Projects
![]()
No projects found
Investors
New
DAO Treasuries
DATs
Lend / Borrow APRs
Chains
Categories
Spaces
π Weekend Recap - Peel to Peel π
Recorded: Sept. 14, 2025 Duration: 3:37:45Space Recording
Short Summary
In a dynamic discussion, key figures in the crypto community emphasize the importance of collaboration, ethical fundraising, and the evolving landscape of rights within the industry. As trends indicate a shift towards inclusivity and sustainable growth, the conversation highlights the potential of innovative projects like Chia to drive future developments.
Full Transcription
Thank you. we'll get a little music going we'll kind of warm up the vibe the world is so off-center right now that i think alchemy goal emotional tuning is sort of the appropriate way
to ease into just hanging out getting to do information transformation and exchange because
otherwise it's very much incompatible wavelengths and resonance i tried my best dude where's oops at get oops all oranges in here dude i tried my best
i sat there i listened to it dude when i was 13 years old i believed all that stuff too okay
it's not to diminish you by the way i was a hyper engaged 13 year old i was actually very ahead of my time but there's there's layers to
complexity in life and short cutting one road to block off another is not
actually progress so very easy to allow other people to replace your critical
thinking with the presumption of critical thinking that has been
done for you and to think that you're taking a more evolved perspective because of the borrowing
of contradicting information from opinions that align more with your internal bias.
And that's why I think Chia is such an interesting blockchain for people to learn about because I hear
it all the time. And I'm probably the only person in your whole online community that actually has a legitimate
claim to traditional institutional higher education and yet doesn't ascribe to like a fraternity of
secret society weaponized social hierarchical institutional network effects.
So I'm probably the only person, the only one in your whole friend group that's actually sober to reality and can still entertain schizophrenia from like an honest and authentic origin.
So just know that I have a great deal of patience and respect for everyone on their learning journey, but I also want what's best for you as an individual, and that means you being a free human, a whole, all-to-yourself free being.
And we live in a society, motherfuckers.
We live in a world where things are complex.
So if ever you think that you've figured it all out,
that's when it's time to get working because you absolutely have not.
Shout out to everyone in the space.
I see Curry's rocking a, I can't remember the name of those,
uh that particular derivative but i see you're rocking an orange hat which is dope i know uh
that particular derivative, but I see her rocking an orange hat,
which is dope.
charlie came out and and spoke about orange being his favorite fruit i think that's
a sign of the times i think uh the network spirituality is identifying the the core
ethos and the referential content that aligns the effort of a more
long-range infinite timeline over the precursor presumed generational expansion of humanity
there's probably undercurrents that are entangled for more than the next birth rate. They're probably built upon centuries, if not millennia, of momentum.
Not that there's always a single coherent energy or campaign,
but that the interoperability of converging interests
yields a large enough swath of consistencies across beliefs that we find ourselves sharing common ground and opposing people who we don't share common ground with.
And that's where we're at right now in the journey.
We're at the disagreeability crossroads where people are saying, yeah, Curry says time is fake and gay.
There's a lot of that.
That's kind of probably the faster way of getting through it is uh we often hold too rigid to the literal passage of time and
and probably too loosely onto the ethereal constants of the moment and at the same time we
we likely shortcut the rigid infrastructure of time with the placation of utilizing convenience
as a sort of wormhole to isolate ourselves or to communicate ourselves into discourse
that we either agree with or disagree with and we use it as like this convenient time
warp to either all of time is super important and it's 24 hours in a day built
upon days on days on days or it becomes this interdimensional telepathic instantaneous
teleportation of information and so it just depends on which master you're seeking to serve
sometimes and i'm trying to align with people that have a more long-range value system.
Some people's long-range value systems go beyond their mortal lifetimes.
They might have children, and they might believe that they're going to pass on the legacy to their children,
but there may ultimately come a reality where they pass on and don't know, you know, for whatever reason.
So there's an element of faith even beyond that of the traditional secular view that says some people weigh life
and they say it's either, you know, worth living or it's some hellscape, unsalvageable domain or whatever their opinions are.
hellscape unsalvageable domain or whatever their opinions are but i i align with people who are
willing to face those uncomfortable unknown futures and still choose to commit themselves
to timelines that may exceed their own you know the classic uh plant seeds whose uh trees shade trees, shade, you will not enjoy. Just to say, doing work today that will benefit
humanity and future generations,
even if it doesn't directly magnify
your own benefits in the present.
Anyway, the reason I bring that up, we're in an information war.
We have a kind of a war for souls on the line right now.
And a lot of the goyim or the cattle level disagreements happen because of lack of accountability.
you're on this very kind of like hyper liberalized arc, or if you're on this nationalized conservative
arc, these are sort of two major diverging paths. Most of the common ground that's shared is a
disenfranchisement of the younger generations, people feeling as if there's no hope in changing the institutions or representing their own self-interest.
And so they choose a dialectic of destruction.
They choose an idea that things have to be uprooted and burned and the earth must be scorched and then new foundations can be laid.
And that, to me, is ridiculous.
First of all, you just got here
just keep in mind anyone who's alive to hear my voice right now you just got here so before you
put on captain first player pants you might want to fucking take an analysis of the field and just
think about the billions of lives uh that predate yours and then think, okay, where do I actually fit into that schema rather
than this totally narcissistic viewpoint of player one energy where we think, okay, I can see
everything. I know all truths. I know all falsities. Ascribe to my wisdoms and bend to my will and
earth will be saved. And that's just not ever going to be an effective means of change.
We also have a, because of this lack of accountability brought on by a perceived disenfranchisement, there's also the impressionability, the false critical thought pattern. And this is what most people who are
talking about those types of issues are unfortunately falling prey to. The idea is that
you disagree with the institutional norms that are currentlyure of having an ace up your sleeve. This like, oh, it can all be explained so easily. All of my complex, generational, woven, diverse, vested interests that yield unpredictableit that's been out in probably the last 30 years is the George Washington skit. If only it were so simple.
art of assumption. And so broad brushstrokes will likely yield unfavorable results. And
people right now are clinging to contrarianism because it's a comfort default to the ascribed
institutional, you know, official narrative. I don't align with governments and think,
oh yeah, there's no examples of governments lying to their citizens or doing abhorrent things, but I also don't ascribe to you is porn they're they're tantalizing you
with uh fantasies that will they are much more attractive wastes of time than studying reality
because it's probably going to take like a full minute to digest 30 seconds worth of history and so it's much easier
to expedite the learning curve through the falsification of information and manipulation
of the psyche and utilizing people's fragility in the temporal form of them just arriving to
the party of existence to empower them falsely with these claims to actually dignified action.
But it's not the case.
It's actually a misinformation campaign.
We're being fooled by people who have noticed that we don't agree with somebody.
You're being fooled by someone who can see what you don't like,
and they are showing you an alternative that you'll say,
ah, that's superior.
And so I think the Chia blockchain is going to be a huge learning opportunity for people who
don't commit suicide to have to actually wrestle with what they think the world is and how they
feel the world actually operates. Because we are moving, these ideas ideas these ideologies are not hidden from anybody globalization has
been on the un's agenda since the day it was formed and none none of these institutions
are able to communicate secret messages to each other that escape the reality of a people so
a sociological net of people that are going to hold one another accountable
for the things that they do and say.
So it doesn't mean that all the criminals always get caught, but it absolutely means
that if your belief system goes like this, destroy and replace, you have been psyoped.
You've been psyoped. You don't have a single example in all of history where the maximum good was the result of destruction. It's never once has it been the case.
You've been psyoped.
who refuse to give up, rise to the occasion, and lay another brick down the next day.
You can knock the tower over as many times as you want, and another one of us will come and grab the brick and lay it down to begin again.
And that's what the easiest way to imagine a perfect world is to control, alt and then start end tasking things that you disagree
with and just boot up programs that you believe replace those um you know those previous ones but
the world is a very complex place and the misinformation comes from all directions
so we unfortunately the terminally online generation has fallen prey to the most classic psyops of all time, which is if you lie repeatedly enough, often enough, in contradiction to something people disagree with, they will begin to believe the lie.
It's Communist Manifesto 101. It is a psychological operation that institutions have weaponized for centuries. So
you have to be even more critical. You have to go even beyond the prescribed solution to
the alleged illness. You have to go even further beyond. And that's where you'll find the rest of us hanging out doing very precious little.
Precious little because you're in this quantum timescape of it's the time traveler's paradox.
We can go wherever we want, but you can't leave a trace.
You can move through the multiverse however you want, but you just can't step on anything. So the only way that you can really navigate is through stillness. You
have to stop doing things. You have to stop justifying this because that. And as you start
to peel away all of the mechanisms that cause an effect churn through, you've, you might find yourself becoming quite
still almost afraid to move, almost imprisoned by analysis paralysis. But that's where you begin.
And that's why I tell people do less. If you, if you ever land on something that goes like this
first blow up, then build, you're wrong.
Just know that you're wrong.
The first step is always the first step.
It's never negative.
The first step is never a drop step.
This isn't Taekwondo.
We're not dropping into a defensive guard.
We are exerting our will on the universe and we are moving forward.
Now, the question is, in which direction?
Where do we step forward next?
The world has become a challenging place.
And so there are lots of obstacles and reasons for you to draw back and want to take three
steps back to find a different path to go forward.
But what you will find is you're just going to put yourself into another circumstance
that will have other things you disagree with and require change on those fronts. And if your remedy
again is to go backward, to go forward, you're always going to find yourself backpedaling into
a state of non-progress while you face these insurmountable challenges on the paths that you believe are in front of you.
So the reason I call the Chia a breakaway civilization, the people that are buying XCH
at $10 versus those that aren't, the people that were buying Bitcoin at $10 versus those that aren't,
is because the rest of the world doesn't have to participate in your psychosis. The rest of
the world doesn't have to participate in your belief system. So the best outcome for you is that your belief system is right, and therefore all of the things
that you're doing are serving your best interest. But in a reality where it's not the case,
then there will be other people who might be right, and you might not be, right? So
in that environment, they're not going to care. They're not going to stop everything
they're doing to come and catch you up to reality at large. They're going to say,
everyone had a fair shot at it. Our goal tomorrow is to lay down another brick.
And it turns out those of you that feel left behind are also probabilistically more likely to be disruptors in the future.
You're actually probabilistically more likely to want to blow up the whole parliament because of that one law that was written 170 years ago that you don't agree with.
So that's a problem for people that want to have peace and safety in society.
We can't start with bombs, right?
We can't start with death. We have to rise
above. That's actually the call of the highest order is to rise above and to enact the will of
God onto the savage uncertainties of a lesser, you know, a lesser walk of energy or something.
you know, a lesser walk of energy or something. But no, it's literally just a matter of,
if only it were so simple. If only the answer to Charlie Kirk being assassinated was killing more
people, at least then everyone would agree, it seems on the internet, that the best path forward
is terror and violence. But that's not the best path forward. And just because some
people believe it, and just because some people ascribe to it, doesn't make it true. The same
way that just because some people claim that there's this sovereign citizen loophole to the
law doesn't mean you're ever going to get through court not paying your taxes. There are far more examples of the times in which these things are not as
described than there are ever evidence that they are as they are described. And that should concern
you because you play a dangerous game. You might be a rational human being, but you play a dangerous
game with the human psyche if you begin to denounce the evidence and then elevate
evidence from the same source, but only that fits your prescribed belief, you are creating a
psychosis. You are creating a schizophrenic dungeon to live in where because you refuse to give ground
to who you perceive to be your opposition in any time where the merits are justified,
to who you perceive to be your opposition in any time where the merits are justified,
you create an invalid argument for the progress of your own platform.
And so the more difficult thing is to rise above.
And unfortunately, in the case of the violence that has been dominating the headline news,
and dominating the headline news, the actual statistical data does not represent a devolution
of society. If you go and you look at mortality rates, death rates, pre-COVID, post-COVID,
we're actually back on track to have longer average lifespans and better end of life mortality rates.
We're also finding that evidence, which is circumstantial,
is painting kind of an inaccurate picture of reality when we say that these
observable issues are on the rise.
The autism rates are on the rise.
And then the question,
you know, for the people that want to find issue with how the autism is being caused,
they don't need much more than it's on the rise. And then they'll just point at everything you've
done during that time and say, that's wrong. And the other side of it is the people that are going along with it who believe it's right
will look at the detractors and say, you're crazy. We have the institutions on our side.
We have the science on our side, right? So it's all just this appeal to authority. And it's really,
who do you want to be the master of your life? And at one point, I was ascribing to other people's
theories. I was willing to say rigid, hard truths about things.
But what I have found to be much more successful in navigating the mystery of the universe is in constantly reserving the right to change my mind and in constantly withholding the kind of compelling force to decide upon anything with absolute certainty i just refuse
to no matter how compelling the story no matter how good the meme no matter how
you know it just feels gripping this case that's being made i can entertain that the case exists i
can appreciate the forces that lead it to feel more compelling than other cases that might be similar, and then I still move on and I still
don't have to own it as my internal belief system. And the reason that's so powerful is because I
will never end up being caught in a corner where it turns out someone else has the right answer,
but my stubbornness is locked into a different answer, and then I forfeit the assistance I need
to survive because of a stubborn
belief that I hold, which is not based in reality. And so rather than holding onto anything too rigid
in this world, I suspend the firm value assessment unless otherwise critical for my survival.
But if it's simply an ongoing conversation of uncertainties,
then there's no bonus points in locking in your answer earlier. You're just removing the
likelihood of introducing new information to improve your assessment in the future.
So there's really no benefit in deciding, oh, it's all this way. This is how it has to be now.
Which is why the conversations that dominate the conspiracy is more popular than the Rockefeller Foundation or the Carnegie Institute or any of these large narratives of consolidation of education and resources for public good and possibly
marginalizing the alternative remedies of a homeopathy or alternative cultural medicine
offerings, those things change, man. They change. They change. And it's very easy to look at institutions that have been plagued with individuals who make bad decisions and then damn the institution.
And that's where the energy β that's where the crypto-anarcho energy comes from of the destroy what exists and we'll build something better.
And I'm here to tell you, like, we have a Carnegie Stout Library in town.
We have a Mason Lodge in town.
We have churches.
Okay, we have universities.
This is not some hillbilly farm town.
We have farms.
There is cropland.
There's agriculture and cattle.
But there is also enlightenment. there is also institutionalized education.
And within those institutions, those bricks, those stone slabs that were laid to form the library have stood for 100 years.
People live and people die. The librarians change.
New books get published and old books get remade. of information that they would go and build public libraries where anyone can submit a published work to the Library of Congress and have it circulated to the Carnegie Stout Institute of
what do they call it? It's like literature or something like that. Anyone can do it. Literally
anyone can do it. Anyone can write a fucking book and put it on Amazon. If Amazon is behind
some massive terror cult, some death satanic cult ring, why would they allow you to publish
a book on the website? Why? Wouldn't it be so much more efficient for them to not allow that
to happen? Why ever risk the truth getting out?
What you think that people are going to complain, Amazon won't become my publisher and manufacturer
and supply chain partner for a book that I wrote. No one's ever heard of me. You think anyone's
going to take your side in that argument? They'd be like, Amazon's a very busy company and I need
my dog food delivered tomorrow morning
with Amazon Prime. So I'm not really interested in your opinion about Amazon being bad. Amazon's
directly helping me and your alternative is get rid of the thing helping me and then trust that
there's a replacement better than that. And the replacement that would be better than it probably
actually looks very similar to it. It probably still requires warehouses and trucks and inventory schemes and SKU codes and return policies and legal and all this stuff.
So maybe your issue is with like a Jeff Bezos. Maybe your issue is with like Dr. Fauci. Maybe
your issue isn't actually with every single doctor that's ever gone to a North American medical institute for their education.
Maybe it's actually with individuals who have undue influence over some of the decisions that some people have the freedom to make or not.
And that's where it's a very challenging world to navigate.
It's a very challenging world to navigate. It's a very challenging world to navigate. It would be so easy. It would be, it seems like it would be so much easier if they would just hand me the guillotine and like get to go through a crowd and pick who makes it and who doesn't.
scribing to a faith of some kind helps achieve a stillness where otherwise tensions arise to a
point of like, it's me or him. And that's where the kind of self-sacrificial ritual of Christ on
the cross serves as this iconic reminder that there is a choice. There is a choice actually
beyond going to war with Rome with spears and shields.
You can actually go to war with Rome on the battlefield of principalities.
You can actually debate.
You can actually stand for something, and you can die for that thing that you stand for, and someone else may have to take up the mantle and to push your beliefs further.
and to push your beliefs further.
That is the reality of the good, earnest fight
for this kind of enlightened progress.
Some people are not going to live to see the change.
And so we have to decide, who are we?
Are we the kind of people that must win within our lifetimes?
It must be about us.
We must be in the chair of control.
We must be the captain star command.
And all of the universe is going to bend to our will.
And inevitably the singularity will be here in time so we can achieve our immortal cybernetic robotic animal skin suit.
you know, robotic animal skin suit and live for millions of years and create a simulation where
we go back in time and forget our history to feel the allegedly slow progress of evolution of life
on Earth. And we go through this cyclical simulation until we land on Mars or wherever
it is that we've been traveling in our, you know, cryogenic storage tubes as we hurl through space from a planet that was destroyed in a nuclear
apocalypse because of that lesson that we keep learning over and over again in the simulation,
so that by the time we land on the new planet, we're all programmed to be docile and not want
war for one another. Whatever it is, it actually seems that the people that take a longer range
view do much less of the senseless bloodshed in the interim. They're so much more occupied and concerned with maintaining β because they understand the fragility. They understand the fragility of the state of things. could take a bullet. That thing could stand. I could crash my SUV into that thing and it wouldn't collapse that building. And so we start to think that these institutions that are very
hard to destroy are very easy to replace. And that's such a misstep. It's such an inaccurate
assumption that I feel people underappreciate the true daunting reality of having to begin again.
There's this idea of like a preservation of humanity.
There's a book called The Giver where society is moving into a hyper-digitalized and technologically advanced society
and people are put on emotional suppressants.
They're given assignments in their society for what their jobs and tasks will be, and
there's only one member of society in each generation who is presented with the role
of becoming the giver. And the giver's job is to archive
all of human experience in the form of memories. And through this ritual practice, they embody
all of the memories of the previous world. One of those memories is that of color. So society lives in this gray tone, this everything is white, black,
and gray, but the giver sees the world in color. And when he gives the memory of seeing color to
the next generation's giver, he no longer can see in color. It's this concept of the fragility of
the preservation of the tradition and of the wisdom. The idea that there's only this one trusted person in society who maintains the authentic record of human existence, and they must pass it on to another node in a new generation who will be responsible as the wisdom keeper of the community to hold on to the truths of the past and to deliver them into a vessel of the future, whose job will then be to go on and replicate that.
It's like a standing of the guard.
And through this transference of memories, the new giver, the young man who becomes the next giver,
comes to appreciate emotions.
He comes to appreciate the inescapable, skin-crawling, emotional, magnetic field of thrill and fear and love and loss.
And the idea in that book was even this runaway neutering of society, this neutering of humanity, if you will. It's propping up society
in textbook form. The institutions are solid. The electricity stays on. The people mind their
labor. The job gets done. Birth rates are healthy and children grow up. But it rips the soul out.
and children grow up, but it rips the soul out. It rips the soul out. And that's where
right now, when they say there's a war on for souls, look at who is participating.
There are so many people, they're literally choosing the rainbow, by the way, the iconic
rainbow flag of the LGBTQ plus community is literally a reference to the giver. It is a reference to this
concept that there is a human fragile soul and that it doesn't actually physically receive
dictation from the bricks and mortar that create the institution. The idea is that there is a human
free will somewhere in the body and that it wants to express itself. And society says,
no, we actually, the only colors that are allowed are white, black, and gray. Pick from those three.
And when you realize that there are individuals who are so far removed from a belief that they have a matter of contribution impact on the process of democratic process, people that feel so disenfranchised that they won't vote or that they feel that there's no need to vote because it's all part of a fixed system, the society that has already agreed on gray.
has already agreed on gray, they fall out of the parameters that currently exist. I'm not saying
that you have to agree with the parameters that currently exist. I don't think I necessarily
agree with all of them, right? And that's why I come to learn the same types of things, like even
our brother Oops is talking about. I've learned all about the sovereign citizen movement. I know
all about the alleged gold fringe border of a flag.
And if it's facing this direction or that direction, I know about maritime law. I know
about the alleged bonds. I know about the federal reserve. I know about the birth certificate. I know
all of the stories. I've heard them all. I've heard them all. But that doesn't get us any closer
to making an impactful change on good, especially when you come to realize most of those stories are ghost stories. They're actually empty, baseless lies that people use both as a form of comfort
and of criticism of a platform they don't agree with, as well as a cautionary tale of keeping the
door open for uncomfortable truths should they ever come to pass. And in
engaging with that information, the pull on especially young men is one of taking back this
deep-rooted survival instinct within us that ascribes purpose to our lives. We say, no, I'm not ready to die yet, so I can't.
My life has meaning still. My life has a purpose still, so my time cannot come yet because
my purpose has not been fulfilled. But take the life of Charlie Kirk as a lesson we can all learn.
Nothing is promised. Tomorrow is absolutely
not promised. That young man probably had decades of good left in his heart for what he believes is
the right thing to be doing. Whether or not you agree with him is a secondary matter, but
from his perspective, do you think Charlie woke up that day and thought,
well, let's keep it to about a half hour because I'm never, ever going to do this ever again.
I don't think that's how he approached the job.
I think he probably saw this as one of many stops on a tour he was going on,
and then life had other plans, reality had other plans.
And so we have to humble ourselves and accept the change we wish to see in this world
does not require us to see it to be real.
It can happen long after we die. It could happen
and someone might forget to tell you that it happened. So we have to stay grounded in the
reality that there is a war for souls going on, and it's not individual people who are
largely responsible for the pressure.
The pressure comes from an incompatibility with institutions and the current society.
And I'll tell you this, because I get very nervous.
As someone who actually appreciates the inalienable God-given right to the freedom of expression, the freedom from religious repression, the freedom of privacy.
from religious repression, freedom of privacy. These things are so crucial to me that I refuse
to shortcut someone else's rights to deliver protection of my own. I understand right now
there's a lot of dialogue about people who identify as transgender and people that have
ideologies that seem to fly in the face of a traditional, maybe Christian Judeo-Western society.
And it would be very easy to say, round them all up into a truck, right?
And lock them up or kill them all or something.
And like, well, that's just what the crime alleged of the Nazis is.
That's just the crime of Mao Zedong.
That's just the crime of all the persecutors of all of history.
So we're not doing any good. And I also rely on history to teach me the exceptions to the rule. So how many people in
here have done any research about the study of transgenderism? And before the emergence of
transgender studies, how much historical context do you have on gay, lesbian,
queer individuals in society? I think an important story to remember is that of Alan Turing,
right? Alan Turing was admittedly homosexual and was persecuted for his homosexual lifestyle
in a more conservative society. And it was his contributions to Enigma
that led to cracking of the Nazis' codes during World War II. And so imagine if we locked up every
single person who was homosexual or who was lesbian or felt queer because we disagree with
their lifestyle. And we were even so, we were so convinced that we knew better.
We were so aligned with our own belief systems that we felt justified in stripping away the humanity of other people because of a set of beliefs that we don't find as our own.
It's kind of a crusading intolerance.
intolerance. It's sort of this, I think a good scene from The Patriot is when Benjamin Martin is
pleading the case to negotiate with the Crown. The guy who fought at Fort Wilderness,
scalped and maimed women and children who were of Native American descent as a retaliation attack
on the Native Americans who came and raped and murdered their people
in their own outpost.
He's the one advocating to the general of the army and to the colonies that we should
go back and negotiate.
We should actually go back and plead our case before the crown and explain why we deserve
these rights.
And the army says, we've tried.
We have debated. We have negotiated. We have, we have debated, we have
negotiated. We have written them a dozen times. And Benjamin Martin says, then we do it again.
We try again if we have to. And he says, that must be the measure of our resolve. And then
the general says, I was there at Bunker Hill when they took the fort and advanced two or three times through gunfire. That is the measure
of their resolve. And that harkens back to the Crusades, the Islamic invasion of European nations
and the Christian and Protestant attempts at holding out the invasion and then ultimately
choosing upon Crusades to go and thwart out
the ideologies that they felt were incompatible in the long scale. And Benjamin Martin would be
the first one to tell you, we negotiate again. We must try again to find a nonviolent solution.
And that's coming from a purveyor of death, a master of killing. He's the one telling you,
of death, a master of killing, he's the one telling you this war will not be fought on
some distant land.
This war is not going to take place in some island.
It's going to happen in our backyards.
It's going to happen on our fields and in our towns.
So that is why we must be extremely cautious because you've heard the adage of first they came for the them and thems and I said nothing.
And then they came for the them and thems and I said nothing.
And then they came for me and there was no one left to say anything.
So the idea is that there is a war for souls going on and we believe it's us versus them.
We believe it's us versus them. People have lost their humanity to the point where they no longer identify the pain, suffering, and the manifestations of those changes in the other humans around them.
And so we're willing to pick and choose which humans are no longer human so that we can begin whittling away at the population until no one is left to challenge our comforts, to challenge our claim to what is right and how the world should work.
And I'm not advocating for some, oh, I'm so tolerant and every belief system has equal weight.
Benjamin Martin says that we should debate.
We should argue.
We should have to actually bring out principles and logic, and we should hone the truth rather than plaster it over someone else's claim to reality. an extremely kind of flashpoint, you know,
Charlie Kirk being assassinated is not the only example of violence. I guess on that day,
there were also children who lost their lives in a shooting.
I think the day before that,
the woman who had emigrated from Ukraine or Russia had been murdered.
And I'm sure that there are other murders happening,
you know,
all the time.
But when we're looking at who's fighting who, imagine for one moment that it's the people on this app yelling at each other who are responsible for building that library downtown.
for building that library downtown. Imagine you thought it was just any chuckle fuck that's
allowed to have an opinion that's actually directly responsible for building an MRI machine.
Imagine you thought genius was contained in the vessels of idiocy.
How incompatible that belief system must be. And the next war on identity would be, okay, well then look at how
white men have invented everything. And look, there's a lot of truth to that. There's also a
lot of uncomfortable truths around IQ as it's associated with your ethnicity and where you were
born and of what people you were born to. And even that does not determine who is greater than and who is less than. It is
simply how we are different than. And in the ways we are different, we will never cease to count.
But in the ways we are the same, we need only find one. We only need one reason to not tend to violence. So in these trying times, in these uncertain times,
do not give yourself to the opinions of others. Do not give yourself to the value constructs
being prescribed by others. That is the simplest way to become a weapon of a tyrant who you are not even aware is pulling your strings.
We have to be cool-minded.
We have to remain steadfast.
It is a challenge.
It is not easy. with empathy and respond with patience and respond with a calling to a higher resolution
to say your tragedy committed does not justify a tragedy in response. So as much as it pains me to
be pained, that pain is not a justification for enacting damage on others. And so right now,
you have to understand, there are so many Americans who have felt disenfranchised and
left behind. Many of them checked out of institutionalized narrative weaving years ago.
Most of them did it in middle school. A lot of them did it in high school. And the writing was
on the wall. There became this culture of too cool for school, this idea that, man, those books will dull your mind
and you won't be able to be a real person if you learn how to be an electrician or if you learn
anything about world history or things like that. So it's like there became this idea of anti-establishmentarianism as a
viable alternative to every instance of institutionalized rhetoric that could be
discovered. And that sort of too-cool-for-school mentality propagated long enough separates the participants of the current infrastructure
from the interests of the infrastructure. And you have these diverging interests that occur
on the call it the liberal side, or like the, the more socially liberal, let's say,
because I think the terms of like liberal and conservative are just so fucked up. It's like,
you're not even describing what they actually mean anymore, because of how warped any of it is. But
with the people who you face them with the challenging question of can a person who feels
as though their body does not match their psychological interests or their psychological
biases, is that person mentally ill for feeling
that way? Or is it a complex human experience and they're no different? They simply experience the
psyche from a different lens of potential biases and proclivities. And is it just to identify the behaviors of others and define them only by those
behaviors? Was there ever a time before they began making those choices that you would have found
their soul redeemable? And is it immediately forfeit forever if they start making choices
that you don't agree with in the future? Can it ever be redeemed again? I don't think we have a protocol. I don't think that we have a framework right are often vapid and empty and fail to actually touch on the nuance of the complexities of society. gravestone and the short cutting is becoming this strategy this why why nuance when broad brush
strokes will cover the canvas faster well if i'm trying to paint the whole picture so i can
understand reality why get bogged down in the details when i can at least start with these
broad blacks and blues and grays and yellows and say, now that I have a framework, a canvas, a background,
now I can begin to build real reason upon it. So the challenge for people who have the long-range
good in their hearts and in their minds is that the disagreements of the present threaten to
dislodge the better nature and the better efforts of people
who are more tolerant, more inclusive, more willing to revisit challenging ideas and to
debate and negotiate and work through a civil discourse to yield these better composite results.
We have probably forfeited that stage now because the celebrity,
the fame-instilling qualities of the viral movement of 20-second sound bites being ripped
out of someone's head and then used as, in some way, an accurate representation of the totality
of the infinitude of their soul is this gross whitewashing that's
occurring or this broadwashing that's occurring where we take the extreme complexities of the
human experience and we boil them down into identity politics so that we can have a you
are wrong to point at and an i am right to refer to. And that's all it is, is who can take the high ground?
Who can say, I'm right, you're wrong? We have lost the interest in what is right, what is wrong.
We are now identity entrenched in I am right, you are wrong. And if that means if the ideology is to die, then it's taking that human with them. They didn't kill Charlie Kirk because they were afraid that some people have his ideas. They killed Charlie Kirk because they believe he is those ideas.
The only way that I can survive in this world is if that ideology is killed.
And rather than see words and thoughts and principles and textual references and historic history, they saw a man.
And they said, there is the principle that I want to snuff out.
And so we've probably forfeited a platform of authentic debate.
We've probably forfeited a platform of authentic debate, and we're now playing dangerously with this fire of I'm right, you're wrong, and neither side has a claim to spiritual purity.
So, you know, did the Christians have the side of spiritual purity during the Crusades?
Did the Muslims have the side of spiritual purity when they were invading Europe? Did winning the war because God wills it
determine truthfully that that was in fact the will of God? Or is that luck? Is it a temporary
physical victory that condemns you to a timeless hell of another kind you know we we often believe
that we can understand everything especially if we're facing someone who also has a claim to
knowing anything as soon as anyone introduces the idea that they have any fucking clue what
they're talking about we enact enact our ready player one response system
that becomes the Akashic record of all known human wisdoms and teachings, and we just start
spouting off at the mouth all these different things. And we don't get anywhere with that.
Again, it's the same thing that drives us young men to look at the sovereign citizen doctrines and those ideas that there's this cabal that's doing a financial
bond enslavement of human beings is because if that were the case, then at least we could stop
debating. At least we would have a them to point at and say it's time to get rid of them so that
we can be successful or so that we can thrive. And because we face a society that is so
incompatible with our personal interests and we may feel disenfranchised as this young generation
inheriting debt and uncertainty in a technologically explosive time of globalist
resource supply chain interoperability, we say, damn it all to hell, burn it all down, I can do it better.
And don't you think someone already thought that at one point? Don't you think everyone's
probably thought that at some point? So what if it's the case that the stuff you disagree with
is actually as good as it can be done right now? And what if you're discounting tomorrow for
dissatisfaction today? What if you're discounting the promise of what we might build tomorrow because of how dissatisfied you are today? And I think that's why you don't
hear. Did you notice how you didn't see Gene go into the timeline to talk about the politics of
the Charlie Kirk situation? Doesn't mean he doesn't have opinions. Doesn't mean that it
doesn't bother him. Doesn't mean that he doesn't want to advocate for a certain platform. But
perhaps when he looks at the long range, most contributable
good that can come from him, maybe none of it has anything to do with that. And so difficult as it
may be to steal your emotions or, you know, refuse to go out into the internet and pick a fight with
people, you might have to accept that you don't even like it. You might even think that
you have the right answer. And yet the maximum amount of good that you, the human being can do
requires your focus in other places. And that is the, the sign of the, the long vision that the
kind of, whether, whether you find it through faith, okay, maybe a belief in God or in Jesus
Christ or in whatever your belief system is, or you find it through a moral calling within you
that says, we have choices to make every day. Do you want to choose to try to do what you believe
is good or do you want to do something else? And in making that choice to do what you believe is good or do you want to do something else? And in making that
choice to do what you believe is good, you often have to sacrifice other things that you feel you
could do. I could go and make my timeline us versus them. I could go and talk about gun rights
and mental health and institutional access to firearms. And also, I could have all
those debates with people. And meanwhile, we're running out of energy. Meanwhile,
the inflation is getting worse. Meanwhile, the things that cause the systemic fallout
of society are going to go unattended because we're placing our focus over here.
Doesn't mean that it's not worth it. Doesn't mean some people can't hold that discourse, but look at yourself, look at yourself and ask yourself, what is my
job? What is my calling? Where do I fit in best? And it might be on the, it might be in the trenches.
You might actually, your maximum amount of good might be in stimulating more conversation of
something, but I don't think that's where maybe the developers at chia are focused right now i think there's probably a
different long-range strategy that they're working on and in the meantime there are going to be
events that happen good events tragic events happy events sad events but unless we stay focused on
our priorities unless we stay focused on the higher calling, we are going to become wasteful in our energy and in our time.
So you'll notice that not everyone is participating in the same public discourse. and transgender studies and the societies throughout history that have had publicly recorded communities that are gay, lesbian, queer instances of identity dysmorphia or a difference in a self-identity scheme. These histories are not totally analogous
to today, but we can look at several histories and begin to glean insights. So for those that
don't know, the first ever gender reaffirming surgery took place in Germany.
The psychologist who started the institute, who was spreading the education about sexology, it's all the Jews all the time. That's where a lot of the stemming of this modern nationalist right wing movement comes from is they look at the conditions that were facing Germany in the Weimar Republic, which was being funded by bankers who had Jewish ethnic backgrounds and an intent for Zionistist uh you know future plans they were funding the weimar republic
which was the existing government of germany of the time and they were you you effectively create
this look at how look at how interests separate so i'm the banker okay i'm happy to profit off
of your nation's need for access to capital, lending markets, etc., so that you can build a nation, build your capitalist future, and have things. So I have the resources. I'd pay you.
a working relationship with the government whose job it is to take the bank's money and to invest
it out and to lend it out and things like that. So I'm actually advocating for continued policies
and continued politics and continued offices of the people I'm funding now. And this is sort of
the pattern that we find. During time, you know that meme of like, good times make soft men, soft men make hard times, hard times make hard men, and whatever that shit is. political class from the citizens, you have this situation where banking interests are
filling the pockets of their coffers, of their political coffers. Those politicians are happy
to live an enriched and elevated lifestyle, but economic inefficiencies where equity is not being passed on to the citizenry causes a devolution of the
society at the citizen layer. And that starts to boil up toward the infrastructure of the
institutions and the vested interests that have propagated them. So what you effectively have,
then, look at American politics today. you want to know why AOC wears those
beautiful dresses? Because she feels more beautiful when she wears designer dresses
than she does when she's wearing sweatpants. She is happy to take the money. They're all
happy to take the money. Thomas Massey doesn't take money from APAC, but he takes money from other donors.
None of them want to be poor and in public office.
And so they have a vested interest with the people that pay them.
And when the needs of the constituents of the politic class are not being met, there becomes this divergence in the lifestyles and the values of the people spending the money,
the interests and the policies of the government, and then the reality of how it affects the citizens.
And so you had runaway sexual proclivity, debauchery, institutionalized homosexuality, sodomy, transgender studies, sexology.
homosexuality, sodomy, transgender studies, sexology, all of these things were not this
necessarily discussed anti-Christian, anti-Christ theology. It was actually just
a republic of people that had become so socially liberalized so quickly that the institutions could not sustain their obligation
to their constituents. And this happens all the time throughout history, okay? There are these
sort of four mechanisms of society. There's your technology, your institutions, your economics.
I have to go back and look at it, dude.
But it's effectively this pretty well understood push-pull where advancement is happening, and then there's kind of this golden age.
And during the golden age, a hyper-liberalization of values occurs because of the abundance that affords the freedom to entertain less traditional lifestyle choices. But the kind
of like DGENs in crypto who sort of FOMO into green candles, people start going harder and
harder and harder into straining the institutions through their liberalized, you know, newfound
lifestyles that they want to have represented by government so that they have civil liberties and human rights,
that the institutions are incapable of keeping up with the evolving needs and wants of the citizens,
and then there becomes a collapse.
There becomes a collapse and an overcorrection, which is where then the conservative side comes in
or the extremist right wing comes in in and they say society is falling apart. These are the values that emerged that disjointed us from a productive society. We are condemning these behaviors and ostracizing those people because they're the problem.
then you get the swing to the other side and now you're rounding up all of the transgender people
because they're all guilty. They're all the problem. They are all the debauchery that is
undermining society. And look, if you want to take a staunch Christian or even Roman Catholic
belief and you truly feel that way, that it's just fully incompatible with your religious beliefs, the First Amendment
protects your right to feel that way. And you're actually allowed to believe those things.
Whether or not that will in any way represent the changes that occur in society is a second
matter entirely. And that's what voting is about. And that's what democracy is about.
But if those are your beliefs, surely you can still see a danger in rounding up everybody, right? That's obviously a step too far. There's clearly many, many, many measures that should exist before we go, oh, they all have blue hair? Get them.
get them. Because if you do that, you're kind of showing your hand that you don't actually have
the faculty necessary to discern when it's coming for you. Because if it's coming for anybody,
that's you, dummy. You remember how you're not the president? You remember how you're not the
Illuminati? You remember how you're not the royal families? You remember how you don't have private
security? They might as well be coming for you, moron. So if you're the one that starts the go get them, you need to be prepared for war. You
need to be prepared for no more institutions, no more society, no more higher education,
no more politics. You need to be prepared for whoever has the most guns and the most ammunition
and the most clean drinking water and the most petroleum is probably going to endure, and everyone else is going to die. That's what you're signing up for. Society is a tug of war. It moves generally in the direction of progress, but it is constantly being accelerated and then overcorrected. And in these cycles, the underlying institutional accountability is being lost
because of a hyper-personalization, this embodiment, this internalization of conditions
and misappropriating them as politic. You're not advocating for politics. That's not what
you're actually doing out there. Politics involves two parties or more coming together and forging through disagreement
compromise. That's politics. What you're describing is totalitarianism through the
justified, call it the crusaders dilemma. God wills it. It's not immoral. I believe that God would want this. But you're just a man.
You're just a man. And the world's most spiritual man poses no more certainty to heaven than its
most deviled red ant. Okay? So you're just a person. It's not for you to decide what is true
for all people. It's not for me to decide. It's not for anyone to decide. And the idea is that through democratic discourse and through the propagation of the value system of personal expression, we should have an abundance of information that we can whittle down to a higher form, to a more productive and inclusive form and now here's the other thing
before you get on your crusader horse and you go riding into the transgender village to round
them all up know this we have historical evidence fully aware of the reality and embracing the sociological forces of homosexuality, being gay, lesbian, queer.
In Athens, Greece, which is often attributed with a period of enlightenment in mathematics, philosophy, and civics, there were prescribed roles in society where especially oftentimes the philosopher class would have relationships, men would have relationships with young men.
men would have relationships with young men. And these societies knew that, and they were not
opposed to that. And when you stand on the Christian mountaintop and say, you know,
Jesus was this white guy that only loved women or something, like, you're perverting reality to fit
these biases that you want to believe. But if you go and look historically, there are
examples of good societies and bad societies, each that have their own relationship with
heterosexuality and homosexuality. Some of them have documented success. Some of them have
documented failure. But the reality is they exist. So this isn't new. Now, the transgenderism stuff is more broadly speaking new as far as this concept of institutionalized sexology or the study of the human body.
So in Athens, Greece, the philosophizing that was being done was about math and the platonic forms.
Okay?
Now the human form is up for debate now the question of the and and
this is stuff that um emmanuel kant was writing about hundreds of years ago the the animal machine
okay the animatronic human this idea that like your flesh and bone and organs are just faculties that host a
reality of thoughts and experiences that are being transmuted to you through atmospheric
conditions of electromagnetism and stuff. What if it's actually the case that God is pulling the
strings on your puppet body?
Do you know better than God?
Could you even discern that that's what's happening?
And so these rigorous debates have been taking place for hundreds of years. It was only more recently that there became institutions which were propagating schools of thought that reinforce these otherwise not majority beliefs into becoming equal
representation. And this is one of the other pillars of that tug of war of society.
It's the floor of human rights. And what you don't necessarily appreciate if you're on the
side of like the cisgender heterosexual christian white north american
anglo-saxon guy like you might not appreciate the idea that taking guns away from transgender people
could be one flavor away from taking guns away from christians or taking away the right to vote
for homosexuals is one degree of difference away from taking the right to vote away from heterosexuals.
We cannot β the highest claims to immaculate divinity, the closest that people have ever gotten,
can probably be found in the spirit of the United States Constitution of America.
That doctrine challenges thousands of years of man's relationship with government and man's relationship with God and restores autonomy and power to the individual and allows them to advocate for the change that they wish to see in the world without the threat of persecution for having different beliefs.
the threat of persecution for having different beliefs. That is probably the single most
godlike document since the Bible, okay? That is as close as we humans can get to aspiring to
an even greater ideal that empowers all individuals. And so when we're living in these times of controversy and identity politics, never forget that you are first and foremost a human being. All the other conditions you experience are the human condition.
So before we rush to malice, let's take an additional moment and let's really think it through because every punch we throw is also going to land on us.
You are not able to separate the individual from the ideology so long as they choose their ideology.
ideology so long as they choose their ideology. So simply going round up the ideology and put it
in camps is no different than round up the people and put them in camps. So if you don't want to be
round up one day and put in a camp, you need to think about that heavily. You need to aspire to
an even greater resolution. And I'll tell you this, in my brief research in history and trying to find kind of
the social inequalities and challenges of people that have different personal beliefs, whether it
be their sexual orientation or their religious affiliation or whatever it might be, it turns out
the most successful populations, the Athens, Greases of the world, they were striving for more inclusivity. It turns out on the other side of the spectrum where people try to create exclusivity and identity politics, a greater amount of violence is observed. A cause for war is often close behind. So it's not to say that you need to be tolerant
and accepting of everyone's belief systems, especially those that are not your own. That's
not the point. I'm not a kumbaya, oh, let's all pretend like there's no observable statistics. There's no trends. There's no evidence.
Everything is a smorgasbord of love and affection, and we just accidentally keep having murders all over the place.
No, we can quite literally go and use broad-based statistics to potentially glean insights. We also have to be critical of the sourcing of
information and biases within data gathering and narrative-driven display of potential sources and
things like that. But we can look around and start to identify there are absolutely differences
between people. There are plenty of things that are similar, but that does not override the
differences. There are still differences, and so to not account for those is folly.
Right now, we live in a time where individuals want to fight with each other about,
I'm right, you're wrong. No one wants to be held accountable for what's happening.
They don't feel like they've been given enough benefit to justify taking the scar for having skin in the game. They're not going
to say, yeah, no, I'm actually pro the American government and the, you know, contras that were
running drugs over the border or the scientists that were issuing poisonous medicines and, you know,
hurting the fertility rates of already marginalized people in the economy and things like that.
So there's all these things that we can choose to disagree with pretty easily.
There's a lot of things that we don't have to agree with, but burning it all down to
start again is so counterproductive. That's why
I like the last great dictator speech, Charlie Chaplin, where he's basically dressed up as Hitler
and he's giving a speech about don't give yourself to these machine men and their machine minds and
their machine hearts. You are not machines, you are men. He's talking literally about Immanuel
Kant. These lessons are taught in the Illuminati universities
of the students that are willing to go and engage with the content and read the books
and learn about the times and the challenges of a society that's becoming more empowered with
telecommunications technologies and a convergence of populations of diverse backgrounds accepting a
singular location or locality for them to build their family on.
These issues and challenges have plagued humanity from the dawn of recorded human history.
And yet, all too often, the poorest prescribed solutions rise to the top in a false binary
dilemma, a paradox of sorts, where we are not interested in accountability to
the failure of the system. We are only interested in prescribing failure on those we blame while
redeeming ourselves as the solution. It's them, not us. That's how it's to be discussed. There's
no room for a conversation about principalities in high places, forces that seek to divide and destroy. There's no room for that conversation because first I have to tell you that you're wrong and I'm right. And that's where the conversation begins and ends.
And we'd have to substantiate our opinions.
And we'd have to debate over uncertainty.
We'd have to negotiate for compromise.
But rather than do that, it's much easier to say, enough is enough.
I'm exhausted.
I'm tired.
You don't know what tired is.
You haven't walked through the desert for 40 days and 40 nights.
You haven't walked through the desert for 40 years.
You don't know what tired is.
You're just tired enough to compromise on something that is objectively wrong.
You have no idea what tired is.
Tired is the feeling you feel on the 100th year of doing the right thing in spite of all the reasons to stop, in spite of all the pressures to give up. And to compromise on virtuous identity value.
Of we can do better.
But I'm tired.
As soon as you take that knee.
As soon as you take a rest.
You have given up.
You don't know tired.
Tired is coming back in your 100th human vessel.
Over the course of a thousand years to try and
push that rock up that mountain and then being whipped and persecuted for it and still trying
until your last breath and your last effort can push it and that rock comes back and it crushes
you and buries you in the hill to be forgotten forever and yet if ever you were to manifest
that mind and spirit again you would do the exact same thing you would come back to that mind and spirit again, you would do the exact same thing. You would come back to that hill and you would push that rock because that is what must be done. That's tired. Tired
is appreciating that you stand on the shoulders of giants and that you are the genetic offspring
of some lineage of history, some cause, some purpose, some will, some desire, some effort
that someone else once embodied and they are gone now and you are what remains.
And you have the power and autonomy within yourself to make a change on this world,
to make this life free and beautiful. You have that power and it is your obligation
through time as the existing proof of the past to make a better future or not. You don't have to,
make a better future or not. You don't have to, but don't be surprised when the people who choose
to make a better future do not come back for you. That is why I call it a breakaway civilization.
You can kick and scream and cry and pout and say, that's not fair and I'm not represented
and they don't care about me. And I assure you those complaints
will fall on deaf ears. They will have left a long time ago and no one's coming to save you.
So you can either get with the fucking program and start moving through the desert and realizing,
yeah, you're going to have to strategize on the move. You're actually going to have to adapt as you go.
You're not going to get exactly what you want just because you decided that you want it.
You're going to have to work for it.
And so most of the conversation that you're looking at right now is not a discourse.
right now is not a discourse. It is not a debate. It is two exhausted parties who do not feel they
It is not a debate.
are accountable for the failures of institutions which have been unable to keep up with the social
equity programs of inclusivity that have been the kind of pillars of abundance that most of the
highly evangelized societies of the past exhibited. They were very inclusive, very democratic,
very liberal. They also could not sustain their hunger for freedom. The institutions failed to
keep up. There's an inequality of resources. There is a supply chain dilemma where your needs and
wants pile up faster than the ability to deliver, your willingness to take second third or fourth choice
is incompatible with the ego that says you're you're the main character of the story it was
all for you anyway you need to be taken care of first otherwise you wouldn't be here
and so it's in these times that we should challenge ourselves to remain steadfast and patient. And if you're angry, take that anger inside.
Turn it into a flame that gives you the energy to not give up.
You're going to have to outlast the noise if you want your message to be heard.
You can continue advocating right now, but it's going to be difficult to hear.
The people whose messages will never be denied
are those who never stop delivering on the message. Continue pounding the drum,
even when it feels futile, even when it feels like there's no hope.
You go down swinging on the drum. Charlie Kirk died preaching things he believes in.
It's a tragedy.
You don't have to agree with any of his beliefs.
It's a tragedy that a man who had more to give
was snuffed out with more left in the holster.
That's how people felt taking it away from the fear porn of death the
tragedy of murder barry sanders played for 10 years in the nfl undeniably the best running
back of all time unless you try to measure him up against things that are outside of his control
like super bowl rings and at the end of 10 years he said i'm retiring while i still have my knees
and i still have my ankles and i still have my ankles and I still have my shoulders. And all of the beat writers said, hey, you can't do that. You're the greatest running back we've
ever seen. You can't stop now. You've still got two or three years left. And Barry Sanders said,
when would it be enough? Would it be enough when I can't walk anymore? Would it be enough when I
can't go to my kid's football game because my legs hurt so much or because my knees don't work? When is enough enough? And so doing it because you choose to do it is the
power. Barry Sanders is the only one that can choose to retire. Charlie Kirk's the only one
that can choose if he wants to never do another speech. Someone else took that away from him,
and that's why it's a tragedy. The idea, the scripture of the United States Constitution gives you inalienable rights.
It identifies, rather, inalienable rights you have been given by God, an authority beyond any man.
So no singular man can take them from you.
Those are the virtues of the Constitution.
That is the power of the ideology of the american democratic republic okay all men
created equal and they weren't even able to achieve that and manifest that in the times that
they wrote that constitution and so much has changed since then that the world actually looks
more closely like that than than the world that they wrote it in. It's not flawless. It's not progress in
only one direction. There are things that are setbacks. There are challenges. There are
times where the battle is lost, but that doesn't mean a loss of the war itself.
And yet, generally speaking, things get better. Generally speaking, people are living longer. Generally speaking,
more people are literate. Generally speaking, more people have drinking water.
And you look at those long arcing developments and you have to ask yourself, is the disruption
you seek today going to threaten the success of these long, arcing
progressions that are empowering more people?
Are you about to insert yourself, the individual, into a multi-generational conversation and
shortcut the interests of all so that you can achieve the outcome you seek now.
If ever you are moved violently in emotion, you feel that you need to condemn all people who
have these different sexual proclivities and value systems and you think they're the enemy
and I'm righteous. And they're looking at you and they're thinking you're the enemy and I'm righteous.
How you have any idea how little I value your opinion?
You're a child.
You're just a kid.
Hey, I worked at a daycare.
You're just a kid.
I'm the teacher in the class.
I got you both to disagree with each other.
You remember when I identified that one of you was more liberal and one of you was more
conservative.
And then I just told one of you something that made you feel right. And then I told the other person something
and I made them feel right. And now you two go at it. I caused that. You guys aren't smart.
You're kids. You're not actually smart enough. You've been around for what? 30 years, 40 years,
50 years, 60 years, 70 years, 80 years, 90 years, 100 years? How long have you been around?
And you think that you totally embody the wisdoms of thousands of years of human history and the
nuance and the psyops and the information warfare and the lies and the covered up history and the,
you think that you have it all figured out really and you thought you figured it out
so fast that you were going to have enough time in your day to kill everyone who's wrong
and start something new and experience it for yourself all in your lifetime
yeah i don't know buddy that sounds a little crazy to me you know
that sounds a little bit far fetched
just to me
but maybe
we're fighting each other
the reason that the
Jew conspiracy comes up so much
is because you go back to the
Republican and you say well follow the YMAR Republic and
you say, well, follow the money. Okay. You look at American politics, you say, follow the money.
Okay. All but Thomas Massey and AOC are being funded by AIPAC. AOC is being funded by a Muslim
brotherhood. It's incompatible with AIPAC. Thomas Massey is a rootin' tootin', gun-totin' country
boy, and he doesn't see Israel as America. He sees America as America. And the's why it's so challenging to have conversations
is we use identity politics to try to hone in on the scope of something. But then in doing so,
that convenience misattributes value and bleeds guilt to people that may not deserve it. And it
draws the guilt away from people who may deserve it. So we have to be more specific. That's why Alex
Jones says globalists. You have to understand, you think you're such a genius because you figured
out that the Rockefellers and the Carnegies, which owned energy monopolies, were willing to
assert their own ideologies into institutionalized education. But what you have failed to understand
is that they're the same ones that offered you
the place to disagree. Hitler would have just shot you in the head. They say that, oh, the Israeli
Jews use false flags to strike out and then play the victim. Hitler used a false flag attack on a
radio station to invade Poland. You want to know why he invaded Poland?
They were running out of fucking money.
They couldn't eat the money.
They need oil to fund the war machine so they can conquer land, so they can eat their crops, motherfucker.
If it was as simple as God wills it, he could have sat at home.
They were running out of resources
for their new government.
They were plagued with the debt of the former government.
So if your government
is in a financial pinch
and they start talking about taking territory,
you're not on the side you probably think you are.
And just being a conservative in that nation does not make you a Nazi.
Because doing those things and selling out the country is not a conservative value.
That is a corrupt value. That's not conservatism or
liberalism. That's corruption. And so if there are ideologies that threaten society,
we need to understand in which ways they threaten us. Is the emergence of the study of sexology and the first gender
reaffirming surgery, is it actually a satanic, societal, incompatible death sentence to all who
feel that way, are driven to that proclivity, have a bias toward those feelings? Or is it more
likely the case that while those things are happening,
other things are also happening, and we are conflating cause and effect? We're conflating
correlation and causation. I don't know. Why is it that the city of Athens was allowed to diddle
boys? You don't have a problem with the Pythagorean theorem.
So would you have gone back and denounced
the philosopher-alter boy relationship
of Athens-Greece?
Or do you like democracy?
You know, like where it was invented in Athens, Greece.
So it's a lot of picking and choosing.
It's a lot of prescribed value systems.
You don't actually give a fuck.
You start giving a fuck when someone else puts it and presses it upon you. They impress their lifestyle on you. Then it becomes a problem, and it exists for both sides. Check this out. The transgender community doesn't want you to push your heteronormative traditional values on them because they don't feel that that's who they are. The conservatives don't want you to push your transgender or homoerotic
preferences on them because they don't feel that it is their values. You're just both
on the same topic from different sides, but none of you have a claim to the moral high ground.
The closest you're ever going to get is in fooling yourself to believing that you understand the will
of God, that you alone have the faculty to understand God's omnipotent plan for the universe. And so somehow you're being
charged with in the flesh, the role of going and enacting God's will on the earth. That's really
no different than the level of psychosis necessary to sit on a rooftop and take a shot at the guy to take his life because he disagrees with your opinion of something.
That's how deluded that approach is.
media amplify controversy and they reinforce an emotional affiliation to controversial
opinions. It's not enough to say, well, I think it's a complex conversation. You must say
something bigoted or something intolerant. You must take this aggressive stance and tell everyone that
you have monopoly of the truth and that you understand ethics and that you understand morality
and you understand reason and they do not. But that is not true. That is not the reality we live
in. So we actually require a greater amount of patience. If we could stop fighting each other
just long enough to follow
the money again, we might figure out you actually didn't know anything until it was given to you.
Remember when you were a baby and you didn't actually have the faculty to understand anything?
And then at the earliest impressionable age where you began to form a consciousness,
other people were imputing value systems into you.
And you might have had the free will
and the contrarian nature to disagree with them,
but overwhelmingly,
you probably think the sky is blue and grass is green.
How do you know that that's really what's going on?
How do you know that there isn't a guy in a hut somewhere
on a snowy hilltop
whose job it is to program the emotions of society to believe that we all see blue when we look up
and we all see green when we look down? You don't know. You don't know any of that shit. You don't
know if you live in a simulation that's being controlled by a human civilization that's star
charting the universe and has to remain cognitively empowered while their body is at rest in a chemical soup that preserves the organs.
You have no fucking idea.
And so there is a sense of faith.
You don't have to be Christian and believe in Jesus Christ to understand that any assumption you have of your tangible grip on reality comes with an essence of faith.
It comes with an unprovability paradox. and that's just the way it is, an uncertainty.
Every human being is having to experience an existential crisis of identity as long as
consciousness has ever existed.
So let's pay attention.
Let's meta-analyze what's really going on because it's easy to say, I don't like it,
change it back to what I like, but you might not have an appreciation for history. You might not
understand the ingredients that make the best cake. And you're about to start pulling away the
eggs and pulling away the flour and pulling away the butter because you just don't like the way it
looks when it's not baked into a cake. And your brain doesn't understand that the West, which
affords you the opportunity to have these disagreeing opinions, only exists because they
were able to fight for the right to disagree.
The point of fighting for that right wasn't so that we could dictate truth. It was so that debate and negotiation could challenge, steel could sharpen steel,
could challenge steel could sharpen steel and we could challenge the truth with a need
a provable relationship between cause and effect that is what we're seeking for is to better
understand our place in this universe so don't give yourselves to the media you're playing a
video game and and you're the m the NPC and they have built the program.
You can opt out whenever you want by simply not uttering the beliefs of someone else
without fully understanding your own beliefs. You don't have to be right.
Chia's not concerned with telling you what's right and what's wrong. They're not fighting
for your moral opinions. They're creating mathematic efficiencies. Some people will
live to experience them. Some people will not. Some people will come to live in a future that
did not exist when these things were created, and they will be existing in a world where they already do.
So if you're really unhappy with what you're seeing around you, then heed my words.
Where you place your focus, you plant your fate.
Get so busy building the future you want to see. Get so busy being the future you want to see,
get so busy being the change you want to see,
get so busy producing the good that you want others to have that you cannot be drawn into these senseless, dichotometric battles.
I don't have to win whose god is the righteous
god. That's not going
to get the water up the hill.
What up, Naz?
The future is bright. The future is orange.
GM, GM, everyone.
It really is. Here's what they don't understand, Naz.
You want to know why you all give a
fuck about this tragedy that they continue to put in front of you? Because it's a lot harder to wake up and do the right thing again. It's so much easier to take a day off and to say, no, no, no. These are the beliefs I have because I've been told what's morally right and what's morally wrong. And what's morally right today will always be morally right. And humans have never gotten it wrong and will never
disagree on that. It's so much harder to wake up and look at the chaos and look at the bloodshed
and look at the dissolving society around you and say, I have to get to work today.
I have to get to work today on a mission I may not
live long enough to see come to be. And I might need faith that others will pick it up where I
leave it. Should I be taken out? Should I be unlucky? Should anything come to affect my
ability to push forward? Charlie Kirk is a martyr because people believed what he had to say and
they want more people to hear what he had to say. they want more people to hear what he had to say.
They will go forward and say what he had to say.
You don't have to agree with it.
Apparently, some people didn't agree with Charlie when he said it, but they believe it.
They agree with it.
So they're going to pick it up and move it forward.
Gohan done told you.
Future Gohan done told you.
You might strike me down, but another will take my place. Okay. Obi-Wan Kenobi done told you, future Gohan done told you, you might strike me down, but another will take my
place. Okay. Obi-Wan Kenobi done told you, he said, you may strike me down, but you will only
make me more powerful than I have ever been. He's talking about if you're fighting on the,
on the side of justice, because you believe truly that you are, if nothing else, not acting evil on anyone.
Then when they snuff out your inalienable right to autonomy and self-expression, they will amplify that message.
And it's our human faculties that believe we understand what this life is at all.
That fears death and that fears an end to the physical world.
And it is sad.
It's sad that our parents grow old and die, and it's sad that we grow old and die and our children have to live after that.
It's sad.
But it's only sad because we have a limited understanding.
If it's true that the smartest scientists have discovered energy can never be created nor
destroyed then where does the soul go when a man dies transfer but earlier honestly i was thinking
myself right you're like you know rather than going to a whole religious sermon islam christianity
etc go watch attack on titan literally everything you said is pretty much the whole fucking plot line of that
whole series bro right uh yeah go watch that series guys if you haven't yeah no i've watched
it's got good animation um yeah man it's it's just this uh it's an opportunity for us to
challenge ourselves to look within to revisit our own foundations of values to challenge ourselves to look within, to revisit our own foundations of values, to challenge
ourselves to seek out truth, to reinforce our beliefs, or to change them where they deserve
to be changed, and to aspire for an even greater outcome that may require a displacement of our
emotions today in order to maintain a path tomorrow. And it's very easy when you're
walking a path, maybe you've been under the sun for like 40 years and you're real tired and you're
real thirsty and someone hands you a bottle of hate this person juice, it would be real easy to
grab it and quench your thirst. But that does not make it right. We have to realize very few human beings are channeling into a desire for justice and goodness that goes beyond personal bias, that goes beyond a need to be right, but rather is defending the freedom to make mistakes without infringing upon the freedoms of others.
And that is the level of malleability that we have to navigate with.
If we only allow our ego to be the decider of what is real and what is not.
We shut off faculties that have been understood throughout all of human history for thousands of years.
There are more than one set of eyes to see the world with, okay? You can use the set of eyes
in your heart. You can use the set of eyes in your gut. You can use the set of eyes in your
balls. You can use the set of eyes in your head. You can use the set of eyes in your mind, okay?
use a set of eyes in your mind okay there are different ways to view the world and to try to
discern what is real and what is not so we don't have to rush into being right rather the opposite
we need to rush to patience we need to remember that the next punch thrown deals damage. The next bullet fired takes a life.
If we don't need to throw a punch, if we don't need to fire a bullet, then we need to maintain a patience.
We need to be steadfast in our resolution of a better way of handling things.
And that's why I like to look at the technology that is probably going to be here after I'm dead.
My dad said, what technology do we still use today that we used 5,000 years ago?
Language, math, okay?
That is technology.
Consensus?
Yeah, you know know language of math that's technology so why would it be different that in 5 000 years from today that they wouldn't be using technology
that you're telling me they won't use math they won't use language i find that hard to believe
and you realize yeah if if we are to believe that there is any human race in the future and it's not the greys coming to extract gold and program a new humanoid civilization on a rock somewhere, then it's probably important that we be patient.
it's probably actually really important that we understand we don't know everything.
We have some things that are going to last longer than the breath in my lungs.
If you want to only destroy everything that can stand the test of time,
that's not even where the work begins.
The work doesn't even start until after you've destroyed
it all and cleaned it all up now you have to start from square zero and build civilization
do you understand you can probably see why that doesn't make any fucking sense
and so so long as men die liberty shall perish. The idea that people don't live forever, but our ideologies can endure. And so we must aspire to better ideologies, we must aspire to greater value contribution, and we must forfeit the ego's desire to be the main character, to be the star of the show.
All the resources are gathered onto Caesar.
Rome is Caesar.
The people make it so we may have the good fortune of value that endures.
Crops in silos.
It's the people who plant the crops, not Caesar.
So glory unto Caesar does not mean to Julius Caesar or to Octavius or to whoever the emperor is. It means glory to the people who have made,
they have created a ritual whereby a person, some people, the Senate and the emperor will be
risen up on the shoulders of the society, of the people. And any glory those leaders achieve
is the byproduct of those people. Glory unto Caesar does not mean
glory to the emperor. It means glory to the people of Rome. Caesar is merely an anointed man of the
people. He doesn't get any special treatment as far as the glory is concerned. The glory belongs to everyone who made it possible for him to be Caesar.
to provide their support to the spirit bomb to goku gathering love force to be able to destroy
evil you will you will no longer need to take a jersey from a team whose values were handed to you
you can don your own cloth you can take your own moral principalities and advocate for them. You don't need to be some faculty of some other person.
You're not some puppet that someone gets to decide for you what is true and what is false and what you should do and what you shouldn't do.
You are an individual.
We have enormous power if ever we stop handing it directly back to the institutions that are
failing to maintain scale with the increase of demand from an ever more involved citizenry, if we could ever stop arguing over the prescribed notions handed down
to us and we could ever start advocating for our own interests, we just might accidentally remember
the White House wouldn't exist without an American people. The Washington Monument wouldn't exist without an
American people. These institutions exist because of the people who made it so. Not because
Donald Trump is the third cousin of Jesus Christ and so therefore he gets big buildings to live in.
No. People made them.
That is important. People die. Buildings are not alive. That's important. We can keep what we've
built and we can replace the components that plague the decision-making process. Because no
one's omniscient, we probably need to have debate and discourse and peaceful conversation. That's
why I don't go to crypto meetups. I can talk to you right here. You can't shoot me from where you are. I can spread my message and minimize the attack surface.
People get robbed.
People get attacked.
People have been killed.
I don't put myself in that situation.
Not if I can avoid it.
And I actually do find some value in a Charlie Kirk who's willing to go and bring the fight to the jungle. He's willing to
take the Promethean fire of debate into the jungle of people whose belief systems are under the
constant pressure of what they feel is a non-representative institutionalized government
that is dictating life choices to them they don't agree with. And now it's kind of like
a child of divorce. They have this resentment towards stepfather. They have a resentment towards
the traditional class of ideologies and leaderships. And they believe that those
ideologies are rigid and firm and unchanging and unwavering over time. And they don't realize the
maturation and evolution of human progress because they buy the headlines and they sell the news.
They don't actually read history. They don't actually care to show the exceptions to the
rule. They don't actually care to identify the positives of things they disagree with.
They're only interested in the negatives of the ones they don't.
That is foolish, man. That's childlike. That's primitive primitive man that's not the philosopher king that's not
the top of the mountain that's not the person who has time to meditate on the idea that is reactionary
dude i was listening to the new lecture by dr roy casagrana last night or this morning as i was
falling asleep so i didn't hear all of any go back I pinned at the top right in the link to YouTube but he mentioned something and I learned this for
the first time last night that talking about true democracy right there's no such thing as a true
democracy democracy but there are or rather there's no country in the world that can call
itself a true democracy but according to Dr Roy there are a couple of cities or states in the US that can be classified as that.
And they don't have a mayor.
They don't have any parliamentarians, MPs, etc.
The town or city, they get together once a year, decide all the rules, and that's it.
And then enact it.
What happens if...
Let me create...
Every hero needs a villain, dude.
You guys are so...
This was supposed to be the tutorial island level 1 skeleton.
Okay?
And you guys have been on level 1 skeleton tutorial island for 20 years, 30 years.
Let me give you a real enemy. Let me give you something to actually
be afraid of. Let me show you what actual terror looks like. And then maybe we can have a conversation
about where we fit into the equation. I want you to imagine a world where technology is creating
this all-encompassing database of instantaneous analysis,
the ability to know where everyone is, what they're going to do,
when they're going to be there doing it,
the ability to firewall them from financial services,
from political debate and discourse, to be underrepresented in things like insurance and education.
Imagine a world where the AI figures out the most energy-efficient,
optimal path forward for humanity, and all of the scientists have to agree.
They all fall to the will of the omniscient AI, and it carves us through a path where we have to have these particular outcomes
where we're put in the camp and we're lobotomized and we're shipped off into the ocean, okay?
In that world, if the AI decides that the best path forward doesn't have fuck all to do with your personal opinion, society is going to just move on regardless.
Your opinion will be a speed bump that is unfelt in the progression of a society that refuses to die.
You might choose that as your hill to die on, but again, you are an unnoticeable speed bump
in the grand scheme of everyone else not wanting to die on that hill with you.
So they will get over it, and they will continue on on avoiding being crushed by this slow moving change of society, these ideals and concepts that are forging a new framework for society.
not literally us, but the timeline, is sitting here arguing over the troons and the trannies versus the chads and the conservative Christians.
And like, the whole time, global finance is tuning up to put the world on a blockchain.
blockchain. The whole time, institutions are getting ready to pull back a curtain and show
you a whole new world, and closing your eyes isn't going to make it not happen. Pretending that you
don't like it or saying that there's reasons to not support it isn't going to stop the way more
interested parties who are going to continue down this path from continuing
down this path. It's like a glacier. There's this glacier slowly melting across the plains,
and everybody wants to believe, I'm going to stand for this thing I've just been charged with today,
and I'm going to hold back the glacier of human progress. You're not. You're going to get crushed
and left behind like everyone else before you, and you have to decide, is that the hill you want to die on? Because if it is,
then make your fate, you know, have your date with God. But if it's not, then get over it.
Not because it's not worth being compassionate or, you know, having empathy or wanting to have
discourse and debate, but because you don't have time.
You actually have to keep up with getting ahead of the glacier before you worry about stopping and solving every problem, especially because there are problems further down the
road that you need to be bankrolling your time today.
You need to be hustling and accelerating today so that when you get to that challenge, you'll
still have the time to finish
before the glacier rolls over you
that's the side up guys don't get distracted yes you have to keep building you have to build
further ahead you have to look longer range you have to decide is this the hill i'm going to die
on or can i pick this fight on the next hill
and failure is not an option two years on look fucking hell four new chains for nine mm
just march them down people don't realize people are starting to we're getting firewall let me
explain some things that your human eyes can't see, but my matrix eyes can. You're being firewalled right now. We all got swept up overnight in the firewall of the dialogue of gun violence in America on an app that shares a stage with a number of countries, many of whom do not have guns in their constitutional rights. And the discourse now of this app is being
algorithmically tuned to elevate political discourse again, just like it was during the
election. But now with respect to these sociological frameworks, these rights or
maybe a reduction of rights or whatever it is, that's where the volume is going right now.
But here's the reality. It's very easy to get the big viral post every now and then. It's so much
harder to have generally enjoyed content all the time. The Tang Gang is a group of individuals who can opt in instantaneously
and opt out instantaneously to any platform that they choose to advocate for or against.
And so we can actually, just because I as the individual decided I want to show up and say
something today, I can do that. And if anyone supports it, we are already crushing the return on investment that
these corporations have with respect to the amount of money spent and the amount of maintaining of
messaging that they can endure over time. We are starting to walk down entire Fortune 500 companies
and dog walk their engagement because rather than a raid group of people that think, oh,
I'm going to do this for the next two of people that think, oh, I'm going to
do this for the next two weeks, the chart goes up and I'm going to sell. We have people who believe
in principalities, in ideologies, in values, virtues, and they're willing to show up again
tomorrow to earn the reward that they seek. And so we are driven by our own self-manifestation of success.
They are driven by algorithms and pro formas and KPIs and A-B testing.
They don't have a soul. They have a machine.
Dude, you know what had a massive fucking smile from cheek to cheek?
Or what put a massive smile from cheek to cheek on my face a few days back?
When Trent just popped up all of a sudden into your space.
I thought, boom. Yes. my face a few days back when trent just popped up all of a sudden into your space i thought boom
yes you understand why the tang gang gets this opportunity and no one else does right
because we're real humans because we have both homogeneity and heterogeneity we actually have
autonomy and we have consensus so when you need liquidity from a diverse group of individual investors,
but you want the predictability and the ease of communication of group dynamics,
the Tang Gang delivers on both simultaneously. No one else has figured it out yet. The Mlady
cult at the highest levels, they get it. The organizational leaders get it.
But the average passerby is much more psyoped into the Neo Chibi aesthetic or the kind of fun like anti-Fed, Fed posting, psyops and stuff like that.
It takes time and a learning curve to actually appreciate the culture that they have been laying down.
And that's why most people when they see theanyang, it doesn't intuitively mean anything. But the reason you pick the orange is because if we were not able to speak,
if we were not able to use sign language, and I needed to convey the totality of all existence,
of all known conscious human history into one muse, I had to deliver it in a, I get one object on the entire planet
that I can choose to make you and I see God, I would choose the orange. It's the only thing
you've ever known. The giant orange in the sun, the pre-sliced fruit built to be shared,
grows on a tree of giving. That's the one. You would let every single scholar, philosopher, the philosopher's
stone is an orange.
Even the other one, I don't know,
we didn't make their new phone orange.
Everyone knows the dead drops
or marked with an orange.
Yes. And like, you really think
Charlotte Fang's favorite fruit to eat
is an orange? No.
His favorite fruit is an orange.
Because it's the right one.
That's the one. They named it after itself.
It's the meta fruit.
Guess what they call candied
fruit in Chinese?
Tangulu.
Dude, look, the lore
will, the lore will write itself.
I'm not the first
person to have higher order thinking that looked at the sun and thought,
isn't it kind of bizarre how we all seem to get our energy from the sun?
And then people are like, Superman's a sun god.
Babylonian, Egyptian, Osiris and Isis came together and they were raging.
It's like, dude, you also get your energy from the sun, you fucking idiot.
They're like, we was Superman.
We're black guys with the super.
Listen, motherfucker.
We're all Superman.
You were born on Earth.
Everybody wants to take credit for it.
It's like, you can have it.
Hey, you can have it.
But now you got to go fucking do good.
That's what Superman does.
Oh, watch the new batman as well cool anime
what up curry dude i uh i'm deeply inspired by uh your message today i um you know this is this
is really something that i've thought a lot about and I've spoke a lot about with a lot of people over the past, I'd call it the past year.
Um, and it's just, it's hyperstition, right?
If everything is fake and gay, and if you believe that to be true, then you can create
your own fake and gay and it can be wakeful or and better than everybody else's.
Romilia is simply that, right?
Like that's really kind of the message is like, Hey, cool.
Everything's faking gay. Ours is way fucking cooler. Way fucking cooler. remilia is simply that right like that's really kind of the message is like hey cool everything's
fake and gay ours is way fucking cooler way fucking cooler weaponizing weaponizing the
uncertainty of conspiracy to pull out the compelling almost immersive experience of like
is it true is it fake what's real what's not real and now you're caught in rather than a rabbit hole
it's this spiral of kind of unprovable unprovability that either you're going to continue honing your uncertainty or you're going to just give up.
You're going to just capitulate to one side or the other.
But the real β someone even posted as a reply to one of my spaces before.
a reply to one of my spaces before they said like the sign of an intellectual is the person that can
entertain an idea or a person that can come to understand an idea without entertaining it to be
true necessarily like the idea of holding contradictory beliefs simultaneously in your
mind rather than having to build a value structure around the rigidity of the truth you know have
always maintaining an elegant caution against totalitarian omniscience as your bellwether of human experience.
You're always going to fail to be all-knowing.
So as soon as your brain tells you, like, well, this is the final answer, it's like, sure, but put an asterisk, right, that says I reserve the right to change my mind.
Winning the culture war isn't about winning every battle, right?
It's about simply being in the arena and living into the next battle.
And that's really, that's the core of a lot of this,
is really just preserving something of value in history to pass forward
and that we can all kind of circle back to in consensus and say,
this is the lore, this is what really went down,
and this is what's made us today. So, dude, it's really, it is the lore. This is what really went down. And this is what's made us today.
So, dude, it's really powerful stuff.
Surviving to fight another day, man.
So many young and vengeful men, they pick the next battle to be the hill to die on.
And it takes a wise veteran of the battlefield to say, we're not actually going to fight that one.
is veteran of the battlefield to say, we're not actually going to fight that one.
You know, the idea that Achilles was this super soldier, not because he was dipped into a river
and turned 99% into a god, but rather because he knew how to pick his battles.
He knew which battles could be won, which battles were worth the glory,
and which ones to stay away from because they were just a death trap.
That's what makes Achilles this unstoppable warrior.
Highly proficient, highly talented, and never paints himself into a corner.
And that's why the heel, which is the corner of the foot,
is the symbol of his weakness.
It's the tendon that holds up the rest of the skeleton.
So he is quite literally Achilles, the man painted in the corner.
The story of the man who was never painted into the corner until he was.
Until he got shot on the heel.
And his Achilles tendon.
Yes.
But that's the idea. The myth is an artistic representation of someone who could never be boxed in. But if he could never be boxed in, he'd still be here. And if he was still here, he'd be thousands of years old, right? And then that would probably set a different precedent for who's in charge.
He didn't live to be a thousand.
He did get boxed in, just like everyone else does.
Some use pine, right?
But everyone's getting boxed in eventually.
It's just that Achilles knew to pick his battles to endure to fight another day.
That's how you become, that's why no one will remember your name.
You're going to die in the battle before the big battle.
battle. You're going to die before it matters. Achilles is going to live beyond the storytelling
You're going to die before it matters.
and die at a later date. His peak fame will come after he dies and he will have earned it in his
life. But most people die on that hill long before they see their opportunity come to pass,
their potential come to be realized. So yes yes picking our battles and staying in the fight when you look at the most advanced
guys your bram cohen's who made a bit torrent and you see them not coming to the timeline to like
pal around with everyone about i think this well i think that and i think that it's like
they're picking a battle you think they weren't affected at all? You think those humans didn't feel any type of way when something like that happens?
Of course they do.
They're human.
But they have to stay ever-focused.
They have to remain steadfast and fight the next battle.
If they stop and become a casualty of this battle, you forfeit untold foundation. You are forfeiting an attempt at
building sustainable foundations. And that's what it's about is the floor of human rights.
The floor is not always level. It seems that the person who was in charge, the people that won their most recent bloody conflict, have a little bit higher stoop on the floor that is canted at an angle.
And then everyone else is kind of stratified down the cant.
But over time, kind of like resetting concrete with foam, we're lifting up one side and then we're going to have to level
out the other. And then we're hoping to raise the whole block again. It's about that minimum
human rights threshold. And that's where right now you're actually seeing a psyop and it's a,
it doesn't have to be a psyop for the sake of, uh, confusing people, but rather for drawing out incongruities in ideologies. If you believe all
people are created equal under God, where do you draw the line with respect to those inalienable
rights? Because if you're willing to take guns away from people who identify as transgender,
where does that stop? There isn't a clause that says, oh, unless they're black.
stop. We don't have, there isn't a clause that says, oh, unless they're black, you know, that
the all men created equal doesn't have an asterisk. That's like, as long as they're white and they
come from the Graham family, like, no, that's not written in there. It says all men. Um, and,
and they're speaking about all of humanity. So that's where it's very easy for us to get caught up in these disagreeable arenas.
And I'm happy to listen to both sides advocate for what they believe is the most productive path to the future.
But there are other realities at play too that are not being held up by this battle.
This battle is being had and it is
not the only battle that is happening and so some people who are enlisted in you know the division
of we got to build this thing over here they they will not be seen participating in this battle it's
like you don't send the air force to fight the submarine battle you know it's like no i'm sending
the navy i'm sending the water guys to fight in the water i'm sending the Air Force to fight the submarine battle, you know? It's like, no, I'm sending the Navy.
I'm sending the water guys to fight in the water.
I'm sending the air guys to fight in the air.
I'm sending the land guys to fight on the land.
And that's where, if we would realize right now, we actually have two factions of Team
Human fighting each other.
We have an inter-team skirmish happening, and they are both saying that it's a failure of the institutions.
They just think that the other person in the skirmish is responsible for the institutional
failure. They're not able to appreciate this historical context of a tug-of-war whereby
abundance exceeds the rails of public institutionalized social welfare.
If all we had to do was print more money to make sure no one was poor, we'd have done that.
If all we had to do was plant more trees to have more seeds, to have more food, we would have done
that. The problem isn't necessarily in having enough, It's in having enough now, having it next.
The supply chain of delivering.
What if there was virtually unlimited oil in the world?
Well, you still have to harvest it.
It doesn't just shoot into your car and then refine itself in the tank and then start speeding
you down the road.
You have to refine it.
So there's still constraints. And that's why if you listen to how the cypherpunks and sports codes provide
a traditional finance equation for trying to estimate the value of a blockchain, there are
two major components. One is all of the value on the chain, but the other one is the value being commanded next. How badly someone wants into the
next block, as well as what all is secured by that blockchain. So we have these constraints
that face us. Yeah, we have money. Yeah, we have food. We have water, shelter, resources. It's not that
there isn't a total value. People say the earth is abundant. We have more than we need for everyone
to have everything. Hey, that's fine. You build a fucking railroad then. You build a combustion
engine and you fix the timing belt and you put the fucking wheel on and you replace the guy that
has a heart attack who did that job before me. So until you start
fucking moving anything, you're just complaining. We have an abundance of resources. That's not
the dilemma. It is a supply chain issue. We have an inefficiency of distribution of efficient resources. That's the problem. It's not that
the sun can provide all the energy the planet will ever need. You want to know how I know that?
Because it always has. Because it's the only thing that has always predated all of us,
that we have ever known. So how did we get here? Sun abundance,
bitch.
You got here through the abundance of the sun God.
Okay.
Now,
what are you going to do with it?
Hold it and not distribute it.
So some people say I'm going to plant trees whose shades I may never enjoy.
I'm going to work on something.
I understand the fragility of survival and the beauty of the
human experience. And it's my obligation as someone who believes in the life of others.
I'm not some schizophrenic deluding myself on the, you know, fractal imaginations of a subconscious
projecting the potential human identities of false phantoms in a world of my
own locality. I believe that there are other humans. I believe that there are other people.
I believe we come together and we achieve things individuals can't do. It's not like a schizophrenic
angel on your shoulder giving you the answers to the math test. It's like, hey, I only have two
hands. I need someone to lift this bar up so I can hoist the joint. You know, like that's believing in other people.
That's manifesting your schizophrenia into a physical reality that helps you.
And maybe that's what it is, but at least you got the job done.
Whereas if you just sat in a room with a straight jacket on,
you rock back and forth, you're probably not getting the same kind of results.
So, you know, we got to come together.
Everybody needs an autistic angel in their life.
That's what it is.
And those people can help because it introduces challenging information in compelling ways.
The reason that everyone's very quick to jump on the anti-Jew train is because they've been given reasons to see new information.
They didn't know that there might be a cabal of people somewhere that they could
hate. They didn't know. You give them an opportunity and now it solves the problem.
Unfortunately, it's a broad brushstroke. Unfortunately, it doesn't hold any individual
accountable. So unless you think there's a hive mind of people that open up a particular book
and then they're all controlled by a demon that's using them as this neural network to exert its
will on humanity, unless that's your belief's using them as this neural network to exert its will on
humanity, unless that's your belief system, you're probably more likely to believe that it's
individual humans that are doing things that you don't want them to do. Now name them.
Now just name them. And if you can't, then you need to keep researching. You need to keep
investigating. You need to keep building a case, finding evidence. But if all you can do is say, there's somewhere in that building.
Okay, well, guess what?
When that whole building comes down, they're going to write articles about the families
that were inside, not the antichrist that I took out.
They're going to write about all the casualties I took out along with them.
And so if you're trying to be righteous and dignified in your choices, you need to account for the fact that other people exist.
Now, I'm all for the truth seeking and I'm not going to ever give someone a free pass.
Oh, you can't say that. No. Hey, test it on its merits is what I'll say.
Let's actually let's give it more rigor. Let's give it deeper scrutiny.
Did you know that that actually has a name? It's called the Hannibal Directive.
You say the Hannibal Directive?
Yeah.
I think I've heard of it, but it doesn't...
It's not eliciting anything right now.
Where, basically, you can kill your own statespeople for the greater good.
Right.
Hey, dude, it's very easy.
You want to know how I would create world peace i'd just
slip something into your breakfast cereal in the morning and you would all die peacefully
by lunch and then i'd just come in and i'd take all your silverware and your books and your clothes
and your dog and i just own it all and i'd be at peace and no one could hurt me and then an
asteroid would come and fucking kill me anyway you know so when you really start to think longer term you do have this
bizarre kind of like frozen time that you have to try to progress with this idea of like the next
step forward will send ripples backward it will send some almost like counterforce out as well. So in order to actually
walk the path, we need to find this paradoxical alignment whereby the backward force emitted
during the forward progression accelerates us away from bad outcomes and accelerates us toward
good outcomes. What does that mean? Well, that's a very complex, that's where the debating is. That's why
we don't go anywhere fast is, okay, so where do we step next? Well, I'm glad you asked. Here's my
opinion. He's wrong. Here's my opinion. You're wrong. Here's my opinion. So that's why it's
analysis paralysis is because you're trying to account for all of the different possible outcomes
and you don't want to take a reckless step in a direction
that you'll have to double back on anyway.
You also want to get out ahead of your problems
so that you can live to fight another day.
Polarization is the algo's best friend right now.
Yes, and what I'm telling you is
they're not using polarization because there's not enough of you
that disagree with each other.
They're using polarization because they don't enough of you that disagree with each other.
They're using polarization because they don't have enough people that agree with them.
The Tang Gang rolled up on a Coinbase executive's day-old post about a credit card product that the Coinbase centralized exchange, which boasts over 1 million human users, has a product that you can earn Bitcoin on your spends. 4% back in Bitcoin on all of your spends. They got 33 reposts. I made a post and sent it to just the Tang gang,
and we're going to ratio their day-old post in a matter of two hours.
ours. Coinbase is the largest American crypto institution. Their executives are no more famous
than me. They have more followers, and their engagement is no more far-reaching than mine.
preaching than mine. When you guys start to realize you're in control, you're actually the
value, you're actually the difference maker on the scale, you will no longer need them. You will
realize they need you. You can get busy working on the things you believe in and they need you.
can get busy working on the things you believe in and they need you that's how you overcome
an institution or infrastructure you don't align with do better without doing it for them
they need you go be the person they need and watch their empire become your kitchen.
They're going to be building for you to just have dessert because they need you.
They will make you a slice of carrot cake with cream cheese frosting.
They need you.
But if you keep rolling up for them, if you always show up for them and say, hey, what's the current thing?
Yeah, I believe side A is right.
Then you are just a product that they have invested in.
You're just a technology they have chosen to get their interest spread.
their interest spread. When you guys go to the timeline and you fight over right versus left,
you just entrench the idea that the two-party system is legitimized. You entrench the idea
that the current prescribed ideologies coming from those two branches are the only ideologies
that can be expressed. You're not choosing to advocate your value. You're rolling it up into someone else's
platform and you're compromising over the similarities so that you feel like your team
is big and your opposition's team is small. And so we say, well, we can round them all up. There's
hardly any of them. Okay. What if I round up all the Christians only starting with the ones that didn't go to church?
Not that many of you all of a sudden. Whoa, holy shit, just knocked down that population by about
98%. So, you know, how big is your team, really? I don't build the tang gang team on this idea that they all have to be in the tang
gang no the opposite you have to be yourself and if and when you ever opt into a tang gang related
endeavor that is just simply you sharing energy to the spirit bomb we have identified we align
with love and we align with more equitable outcomes so when we raise our hands
into the sky and we power up the centralized ball of energy that destroys any evil it touches
we have a purpose that we have opted into people of earth lend me your energy lend me your energy
that's what goku says people of Earth, everyone, people, just people,
don't have to be a Z fighter, don't have to be a Kai,
don't have to be an angel, don't have to be a demon.
The people of Earth, lend me your energy.
It's reciprocal.
The Tang Gang can do things no individual can do,
but the Tang Gang only does it because it empowers all those individuals.
It promises a tomorrow
to all of those people that believe in that cause. That's the spirit bomb.
The message has always been love. You step right, you get treated right, you step wrong,
you get no tone. It's as simple as that. They lent us $17,500, and then Deva added 5, and then the community put over $30,000 of TVL and has generated over
$70,000 of volume every day. The Tang gang of individuals said, I can lend you my energy,
and then we achieved something that now has us on pace to be the fastest growing decks on base.
It's growing so fast, base hasn't decided whether or not they want to go to war with us.
The Coinbase team is looking at our brand and saying, do we really want, there's only really
two paths. They either validate us and we become so powerful, so fast, we likely eat into the constrained business operations of their existing infrastructure.
Or they take a negative stance, whether it's through ignoring or outright gatekeeping, and that's war.
They have to pay their soldiers to show up.
Our soldiers show up because it's the right thing to do. Who are you betting on? And we brought more soldiers than you.
Yeah. And that's what those posts should be showing you. But people are so afraid of their
own power. They think it'll always be an NBA team that yields the greatest talent.
They don't realize those NBA teams were recruiting college kids.
Those college kids went to high school.
Those high school kids played youth ball.
The talent started way somewhere else.
And then it climbs into that institutionalized, preserved talent pool.
But there's individuals that led to that thing happening we as individuals can roll
up on coinbase we don't have to send out hey guys remember everyone gets a five dollar bonus if you
repost this i will tell you please repost this and if you don't i don't give a fuck everyone who does
it thank you that's the difference dude they have a negative externality that instant they try to
communicate they have a negative cost associated with it i start with a cost of zero and then people lend me their energy
dude your post and a few others right i'm gonna be posting them in the beppy army and the tangan
main chat right i got i got i actually got a dm to say like the the the the posts in tangan the
raid posts in the tangan main chat is it like a reward for those just like Bepi Arnau's like,
nope, that's all for the Grove.
It's just people that want to press repost,
and they might not know what exactly it is that we're trying to amplify.
But if you tell them, hey, I want to amplify this,
they'll say, yeah, okay, one click, whatever.
Okay, did my part for the day.
They have to be incentivized to show up.
We've already inherited our incentives.
We've already decided that we are a people, that we are a movement, and that we have aspirations.
So it's very simple.
Why am I doing it?
To achieve what I want to achieve, right?
Why are you doing anything?
Oh, because they pay me to.
Okay, well, then I bet I can go longer than you.
Yeah, I mean, it goes back to the whole, whole you know rising orange tsunami helps lift all yachts and you know the safety of numbers especially like when more of us are moving in the same direction
then it doesn't matter value extractors ops etc that are always going to be here we can't get
rid of them but at least you know we've got the momentum in the right direction. Yes.
And that's why, you know, I don't know what the future will look like.
Civil unrest is a kind of a touchy and sometimes scary thing.
Because just like kids fighting that can't separate themselves, it usually means someone with more authority is going to step in and separate them.
And in the context of democratic society, that can be kind of scary.
It can be kind of scary if the presumed remedy is Uncle Sam dispatches troops to separate the two parties because now they're both in trouble, right?
They're both going to detention.
both going to detention.
Shout out to the Bolsheviks.
Shout out to the Bolsheviks.
Yep.
So that's where we have so much more power than people realize.
We have real authentic human beings.
That means that the cost to acquire the next investable dollar is more
efficient than all the other alternatives.
If Trent could go to just a random room on Twitter
and have non-adversarial interest in his product,
he would.
But he can't.
Because that's not real.
Because people are not educated.
They don't understand the value proposition.
It doesn't translate to action.
We are much more homogenous people. We also have the benefit of scale, so we don't need 100% of people to align with anything or participate in anything. Some will do. Some will suffice. Our sum is much larger than most people's all. And so we don't have to allocate all of our resources, but we can fit the
bill. We can still get the job done for whatever that scale is. And we're non-adversarial. We,
before you met us, chose a higher calling. We ascribed ourselves to a longer range vision,
and we're not the people that hold an interest in weaponizing the moment of now to exploit the resources of
those who we claim an alliance with. And so when you introduce yourself to us,
the message is much easier to sustain and much easier to trust. And that takes away some of the
paranoia and the weight of risk that is associated with trusting someone else and going into an investment or an agreement with them.
Authenticity is a currency. We may be flawed human beings, but we are human beings. We are not
a corporation. We are not an ideology. We are human beings who opt in to a movement of other human beings coming together to achieve something individuals alone cannot.
Look, the last two years has proven none of us is infallible. We've all had mistakes.
Shit's happened. Arguments have happened. Fall-ups have happened. Blah blah blah.
Yet, as we said before, we continue the momentum moving in the direction, and the, you know, the orange'll give you some site. The last four days, multiple
small package DEXs, they have these very unique niche offerings, and they are all funded by
one interest. They were generating volume that kept them ahead of 9mm on base in key pairs that if you were to examine the liquidity and the volume had irrational demandL, and yet they were the same pairs as Aerodrome and PancakeSwap had,
and Aerodrome and PancakeSwap weren't doing anywhere near those numbers with respect to the volume to TVL ratio. So it was not the case that that's where the real demand driven numbers are.
Those were manufactured asset numbers so that they could maintain a posture above 9mm. You want
to know what they learned? They learned that they might as well just take hundred dollar bills out of their pocket and light it on fire because we're not going fucking anywhere and you spending three or four days to
try to bot swap your decks is not going to work mark andresen you're going to have to accept that
i will be talking to you in spaces shilling revenue share to ordinary people or your business will
become crypto.com i saw something yesterday in deck screen and i went and clicked on eth right and then i filtered
by volume for the last 24 hours right just to see what the top pairs were and they're all like
stablecoin pairs between eth and bitcoin right but there was one pair in there that i saw it had 195 million in volume guess how many makers one like what the fuck yes
and that's what i'm getting at is just because you see numbers does not tell the story you have
to understand the inputs and the the intentions and the coming together of the surface area of
competition because they have caught on in the last week
that we are competing. Do you see that Merkle doesn't spend all day talking about how much
better our incentives are than the other small DEXs that they have? It's because those other
small DEXs are funded by A16Z and we're not. Merkle is funded by A16Z. Merkle is in bed with
Uniswap Labs. They're in bed with Aerodrome Finance.
They know these companies.
They're paid from the same skill tree.
We are complete outsiders.
You guys do not understand how fucking insane that is.
No one else.
The Miladies don't even have a fucking DEX, dude.
No one else is building their actual core infrastructure
on the same rails
as the number one institutions.
Even the funks decided, we're going to go build
magma. We're not going
to compete with you on the public
ledger that you start.
We're going to start our own. And that's
fine, but here's the thing.
Coinbase isn't going to capitulate and come to you.
They
have the high ground.
If you want it,
you got to go take it.
Yeah, speaking of that,
check your DMs. Very cool. very cool yeah that's just cool just don't get me shot or anything you know i just don't
don't make it highly profitable to disagree with me um not yet but uh yeah not yet just
wait until there's a large enough audience to switch um Yeah, dude. I mean, we are watching corporations
fight the difficult battle
of trying to posture themselves
as open source, all-inclusive,
built for everybody,
and the very real investor reality
of the funding protocols
that they have their eggs in
and not wanting to watch their money turn into dust.
So they have to pretend like they want everyone to succeed, but they can't talk about everyone
the same because we don't actually come from the same place. We come from the open side of open
source. They come from the source side of open source. Slightly different, very different,
but it's very similar in some ways. They look the same kind of, but they're very different, very different, but it's very similar in some ways.
They look the same kind of, but they're very different ethos.
They're not so afraid of us that they will never allow us in.
But just like there's currently fear in the streets and people disagreeing with lifestyles they don't understand,
the institutions are not going to roll over dead
and hand over the keys to their kingdom. They're going to just continue on their own path of
believing they have the righteous high ground, they have the undeterrable path to progress,
and then eventually we're going to just be biting at their heels and they're going to say,
hey man, I'm sick of putting band-aids on my heels every morning when we got to start walking.
Can we just address that fucking thing that keeps biting?
Because it turns out all you got to do is like throw us an orange slice and then we'll shut up.
Hey, we'll shut up.
But, you know, how many days you need me yapping and biting at your ankles until you finally throw me a little treat or something, you know?
treat or something, you know? And what you'll find is when they finally overcome the scarcity
mindset of fearing that their business model will be negatively impacted by adopting new users and
multi-channel communications, they will eventually say, well, if we don't do it, someone else will.
If we don't bring them in, someone else will. Is that what we want? Because
if you look at the market and they know what they're funding and what everyone else is funding,
there ain't two communities doing this. You don't get 12 choices.
Someone's going to pick this choice. You can bet your fucking ass. Trent already picked us.
this choice you can bet your fucking ass trent already picked us chia already picked us
if you think that's where that's gonna end you're crazy so now it becomes opportunity cost
you don't have to like us but someone else might can you afford that
gene knew gene was on top of that dude Gene saw it before I even made the awareness movement
to Chia. He knew exactly what the score was. Gene's life only gets harder if I'm schizo-posting
against him. Not because I stand to actually threaten what's being
built, but because you fucking idiots are highly impressionable and I might just convince you I'm
right. And that means he's got to work twice as hard to prove me wrong just to satisfy your
inability to use discernment. Luckily, I'm not interested in that. I'm actually very pro what he's doing,
and he's pro what we're doing because he understands the value in authenticity.
We're not going to be the highest score on the SAT. We're not going to be the highest
score at the medical school necessarily. We might have a person in here that was. We might have a
different person in here that's the number one doctor. We might have a person in here that's
the number one fighter pilot, but overarchingly, not any of us are all of those things. And yet, we are all relentlessly us, humans, individuals,
sovereign individuals with full autonomy. You can choose to do whatever you want.
Do you have any idea how much money companies would spend to get that out of just their
employees, let alone their customers, just out of their employees. They pay those people. They get to pay those people to do
what they want, and they can't even get authenticity. That's what the quiet quitting
movement was all about. Those young people will look at you and say, no, I'll be here tomorrow,
and they're shopping their resume, doing anything but coming into the office tomorrow.
They can't even pay you enough money to give a fuck.
Look at the way they deploy all these badges and all of these gambling platforms and how
they get all those super cool people who wouldn't you believe it,
they host all those spaces
to talk about all those great products every time.
Yep.
And it's not by chance.
So imagine that you stop getting new demand,
but the only way that you got the previous new demand
was through those channels, through those strategies.
There's the law of diminishing returns. How many times can you go back to the well? How many times can that same
guy host that space and the message increase? Well, I'll tell you this, if they're not authentic,
none, zero, there's no fucking prayer in the world that they're ever going to attract new people.
But if someone is willing to stand up for something they believe in and patronize
and advocate and relentlessly, continuously pound that drum, then you've got to be a pretty
ballsy better to bet against those kinds of people because I watched a man lose his life
pounding the drum.
That was the measure of his resolve
That was the measure of his resolve.
You are up against some people who believe so fully in a thing
That they will commit their lives to it
If you don't have something that you are willing to commit your life to
You might want to put those $7 back in your pocket and bet on something else And that's why I take inventory of the wise elders. Where is their attention? Their mind is on their work.
elders. Where is their attention? Their mind is on their work. It doesn't mean that they don't
have empathy. It doesn't mean that they don't have opinions. It doesn't mean that they don't
care. It doesn't mean that they're not interested even. It is simply that in order to achieve
the highest priority path of progress, they must overcome these alternatives where they could spend their time and place their attention
and they must commit themselves again to the mission. It's difficult. Some people can't do
it because they think they're abandoning humanity. They think that they're leaving
people out there to fight for themselves. That's not the case. You have to be more mature to appreciate a holistic approach
to really remedying the underlying root causes of the issue. If all you can do is spray water
on the gas fire, you might feel like you're really doing something, but you're not. You're
simply applying what you believe the solution to be
to a problem you don't fully appreciate or understand. And there are some people who are
not going to hold that hose with you or argue about where to spray because they've realized
a much bigger problem and that that is the root cause isn't being properly addressed
and changes need to undergo changes need to be undergone in order to provide an environment
where the conversation can water the discourse can fight can fan the flames of a revolution
but if we don't address these root causes,
you might as well be exacerbating the problem and putting other lives at even greater risk.
That's how far removed from the problems of the present the forward thinker mind must be
in an unpromised future that they are yet to have built. So at least we can say they weren't actively trying to hurt someone.
They didn't go into the street that day looking to pick a fight. Sure, they stayed home. Sure,
they didn't voice a politically charged message and they didn't use their provenance to rally a
base to pick a side and to show up with spears and shields. But they were calculating the distance of the sun from earth
and making sure that we weren't all going to burn alive tomorrow, right? They were in the trenches
working on the math and science. And one day they're going to emerge from the laboratory and
say, aha, we've done it. Pure retardation. We figured out the serum. But until that day, they're not going to look as engaged.
And so people think only the things that look engaging are the things that are happening. They
forfeit the ability to do nothing, to participate in highly controversial, highly emotional,
highly energetic and charged instances of disagreeing because they think that they have
to do something and then they don't appreciate that you can work on things that are so much
more complex and needing of attention and convictions and noodling in the dark that
it might look like doing nothing to the untrained eye. But it's progress at the speed of sustainability.
You don't have to figure it all out today,
but you can never give up.
We know that if we give up,
it is a 100% guaranteed failure rate every time.
So unless we're looking to fail,
that's one option we can never employ.
But just because you don't see progress doesn't mean it's not happening.
Sometimes you need to remove yourself from the chaos and get working on something that basically removes you from the discourse.
But that does not mean that the discourse is any more or less valuable.
It's just not for you right now.
Call yourself to a higher purpose.
Employ your resources in ways that continue to be less directly negatively impactful to others
and more positioned to provide better outcomes to everyone in the future,
more equitable outcomes. Progress, not perfection. We get so hung up on the rigid identity politics of you look this way, you're wrong.
You say this thing, you're wrong.
We lose the nuance.
What if the person that can build the technology to create the total free and abundant universe is gay?
What if they identify as transgender?
What if they're smarter than you and they identify as transgender? What if they're smarter than you and they identify as transgender?
do have less, you know, traditional lifestyle choices or feelings and beliefs, and that there
are a lot of people that are in the computer sciences that ascribe to a LGBTQ plus lifestyle,
or, you know, those are their orientations or whatever. And we come out here and we think like the chad thing is to be the reddit epitome of like the white american christian nationalist radical conservative
and it's like dude you're literally leveraging technology that was built by alan touring you're
you're leveraging technology that was built by people who are being persecuted for having
different beliefs than you and you thought that you were somehow on the righteous indignation side, you're just naive and dumb. And you're pushing people
down that are lifting you up. So we have to rise above that. Just because some people share some
qualities, or even if we glean patterns and we identify schools of thought that
lead to outcomes we disagree with, that doesn't mean that we condemn a group of people. Tell me
their name. It's not enough that you invented the thing. Tell me his name. Who did it? Because I'm going to give them credit. And in that same breath,
I will not assign guilt to people who did not participate. It's not enough for you to be gay
for me to say that you're evil. That is not the defining quality. And if you truly feel that your body does not align with
the psychological forces going on in your mind, how the fuck would I know, dude? How would I know?
I'm not in there. I'm not in your skull. I don't read your mind. I don't know.
And if you could save my life, am I going to tell you what you can and can't do in the privacy of your own home and risk dying about it
i don't think most people would i don't think if you were bleeding out and someone could come and
apply pressure to the wound but they were wearing a i'm gay t-shirt i don't think you'd go no no no
let me just fucking die like you might think that you're hardcore, super staunch, traditional, conservative values,
but you would, through the blood-curdling tears, beg that person to save your life.
Everyone thinks that they're tough until mortality is on the table,
and then they become the ultimate negotiators.
Then they become the merchants of compromise,
and now they can see all of the creative solutions that might remedy the disagreement.
But it's a little too late.
And then we killed them.
Yep.
because I said my bags and then I pulled the trigger.
Because I said, my bags, and then I pulled the trigger.
Sorry, Jeffy.
Sorry, Jeffy.
So that's what you'll see is the navigation that's going to be difficult for the Tang Gang
is that we come from a population of people that were the victims of psychological operations
and emotional engineering that causes sort of a Stockholm Syndrome
to appreciate the captor as your savior.
And so it's the absolute last population of people who are the most odds on likely to be able to discern high from low and right from wrong.
They're actually the people that are proof anyone can be fooled some of the time.
And so now we have to take it upon ourselves to go above and beyond that and to demand a higher level of authenticity and
transparency odd hptsd is still live and kicking even till today bro it will be dude it will be
forever it will be forever it's it's you can opt into that as well right i opted out of that before
they even launched the chain, but some people are still
opted in. That's a choice. And I'm not Captain Save-A-Ho. I'm not going to fucking fly around
with a cape on and pull every single person out of Richard's ass. It's not my job. I'm going to
focus on something bigger and greater, and hopefully people will see me working on it.
They'll pull their own head out of that ass, and then they'll come and help me. But if they don't,
they don't, and that's fine.
And if it ever comes the day that Richard eats like a really delicious meal and forgets to digest all of it, then they're in for a hell of a treat, you know, and they're in the right place at the
right time to, you know, reap those benefits. But I'm going to focus on other things regardless.
The point is, you should be able to look at all of our shortcomings.
You should be able to look at the nearly endless tray of experiences of not having the answer right and come to the rational conclusion getting the right answer next is going to be challenging.
At least for us.
At least for us at least for us maybe there's a
group out there somewhere that has rain man discernment skills but it ain't us as evidenced
by literally anything edward from chia is on the timeline talking about charlie kirk wasn't actually
killed it's a psyop it's's a fucking Illuminati conspiracy ritual.
They're putting a different clone on the stage and then the blood is a blood packet and he's carried off into a Jew plane and flown to the Pfizer headquarters where he's liquefied into
vaccines. Like, yeah, listen, dude, I don't know. You know, we got oops is telling you to don't pay
your taxes. Go to the fucking courts and tell them that you're a sovereign citizen look dude let's say that we're right why the fuck is it taking so long for
everyone to catch on why does it feel like all the other stuff like the internet people just
adopted it why does it feel like the truth as we understand it is so difficult for people to wrap
their heads around maybe you're just early you know i i reserve the right to change my mind maybe just early. But also, could it be the case that we're wrong? Could it ever be
the case that we weren't right on the first try? And then if that's the case, are we just going to
end? Is that where it's all over now? Or do we continue and try again and improve and refine and
hone? So we might not be perfect decision makers. We might not be perfect analysts of
the playing field, but we are humans and we have choices that we can make. Individuals that can
choose a team. We can opt in to a belief and we can opt out. Both are important options.
Both are important options.
Now, society is figuring out where the yield comes from, and eventually it's going to roll up to a couple of places.
Someone else with a vested interest, or your own platform and your treasury.
Those are the two final owners of the business.
Who is holding the debt and who is holding the equity.
That's it.
So if it turns out that someone else holds your debt, there's probably a reason to believe that you have some political alignment with their interests. If for no other reason than you need to pay your debts or you are no longer around, right?
But if you own the debt and you own the equity, now you probably have the foundations for
controlling your own destiny.
Now you probably actually have more of a say in which way things are going to go for you.
We are out here in a world of vested interests, and they're all running out of yield.
Guess what? Those Merkel campaigns that are paying wrapped ETH, they'll be over in five months.
Anyone working on what we're going to do about it? Anyone got any plans on how to keep the
music playing, or is it just going to be five months and it's over?
or is it just going to be five months and it's over?
So I'm actively working on that.
I'm actively trying to align resources
to have a longer term view of things,
but it doesn't mean it'll necessarily happen.
But I get to choose.
I choose to put my energy into that
and anyone else can choose to do it or not do it.
It's up to them.
But these companies, they didn't inspire anybody.
They hired everybody.
They hired their customers even.
That's what it is.
If you pay them to come use your thing, you're hiring customers.
I'm just not stupid enough to tell you, no, no, no.
They'll just stay after the
six-month campaigns because they just love it here. No, they will not. Opportunity cost says
that the rational investor is going to go where their dollar is put to work best and that they're
going to earn the most competitive yield for the risk that they're willing to stomach.
So if your yield falls off a cliff and the risk remains constant, then you can probably guess some of the capital is going to leave there and go somewhere else.
Well, guess what? The same thing is true of Coinbase, Crypto.com, U.S. Bank, the American government, bonds, gold, you name it.
and right now the world is getting better and better and better at seeing transparently where
the assets are, what the cost to acquire them is, what the opportunity cost and the risk of holding
them are, and they're starting to get more sources of the same offerings. So competition is increasing,
the margins are decreasing. When Gene says their margins are our opportunity,
that's what he's talking about. If they were actually making their money off of a need and not simply a service that provides convenience and complacency, if they were actually optimizing the
path because of the technology that they were imputing on the path, then they would have the yield.
The reason that Chia is able to come in and undercut all of that is because it is not
the fundamental value. There's a premium. There is a information price spread from the value of
the service to the delivery of the value itself. There's a dilution. We don't have these negative externalities. Now, we also don't get
to have the war chest with $100 million in it, but we also don't have to hold on to $100 million
that everyone's trying to come and take from us all day. There are some benefits. There's some
trade-offs. We are also very nimble, and we are not under corporate bylaws. We don't have to agree and we don't have to be nice
while we disagree. You can be human. You can be a borderline fucking monkey in these rooms if you
want. That's your freedom to do so. The corporations cannot afford that. They need the homogeneity.
They need to have the pillars of values of the organization be disembodied enough that even if
Brian Armstrong leaves and a new ceo steps
in the idea is that the business doesn't miss a beat if i leave the tang gang tomorrow you will
notice i assure you because in about two weeks nothing's going to be different because you will
be arguing with each other online about whatever the next argument is. No one's going to say, we need to build past that.
We need to build three, four, five years past that.
Someone needs to have a plan for 20 years past that.
And that's what I bring to the community.
We don't have to agree.
We don't have to all line up behind me.
You can use me as a stick to whittle at and to perfect the approach.
But I am not caught up in the illusion
of the next 30 seconds. I don't plan on dying in the next 30 seconds. I also don't have a say in
that. So my plan has to be actionable today. It needs to be coherent with a continuity for tomorrow
and many days after, and I have to have the conviction to choose that path
every single moment knowing that the next moment is not promised. That is my decision. That is my
choice, and I will never give up, but I'm here to tell you all of us have the power to choose to never give up. Companies fund and structure the agreement of how
they will give up and at which point they will give up. They've already prescribed it to
themselves. It's called the unwinding process. They've already made a contingency for failure.
I'm telling you, no one's coming to save you and this is my last bullet.
Who do you think has more skin in the game?
And that's what you'll learn as an entrepreneur. You want everyone else's money?
Show me what you're putting in. Do you want to know why so many people support my ideas with their money, even when it's not
directly paying me, but it's what I want the money to go to? It's because every day I show up and
without charging a single dime to anybody, I advocate and I educate and I provide an opportunity
for fair discourse. And because people value those things,
they're willing to support my ideas financially. I'm earning it every day by providing value,
and then they lend their value to me for the things I care about. I'm putting in the work.
I'm building up a social debt all the time by trying to do the
right thing, trying to provide opportunities with the least amount of barrier to entry,
the most amount of equity. And for doing that, some people support what I do and care about
in ways that go beyond my individual ability to push the envelope.
That's where that support comes from. People
thought that I was some fucking cult leader, that I was like, they joined the Tang Gang like six
months in and they were, oh, Orange Gooey's the fucking, what were they calling me, dictator of
the Tang Gang. He thinks he's a cult leader and he's in charge of everybody. I literally don't
know who any of you fucking are. I'm standing by myself in the middle of the street on a box, just yelling into the street about things I care about. And then
every now and then I point at something and I say, I wish money would show up there. And I don't know
if it's magic or if I have a genie looking out for me or something, or if it's a bunch of people,
but it seems like the money shows up and that's pretty fucking crazy.
But it seems like the money shows up.
And that's pretty fucking crazy.
Most people have to spend money to make money.
I spend time and energy to earn money.
Same, same, but different.
And that's why my platforms grow.
They wouldn't go anywhere at all if they were entirely dependent on me.
I alone don't have the resources. I alone am not strong
enough. I alone am not compelling enough. It takes other people choosing to agree or not.
And we already know that they don't all agree. We already know anyone that's been around for
more than 28 seconds. We already know not everyone agrees with everything I say, nor should they.
I'm not fucking omniscient.
I'm not all-knowing.
I'm not a genius of every facet of the human experience.
I'm just a guy.
But I'm very consistent in that I'm trying my best.
And I've accepted that it's not going to be perfect and that it might not even be good some days.
But I'm never going to compromise on trying to be better,
to try my best. And people see the humility and understanding failure is an option. Failure could
happen. It's not the option we're ever going to choose, but it might be an option that something
else chooses for us. So it's uncertain. It's unprovable. It's unknowable until we go all the
way through it. And they're willing to take the ride with me. They're willing to say, of all the dumb shit I've ever done, I can justify one last
ride. I can make one last foolish mistake because you're really convinced that it's not a mistake at
all. And then look at the kinds of changes we make. When I put a post out on top of a Coinbase post, there are zero botted replies on my post.
I don't have a single bot that follows me.
Nobody replies to me that is a bot.
It is people. It is the tanking.
I block motherfuckers.
So if we start putting up likes and reposts in September of 2025 that rival Coinbase executive accounts who are directly in charge of product at Coinbase, then you had better believe we're bigger.
We are actually the bigger thing.
The playing field doesn't show it yet.
That's what being early looks like.
The radar makes it look like Coinbase is this big boom, this big bing that pops up on the radar.
We are like just a massive school of fish, and we're at just the right angle and depth that the sonar is picking us up like there's just a couple of trout.
But if we all turn 90 degrees at the same time, the whole fucking radar is going to be covered in bings.
They're going to go go what the fuck is down
there is that a megalodon because they've never seen anything like it they've only ever manufactured
the jaws robot they've never actually seen big tuna and gene calls it the imposter syndrome entrepreneurs who feel like everything in
this world is built perfectly and intentionally and there's nothing to improve upon that isn't
already understood that needs to be improved upon and someone's working on it somewhere
the reality is when you walk downtown and you see that library, it was built over a hundred years ago. The people whose hands laid that stone have long
since died. This is now a timeless place for education and literature, but it was built by
real humans a long time ago. The imposter syndrome is walking down the street and thinking, oh, it already all exists. Whatever the best thing could be, we've already got it. And however,
the best way to run something is, is the way we're currently doing it. And everyone's already
operating at peak efficiency and everyone knows the best way forward. But it's the dedicated entrepreneur, the insightful, unique contributor that says, no, I have the confidence to tell you this is the way forward.
This is the way forward.
No one knows everything.
Could I be wrong?
You bet.
That's why I'll go first.
We are going to change this world. Those of you who are still here have already seen massive change, but you probably don't believe it yet. You're probably starting to bump up against the
uncomfortable threshold of things getting too real too fast, and you're thinking to yourself, I never signed up for this.
I didn't actually know that we might become the thing.
I didn't know that there was a chance our community could stand toe-to-toe with institutional providers.
I always assumed the hospital is comprised of all-knowing doctors.
assumed, the hospital is comprised of all-knowing doctors.
I didn't know that people were still going to school and learning. I didn't know that people
were still going to school and inventing. I didn't know people were still changing. I didn't know
that it was still in flux. I didn't know that some of it was up for grabs.
And you have only ever known the impossibility of changing the whole world only by yourself,
that you're forgetting you're not alone. It's decentralized and autonomous, but you're not alone.
There is a group of people that can share ideas, that can contribute together. You can change the world, probably not alone.
But as long as you alone are advocating for the correct change, others can help.
Others can agree.
And that's what we're doing.
And these corporations, they don't actually have a governance system for that.
They are private companies that ask for public funding.
They did not ask for public
philosophy of management. They think they know better. Okay. Well, then my job just got a lot
easier. I'm either going to copy off of them or do something different, but they've only got one
strategy. I just rolled out of bed and I've already doubled their strategy approach.
Okay. And it, and it didn't require a lot of thinking to figure it out. So if we keep going
down this path of you holding cards close to your chest and me playing with my kimono open,
who's going to get the transparent outcome faster? Me, motherfucker, you are in your way. You are slowing you down.
I'm taking my pants off so I can run faster.
And that's the power. We can move faster than institutions. The SEC still has to approve the
S1. The ACDCs, oh, DTCC, they all got to get lined up. The Tang Gang can
just turn it on. Print the fucking slips. I'll write my name on it. Call it a day. Come back
in 90 days. Pay me some cash. We can just move. Deva, I want Merkle. Okay, well, it's not my
priority. Okay, I phrased it wrong. Deva, I want $10,000 in my pocket right now.
Okay, I mean, don't blow it on something stupid.
It's already finished.
Deva, we've already doubled the TVL and the DEX, okay?
I just needed you to hand me the $10,000 so that we could change it, and now we can get serious.
Now we can actually do things.
I don't have time to vote.
We don't have three months to argue about it. I'm right,
and I want it more than you. You can either die, or you're right, and you want it more than me.
But I'm not going to agree with that until I'm dead.
So you just got to kill me. You just got to strike my ideas down and then you can have whatever you want.
The reason I get what I want is because I want it so fucking badly.
I will make it happen.
I am asking for help.
And if you don't provide it, I will find it somewhere else.
But I'm making this happen.
So help me God.
You just think you want it.
You don't know what tired is.
What do we want? Freedom. When do you want it? Now.
And so you know where the real value is?
It's in our tolerance. Not because we're interested in subjugating ourselves to disagreeable forces,
but because we're so self-secured, because we're so self-sustained that we are not afraid of
entertaining other ideas, that we're not afraid of using patience in place of violence. We are not afraid. That's the value. That's the power in autonomy. You don't
have to be afraid. Our whole lives, we are constantly in flux between fight or flight.
Every single stimulus, the words leaving my mouth, the reason it's so hard to learn about Chia
is because when I start using words you
don't recognize, your brain tells you I'm in danger. I need to get away or suppress this force.
And so before I can give you logical progressions and foundational lessons, your brain is already
looking for the exit. You're already finding a way to interrupt. You're already looking for a different path.
And it's not because you're bad or stupid.
It's because you are wired to survive.
Which means if you're asleep and I walk up and I press my finger into your ribs, you're going to wake up.
wake up. Even when
your conscious body is asleep, it knows
I don't want to die in my sleep.
And you will wake up.
That instinct
drives us to shortcutting
our patience and shortcutting our wisdom and shortcutting our creative perspective, and it assigns us versus them.
And it's either I'm coming for you or they're coming for me.
But that's not what it means to be a human. That's what it means to be an animal.
That's what it means to be primitive man, not enlightened man. Enlightened man's temperance
and prudence is able to overcome the baser instinct of fight or flight and to stay in the pocket of uncertainty and to
enact a concerted will to make the outcome the right outcome, not the lesser of two choices.
And I explained that to my brother. And when I explained to him the physiological forces that
made it so hard for him to pay attention and learn he became a better student still going to
take a long time of wrestling with your conscious ego and your psyche to be able to deal with the
fact that people who are trying to help you might come across in a way that makes you afraid or makes
you feel like you have to resist or
butt in and disagree. But if you can identify it's happening and you can just say, what happens if I
suspend those feelings a little bit longer and I just listen a little bit more, you might
accidentally pick up enough information to start forming entire thoughts, real belief systems,
actual logical identity of progression. So it's important that we never give up.
And it's also important that you realize
you have choices to make.
Only fools rush in.
Another way of phrasing that is do less.
Hey, only fools rush in. and you wanted to be early,
do a little personal inventory on that.
Do a little personal inventory on that.
Maybe that intoxicating feeling of getting what I want right away
is actually discounting what I truly want in the long run.
And that's how we end up serving someone else's interests and tearing each other apart,
rather than finding the patience and the abstraction skills necessary to remove ourselves from the conflict
and to identify the forces that are driving us to disagree.
In a time like this, cooler heads prevail.
And dude, you're talking to a literal walking armed hydrogen bomb. You are talking to the human red button, and I'm here to tell you, I'm not going to press it.
One of the powerful things about being able to press it whenever I want is that on the other side of that is my ability not to press it at all. And I have watched over the years of me being online and speaking my mind and sharing my ideas and advocating platforms.
Some people who believe some of what I say begin exhibiting some of the personality traits that they attribute to my way of living.
And they start using violent rhetoric or hyperbolic rhetoric,
dude, I have spent the 10,000 hours not pressing the button.
You just discovered that there's a button you can press that wipes things off of the playing field.
That's the difference. I want every reason not to press it. You're ready to press it
to get on with the next thing. We're all going to die. Just so you know, when you take someone else
with you, you're going with them. You're not taking them out and maintaining yourself. A piece
of you goes with them. Okay? So you've got to really decide, do you want to go with them or not?
Because if you don't, then don't destroy them. Not yet. A piece of you is going with.
The peace of you is going with.
We have to find stillness.
We have to find patience.
We have to ascribe to a higher calling.
We need purpose.
An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind.
You can start fires that will rage for hundreds of years. So don't.
They will posture as if they do just long enough to make you think that's where time is best spent, but they will already be working on the machinations to profit off of your allegiance.
That's why June is Gay Pride Month.
make sure that everyone knows that people who have homosexual preferences or homosexual natural
affiliations or tendencies need to be identified every June. No, that's not what's going on. The
idea of baseline human rights is that everyone should be human and all human rights should be accounted for.
And then the question of is it human to have these beliefs, these values, that's the debate to determine who else is included at the floor, at the most base inclusive provisions of society.
And that is where the misappropriation of anger is currently being exhibited the most. You don't understand those people you disagree with who believe themselves to be a different gender than the body they were born into or they have homosexual proclivities with their sexual orientation or they do things that you deem to be debaucherous or otherwise, you don't understand from their
perspective, they believe that is who they are.
And I don't know if I can tell them that they're not.
I'm not all knowing.
I might be wrong.
I probably can be brash and I can assume, but I might be wrong.
So let's just not count on me.
And their belief that that is who they are means that
they're not advocating for you to be like them. They want to be like you. They perceive you to
have rights and protections and lifestyle provisions that they don't have promised to
them. Now, whether or not that's the case can be turned
into a debate, but the idea of why would people violently take a stance that seems so contrarian
to the ethos of some of the foundational perspectives of this country, it's because
they are under the assumption, they are under the belief, they ascribe to the belief that that is who they
are. And the idea that all humans are created equal under God would mean me too. Me too. My
rights are also human rights. But then from the conservative side, we say, no, the only people
that get right, and then we start to whittle away at groups of people until you end up with what the iconic white capitalist christian tyrant the
adolf hitler of new york or whatever like you you eventually whittle away all of the things that
weren't included in the source code of the originating theology anyway and say nope only
these start over start with only these
things that are already perfectly aligned with me, and that's the foundation for moving forward.
Neither group is necessarily wrong, neither group is necessarily right. When they trespass on the
rights of others, they are absolutely wrong. And that's why the conversation is so difficult to
have. The response to people who claim a
particular identity committing heinous acts of violence and murder and then turning around and
saying put them all in a on a jail cell somewhere that is where you're infringing on the rights of
others you might have meant just that one person exhibiting psychotic behavior get them out of
society but you but you don't get to take
the color of that person's hair and decide that everyone with that color hair is a bad person.
They all need to be locked up too. Now you're just doing, you're dehumanizing people. You can
debate on whether or not those are human values the same way that the blacks and the gays and the Jews and the Christians
and every other walk of life had to earn it the hard way.
And there will likely be blood and there will likely be chaos and there will likely need
to be cooler minds that prevail.
But they are free to advocate for that.
That is a constitutional principle, a freedom of expression.
You don't have to agree with it, so express a difference of opinions and advocate and debate
and compromise on those. Or what if, and this is just out of left field, what if that's not even
a priority? What if it's a priority for the people that feel aggrieved, but what if on the side of the gatekeeper that can afford the resources, bring them into the cloth of the minimal human rights protections, what if in order to deliver that future for the institutions to be able to sustain that allocation of resources, we need to go even further beyond the calling of the present.
We need to ascribe to an even higher resonance of purpose so that we can align a society around
accommodating all people's needs. Along the way, people are going to debate whether or not those
are human needs anyway. And so what if you go even further beyond that and you start working on
things that are foundational and impactful to any human that chooses to use it and can bring about
more equitable outcomes for all people the more that any people use it? That's technology.
That's technology.
That is wisdom.
That is the ability to overcome our baser nature and to say, I don't have the answers.
So the last thing I'm going to do is start handing them out.
I'm actually going to go and work on questions.
I'm going to ask questions like, what can we do better?
What needs to change?
How do we make it happen?
Having answers is the easiest way to be wrong.
Asking questions is the fastest path to learning.
So when I saw the violence and I heard some rumors that Charlie Kirk's assassin may have been β I was in spaces actually when I heard the news.
And I said, boy, I sure hope it wasn't a groiper that did that because the fastest way for the groipers to undermine their stance that there's a consortium or a cabal from Israel that's enacting undue influence over American politics,
the fastest way to undermine your position is to go and assassinate somebody because you thought
that he was in bed with that group of people. So I thought, oh man, of all the momentum that
that group of people has, that would be one person doing a heinous act that's going to undermine
a ton of their platform all at once. And then I heard, well, it might actually be this
kind of like activist leftist who is dating a person who's transgender and they're the only
person in their family that isn't Republican or conservative. And I thought, man,
so many people don't know the story of Alan Turing.
That was the first thought that went through my head. The first thought that went through my head
when I heard that it might've been a guy who's on the liberal side of the spectrum and he's dating
a transgender person, I thought, none of these people know who Alan Turing is. And they're about to go door to door
knocking on the doors of people they disagree with, people who they don't identify with,
and they're going to try to bring them to justice. And they don't understand you might execute
the godfather of computer programming. You might execute the code breaker. you might execute the godfather of computer programming.
You might execute the codebreaker.
You might execute the cancer-curing guy because you thought it was an all-encompassing identity reality that people who have lifestyles that you don't personally ascribe to have no merit and no value to society.
it and no value to society. What if you're wrong? It's so easy to use identity politics,
What if you're wrong?
but tell me their names. Just start naming them. And that's one of the reasons that I was never on
team WEF and she is going to fuck us all over. Gene names names. He says George Soros is a problem. He says Elizabeth Warren is a problem.
Now, he doesn't go much further than that. He's not going to name every name that he disagrees
with, but he is not saying the Jews. He's not saying just these people. He's saying George,
I will name him. If I can prove that he's the problem, I have no problem naming him.
So when we throw people into these classist baskets,
you dehumanize the value of society.
You're taking away the human element
and rolling it up into some sociological experiment.
Hey, dude, 24 years ago, I'd'd be called a suicide bomber for my beard right right so it's complex right and like
there are dude there's examples of a lot of brilliant people who are jewish that invented
a bunch of stuff okay um and then there's of course going to be examples of people who are jewish who
do heinous things there are examples of black people who have never committed a violent crime
in their life there's an example of a violent black criminal from a few days ago that was
televised all over the place has it has very little to do with the large swaths now we can
use pattern recognition to keep ourselves in lower probability
environments for outcomes that we don't want, and that makes people uncomfortable because it
would be nice to just believe that everything is equal all the time, there's no patterns, there's
no prejudice, there's no predisposition, it's all a blank slate all the time falling from the sky. But that's not the reality. That's actually dehumanizing. To strip away reality to serve some ideological fiction in your mind where nothing is different, there are no incompatibilities of any kind across any people's,
you're just lying to yourself. You're just doing the same thing that both parties are doing right
now, lying to yourself thinking that you have a solution to this problem. If there's a solution
to this problem, it is certainly not more bloodshed. It is certainly not more convictions.
It's not more bloodshed. It is certainly not more convictions. It's not rounding people up because they look like the guy that did something bad. No. We need to actually have discourse and due process, and we need to have debate and compromise. These are the pillars of democracy. These are the pillars of an enlightened people.
are the pillars of democracy. These are the pillars of an enlightened people.
But right now, we're all being fed the low-hanging fruit of corporations who can't
compete with the Tangang's impressions on X, channeling highly controversial and psychologically
daunting stories that compel us to revisit the narrative and the commentary over and over and over again, and we are funding their platform that they don't even have a worthwhile enough message to create on their
own. They're weaponizing the tragedy of a wife and kids losing their husband and father and turning
it into an opportunity for clicks on a platform that pays them for having the most views.
or clicks on a platform that pays them for having the most views.
They're not honoring this person's life, and they're not having an honest discourse
about how to navigate complex socioeconomic dilemmas of politics and stuff.
They want answers.
They don't have any more questions.
They're exhausted.
They've run out of the ability to care, to explore creative solutions. And I get it, dude. I get it. But here's the thing.
One day you're going to be dead and then you can be as tired as you want for as long as you want.
So don't shortcut other people's life today because you're tired. You're not going to be
here forever. When you start to get tired, fall back.
Let other people take it up. The universe does not begin and end with your birth and your death.
So keep that in mind. The politics of today are largely driving narratives for technocracy tomorrow. You have warring factions of global influence, both monetary and telecom,
and they are utilizing algorithms on both fronts to position themselves as the arbiters of the truth.
Don't fall for it.
They're not that powerful.
They just have a bigger television screen than you.
They call it a movie theater.
I call it a home theater, home entertainment system.
But it's the same Citizen Kane.
It's the same movie.
They just have a bigger screen and more seats.
But if I go door to door and I watch it with each of you and I explain the purpose of every scene
my conversion rate will still be higher because you're just a bunch of chuckle fucks sitting in
the movie theater eating popcorn no one's actually stimulating the conversation and if they did
your fight or flight instincts would kick in and you would get up out of that movie theater and run
so they have to find the right flavor of butter to put on that popcorn.
So that you won't actually be there for the movie.
You're there for the popcorn.
And the movie will play.
And they will all leave the movie theater safely with an empty popcorn bucket.
And they'll say, great movie.
Or, I didn't like that one so much.
But they absolutely will not be talking
about the things that they believe in, the stories that they want projected on screens,
and the platforms they want elevated to a higher level of awareness. You will have been rolled up
into someone else's vested interests. So you've got Elon Musk, and he owns X, and him and Peter
Thiel funded J.D. Vance. They don't give a fuck about Donald Trump. They already know he can't
run again, so they're not concerned with him. They're already vying for the next election.
Elon Musk and Peter Thiel want Western technocracy. Bibi Netanyahu and Elizabeth Warren and George Soros want nihilism.
Depending on who you ask,
either could look like nihilism and either could look like the right thing.
Neither are what you believe.
You want to know how I know?
Because I didn't ask what you believe.
So I know it's not those other two systems of belief.
Whatever you believe is going to come from you, not from them.
Even if you agree, that agreement comes from you.
So we all have choices to make.
We can succumb to fear.
We can succumb to fear. We can succumb to hate. We can succumb to I'm right,
you're wrong, and neither of us are accountable to begin with. Or we can succumb to patience.
We can succumb to compassion. We can maintain autonomy and defend ourselves.
You don't have to lay down and die just because someone you disagree with disagrees harder.
You don't owe them that.
But if you ever want to be afforded compassion, if you ever want to be afforded patience, then it's time to start paying those bills today.
Take a penny, leave a penny. You're going to need to start offering patience if you want it afforded back to you later.
There are not 1,000 gunmen on 1,000 roofs today. How do we keep on this path while having the delicate conversations about what is
right, what is wrong, and why should we care? They would prefer that 500 of you on the left
get a rifle and go on 500 rooftops, and 500 of you from the right will grab a rifle and go on rooftops,
because then they will have 1,000 shooters on 1,000 rooftops, and there will be millions of
victims. And they will come in and say, oh, allow me to save you. Allow me, the government, to
provide you the welfare. Allow us to solve your problems. Hand over those guns and we'll get rid of gun violence.
Hand over your speech and we'll get rid of hate speech.
Just let us solve the problem.
But there really isn't that problem.
Not unless we choose to believe it.
Not unless we choose to believe it, not unless we choose to play our part. But if we find the time to stop and to demand an even higher level of rigor for scrutiny of ideas and information, then we offer ourselves a chance to at least first do no harm and maintain peace through deliberation, debate, negotiation, compromise, and then to potentially
discover solutions that actually solve problems rather than displace issues onto other people.
So now is the time. Identify the world you live in is changing rapidly, and there is a war between
government and the private industry, private business. Some of those businesses go public,
and they blur the lines between their affiliation to their constituents and to the government who
has constituents. And there's a war going on for influence. Elon Musk can catch rockets with
chopsticks. Peter Thiel knows where you're walking in your house because the Wi-Fi can 3D scan your
bedroom. They have all of the resources.
George Soros can use an endless Jewish Zionist coffer of funds to manipulate markets and bankrupt entire nations.
Fuck a Coinbase.
Oh, Base won't put 9mm in the 0x matcha routing.
George Soros can literally liquidate Great Britain.
You have any idea the powers you're up against?
And they have vested interests.
They are not your interests.
They have to earn your vote.
That's democracy.
You can withstand your vote.
They have to come and get it. They have to come and earn it.
No one can read your mind.
So you shouldn't sit idly by
and wait for politicians to find the right notes
and then throw your vote at them. You should be
advocating for what is required to earn your vote and to put social pressure that extends beyond
the institutions. Someone down there is thinking the votes aren't real. It doesn't matter. Hey,
I don't give a fuck. Tell me the votes don't matter when I put 350 million people behind them and say, we've all decided we want this.
And it's only the one individual between me and those 350 million people that can say yes or no.
Then let's start counting votes.
They're not going to ask if you got the count right.
They're going to be so busy fumbling into doing whatever the fuck you need done so they don't get a worse outcome for themselves, you won't have to count half those votes.
Be undeniable.
The Tang Gang is undeniable.
You've seen.
You have seen what happens.
If you talk ill of the Tang Gang,
your platform goes down and the Tang Gang platform goes up.
If you speak positively about the Tang Gang,
the Tang Gang platform goes up.
That's power.
Those are real people
living on the fragile fringe
of deciding it's not so serious that we have to agree on everything every time.
Whenever it starts to get that serious, we can abstract away.
We can re-delegate resources so that the people who are most concerned can be closest.
The people who are least concerned can be furthest.
There's a lot of people out here.
We have to line up. When I say align incentives, it's not because everyone's the same. It's quite
literally because everyone is different. It's quite literally because different groups will
have different interests. We must align to make more efficient that entire chain of value.
entire chain of value. Little guys line up here, big wigs over there, protocol right here,
a little art market here, but it all lines up with respect to the impact and the purpose
of each contributing member.
don't give yourself to these machine men
with their machine minds and their machine hearts
it is easy to pull the trigger
it is impossible to unfire the gun
you can always pull the trigger later
for now let cooler minds prevail. Negotiate. Then we will negotiate again. We will plead our case again because that is what the highest virtue calls for. It is not losing to die for what you believe. It is a fulfillment of your oath.
It is sad, but only because we don't understand life after death. We don't know. No one's come
back often enough to tell us with complete certainty how it's going to go. And so we fear that we may
never experience another memory with the people that we love and the people who we cherish our
time with. And that makes us sad and it makes us afraid. But we have to overcome those baser
instincts. We have to overcome those emotional pitfalls and we have to decide
some things are worth living for and other things are worth dying
for. You have to choose. You can put your head in the sand. You can pretend it's someone else's problem, but someone will choose for you.
So I make my choice every day.
And I know it's challenging right now.
I know that emotions are high.
I know that the controversy is unlimited.
It's all-time high chaos.
Everyone's coming for you.
No one loves you.
Everyone's mean.
Everyone's a murderer.
Everything's evil. Calm your a murderer, everything's evil.
Calm your mind. That's not true.
Look at history and how far we've come. It's not true.
It might be easier to believe those things for a time, but it is not true.
The world gets better because we will never give up.
