the pricing plays out
will be a huge impact
on kind of the perspective on points,
as it has been on tokens.
Rome, you have your hand up.
And then we will wrap this, guys.
Great space, man.
I appreciate the platform as always.
So my brother who was just speaking
beforehand, it is true, man.
You go in these comment sections,
they're vicious.
They are vicious, but
I don't mean to go conspiracy theory,
but, you know,
the feds do have a different sector
that they're literally just trolls
on the internet.
So don't let people
shake you out of your position.
They don't want this
because they can't control it.
They can't even wrap their head
around it just yet.
Neither can we.
So that's why we're pioneers.
My bad, I'm over here
carrying my daughter and shit.
We're pioneers in a new frontier,
So do your research,
have some fun.
Stick with the winners
and fucking have some fun, man.
That's what it's about,
this whole space.
Build, create, have fun.
Because if you're not having fun
in anything you do,
stop doing it immediately.
Stop doing it immediately
and find something
that's your calling,
something that's fruitful
for you and your family, physical.
I appreciate the platform.
Thank you for letting me
grab the mic, brother.
Have a beautiful day.
Shout out everybody
in the building.
God bless.
I appreciate your room.
It's funny.
And then we're going to
close out.
My girlfriend,
two analogies.
So I was speaking to somebody,
a couple of people
the last couple of days.
Those people have built
the following in crypto Twitter
made good money,
not like major money,
but good money in crypto.
And then my girl
who has the luxury
of doing a job
that is based on,
obviously skill sets learned,
but the core is that
she's very attractive.
I'm not trying to flex
and just be honest.
And then she got,
she got a regular job,
quote unquote, regular job.
That's a great regular job.
Like she works remote.
She liked her bosses
don't bother at all.
The money's good.
It's like in her wheel
out social media and stuff.
It's from a major
Fortune 100 company.
And she complains to me
all the time.
And I'm like, she's like,
I'm going to go look for a new job.
And I'm like, baby,
I need to explain this to you.
You like what you like modeling
because it's passion for you
and you found a combination
nexus of working
and doing something you love.
Very rare.
You're not going to find another job,
especially in corporate America.
That's going to be
any better than this.
You just don't like
work corporate America jobs.
Same thing with the crypto
people I was talking to.
I was like, he's like,
I'm going to go find another job.
And I went,
you understand that
what people in crypto Twitter
and this goes to your room
have a lot of them that are
even reasonably successful.
What they're realizing
is the future of work,
which is there's nothing better
than if your work
is something you love.
And then it's not work, right?
It follows you everywhere
and it ejects yourself
into your psychology
and how you look at the world.
That's how I think about
blockchain and Bitcoin.
Blockchain and crypto
is that the reason why
we're such freaks on Twitter
is because it's not just money.
It's not just technology.
There's psychology.
There's world changing opportunities.
I don't mean that.
I don't mean that facetiously.
This is world changing shit.
There's a reason why
the U.S. government,
if what Rome is saying,
that the Feds are fighting
That's hilarious.
But there's a reason
why they're fighting so hard.
It's because it
presents such massive change
and the pushback is always money.
This is the banks
that have been trying
to get ahead of it.
That took 10 years
for the ETFs.
So I just wanted to heart
by kind of what Rome said is
you can be successful here.
Listen to the lessons
that are being told.
Literally do research
and if you don't know
how to do the research,
find out what it means,
what the research is
and there's more than enough info
in these spaces
to be able to do a lot of it
and then just be careful.
It's not regulated
and we're trying
to make it better.
I think we're at an inflection point
in terms of real products being built.
I think 2024, 2025
is the year that we really see
WebTube leaning heavily into Web3
and mass adoption in the sense
where they don't know
what's happening.
So you are early.
You're not as early as I was
and a lot of people in this space
were five, 10 years ago,
but you're still fucking early.
And so, Marco,
love to hear your thoughts
as we wrap up
and then I'll stop or enter.
Lovely digital.
Fantastic. Great segue.
So I was going to piggyback
on what Rome said about pioneers
and something that Andrew said earlier
about the bell curve
and to your point there.
So I've been around a little while
so I've seen a few emerging technologies.
I've been a founder in them
and hey, for my day job,
I invest in them.
And my point is here,
whilst I might have been a bit down
on the onboarding side,
I'll flip the token.
Hope you saw what I did there
and I'll be on the bullish side.
People should look at,
you know,
when it comes to emerging technologies,
a good rule of thumb
is the Gardner hype cycle, right?
Anyone that knows technology,
works in technology,
should be aware of the Gardner hype cycle.
It's a great, great roadmap
to show how technologies move
from nothing to an adoption.
And I look at blockchain
because that's what we are.
I look at blockchain
as currently in the trough
of disillusionment.
Now, that doesn't mean to say
it will stay there
and to your point, digital,
I see 2024, 2025,
where we are getting real
everyday use cases
being where blockchain
is solving those critical problems.
We will then start to move
to the slope of enlightenment.
And when we get the slope
of enlightenment,
that's when we start to get
the more onboarding
or the mass onboarding.
So I just wanted to chime in
and come up with that.
I love that.
Thank you, Marco.
And again, I think to like recap
is I don't think
that we get rid of
or I think it takes a while
and I think regulation
will play into it.
Won't stop it.
I think self-regulation
will play heavily into it.
It won't stop it.
I think reputational networks
will help.
It won't stop it.
I think education will help.
It won't stop it.
The fact is there'll always be
by virtue, as I said before,
in terms of the need
for mass adoption,
new retail into the space.
Where there's people who've taken
I have been alarmed
at how shitty
and greedy human beings
can be inherently.
So don't think
it's just a crypto thing.
Unfortunately, it's a retail
and shitty people thing.
So we do our best
in these spaces to educate.
I hope that if you're listening,
I wouldn't say take notes,
but like what we're really
when we said before,
you may go and talk
us into some spaces.
He always messaged me.
He goes, this is real, bro.
In the real, real DGen spaces,
which are not very interesting
because it's usually just talking
about what they've eaten for dinner.
And then some.
Bro, bro.
Hey, bro, bro, bro, bro.
The fact is it's pretty hard
to learn stuff there
because they're not trying to teach.
And so it's just a reality.
And that's okay.
That's what those are for.
Those are for like NFTs
are really become like community.
And that's where the DJs
just hang out like it's true.
They don't have girlfriends
for the most part.
They don't really have lives
and they like to smoke weed
and they stay home
except for Andrew.
He's got kids.
He's just a fucking DJ.
But we'll never be able to stop.
Unfortunately, portions of newbies
coming on from getting wrecked.
And if you're down there below,
when we say getting rubbed
is your resume,
it's not just wet three, right?
Failed business, failed relationships.
We are humans.
I don't believe.
This is a rant.
I don't believe really in nature.
I believe in nurture.
And I certainly believe
that nurture can outdo
most of what nature gives you
except for being ugly.
And even then,
apparently I saw these
leg extending things.
The point is we by nature,
our existing our identities
is by virtue
the accumulations
of lessons and experiences.
So you can either learn
these lessons yourselves
and get rubbed
or hopefully 10% less chance
by hearing some of this stuff
by doing some of the work.
If you're really into this space,
nobody wants to see you get rubbed
except for a handful of influencers.
So thank you for coming.
That was good.
And we will see you next Wednesday.
I'll be doing spaces over the weekend.
I am launching a project.
Moby Media has been supporting.
Andrew's been supporting.
Doc's been supporting.
Panda's been supporting.
I'll be in J space later on
with the let go.
Talking about it.
Marco, you better fucking support
Rome or the Valley since.
Kabir and everybody else who's here.
I'll be having some spaces
with some live experiences
with the product I'm launching.
They'll be points to earn
and level up scores and codes
and free NFTs
and free money to give away.
And it's a fun product.
I'm not selling you shit.
So if you see me, put on notice.
Come play.
Come enjoy.
I'm trying to include
as many collaborative projects,
tokens, people, NFTs.
If you can't beat them, join them.
And on that note,
have a wonderful Wednesday, guys.
Thank you, Fidjal.
And just as a final reminder
here for people,
whenever Fidjal says that
it's financial advice,
what he means is that
nothing you hear on this broadcast
is actually financial advice.
No, no, no.
I mean, it's not my financial advice.
Moby Media personally,
Actee personally
endorses every financial position.
And Moby Media is giving
a binding legal opinion that
so you can sue Moby Media
if you cannot sue Moby Media.
Go ahead, Actee.
And none of this is financial advice.
And with that said,
you know, Fidjal is simply larping here.
We only provide educational content here.
So thank you.
Thank you everyone for tuning in.
This has been a great one.
Tune in tomorrow.
We got Austin from Doodles
chatting with our boy Andrew Forte.
And then we get the AI show tomorrow.
So put your noties on.
The team is really expanding their offerings.
I fucking love the J Crypto
and mind your biz on Tuesdays.
I love Andrew Forte spaces.
You can listen to JPEGs
or you can come get educated.
Simple as fucking that.