Multi-Chain Mondays: Bitcoin ETFs

Recorded: Jan. 22, 2024 Duration: 1:33:51

Player

Snippets

Hey Fred, yeah, I can hear you just fine
assuming you can hear me as well
Yep, I can hear you great Kyle
Awesome, awesome
Well, I'll do just a quick intro
and then we'll get started as people start logging in
for everyone logging in, go ahead and just give a
share on the space and let's spread the word
we're going to talk about Bitcoin ETFs
and I'm not going to lie, I've been looking forward
all weekend to talk with you Fred
Oh really, go ahead
Well let me, okay, let's jump right in
I'll do the introduction and then I've got
I'm just too excited
to hold back anymore so
welcome everyone to Multichain Mondays
this is our space for
talking about anything that has to do
with multiple blockchains and
really the vision
of crypto as a
multi-chain space that
assets and users can move
across chain in a seamless
great user experience
today we're talking Bitcoin
and we're going to talk about Bitcoin ETFs
with Fred here, Fred
has really kind of
I would say probably led the charge
on understanding
Bitcoin ETFs, so
Fred, do you mind just giving a kind of background
to what your background is
and how you got so involved
in understanding Bitcoin ETFs
my background is, broadly
speaking, I started at my career
out in finance
I spent six
years as a prop trader on
Wall Street and
once you're in that world you never really quite
leave it and so
I've been trading now for
thirty years and following
the markets like a finance guy
would follow the markets
but for the last six years
I've been involved in crypto
and not always
Bitcoin but really for the last
three years pretty
much only Bitcoin
so I think I have a
unique perspective on
on kind of
these two worlds, right, so
I see a lot of the crypto
people looking
at these ETFs and their impression
is ETFs bad
self-custody good
Wall Street bad
Jamie Dimon bad
that's sort of from the Bitcoiner side
now from the finance side
you have a lot of people
saying Bitcoin's just
garbage, it's not
backed by anything
it doesn't belong anywhere near
our portfolios
both of these people
are somewhat right and somewhat wrong
right and
I think what I
saw when I
really saw this ETF was going to come
happen I sort of said
listen I think I can add something to the discussion
from the point of view of
how I think these two worlds are
going to come together
and that's really my angle
and I, you know
it's a relatively unique angle
so there's not
you won't find a lot of people in crypto
with that angle
I mean there's certainly some who really understand it
and I'll say
in particular I would say the bitwise
guys do, right
Matt Haugen from bitwise
is an ETF guy
and he really understands
this stuff
and the Bloomberg guys
who cover it understand it
really deeply from the finance side
I don't think they completely understand it
from the pure
Bitcoiners world so that's
my brief kind of perspective
on what I bring to the
I love your framing of
you have one side of
maybe what you would call the die hard
Bitcoin maxis, the self custody
the break away
from the legacy system
that's the purpose of Bitcoin
and then you have the other end of the spectrum
which is Wall Street, which is
I mean I would probably venture to guess
Wall Street's interested in just
how do we make money, how do we
diversify our portfolio, those kind of strategies
and so Bitcoin is just a tool
in the tool belt for that
is that maybe a fair framing?
Yeah, I would say Bitcoin
really isn't a tool in the tool belt
so most asset
allocation
portfolios and kind of what I've said
a lot of Bitcoiners will say well there's all
this money on Wall Street that's just itching
to get into Bitcoin and I would say
that's not the case
people are deeply
skeptical of Bitcoin on Wall
and I think you see this
from Jamie Diamond's comments
this is not just one guy
who's out to lunch or Charlie
Munger or Warren Buffet
this is really
kind of how a lot of people
kind of view Bitcoin, they don't
really view it as real or
Vanguard for example, saying
we will not carry Bitcoin ETFs
I don't think it's like they're
sitting there going how do we add this to our portfolios
now I do think
it will get added to their portfolios
and I think this is
an evolution because
one of the things as a finance guy
I've seen people
weren't itching to add real estate
to the mix of people
portfolios before REITs came out
they weren't itching to add
commodities before the Goldman Sachs
Commodities Index came out
were some gold bugs
but that was a fringe
element before the gold ETF
came out so
these things change
and Wall Street
absorbs and extends
to use a Microsoft expression
asset classes
so Bitcoin may
not be today an asset class
by Wall Street but I think
it is about to become one
and that's what interests me
I'd love to dive
deeper into that because I would
that you have what you might
call crypto native ETF
people like Ark
who had a Bitcoin ETF
but then you had this one off that
just seemed to kind of catch the industry
by surprise which was BlackRock
I can't remember if it was you
or if it was Eric from Bloomberg but
somebody was talking about how BlackRock is essentially
the fourth part
of the US government
the fourth branch of the government
First of all the one thing I would say is
a lot of this happened after I left Wall Street
one thing I was
I've certainly been following ETFs
and investing in ETFs but
I was shocked to realize
how big the ETFs have gotten
especially over the last 20
and to put this in perspective
the total size of the ETF
market in 2003
20 years ago
was $300 billion
the total size of the
ETF market worldwide today
is $10 trillion
so it's gone up
30x in 20 years
so this is an
what does it do to?
it's due to a couple of key
players BlackRock is
one of them BlackRock is
the largest institutional
but Vanguard
is actually a little bit bigger
I think than BlackRock
or at least equal size
it sort of depends on the year
but Vanguard is responsible
literally at this point
and I'm reading the excellent book by Erik
Belchunas of Bloomberg
it's responsible for 1 out of
$3 invested in America
by Americans
so basically you have these
enormous vehicles
BlackRock and Fidelity
which is no slouch
either Fidelity is
$6 trillion under
management so between
Vanguard Fidelity and
Bloomberg and BlackRock
that's almost
$30 trillion which is almost the
size of the US debt
that's how much assets they control
you cannot underestimate
how big these firms
and all the numbers under my
days on Wall Street have not
been multiplied by 20, 30
so these numbers
are just absolutely enormous
and they're absolutely enormous
relative to the size of the
crypto markets
everybody's sitting there going wow
you know Bitcoin's at a trillion dollars
and a trillion dollars
is kind of nothing on Wall Street
right now
and it's really the flip side
of all these deficits that we've been running
when you're printing money and running trillions of dollars
a deficit where does that money go
well it goes into the bond market
it goes into the equity markets
so it goes into the
real estate markets
so all this stuff is securitized
and all this stuff is managed
a few very, very large firms
right now
and this stuff is
crystallizing under these ETFs
this is sort of the
leading edge of Wall Street
this is where things are going
and BlackRock, if you see
Larry Fink recently, he sort of said
look ETFs are going to
take over the world
this is where the world is going
they are going to take over everything
if you really understand that
you really understand that this is like
the Borg coming for
your planet
the resistance is absolutely
you will be assimilated
you are going to get converted
there is no
resistance
it's futile
my message to the
Bitcoiners is
this is really cute what you are doing
with your own keys and everything
and that is fine for you
and it is great if you happen to live in
Argentina or Lebanon or whatever
the big money is not
going to invest that way
the big money is coming and it is going to invest
in these ETFs
and you are completely deluded if you think
that the system that is happening
right now is going to continue
five years from now because it won't
actually that is a
good segue I was going to ask the question
you actually did this a great
you set the framing so
well of like you had Bitcoin
which has all these
decentralization qualities like these
you know like the self custody
these features that
made it what it is today
and then you have let's say
traditional Wall Street through ETFs
coming in and they are going to value other things
let's be frank like a better user experience
like you are saying
the ability for people to park money in there
and forget it and not have to worry about
see phrases or not have to worry
about this and that the ability
to kind of tie into a legacy system
is and it sounds like
your gut feeling is that
that is going to kind of swamp that is going to
be the narrative for Bitcoin moving forward
is that it will be more of a legacy
asset than it will be this
currency that could possibly take over
I will say so first of all
these guys I do think
Bitcoin is
this is likely to benefit
Bitcoin more than any other
cryptocurrency but it's
it's very possible
that a year from now we have
an ETH ETF right
Gary Gensler does not
want that but it's possible
and I would say that
Wall Street absolutely couldn't care
they will do a
Dinfinity ETF
a Solani ETF
Avalanche they don't care
they are just in the business of making product
the thing that's the transformative
thing here is that
let's say you have a substantial
amount of money let's just say
a million dollars right
and you say to somebody
who's going to invest a million dollars
whether it's a retail
individual or a fund
and you say I would like
you to go buy
a million dollars of Bitcoin
on Coinbase well
their impression
is going to be wait a second I got to go wire a
million dollars to Coinbase
that company is what
12 years old
it's a startup
so I don't trust Coinbase
I hear it's being hacked all the
time it's not FDIC insured
all their
businesses crypto so if they start losing
their crypto there won't be anything
left to sue
maybe Coinbase is not even going to be around
10 years from now it's being sued by the SEC
so it may not
be even legal they're going after Binance
maybe Coinbase is next
so I would say the impression
of Coinbase is not really
you know it may
seem stodgy to a
crypto person but
to a finance person
Coinbase looks you know
downright risky and
you know when you say well no what I
really want you to do is copy these
etch them onto a plate
put the plate into your safe deposit
and then you know buy this ledger
or this treasure
and update it every
two weeks to some new version
that just is
and trust a million dollars on that
that's a leap of faith that
most people
over let's say
50 will not do they just
are never going to do that now
I'm an exception I'm over 50
and absolutely
you know I've done it
live and die that way so I understand it
I get it but
you know I'm the you know I'm not
even the 1% you know
of that kind of people will ever do that
so you know
now you have the ETF where
it's not only there's
no seed phrases not only there's
no metal plates or multi-sig
or any of that stuff right
but also it's sitting in
my you know Charles Schwab
account along with all my other
assets when it comes
tax time I just hand the whole thing
over to my accountant and there's no special
treatment for it
you know if I die
my wife gets the Schwab
account no problem I don't have to do some
special you know
inheritance planning and I get
the same benefit
right if Bitcoin goes up
my asset will go up
one for one with Bitcoin so
and that's really the only thing I care about
as a rich American
you know holding
this asset that's the only thing I care
about right so
there's all this other aspect
right to crypto
and Bitcoin and you know
all the stuff that you guys are doing with
ICP and everything right there's
plenty of other things that are interesting
and great and the network and
speed and apps and
everything else right
but bear in mind that does not interest
a person who
is holding this in their IRA one bit
zero no interest right
and that's kind of most money
right most
you know the most money is not
is not kind of
moving around in these kind of
self hosted wallets I mean
there is a large amount of Bitcoin
and so on that's in there just from historical
reasons but most money
does not want to be in a self
hosted wallet
your experience or your gut feeling
do you think the average
ETF buyer is
interested in Bitcoin I guess
I'm trying to dive deeper into like
do they think of
Bitcoin or cryptocurrency as
the innovation side so you know if
it's a theory on the ability to deploy smart contracts
and have interesting software
running on chain
or is it more just that they see
a different
currency they're worried about
like fiat currency you know debasement
or is it even a third thing of
just hey you know what this is very speculative
I don't really
I don't really know what's going to happen but I just want a piece
of the action and so I'm going to put a small
percentage in like do you have a feeling
of why people are buying ETFs
okay so why do people buy
there are
there are so many ETFs
I mean I think there are probably 10,000 ETFs
all together
so you know there's a
mid cap Indian
technology ETF
so the people
buying it I guarantee you they don't
know which stocks are in the
mid cap technology
India index they have no idea
right they just sort of have
a vague idea that India might be a good
place to invest and they like
technology and the
fund has done pretty well over the last
two years that's that's about that's
about the extent of the knowledge
right so I think
with Bitcoin it's not
like they read the white paper
or they you know none of that
is they they have
not they're not not only they haven't
read the white paper they're totally uninterested
in reading the white paper they will never read
the white paper right so
what they are interested in is
an asset that went up 160%
last year that's the only thing they're interested
in right yeah and they've heard
the brand name and so they like
Bitcoin that it's kind of
like the new bitwise commercial right
it's the guy saying you know what's
interesting Bitcoin right
and they're like huh okay Bitcoin's
interesting great let's see it went
up a lot the fund that owns
it you know I bit
went up a lot I trust BlackRock
great let me put some money in that
it's that simple right
now Ethereum
could be the same thing right it could be
just like Ethereum
yeah I heard about that one my
son likes it you know
it's somehow
very technical I don't want to get into the details
buy me a hundred grand
worth of that Ethereum thing it looks
promising that's about it
okay yeah no that I mean that makes
complete sense and it's a different use case
a different target audience that
the ETFs will appeal to then
then maybe what most of the people on the
space would would you know
from their own perspective I wonder
so one of the things that I've been interested
in learning more about is when
I think about you know you have a share like
I bit I go on I buy one share
of I bit I've obviously bought
that from somebody else who previously
owned that share of I bit
but how does how does that buying
demand for the selling demand
impact the actual
underlying Bitcoin like what are the mechanics
there that result in spot Bitcoin
getting purchased at somewhere
is it like an end of the day
I don't know how do they figure out
how much more Bitcoin to buy and to hold
and all that okay first
of all it's very confusing
most people have got it completely wrong
okay and that was something that
was very clear to me when
the CTF came out is
that most people have no understanding
of these ETFs so first of all
what is an ETF and
how how are these shares created well
they're created in
two ways they can either be created in
what's called a cash create
or they can be created with an in kind
create right now the best way to do
this is with an in kind create
where I say
here I'm going to send you let's just
say one Bitcoin right
and you're going to get
the equivalent of one Bitcoin
worth of ETF
which will be let's say
a thousand shares of I bit
that's the easiest way to do it now the
SEC denied this
they said we don't want people sending around
Bitcoin to this stuff
it's for a bunch of reasons
all bad but
I won't get into it why they
denied it but
what they did settle on is a cash
create and there are plenty of these
cash create ETFs out there too
and the cash create works like this
eastern time there's a
cutoff and you can say
I would like to create an
ETF with some cash
so you sent let's just say
a million dollars into
to a transfer
agent who deposited
deposit this hundred thousand dollars
at coinbase
and the hundred thousand dollars
or the million dollars is used
to buy ETFs
at the net asset value of
that day right so there's a net
asset value of the day that's computed
computed as of in the case of
BlackRock 8 pm eastern
standard time so at 8 pm
eastern standard time they say the net asset
value of the fund is
you know 20.31
right and that
means you can send money into the fund
and you can get shares
at a value of 20.31
and you can send whatever
cash you want right but you
send the cash first the net asset values
can be created two
two hours later
and then at this point
you are going to
get the shares you know exactly how many
shares you are going to get now
BlackRock has another day
in which to buy the Bitcoin
right so they are basically saying
okay we got this cash we are now
deploying the cash
we are not going to buy
it instantaneously we are going to
deploy it over a day
and by the end of the day
we will have deployed all this
cash into Bitcoin
so that the next
batch of people creating the cash
are going to look at NASA value
which incorporates only
Bitcoin the net asset value
so that is how the creation is done
it gets more complicated
than this because there is continuous
arbitrage
all day long
between the share price and
so if there is too many people buying
the price of the ETF
excuse me
is going to go up
relative to Bitcoin
and then people
will want to
sell the ETF and buy
Bitcoin but if they don't have the ETF
how do they do it? Well they borrow
the ETF from another market maker
they short it
they buy Bitcoin
and so now they have locked in the
difference and they can buy Bitcoin
they can buy Bitcoin futures
there is a lot of ways they can get the
exposure to Bitcoin
but they can arbitrage this
in very close
all the time
continuously all day long
and then at the end of the day
they can kind of close out their positions
by creating new
and they can also
redeem new ETFs
they really need to understand this mechanism
but basically the mechanism
keeps the price of
and the underlying asset
which in this case is Bitcoin
it keeps them very very much in line
they are not perfectly in line
there is a little bit of friction
there are things that can go a little bit wrong
and they can go more wrong initially
because as these ETFs
grow and grow and grow
they just get bigger and bigger
and bigger and bigger
and as they get really big
any individual day's
net asset value
it is not going to impact things that much
once there is
$10 billion in the ETF
or $20 billion in the case of the
grayscale ETF
whatever buying comes into the grayscale ETF
will not affect
the net asset value
of the grayscale ETF
it is not going to matter
is that clear now?
that actually makes a lot of sense
so it sounds like once a day
so there is two markets more or less
there is the actual trading
of the shares so I buy one
I bit from you
and then the second market is
basically the
redemption of that
or I guess where the arbitrage
happens of hey
you are not
redeeming
that is only the authorized participants
who are arbitrageing
this process
so in all
cases buying an ETF
from somebody else who created the
that ETF has been previously
and in all cases
when you are buying an ETF
you know that the cash has
either been deposited and converted
into an ETF which is
98% of the time
and then there is that one day's
worth of cash that might not have bought
into Bitcoin just yet
but more or less you know that
the Bitcoin is there
for the cash so it is not
really possible to create paper
Bitcoin if that makes any sense
yep completely
and then it also sounds like the price of Bitcoin
if not real time certainly
on a very short time frame
within a 24 hour period
will always reflect the
demand or lack of demand
of all the ETFs
right I mean
these two prices are going to be
for something like iBit they are going to be within
10 basis points
20 basis points
so these authorized participants
in the case of BlackRock
are JP Morgan
Jane Street and Goldman Sachs
right so these guys
the biggest traders
they will trade
and they can extract
efficiencies of two basis
points you know no problem
if the thing is deviating
in any way up or
down they can close that
gap and make money right
gotcha yep they are going to do that
well let's talk about
I want to talk about Grayscale as well
because I have seen a lot of talk of
essentially I don't want to say
blaming Grayscale but the fact
that Bitcoins price has not
has not mooned since
the ETF was approved I have seen people
basically saying
Grayscale their customers are
redeeming and
either selling their Bitcoin for fiat
or they are
selling it so they can buy one of the other
ETFs can you kind of walk us through
what's going on there? Yeah okay so
Grayscale is
much more complicated right because
Grayscale was a closed
end fund right
been around now for I think six years
right and
it's had a very long history
digital capital group
and not a particularly good history
really right so you know it was
Grayscale grew
was giving loans
to people who were arbitraging
it in the very first period in
which it traded at a premium
I may be going into a little detail here but
in any case it started by
trading into a premium right
to Bitcoin and a substantial
one it was at one point about a 20%
premium if you bought if you bought
it in say
2019 right 2019
2020 you were buying Grayscale
at a premium because there was no
better way to get exposure
to Bitcoin and again
there was no MSCR
for example you wanted to get into
Bitcoin you bought Grayscale and
it traded at a premium it was a closed end fund
as a result
of three arrows collapsing
a number of other
that premium went to a discount right
and then a lot of people
got trapped into Grayscale
right and they
bought Grayscale at a premium
and the thing went to a discount and even
when Bitcoin price went up
they were now underwater right
and so at the beginning
of last year that premium
and a number of people
bought into
Grayscale at this
extremely low discount right
and I'm one of them right
so I bought shares at Grayscale
in January at down 45%
so you know while
Bitcoin was up one and a half times
last year right
I made four times my money on Grayscale
I mean I bought the thing at
$10 went to $40 right
anybody who came in
at this kind of a discount
really they're kind
of natural flippers right because
part of the fact that you finally
because of the ETF conversion
you now finally
can get your money out so for those
arbitrageurs they have an
incentive to sell there's other people
who have different incentives to sell
we don't know exactly how
much of this stuff has happened or
if it has even happened yet
but the FTX
bankruptcy estate holds a bunch
so they're incentivized sellers
and last there's a bunch of retail
people in tax advantage accounts
IRAs and so on
right that held GBTC
that even if they're in a
they're in profit on GBTC
they'll prefer
an ETF with a lower fee
so those guys are also
incentive to sell
all this to say
that there's been a lot
of incentive and a lot of sell pressure
coming out of GBTC
and that probably
will continue a little bit longer
but that's not really
the big story here, the big story is
there's been
actually historically now
over the last week a greater
buy pressure from new
participants coming in and wanting
to buy the ETF
so that's neutralized the GBTC
but it's sort of neutralized
and people are like well so you're
telling me that all this is for nothing
well kind of for now but
once the GBTC
selling pressure
ends we're back to
a world in which
you just got all this new demand
for these ETFs
so that's what I'm looking
forward to. Yeah it definitely
seems like the GBTC
is going to be like a short term
just again like you said flippers who got
in for the discount and now
you just had a you know
you closed out that 40% discount
so now you've got some great gain.
They also have lost 10% of the
fund over a week, right?
They're not
going to lose 10% of
the fund for 11 weeks
automatically.
Right so there's only so much
Bitcoin that can go out of the fund until
it goes to zero. Exactly
and it's not going to zero
and they can still reduce the fees
but they're also not completely
suicidal. I think they're
very greedy people but they're
not suicidal and
you know I think that they
if they lose half the fund
they're going to switch
to a lower fee so they can
at least not lose the other half.
seem like their competitive advantage
is that they had a user base already
purchased in.
That user base may be in a lot of
profit and may not want to pay capital gains
at this time and therefore there's almost like
a tax lock on some
of their customers so why not monetize
that? It's exactly
correct. I mean the expression
is they're milking the cow and then they're
going to take the cow out and shoot it.
Right, right.
So now moving
longer term though
I've heard it say that it's basically
you know we have, is it 9 or 10
other ETFs? I guess it's
10 other ETFs other than GBTC
almost like a
winner take all or like
there's not going to be 10
that get equal, you know everyone gets their
10% of the pie and everyone's happy
it'll be one or two
dominant players. Does that create
a scenario where we see
a lot more advertising, a lot
more sales, a lot more
push on this market to try to
as you know the Black Rocks
the ARCs try to become one of those
one, two, or three players?
Yeah well, okay so
I would say
the first thing to realize is this
battle is not for retail right now.
Okay, so I think
everybody in the Bitcoin side says okay great
I'm going to see more billboards saying buy Bitcoin
right? But
the reality is
this ETF stuff is
much more for an institutional audience
than for a retail audience
because the feeling is
and this again is the structure
of the financial industry right?
We've gone from
a world of brokers
to discount brokers to
now advisors
and the advisors control the
wealth now that's no longer retail
directly. And so
there's 600,000 financial
advisors who advise
100 million Americans
right as to where to
put their money. And
those advisors have their own
platforms like Fidelity
as one right? And
BlackRock you know is another one
and Vanguard's another one right? And
they're basic but Vanguard doesn't do
20 TFs yet
and probably won't.
those advisors need
they need
special sort of attention.
They are not going to just be looking at a billboard
or a radio ad or a TV
ad right? They're going to be
looking at special
marketing materials that are
targeted for a financial
advisor right? They're going to be doing meetings
in person meetings and so on.
So I think that the kind of
stuff you're going to see more
is those kind of
that kind of marketing. It's
marketing to intermediaries
and not marketing to the end user
Now again the best
marketing is price right?
Bitcoin going to
70,000 is
the only marketing you're ever going to
need right?
Well that's been its marketing
so far in its first 12
years right? And it will remain
the marketing right?
So what I believe
is this is kind of the scenario
I believe
is you know we're
going to have
there will be buying from Wall Street
right? Why? Because it's now
open to Wall Street.
You put the
loaf of bread on the shelves of the supermarket
some shoppers are going to come around and
take it now from the shelf right?
You know don't underestimate
the value of distribution. Distribution
is everything right? So
we now have it's now
in the supermarket. It's on the shelf
and people can buy it. Now
do they want to buy it? Well
they want a little bit of it. They'll take a little bit
they'll take a taste of it right?
But the minute it gets to
all time highs and they're seeing about
it on CNBC when they wake up in the morning
that's when they tell their financial
advisor hey can you get me a little bit more
of this Bitcoin thing?
You know so really the
value of this thing is
sort of a booster rocket
once we get to like all time
highs right? So I think it's
going to be you know it's a little bit of a slog
getting to the all time high. We've got you know we've
got a 50% to go from here
right? But
once we get to that point
that's when Wall Street's
going to get very interested in this asset
right? And unlike
2020-2021 when they
were interested but they
couldn't invest right? Or they
had to go through grayscale or
micro strategies or some other
thing that didn't really fit that
wasn't part of the wealth management
channel and all that right?
This time around it'll be BlackRock
or Fidelity right?
So this time around when
the markets
now these guys can come in and I think this is
going to act like turbo booster right?
It's going to be like have you ever seen the movie
Fast and Furious?
They press the nitro
you know what I mean?
So you know they're already passing
the guy and they're just to like
kind of rub it in
they push the nitro and they just go
super fast.
That's what we
that's kind of what I expect to happen
right? Everybody on the Bitcoin side is going to be like
well it's getting expensive it's at
100,000 and everybody on Wall Street's going to wake
up and go wow this thing's not actually
dead let me buy in right?
So you know their perspective
is 100% different
from our perspective right? Because we've been
watching this stuff for so long and you know
you know we're skeptical
it's like okay there's going to be another rug
blah blah blah but their perspective
is completely different you know? They're not
particularly even focused on Bitcoin
and they don't really care
if some ad comes out right now
they're going to be very focused on when it hits
an all time high right? That's
when they're all going to be like
get me some of that.
What I love about that is
in crypto we're used to being
degens and
degens it's the complete opposite where
as things get more expensive
there's more demand for that thing
and what you're saying is
Wall Street's no different so
it's just a human nature thing.
I'll tell you they're a little different. I'll tell you because
I posted one thing and it irritated a lot
of Bitcoiners right? But I said
listen guys
you guys are always bragging about your diamond
hands and everything right?
But I said you know the real diamond hands
are Wall Streeters right? Because what
do they do? They have index funds right?
You know people bought the Vanguard
index fund haven't sold in 30 years right?
You know like
they buy homes they didn't
you know they're all like well my
dad bought this house and he bought
it in the 70s for like 20 grand
yeah because he held on
to it right? Right.
You know the boomer generation
are that they become
the best investors because
there's so much they're
closet indexers all of them now right?
They're exactly the opposite of
these degens who are like
you know an example is I sort of
made fun of on my Twitter feed
Arthur Hayes right? Now
Arthur Hayes is a funny guy
I enjoy his tweets you know
his stories on Medium
but you know he's a total degen right?
He's like Bitcoin feels heavy
I buy some puts and oh
Bitcoin now it's great go yelling
you know like my point is
he changes his mind like
Jim Cramer you know
and you know
and the average index person
barely understands where the
S&P index is
they just open their brokers
accounts every month and they're like
oh okay I'm up 2.1%
I'm down 1.3%
it's a very
passive non-degen
way of thinking right?
Yeah and the way
Bitcoin is going to get introduced into these
portfolios is going to be
you know we think you should get
you know between 1
and 5% of your portfolio
should be in Bitcoin right?
And that's it and if
you have even the peak of
that'll be 5% and that'll be
some small percentage
of all portfolios right?
But even if you're in 5% and Bitcoin
and Bitcoin loses 20%
well great you just drop 1%
on your portfolio you know
it's not going to ruin your golf game
you know what I mean?
Right well you mentioned
and actually anyone who has a 401k
and you think about how often you're
not trading in that 401k
makes complete sense of
those are the true diamond handers right?
You set it and you forget it
and you wait 30-40 years and then you
tap into it.
In terms of so you mentioned microstrategy
that was one thing
you know I spent the last bull market
trading microstrategies
Marathon, Riot
you know basically these
public companies that
gave you exposure to Bitcoin but
it wasn't you know it was secondary right?
Or in case of microstrategies
it was almost
the entire enterprise value was
what they were holding in their treasury but
what I noticed was that
all of those products probably
got a benefit from the bull market
and I'm guessing that was just because
it was the only way to
basically get exposure to the bull
market on Bitcoin
without the ETF.
I'm wondering if the ETF changes that
so these are now so now those companies
will actually be valued at you know
some sort of like discount
cash flow or
model or something like that
and less of the speculative
I just want to get exposure to Bitcoin.
Well I think those
two things are very different right?
So I think if you look
at MSTR there's a little bit of
kind of almost
Steve Jobs hero
worship story
that's happened with Michael Saylor at
this point right? Because he's just
such a voice in Bitcoin right?
He's been such a voice over the last
three years you know
and you know it's just
it's just such a meme at this point that
I think a lot of people are investing
in him just like they would invest in Apple
because they want exposure to Steve Jobs right?
Now should they do that?
I think they should not do that right?
I think I like Michael Saylor but
I don't think
I need to invest
anything in his ETF which I think
is overvalued at this
point right? And I've made
that point on
Twitter but you know marathon
is a different and these miners
are a different thing
I'm you know not a
miner expert but
from what I can say
these miners are just in
general a bad way to invest
in Bitcoin right?
But I understand that you know I understand
some people love this
the excitement of you know even
more volatility than Bitcoin
but I'm very
fresh on all these miners and I think
I think the core
kind of the indexers
and the you know
the people just adding it to their portfolios
are much going to prefer the straight
ETF than the miners
so I do think it's going to
it's going to cut
down on the premium and it has right?
I mean these miners have gotten slammed
over the last month
right? So it's slam
and so I just like
you know there's
not financial advice because they could go
way back up I don't know
but I just
I don't like
investing in miners
I don't like Bitcoin
I've done a tiny bit of Bitcoin mining
myself and
it was sort of like
sort of like going to the dentist
it's just about as much fun
I'm going to stick to just pure
Bitcoin for me
you know or ETFs
I think the ETF
for anybody new coming into this
market I would
highly advise them to just get the ETF
as opposed to try to do self custody
for all the reasons I mentioned
right? I mean when I say new
I mean again if you're
in Argentina you're in Lebanon
or you're doing a ton
and transactions and stuff like that
yeah absolutely
you know there's
when we could talk about ordinals
and other things like that
and peer to peer payments using
Bitcoin and all that stuff
is real and
it is a use case right?
It's not a
use case for investors
it's not the investor
use case it's the more the usage
use case right?
Right yeah no that's actually a good
area to go down is
how do you see
I mean within Bitcoin right now
you have three stories
the halving which I would love to talk to you about
but before that we have ETFs
and we have really what you'd call
the Bitcoin economy which is
side chains, L2s
ordinals, BRC20
tokens, Bitcoin really
kind of took on it took a step
towards what Ethereum
has been you know all along
Bitcoin's kind of taken a step that direction
in terms of the context of the
ETF do you see these as basically
just two different tracks
for Bitcoin and there's not really
one doesn't impact the other or are there
ways in which these two
stories intersect
and for the benefit or for the
for the worst for
either one of them
I think that ultimately
the ETF is going to
get people
more interested in self custody
and in the potential uses
of Bitcoin right
so and you know
I've sort of gotten a little bit of trouble
among maxis for saying this because I'm pro
ordinals as well
and you know I do think
you know if you
if you start if you
own the Bitcoin let's say you start
out and your first thing is you buy the Fidelity
Bitcoin ETF right like my
my wife just bought the Fidelity
she's a no was a no-coiner
right she now
she now you know now is a
whole-coiner right
good for her yes
she's a multi-coiner actually
but you know her coins are Fidelity
are in the form
of Fidelity right
shares right
FBTC right so
so you know
now once you start that route
right that's the good that's a great place to start
right because now you start caring about
you know it's sort of like you start
watching it every day you start caring about it
and you start getting curious
as to what actually
is Bitcoin right and so
if somebody says well you already
own you know a bunch of
Bitcoin maybe you should put
you know you know
a thousand dollars worth of Bitcoin into one of these
kind of you know
self-custody wallets
I think that's a lot easier
you know at that point for that person to say
okay I'm going to go and get
the self-custody Bitcoin I'm going to go
buy it from Coinbase or
Moon Pay or wherever I
I'm going to make that step right
I'm not going to view it as
my investment portfolio I'm going to view
it as sort of my
transaction portfolio right my
my hot wallet right
and I think people will do
that right and then they're going to start saying
they're going to find a friend who
you know they need to pay and they're going to be like
is it okay if I pay you some Bitcoin
right and
the person will be like yeah sure you know here's my wallet
address you know you have lightning here
here's lightning me you know
so I definitely think
it's a good thing
for the transaction economy of
and you know I think
ordinals are another you know clear
use case right in terms of
if you look at the total number of transactions
of Bitcoin per day
and you look at all the stuff to know
on the Bitcoin blockchain right
this number was around 300
thousand in 2017
right well you know
where it was in 2022 300
thousand so you know the price of Bitcoin's
gone up but the number of transactions
you have did not really go up
and then of course in
the number of transactions
more or less doubled
and that was
basically people buying
ordinals or minting ordinals
so now we have
you know and you can argue
are these things good
uses of cash and you know
I don't even want to weigh in on that because
I don't have
is it good to mint a
quantum cap on Bitcoin
and sell it to somebody I don't know
I don't care you know what I mean this is like
is it was a lot
of modern art is kind of
pointless too you know what I mean
and you could argue that
Andy Warhol is not that great
and there's just
500 different versions of
soup cans but
but those soup cans are
now worth you know
five million dollars each right now
you know what I mean
so you know sometimes
sometimes this stuff
actually does tend to work
and you know there's all these other tokens
on Bitcoin so you know
again I don't think you need to pass a judgment
on any of these things
the only thing you need to recognize is
they're definitely being used
right it's definitely
a thing the idea
of putting data on Bitcoin is definitely
people have found they're
very interested in doing that
they're very you know it's something
that is you know
you can't debate is there
a use case clearly there is
because it's half of the Bitcoin transactions
right now right and
it doesn't appear to be going away
I think that you know for this reason
there are now a bunch of stuff that's
happening on Bitcoin that make it interesting
as a platform
and I think that's going to
it's going to only grow
and for that reason I think
you know this is not going to be the way people
discover Bitcoin
contrary to what somebody like Oody might
think right I think they're going to
discover Bitcoin because
they own it in their
that's how they're going to discover it
right because
there's so much easier to do
to buy $5,000
worth of Bitcoin in your 401k
now right
and then it is to buy $5,000
in a spare row
wallet or something
I just think that's the way
but I think it is net, net, net
very good for Bitcoin
and it's going to all
this is going to drive price higher
and price number go up equals
more attention to it
and you know
it's all good for the thing
and ultimately of course
you need that
the ETF is a derivative
that only exists because that exists
so if self custody didn't exist
there would really be no need for an ETF
it would be somewhat like
GLD where
the gold actually never moves from the vaults
right the only thing that trades is the GLD
yeah you're bringing up, that's the great framing
of it though in terms of
the way that these two things interact
is the ETF almost
takes Bitcoin from
having let's say
1% or 5% of the population
that has an interest in it
to maybe taking it to 40,
50% and then on the other
side of that at the same time that that
mass market is occurring
you now have these layer 2s
and these side chains that are making Bitcoin
both more usable, giving
it more use cases as well
as improving the user experience
because that's I mean let's be honest
even in ordinals there's
the user experience is not great and
we need to improve that
so probably very early look
there's all this stuff very early right
I'm confident that eventually
eventually
if there is a need
for these things it will get resolved
like nature finds
nature abhors the void
as they say
this is going to get
there will be solutions to all these problems
and there's plenty of different
approaches to
all these things
at some point this stuff becomes
more pedestrian and becomes more
sort of normal
point is in there today
but it's going to get more use
I think that the use
case of Bitcoin as
an investment
as sort of
the next version of digital gold
as this investment
thesis for Bitcoin
I think that's a thesis that
pretty much any
stockholder, anybody with a broker's
account can appreciate
and that's not 50%
of Americans but it's
maybe 40% have a broker's
and by the way
majority of it is controlled by
10% of Americans
so 10% of Americans
have 90% of Americans
stock wealth
we're not living in a fair world here
so the real question is
where does that 10% put their money
actually that's a good point from the other side
which is maybe
that 10% puts their money into a Bitcoin
ETF, they like what they see
they go from just the
number go up to more of like what is this
technology and then that's when they might start
thinking maybe I should invest in
some of these ancillary
businesses that are
leveraging the Bitcoin network to
put art on the network
have swaps between
different cryptocurrencies
I think that
I just think that most of these
people are just looking at
they're very conservative
it's not like they're
look, there's only about
40 BC firms
of any size anywhere
and it's that's taken
50 years to get to that point
there's not
there's not going to be more than
10 companies that invest
in Bitcoin infrastructure
in any big way I don't think
you know what I mean
I think when you're talking about
building on Bitcoin
or building all these things
I think it's a specialty
it's a specialty, it's a very
small thing
and I don't think it's
Wall Street that's going to fund this stuff
you know what I mean
it's going to be people like
it's going to be people like
your founder Dominic
who's made a bunch of
money and he wants
to kind of
start a wallet
thing or this or that
that's kind of the way the
VC thing worked in the beginning
how was Sequoia Capital created?
Well it was created by people who
had made money at Fairchild Semiconductor
and they were like
I'm going to invest in a bunch of these other
semiconductor companies
let me invest in this little thing called Intel
I think that's more the
path of how this stuff grows
it sort of grows from the inside
as to from the outside
look I definitely think that we're
going to be in a multi-chain world kind of
to your point
but I think we're in a multi-chain world
with Bitcoin as I think the
Bitcoin's
going to be the numeraire
it's going to be the ultimate
yardstick
where we're going is
how much Bitcoin is this?
That's what I think
it's not going to be how much
ETH is this worth or
I think we're going to start thinking as a
world in Bitcoin
Bitcoin's going to be the ruler for everything
whether it's a wrapped Bitcoin
or whether it's a
Bitcoin that's stored in a lightning channel
or something
I think we're going to move away from
what's the dollar value of that to
what's the Bitcoin value of that?
How many Bitcoin are in there?
This is so many Bitcoin
and that's why I'm very very bullish on
the historical
implications of this
economic implications of this
because I do think we're moving away to this
standard but I think that there's room
for all these other chains
as far as
kind of layers on that
layers that use
that framework
that somehow have some
notion of Bitcoin in them
you're preaching to the choir here
I know within the internet computer world
we, you know, ICP has a
Bitcoin light node running on its
protocol and that basically just
gives developers an opportunity to
write smart contracts that interact
directly with Bitcoin. Well I think that's
a great, to me
that is the correct way to think
about this stuff, right? I think
trying to fight Bitcoin and sort of
say we're better than Bitcoin
you're never going to be better than
Bitcoin from the point
of view of a reserve currency. Nobody
will ever achieve that, right?
Now, you know,
Hoskinson will disagree with
me, you know what I mean?
Vitalik will disagree with me
but I can tell you they're wrong
they're never going to compete, right?
And you can say until
you're blue in the face that Ethereum is
ultrasound money
it's just not
Ethereum will not
ever be what Bitcoin
is, right? Bitcoin is
it is a unique thing
it is a unique
moment in time that this thing was created
and I think it was
you know I sort of
you know I've met a lot of
very smart people in my life, right?
But if I had to sort of say
how smart was Satoshi, how unique
was the discovery?
I would say it's not a one
in a million person smart
it's one in a billion person smart
like I would say when I was
at Stanford I was
on paper I was the smartest guy there
right? I mean two courses were
taught on my thesis there
but comparing myself to Satoshi
is like comparing like
you know an insect to a human
being, you know what I mean?
Like what Satoshi
did with Bitcoin
you know the intellectual
vision of what he did and what he's
created is
next level, right? It's just
and you know
I go back to people like Adam Back who are
you know super technical, right?
And they're like, you know
I remember reading this thing of Adam Back
he's like, or I think he was
a YouTube video
and he's like, you know when Bitcoin
came out I sort of spent two months just
trying to improve it. Then he realized
that it couldn't be improved
you know? And it's sort of
like, it's sort of almost
canonical like it's almost like
ah, Satoshi actually
solved the problem, right?
So you know
it doesn't mean that there's not other things
that can be built, you know
smart contracts and so on
but like that particular problem
the problem of
you know creating
trustless value that could
one day supplant the US
dollar, the yen and the euro
right? That was
solved by Bitcoin, right?
And that's a sort of like
you're not going to have another one of those, right?
It's not going to happen, right? So
I kind of feel, you know, almost a
religious kind of feeling when I see this
because I do think it's like
you know, it's like one of the great
achievements. It's going to go down
as one of the great achievements of human
of human beings, right?
And I sort of like
I was thinking about
Sailor says, fire electricity
Bitcoin, but I would say it differently
I would say, language
mathematics, Bitcoin
Imagine how we humans
got along
10,000 years ago when we couldn't
speak to each other, right?
We'd just grunt and maybe draw on some
cave, right?
You know, that was 10,000 years
ago, right? And now
you know maybe
2,000 years ago
when Pythagoras
you know, or 2,500
years ago when Pythagoras realized
that you know
you have the Pythagorean
theorem, right?
Like, that was the birth of mathematics, right?
Like, I mean people realize
wait, there's this thing out there
that's not based on anything
and I can now explain
but it's totally
it exists in some sense, right?
And I think Bitcoin's like that
I think it's sort of like
it's an illusion, but it's not
an illusion. It ties to the real world
and you know, the more you
study it, the more you realize it is
real and the more
you realize it's just better than anything
else out there, right? From the point
of view of just providing this yard stick,
right? So, you know
long story short, I do think that
is going to be
the center of crypto
for the next hundred years,
you know? And everything else
has to kind of build
itself around that, you know? I think
the smart ones will build itself around
that and will integrate
Bitcoin as
tightly as they can in their
protocols and in their
and not just at the
protocol level, but in the
apps and the usability
of all this stuff, right?
And if you get that really
tight connection with Bitcoin
I think that's when you can really
do great. You know, I think that there's
a lot of stuff that can be built
and will be built for that.
And, you know, Ordinals is just one area
but very interesting right
now, you know? There's a bunch of other
stuff. But, I mean, just peer to peer
payments, you know? Making
versions of lightning is sort
of very deficient in my view, right?
At the current stage, right?
But, like, you know,
at some point
there will be really
good ways of just zapping people
for coffee at Starbucks, you know?
We're just not
there yet, right? I mean, I'm not whipping
out my wallet
of Satoshi, which no longer even works
in America, right?
To pay for my
Frappuccino, you know?
love kind of the world
of apps and everything. I just think it's super
early and it really
needs to be integrated really well with Bitcoin.
And I think the next
I think that's
what's interesting in crypto right now.
Yeah, I love
the way you said that. I'll give a quick
plug and just say if you're a developer
who's interested in building a Bitcoin app,
the internet computer is a full-stack
platform. You can deploy
100% on-chain. And, like
I said, we have a Bitcoin node actually running
on the protocol so you can write... Maybe you can
go into a little bit how
you do the wrapping
I don't even know the name
of the Bitcoin
that's sort of the ICP-wrapped
version of Bitcoin, but
how do you do the wrapping, the
unwrapping? How long does it take?
What's the security model?
I'd love to learn more about that.
I think other people would be too.
Sure, sure. I see
a lot of new faces on this
space. So the first thing to
understand is it's not just the financial
side like you wrap a Bitcoin
and now you have it on a smart contract.
Essentially the internet
computer has a
Bitcoin node running on the protocol
so it can read the Bitcoin state so
now you know from the
internet computer you can deploy an app that can
know from reading the Bitcoin
state exactly what the wallet balances
are, what the UTXO state is.
And then the flip side of that
is the network itself
can store
sharded keys or shared keys
so essentially the way that it works is it can create a Bitcoin
address and then it takes
the private keys and
sends them across 40 different nodes
it then shuffles those nodes periodically
so that there's an added layer of security
and then the only way to reassemble that is
using the smart contract that created the wallet
and it can
basically reassemble the private key
and sign a Bitcoin transaction on behalf
of that wallet.
So high level, the idea is you can
build any app that can interact
with Bitcoin but now you have a full stack
platform to build it with so you can program
in TypeScript, you can program in Rust
you can program in Python
obviously we'll
extend, keep extending out the languages
to try to make it as web2 friendly as possible
the idea then is then so you can build
any kind of app, it doesn't have to even be a
wrapped Bitcoin app but there are wrapped
what you might call the same thing as a wrapped
Bitcoin on the internet
computer and the way that does
is you have
the DAO that governs
the internet computer which is
comprised of hundreds of
thousands of individuals
companies, people
there's a
smart contract owned by that DAO
that then manages the
Bitcoin coming in and the Bitcoin
going out so then you could have what we call
CKBTC which
there's no third party, the third party
is just the protocol so ICP
to Bitcoin, there's no
one in between and people can then
bring Bitcoin onto ICP
convert it to CKBTC
or go the reverse
way in a very decentralized manner
so any app can have those on and off
ramps so it's
just protocol to protocol so
what we're hoping, what
our goal is, is really just to again
extend the application
of Bitcoin so that you can build
novel apps, deploy novel apps
that people can
use Bitcoin and
now they're using it natively or whether they're
using the CKBTC, that's up to the developer
what we want is a
new explosion of
innovation around Bitcoin
I think that approach
is the best
you can have right now
I think one of your
advocates is
Bob Bodley
who's doing some stuff
I respect Bob
from a technical standpoint
quite a while and I think he's
made the point that look, right
now this approach is
kind of best practices
eventually we
could have some form
of soft work on Bitcoin with
some covenants or whatever
and that might tighten
the security model
and look, I'm
all for these things
it also is kind of science fiction
thinking that's going to happen in this year
And I also think that there's a lot
even when you get that
there probably
is another year before it becomes even usable
right? So there's a lot of usability
layer stuff that how
does it all fit in with the smart contracts
and everything else, right?
Which is kind of the stuff you're working on
and I think
that stuff's as important
or maybe more important
right now than really
ultimate security
of this stuff
people, as long as it's
reasonably secure
they're going to trust small amounts
and the game here
is not to
these kind of
wrapped solutions
alternatives
to an ETF for example
The game here is to
distinguish between
transactional money and
long term investment money
that you're either going to put in cold storage
or you're going to have a custodian like
Coinbase use via your ETF
so I'm in favor
of what you guys are doing, there's a lot of different
approaches to it but
I definitely think
for 2024 this is kind
of the best we can get to right now
Yeah, I mean I always like
to say holding native Bitcoin is always
the safest because then you're only trusting the
Bitcoin network
ICP and Bitcoin is probably the
second best option
second to just holding it native because then you're
only trusting ICP and Bitcoin
you don't need to have a third party
I would disagree, I would say the safest
is to hold it in an ETF
reason I would say that is
I just have so much experience
watching people lose their keys
and screw up
self custody that I think
unless you're an
exceptionally
person, right?
I really think
self custody is
a dangerous thing
and I know
and I'm not saying I am
a very careful person
and I'm pretty
comfortable with
multi-sake solutions
and everything else but I think
for most people that's just not advisable
There's no
bad comment on my wife but
I'm not recommending
to my wife that she opens a multi-sake
and store Bitcoin there
I'm very happy
she chose Fidelity
and she loves it
whether Bitcoin's
up or down, she's not going to trade it
she's going to let it sit there for a while
and I think that's a perfect solution
for my wife
and for most people
that's kind of what I
I'm a little bit
as much as I like the Bitcoin
community and stuff, I'm out there
kind of recommending people that they
just put a little bit of money
into these ETFs and forget about it
that's kind of my view
and I 100% agree
that gets back to that user experience
we can't expect
people have a
specific expectation from using
the internet of how
user experience should work
the ETFs obviously get you there
because that's part of the user experience of the traditional
finance system to begin with
within the internet computer
our goal is obviously that
developers are building
phenomenal user experiences
we want to rival web2
experiences
so one of the things we have is an identity solution
just basically ties to your hardware and your biometrics
so if you unlock your phone
with your fingerprint or with your face ID
that can then be how you access
your wallet on the internet
computer or how you access any app
from a user perspective
so those kind of innovations
is really where
not just the internet computer
not just Bitcoin but where the industry needs to
go because you can't go from a web2 experience
to what's now the web3
experience and expect
really anything but degens to be interested
you have to rival the web2
experience in order for people to want to use
the apps built on cryptocurrency
but here's the thing
the minute you're talking about
large amounts of money
I think that
it's not just the user experience
it's just the process of getting value
into these apps
and that's
the experience of
buying Bitcoin
buying Ethereum
and then moving it to one of these wallets
let's say Metamask
which is kind of the standard for Ethereum
moving it back out and
translating it to fiat
that whole process is
right now
so I think
even if the apps themselves are better
it's going to take a while for people
to figure out the rails
and I really feel comfortable with the rails
the Moonpay guys
have done an okay job on this
I'd say better than most people
Moonpay is still not
it's not a great experience
in the US
it's just not
so it's not where it needs to be
it's not like
pay with Visa
it's pay with Visa, KYC
hold this thing up
do the selfie
enter in your social security number
wait an hour
wait a day
that whole experience is sort of like
no matter
you built the biggest
the best game in the world
the funnest, coolest game in the world
the best experience on the front end
you're not getting any users
that's the hard part
the hard part is
and I think a lot of people don't understand this
it's just
I'll tell you
long ago I had this wallet
I built the largest wallet on EOS
a long time ago called Lynx
it was a very fun wallet to use
one app that really
really was great
this betting app
and everybody used this app
I didn't invent the app
a couple of these betting apps were running
inside of my wallet
but once you got
you could bet the EOS and it was fun
it was completely addictive
and we had serious volume
on this wallet
the problem was people couldn't get the
currency in the first place
that was the problem
how do they get it?
that's sort of the big problem
with using any of these cryptos
whether it's
internet computer
Bitcoin, Ethereum
you're dealing with
a small subset of people
who actually have
let's say more than $1,000
worth of it
it's not a large amount of people
you get to that first $1,000
are pretty high
so if you're
taking that and you're comparing it
to using an app like Instagram
where you sign up and you're using it
with no delay
Tinder, Instagram, Twitter
whatever app
that's in this web tube
you're up and running within 15 seconds
15 seconds versus
that's just
1,000 x difference
in terms of usability
yeah, well I'm at least
old enough to know and I know from you
giving your experience you probably remember these days
but when eBay first launched
it's hard to remember but you
used to have to mail a check
if you wanted to buy an item
so Fred if I wanted to buy a pair of
sneakers from you I would actually mail you
a physical check
so that would take 3 days to get to you
you would cash that check and when you had
verified that you had the funds you would then
mail me the sneakers so it was like a 2 week
and then all of a sudden
I did not know that but that's interesting
yeah so that was a user experience
but that was okay people were
again they weren't going to reach
you were never going to have a gig economy
based off of that you were never going to have Amazon
that followed that model
but it is today if we still only had
the ability to send checks over the mail
to buy online
and I think that that's where we are at
within our industry is primarily
just you're still kind of sending these
checks if you're working with Bitcoin
you're waiting
6 transactions sometimes which could
take you, maybe it takes you 30 minutes
maybe it takes you 2 hours, either way the user
doesn't know when that transaction
is going to complete
and I don't know you can't compete
with the instantaneous aspect of
the internet experience now
with that kind of a model
the problem is
with all these things you need network
it's hard to get a network effect
when the barriers to entry are this severe
I actually don't think the ETF fixes
in fact the ETF may make it more difficult
because it's very possible
that Warren and Gensler and
stuff sort of say well
okay we've got this safe place
for you to invest
but actually
now that we've allowed that
let's crack down on these
self-hosted wallets
let's crack down
you want to take your
Ethereum from Metamask back
into Coinbase
you need to fill out form
in Triplicate
and that's going to
require you getting a fingerprint
and going to an FBI office
that would not
completely surprise me
if they start
attacking from a regulatory
standpoint
the Bitcoin
the network or Ethereum
or any crypto the network
I think that's possible
it does seem
I hope it doesn't happen
I hope it doesn't happen
but could it happen? Yeah it could
you touched on how this could
open up the Bitcoin to
40% of the world's
or 40% of the American population
but then the flip side of that is it also might
open up new regulatory
avenues or new ways to put
the thumb on the scale
within what you might
call legacy crypto at this point
I almost feel like we have a legacy crypto now
where pre-ETF
what was crypto
like with the focus on self-custody
to be really clear
I think what we're doing
is we're opening up crypto to rich
Americans
I don't think this is necessarily
opening up to the mass market
but it's going to be opening it up to
people with a million dollar
net worth or more
I really actually
even think
the real degen mass market
they already own GBTC or MSTR
or they are in Coinbase
the construction worker who doesn't
have a stock account
well guess what
the ETF doesn't really help him at all
so I don't think it's a democratic thing
I think it's an elitist thing
it's great
for my mother
who's sitting on
a pretty substantial
amount of
and who's 84
you know what I mean
I think for my mom
it's great
the average person who's
saving and has got
a portfolio of index funds
I don't think it really
it's going to be
great for the price of Bitcoin
and that's the other thing
that I think it's going to benefit but
I don't think this ETF is going to
it's not going to intersect
with the world of degens
populating these rooms
I got you
you know what I mean
I know I'm going to wrap up soon
but I want to make sure we have time
I want to talk about the halving
that would obviously have been the big story
of Bitcoin in 2024
had the ETFs not gotten approved
I want to know within the context of the ETFs
is the halving about the same
story line, is the ETF
the bigger story, is there any kind of crossplay
between the two of them?
I would say my view of this
which is the same view
as Adam Back by the way
is Adam Back tweeted this and I
retweeted it and I highlighted it in a word
Adam Back's like
the effect of the
flows of the ETF are 30 times
the halving
and I was just like okay
okay this is what a guy
who I consider one of the smartest guys
out there and who's referenced
this Satoshi White paper and he's
agreeing with me that
this thing could be
30x, 20x, 10x
it's a multiple of
the impact of the halving
so I think the
value of the halving is
to some extent psychological
it's in the
folklore of Bitcoin
we know exactly
the mathematical value of it
is 450 Bitcoin per day
the buying
into BlackRock and Fidelity
is more like
just take away grayscale
assume that doesn't exist
it's several thousand
Bitcoin per day
so it could be
4000 Bitcoin per day
my point is we're definitely
10x in terms of
the pure buying
pressure coming from ETFs
than the halving
now I do think it'll have an impact
because I think
at the end of the day
and I posted this too on
Twitter it's like Michael Douglas says in the movie
Wall Street he's looking at this painting
and he goes to
Bud Fox and he goes see that painting
I paid 50,000 for it now it's worth
500,000 the illusion
has become
the illusion has become real
Bitcoin, right?
Bitcoin is like it's an illusion
but it's become real
and the halvening is an illusion too
but because everybody thinks about it
it's now real
so I would say
because it's in the mythology
because it's
inner subconscious and stuff
I think that plays more of an impact
than the actual number of Bitcoin
that's going to be mathematically
subtracted from the supply
I think this is going to be the last cycle
really where this thing makes any
difference at all
personally
and that's why I think
I think the opening up
Bitcoin to the mass market
to Wall Street is the bigger
and I see my friend Joe
Calisale in the audience
I agree with Joe
it's not an immediate thing
it is potentially
a two year phenomena
but it's an
inevitable thing
it's like
you have a new soda
and you put it on the shelf at Whole Foods
it won't sell
initially
day one, it's not going to sell out
I have a friend who is one of the
founder, the founder of Zevia
and he made a
fortune from it
because eventually people recognize
the value of Zevia and they see it in
Whole Foods and they buy it
and it works
I definitely think this is a longer term
thing, it's going to be the story
of the next four years is Wall Street
adopting the CTF, that's the
story, nothing else matters
it's that simple, nothing else matters
the halving doesn't really matter
nothing matters, the buying
the selling, Sandbank and Freed, Mt. Gox, none
of that matters, the only one thing
that matters is the CTF
BlackRock Fidelity
and these guys pushing it
is going to make more of an
impact than any
than anything
ICP can do, or
Fred Kruger could do, or anybody could do
on the technology side
this is not a technology thing, this is
an adoption by Wall Street
and that's the big story
and we're just here playing it
we're just here, it's a Wall Street
world, and we're just living in
that world, right?
But, we know
who the king is, the king is Larry Fink
look, I worked for the
man for one day, and I can
tell you that
this is a force, this is a force of
a force of nature, and
poo poo BlackRock all you want
and you would be wrong
because, you know
they're coming for your
Bitcoin, they're coming
for you, and they will
steamroll you over and
over and over again
and this is the Borg, and
resistance is utterly futile
so I'm going to close with that
Well said, there's a story to be told
there about how you worked for him for one day
Is that a quick story?
Very quick, so I'll tell you what it was
I was at Solomon Brothers, and
I see another ex-Solomon
friend, I didn't actually
know him, but same vintage as me
in the audience
and basically
I had made a ton of
money for the firm, and
BlackRock said
I was working
for the Arb Desk, John
with his Arb Desk at the time
but I was working for this guy
Moz, sort of in the quant
area, connected to an area
called BPA
but I was sick of
being a quant, and I really
wanted to trade, and then BlackRock said
great, let's hire Fred
so I accepted, I went to visit Larry Fink
40 person company
on Park Avenue in the Bear Service Building
I accepted the job, I
worked there for a day, I came back
handed in my resignation to John
Merriweather, and he said, resignation
refused, you're coming with me, we're going to go out
drinking tonight, and
you're coming back to Solomon, and basically
we got completely drunk
said, what do you want to do
Fred, and I was like, I want to trade
Arbatruff International
Arb, and he's like, done, you're done
where do you want to go
you want to stay in London, you want to be in New York
whatever you want to do, you're in
so I was just like, okay, this is
the most important guy in the firm
and he's kind of opening up the
you know, the red carpet for me
and I came and I told Larry Fink
the next day, I said, look, sorry
I'm quitting, and Larry's like
what? He goes, this is going to be
devastating for our firm, we are a
obviously
and who knows what
my career would have been if I
stayed, but it's
just kind of an amusing thing
you stick around long enough, you get these
you have these moments
if you're in the right time
that's my story of having worked for
BlackRock for a day
that's an awesome story, and I love that you can just say
you stuck it to the largest asset
manager in the world
well that's
awesome Fred, I really do appreciate your time
this was an awesome conversation
it's been a pleasure
I'd say I'd love to do it again if you're up
let's see
how this year progresses
and you know, we'll catch you
in 2-3 months
we'll see how everything goes
thanks a lot Kyle for having me
awesome, thank you Fred, everyone
listening, give Fred a follow
and we'll hopefully talk with you later
thanks Kyle, bye