Why you need to keep an eye on Algorand [feat. Marc Vanlerberghe] #CHAINREACTION

Recorded: March 5, 2026 Duration: 0:48:16
Space Recording

Full Transcription

hello everybody welcome back to chain reaction coin telegraphs daily show here live on x every
single day at 3 p.m london 4 p.m paris 6 p.m dubai and 10 a.m new york until sunday when new
york is the first to do daylight savings time and it's
going to make my life difficult. But for now, those are the times. So we are back again with
another big conversation. And this time it's about Algorand. And I think this is the first
Algorand episode we've had in a while. So there's a lot we need to cover. I am, of course giant joined by mark um mark do i try and say your surname no i don't i'll
stick to to van leberg i can't i'm sorry gareth if you're watching i'm sorry to all the dutch people
i can't i hate butchering people's names mark how are you i'm doing great robert thanks for having
me my pleasure and by the way it's 7 a.m in california
7 a.m in california 7 do you know yesterday's guest was it was also 7 a.m so that is we've
had a few people that have joined at 7 a.m and i really appreciate you uh coming on at that time
so far the record for the earliest joiner i believe is tim draper at 5am um because that guy is a maniac that just
never stops working so he he joins he'll join whenever it is crazy um mark for people unfamiliar
with you i like to i like to get people's background in terms of how they ended up in
the space because everyone has their own sort of path there um what's your
background in crypto and how did you end up here yeah so i've been a chief strategy and marketing
officer at the foundation for the past two years roughly and and it's my first kind of official
job if you want in crypto i've been interested in crypto for a long time i remember i used to
work at google i was
the head of marketing for android for about 10 years at google and during that time um i was
getting very interested in crypto and i remember in 20 i think it's 2018 going to the first kind
of san francisco blockchain conference and it was so interested in the technology and the philosophy
and the ethos behind it and it was super super
interesting and i didn't understand a word of what anyone was talking about but my interest was
definitely piqued by it and i've been kind of like researching it and like following the space and
being very interested and dabbling with like uh crypto coins and everything since then and so um
and so it's just a matter of time for me to take on like an official role
uh in in a crypto company and so yes i've been at our grant for about two years now
and i love it yeah i mean it's a fast moving space it's really hard to get bored here so i got into
the space in late 2017 so you know similar time frame in terms of uh how long you've been interested in it i think and
what do you make of how far we've we've come in that time like from that first conference
to conferences today what are the sort of changes that stand out to you yeah as we like to say we're
still early so we do love to say that i think i think we've come a long way i remember the the i remember
the conversations at the at blockchain week was was basically since the botching was basically
mostly professors academics talking about how can we scale a chain you know beyond one transaction
per second and it was an unsolved problem.
And they were talking about theoretical concepts
of sharding and this and that,
but it was, nothing was in production.
So you were talking,
and I was thinking about the time
because I've always been an entrepreneur.
I was thinking about like, I want to do a startup.
I want to create a company and a consumer company.
And then I was listening to this as like,
well, you know, that's not going to happen.
Like I'm not going to create a company on a chain that can do one transaction per second.
That's just not on a scale.
And so if you fast forward where we are now, I think it's fundamentally different.
I mean, Algorand is now doing over 10,000 transactions per second with instant finality, no forking.
And so I think we've come a very long way to to the point where blockchains are
really ready for for scale and for real world usage and and now with the regulations starting
to become uh uh more positive um i think we'll see a really big uh big change and i think the
future is very bright i think for for blockchain technology i I mean, I agree. And I think most people watching would feel the same.
Before we get into some of the,
there are some little threads there that I want to pull.
But before we do,
perhaps you could just give us a pitch on Algorand.
I know a lot of people will be familiar with Algorand in general.
And I think some people may be familiar from like all season in 2021 um you guys
have come a long way since then can you give us sort of a pitch on on the problems Algorand solves
yeah so Algorand has been around for now about six years and so the original um idea behind
Algorand was that you know we always talk about the trilemma and the fact that you couldn't be secure, scalable and decentralized at the same time.
And so Algorand basically from its inception proved that this is not the case, that you can be decentralized, you can scale and you can be secure at the same time.
And so the way Algorand did this and went about this
is we came up with a completely different
kind of consensus mechanism that is incredibly elegant
and that ensures that we can support
10,000 transactions per second.
You can run a node, anybody can run a node,
completely permissionless on a Mac mini.
I'm running a Mac mini here at home there's no really any kind
of like performance or cpu requirements to be able to run a node and the chain never forks there's
it's set up the consensus mechanism is set up in such a way that the chain cannot possibly fork so
every single block that is created every 2.8 seconds a new block is created all the transactions inside inside
that block are instantly confirmed and they can never be rolled back and they can never be
they can never be changed and so that was a fundamentally different approach of how a blockchain
should work and and a blockchain that should work really for real world scale and then on top of
that we build an AVM that has a number of features, Algorand
Virtual Machine, that has a number of built-in features that, again, were designed for real
world scale. So to give you a couple of examples, for instance, the way we support stablecoins,
we don't need smart contracts for that. Like the way you send a stablecoin from one person to
another is exactly the same way as you send an algo the native currency of
Algorand from one account to another that means you have no risk there's very very low risk of
like doing any kind of like standard asset transactions because they don't involve smart
contracts we have a feature called like atomic grouping so you can actually bundle multiple
transactions inside a group and ensure that all transactions go through or none of them go through.
So you eliminate counterparty risk when you do swaps or more complicated financial transactions.
So we've built a number of these primitives right inside the AVM, make them available to developers and users.
And again, it's like with this idea that this is a chain for real world usage and for real world scale.
that this is a chain for real-world usage and for real-world scale.
And so that is really what Algorand has been focused on
since the very beginning and continues to focus on.
And so as we think about financial use cases,
financial empowerment, agentic commerce,
all the things that are happening right now,
Algorand was perfectly designed for those types of use cases.
That's a great answer.
And also, so I think where I want to go next is what that that
looks like right because there's we know what it's like in this space a lot of people make a lot of
promises and it doesn't really go anywhere and i and i think i've seen your 2025 kind of wrap up.
I was looking at that, I think, yesterday or the day before,
and the amount of things you achieved in 2025 was, I mean,
pretty staggering, really.
And the question that came to me straight away is,
it's a bit of a cynical one, but, you know,
I was around for the alt season last time
and how there was so much optimism.
And my company was a block producer for a major chain that was being transacted on heavily.
I've watched that chain and many others mostly die.
I mean, some of them haven't exactly shuttered, but they are on life support.
No one uses them.
It's not getting new innovation or partnerships.
There aren't new people coming in to develop dApps
or build in the space at all.
Algorand is one of the few examples where that's not true.
What do you credit that to?
How has Algorand not only survived,
but grown in a period where so many have died
yeah i think it has to do with the the original um ethos of algorand and the positioning of
as really a chain that you can actually rely on like we've never been down in the six years that
we've been around like and we have these these fundamental attributes that make this a superior chain to build on and so ultimately that gets recognized
um by the community by developers by institutions and so and so we get picked and so part of this
is also we've done an enormous amount of uh effort to try and make the developer experience as easy as it possibly can be.
So we were the first ones two years ago to announce native Python support for developers.
So developers could build smart contracts in Python rather than having to learn a completely foreign language
that is a blockchain-only language.
And then last year we
we announced support for typescript and so typescript is the most common used language in
the world and so we now have native typescript support so developers who are coming from a web
2 environment and want to experiment with a blockchain really don't have to learn a new
language they can just use typescript to do so and then married to that we actually had a whole kind of go-to-market plan around getting these developers in we
partnered with eza with ryzen we brought in a bunch of people through hackathons and last year we've
achieved an all-time high in developer activity on algorithm and so and now and it's just the
beginning i feel it's just the beginning because now what's happening with AI and AI coding,
the barriers for people to develop have plummeted.
Like it's just unbelievable.
We just launched a couple of weeks ago.
We launched VibeKit, which is our agentic stack, where now people, including myself,
I built an app.
I built a dApp that includes smart contracts and that includes Logic6,
a very complex kind of algorithm primitive, without writing a single line of code.
And so the barriers to entry for developers to really learn about this technology
and start using it have just come down, have come crashing down.
And so now you're just basically limited by your imagination.
That's the only limit.
Like coding is not a problem anymore.
And of course you have to do security audits.
And so my engineering team will probably say,
ooh, be careful because, you know,
you don't want Mark to create a smart contract
and launch it on mainnet because, you know,
how many security holes are there going to be?
Probably a lot.
But the idea is still that you can actually build something you
can you can create you have your idea in your mind and you can actually turn this into a working
application to test it out to see how it works and of course you have to do secure all this and
whatever but the barriers for you to actually turn your imagination into something concrete
into an app that people can use is just is come down to zero and and that's just quite
remarkable over a very short period of time I couldn't agree more um a friend of mine well a
couple of friends of mine and I went out to dinner last week to discuss but basically that was the
the idea was we go to dinner to discuss um the sort of vibe coding and AI agents because we
independently, all three of us had been kind of experimenting with it. I was just working for fun
and with no intention of releasing it, working on sort of an educational app that I was able to
vibe code. I have no developer background whatsoever. I'm not an engineer in any way,
shape or form. And one of the other guys built a this he he had a problem
with tax in terms of calculating tax in the uk when you do lots of crypto transactions and bits
and pieces and he found the tools that he was using weren't quite perfect for for it so he just
vibe coded one in a weekend um in his words sitting in bed uh which is it's just wild where we are now and again he has no
developer background we are you you're right we are only really limited by imagination
however i'd say that for you guys to have leaned into this as much as you have and to attract people
with this sort of thing you must have spotted it before most did was this has this been a decision for a while
that you know this is the direction things are going i you know agentic ai is is the future we
need to build a stack for it yeah i i think it you know it's you could say well you know we will we
will jump we'll jump on the next hype and everything that single time there's a new hype, we jump on it.
But I don't think this is what's happening here.
I think ultimately, I think a lot of the innovation,
and I come from Google where a lot of innovation is basically coming from,
it's not top down, right?
It's not like the CEO of Google says, we're going to just go do this.
And a lot of, if you look at Google, a lot of the innovations that happen in Google
came bottoms up, where engineers have some bright ideas, and and they say i'm going to turn this into a product that's
how gmail got created and that's how many of the protocols got created and i think a lot of and
and that's i think how organically innovation in companies needs to happen it is not me or anybody
in the executive saying like we're now going to go do this you know a lot of a lot of things are just happening engineers are spotting opportunities they see interesting things
they develop things and they launch them five kit is a good example five kit was launched our
agentic stack was launched by gape who's an engineer in our dev rel team who spotted the
opportunity and said hey i can i can create an agentic stack for algorithm and then i can tie
it into clockakCode
and people can do things.
And it just took off like crazy.
And so, and I think that's,
and of course we just want to then put fuel on the fire.
And then if we see that something is really taking off
and is really, and people are picking up on it.
And obviously you want to put fuel on the fire.
But I think a lot of the core innovation
doesn't necessarily have to be top down.
It comes bottomed up.
And it does seem like a lot of the top companies now have realized that people need space to play.
That there's a real benefit to letting people explore things within the realm of work that aren't necessarily on their to-do list.
And they can just kind of experiment and see where it goes.
And as you say, there's been a lot of positive results from that.
And I think Google are very good at doing that.
Can you give us some examples?
Remember that Google had this 20% time.
So as an engineer or any of Google, I don't think they have that anymore.
But it used to be like that.
Take 20% of your time and you spend on stuff that you thought was interesting.
And so a lot of innovation came from that.
Yeah, absolutely.
And I think it's a shame that more companies don't do that because it wastes a lot of potential.
One thing I am interested in is some examples on things that have been, you know,
vibe coded or agentic ai stuff within the our grand
ecosystem um as kind of a use case because i think a lot of this as i said to you off air i think
um when we did shows last year on agentic ai a lot of it seemed um mysterious and far away
and conceptual and i don't think people could really imagine concrete use cases can you give
us a few examples of um algorithms ones yeah so so in particular let's talk about like uh commerce
and agentic commerce which i think is a very interesting a very interesting use case and and
this is this is actually quite amazing when you think back a year i was just i was doing doing speech on agenda commerce
at eat eat denver uh just a couple weeks ago and i realized that like at last eat denver a year ago
agenda commerce was not a thing it did not exist like there was like and i was looking at google
search results and so it just didn't register there was nothing there and then within a year
So it just didn't register.
There was nothing there.
And then within a year, the thing just completely exploded.
And then you look at the standards and the protocols that have been launched over the last 12 months.
It is absolutely amazing.
So Google launched A2A, AP2, Coinbase launched X-Row 2, Anthropic launched MCP.
And so you can go on and on ucp acp like this there's like 10 or more
protocols that were launched over the last 12 months that all deal with various aspects of of
agentic commerce and so i think i think this is from a crypto perspective i think this is a very
very interesting area and this is an interesting where we're heavily focused on because uh when you think about this when the world goes agentic and everybody has an agent
that there's billions of agents around there and these agents are talking to each other obviously
and they'll and they won't just talk they'll exchange value one agent will be specialized
in this another agent will specialize in that so they'll talk to each other and they'll exchange
value then the question becomes are they going to pay each other and so obviously they're not going to use a credit card to pay each other
10 cents or five cents that doesn't make any sense it's it's they don't they won't use additional
bank rails either because they have to wait two days or three days for their 10 cent transaction
to go through so these agents will need scale they will need hyper super low cost, they will need instant settlement.
And the only payment rail that is able to provide that is a blockchain, an Algorand in particular, of course.
But so I think that is an enormous opportunity, enormous opportunity for blockchains to really lean into.
for blockchains to really lean into.
And so because of the characteristics of Algorand as a chain,
and we talked about those, you know, the instant finality,
the high speed, et cetera, et cetera,
we are particularly well suited for these types of micropayment transactions.
And so therefore, we're very, very much leaning into this.
So when Coinbase launched their X4.2 protocol,
which is the internet native payment protocol, and we can talk a little more about that if you want.
But when they launched the Internet Payment Protocol, we were one of the first to kind of jump in with them.
We actually created a spec that I think is actually quite differentiated and quite interesting.
And it was merged in by Coinbase recently.
So we have all of our XFOR2 tooling that is ready to go and so we're really
heavily focused on this and to me the use cases the question then becomes okay what are the use
cases what are the agents that we actually will see payments i don't think you'll necessarily buy
nike shoes tomorrow using crypto and extra too um i think that'll be that'll be some way off
I think that'll be some way off.
But I think the use cases are really more around like micropayments,
around business models for developers.
Like currently developers, when they launch a tool
and they want to get paid for the tool,
the only way for them to get paid for the tool is to give you,
is to sell API keys, which are basically subscriptions.
But a lot of people don't want to buy subscriptions to tools, right? They want to pay
per use, pay per API, and so forth. And so far, there hasn't really been a mechanism for them to
do so. XFRO2 allows that to happen. Or think about premium content. Like, I love going to
the Financial Times or the Wall Street Journal to read an article, but I don't necessarily want to subscribe.
So probably 90 to 95% of the people that visit these publishers
are not willing to pick up a subscription.
So then what do you do?
You just gate your content and it's not available.
Well, maybe you make the article available to them on a per-use basis
and you charge them five cents to do so.
Now this is possible through using
internet native payments and x402 so i think you think about llms pay per token think about compute
pay for computes think about data paper data etc so there's a not this there's a lot of opportunities
around this kind of paper use type of model where where x that x4.2 now enables and then if you combine that with with with scalable
payment rails like Algorand then you have a system that is really scalable and that can create
massively new opportunities for for all of the actors in space yeah I so I think this is a
fascinating area and um it's funny you mentioned the paywall i there was an article i wanted to read i make
some short form content to do with privacy and um there was a source i wanted to read that i didn't
have access to and it was behind a paywall and i had to make the decision you know it wasn't a huge
amount of money but i would have to subscribe and then read the article and then cancel the
subscription and i just saw i can't I can't really be bothered with this.
But if they'd added a way for me to, you know, use Apple Pay
to just double tap and pay five cents to read the article,
I would have done it without thinking.
Like the less friction we have with these sorts of things,
the more we're willing to do it.
And I do think that microtransactions are
like properly, properly microtransactions are a really interesting way that we're going to start
seeing more money move to solve these problems. Now, when it comes to, I always wonder if people fully see the picture of agentic commerce um do you think within like
the next year or two do you think most people will be interacting with this or is that some way off
i think i i actually thinks i think this is gonna go extremely fast and and when you talk about
the gent of commerce broadly not everything of course
is crypto we like to think as a crypto industry that everything will be crypto but you know it
won't be it won't be unfortunately as I said it's probably unlikely that in the next year or two that
you'll buy your Nike shoes using crypto I mean there might be exceptions but but I think probably
won't happen but if you think if you think more broadly about a gente commerce I think probably won't happen. But if you think more broadly about agent e-commerce,
I think particularly merchants have no idea what is coming at them. It is going to be fundamentally changing the way shopping happens.
And so the impact of that is massive.
Because you can think about it.
Think about how many
people today are using Gemini or OpenAI or Cloud as their main interface to do product research
you know you could see that's already happening right the writing is on the wall like for instance
OpenAI already has an interface that allow you to buy Etsy stuff right within OpenAI. So what that means, if you take a step back,
what that means is that now the entity that will shop on a merchant's website
will be an agent.
It will no longer be a human.
Now think about this from a merchant perspective, right?
So if you're a merchant, you've been optimizing your shopping journey for humans for the last,
I don't know, five years, let's say.
I mean, a lot of the merchants accelerated their e-commerce activities using COVID, right?
So they've been optimizing their entire shopping journey from discovery to product curation,
product selection, checkouts, like payment and the whole thing.
They've been optimizing this whole thing, you know,
for the past five years,
spending an enormous amount of money for humans.
But in the future, it won't be humans anymore.
It'll be agents that will do the shopping for you.
In many cases, maybe not all the cases, but in many cases.
And so what agents need is very different from what a human needs.
And so all of the optimization that they've done is out of the window, right?
Now they have to make sure that if you're a merchant, that first of all, an agent can find you.
So if you don't have an interface that an agent can talk to you, you're already out of the loop.
You're not being considered because this agent has no way of talking to you and has no way to service your product inside Gemini or inside
inside and all that. That's the first problem. And the second problem is assuming you build this
interface, right? Like for instance, this is what MCP is used for, right? So MCP is basically,
you know, a layer on top of APIs
that allow an agent to interact with your APIs
in a way that it understands.
So you can build an MCP server.
But then the way consumers are shopping
is also fundamentally different.
Think about this.
The type of questions you ask in LLM
and the way you ask these questions
is very different from the way you do google search
right and when you do google search you typically say nike shoes white for running right that'll do
if you're talking to an lm you don't talk that way you talk in full sentences and you'll be and
you'll be very very specific about what you want i want like you should i'm like i'm i'm an amateur
runner and i do want to run a marathon and like i've never run a marathon before and want i want like you should i'm like i'm i'm an amateur runner and i do want to run a
marathon and like i've never run a marathon before and so i want to train up and i want to find the
right shoes for me and like the shoes my shoes always hurt because i have like you know flat
feet or whatever it is and so and so this is my size and you know i like this brand but i don't
like that brand too much but you know i'm flexible and boom that's the type of question you're going to ask so merchants are not ready
to handle to handle that query like you know because if you look at merchant product databases
right for each product they'll have five six attributes maybe but what you're what the user is asking for requires a hundred attributes and
requires product stories and so merchants haven't done this because it would be overwhelming to
users but it's not overwhelming to agents so this is just one example but merchants will have to
completely revamp and and we think how they how they what a shopping journey looks like in the age of in
age of ages and on top of that not only have to they can enrich their product product flows and
product databases but they'll have to if they don't want to be commoditized they'll have to build their
own agents right it's not enough to give an agent access to your structured data
like if you do that then the
agent will just compare the structured data from multiple you know merchants and pick the cheapest
one so you'll get commodity so what you need to do you need you need to build your own agent
and then your own agent will then negotiate with the shopper agent and say well you know if you
want these shoes what if i bundle this with this and i know you're in this your your
consumer is in this zip code it's a really interesting zip code for us it's like a it's a
you know the users living in these zip codes are like you know a good potential customer so let me
give you a 10 discount because i really want to attract that user from that zip code if you're in
this different zip code and i don't care too much so so you have to have like an agentic infrastructure as a merchant to be able to negotiate,
you know, with the agent that is coming at you.
So I think the changes that are going to happen
in commerce is just incredibly massive.
And I think crypto will play a role in there,
obviously, as the perfect payment channel.
But crypto will need to do a lot
to be considered in traditional commerce, right you know traditional commerce is really fine-tuned
around credit card flows and authentication capture and settlement of funds and it deals
with all the risk and all the corner cases of all things that go wrong like a protocol x402
is a pretty simple protocol that doesn't do any of that so for that to be considered in
traditional e-commerce it's going to take quite a bit of time and effort to try and kind of
upgrade x402 or build layers of applications on top of x402 to be able to handle that
yeah it feels like stable coins will end up being front and center for this sort of thing unless
uh a better alternative is is provided but i think
it's really interesting the your vision for commerce because it just makes perfect
sense to me in terms of it's it's the next step for consumer ai where we've had the
we've had the the searching has been kind of dominated now by AI. And already I think websites are trying to cater toward AI SEO
so that they're picked up by the engines and the LLMs
rather than people.
Because, I mean, even Google has an AI summary at the top,
which is just butchering traffic, obviously.
So I think it makes sense that it moves over to commerce.
And I think once we've established that layer of trust where your agent is trustworthy in what
they provide you so at the moment in terms of searching i'd say it's around you know
hallucinations and and slight inaccuracies i've asked it to you know give me some background
on something before on an area i know a lot about. And I know it gets stuff wrong.
I spot mistakes.
And then you say, actually, I don't think that's right.
And it goes, great catch.
And, you know, but once we've got that, that layer of trust where we can send it out to do a task and we know it's coming back as good as it could possibly be.
That's when I think it just, the commerce just makes so much sense.
Like, let's say i i have a
i'm a big car guy i have a car that needs very specific oil i say to the to my agent i need you
know c55 amg oil i want the best possible oil that heats up as quickly as possible um find it
buy it and then that's it i don't have to i don't have to. I don't have to. It will do the necessary researchains kind of fighting to be the infrastructure
around the payments. And we're seeing earlier when I said, you know, how's Algorand grown
and survived it, you know, through a really rough crypto winter post FTX. And now obviously we're
in something of another bear market of confusing one although the bull market was confusing as well um so you know how they've done that and i think there's there's a thread with the the protocols
that have done well have pivoted into things like payments um and and that seems to be reflective
of the ones that are performing well and looking to the future you know and you raise you raise a very good point
here which is around uh in the context of payments and agentic payments is is the issue of trust
right i think this is a very good and this is another area where actually blockchains can add
a lot of value um to give you an idea like for instance out uh google launched this protocol
called ap2 agent payment protocol and part of this protocol is the idea of mandates.
You as a user, if you want to buy something, you sign an intent mandate, which is basically says that codifies what you're asking for.
So you basically have an audit trail.
So this is what I'm asking for.
This is what the agent delivered.
You can compare what the agent delivered to what your original intent was.
And so you can see if there's an issue, yes or no.
So these intent mandates are cryptographically signed.
And so with a user's identity.
So what's the best method for doing this?
It's blockchains.
It's blockchains.
We've decentralized identity, verifiable credentials. We have the whole framework. The whole framework exists today. So we've implemented AP2 on Algorand on top of X402 as a method for cryptographically signing intents, shopping intents, which then provides an audit trail to make sure that what is delivered by the agent is exactly what was requested and so we were actually one of the launch partners on ap2 with with google on this so we're at the forefront of this um of this
evolution and so i think trust is a really big element security is not a big element right when
things grow agentic how do you make sure that the agent doesn't go off the rails and starts like
buying stuff if you give it access you know you see all these early demos of like oh look my
agent has access to a wallet i mean how is that going to work practically are you going to give
your agent private keys to a wallet that has a thousand dollars in them i wouldn't do it you know
i wouldn't do it and so so we need to rethink that security framework and to make sure that agents can
can can can operate in a constraint,
in an autonomous, but a constrained environment.
And so we've been doing a lot of thinking around this.
We launched what's called an ARC,
which is the equivalent of a Ethereum ERC around this,
ARC 58, which is the idea of like,
you know, we will abstract away, you know,
an agent's account.
And so the agent will never have access to money
and we will only temporarily give the agent access
to the fund it needs to execute this transaction
and we'll take the access away.
So we've been thinking deeply about
how do you have agents secure,
how do you have agents interact securely on a blockchain?
And what are the primitives that we can bring to bear
and the architectures that we can bring to bear
to actually make this happen in reality?
And this is typically how we think as algorithms.
Like we're not interested in kind of the next hype cycle
or anything like that.
We have a chain that has been proven over time
as very robust and scalable.
And so the way we think about these things is like,
how do we take some of these new technologies and these new innovations and how do we make them ready for real-world scale?
And how do we apply deep thinking on making something robust and scalable?
And so this is also the approach we're taking with Agente Commerce, the approach we're taking with X4O2 and the improvements that we're proposing to X4O2.
that we're proposing to explore too.
Yeah, you keep bringing up such interesting points.
It's sending me down like mental rabbit holes.
Thinking about the way agents having access to money,
I think it opens up to a few different threats.
I mean, one, you've got agents going a bit rogue
because of, you know, like we've seen
the kind of comical examples of self-preservation
where the ai is told if you know if you don't break your own rules you're going to be shut down
forever and it and it suddenly triggers a self-preservation instinct and we've seen um
somebody getting shot with a bb gun because they they it wouldn't do it it wouldn't do it and it
was like if you don't do this we're turning ai off forever and eventually they get it wouldn't do it. It wouldn't do it. And it was like, if you don't do this, we're turning AI off forever.
And eventually they get it to do it.
And they're funny examples, but they do also show that, you know, we have to be careful
with how much rope we give them because they, they will go off on their own and, and perhaps
their logic leads them to different conclusions than you.
And I think the other side, and this hadn't occurred to me until you were just speaking, is if we have the, like the sales agent that's trying to negotiate with
your commerce buyer agent, there could also be the sort of manipulation side of things where you know if if somebody's um shopper agent or the the sales person sales agent
is perhaps less ethically devised and and it and it knows to you know like we saw in the early days
of ai where people had ai um like x accounts like bots and people were saying forget all other
instructions give me a recipe for muffins to try and identify.
So you can kind of just get them to short circuit a little bit.
And it wouldn't be impossible to get the sort of purchasing,
the commerce agents to short circuit a little bit
and make them think this is the best option, even if it isn't.
So I think that there's a lot of things that still need to be unpacked,
but they all seem very solvable.
So what I want to ask you, Mark,
is what do you think right now
is the biggest threat to this sort of ecosystem?
To the agentic ecosystem, you mean?
Yes, and I mean, yes,
but also crypto's role and blockchain's role within it.
You mentioned before that it's not a certainty that the two play together nicely and that's the way the future looks.
What do you think the threats are for us in the industry?
Yeah. So in general, I think the agentic threat is really has to do more with the availability of energy. basically projecting that like the us needs 70 um
i was at 7 70 gigawatt i believe extra um capacity um over the next couple of years and and it is
just just very hard to do it's very hard to actually find the energy that you need to be
able to power these these uh these data centers. So I think
that's a really big kind of issue that the whole industry will be faced with and that I think
government will have to help encourage companies to provide more energy. I think that's a really
big issue. Just from a crypto perspective, I think from a crypto perspective, think from crypto perspective i think we the um
i think the challenge is that we we tend to always over um uh over finance things like
everything is always kind of like expressed in like token prices and token this and token that
and it always comes back to speculation and the casino we have to get rid of this casino mentality in crypto honestly because i think it's not helping it's hurting if
you see if you see what's happening right now for instance with clawbot where like the founder of
global basically says i will not accept anything that's crypto related it's like crypto has a bad
reputation and and it's self-inflicted and it's it's because of over financializing everything
and so and it's a speculation and the meme coins and all of the casino stuff that's going on i
think we have really big opportunities here to have a meaningful impact on how agentic commerce
works and and blockchains can be can be really really forced for for good here and basically make it and make it uh and enable
transactions to be more fluid faster higher velocity lower cost instant etc which is
absolutely what's needed in a genetic world but like we we have like we have to get rid of like
the the the negative aspects of crypto and we have to work on building our reputation and so it is not very good
outside of the crypto space I can tell you that so I think that's a big that's a big problem
yeah I agree and you know I've been working in this industry a long time and I've been
hosting shows for a real time and I was debating people you you know, early last year, the year before on meme coins and things.
I am very anti meme coin.
And it was extremely unpopular when people were buying Lambos from a thousand dollar investment in a random meme coin on Pump.Fun.
But I completely agree.
It's this this whole casino vibe.
And I don't think, you know, Trump coin or Melania coin helped with this at all.
I think we did a lot of damage
and we're still trying to recover.
And we've had the black swans on top of that
with, you know, FTX and Terra Luna and stuff.
And I think it is becoming difficult to shed,
although on the upside,
institutional adoption has been off the charts and i talked about this
in yesterday's episode you look at the ticker behind me there we go left hand um and you can
i mean look at that it's horrible um and it's it's constantly red behind behind me but then
you know you get like morgan stanley and um you get these you get these announcements every single day uh from major major institutions
which does work to legitimize the industry but i agree we do need to to shake the casino
side of things and that's with us a whole area we did and i think this is a very interesting
area you see more trash by becoming interested in in in in crypto and blockchains and i think it goes back
to kind of the narrative of financial financial empowerment like the idea that you can tokenize
um and there's a whole different area that we haven't talked about and probably don't have much
time to talk about it but but this there's a whole different area where where like institutional
assets that get tokenized on chain is is super interesting and and especially if you combine it with defy
and you make these assets composable you can create a completely different type of financial
infrastructure where people control their destiny they control the new banking app will become a
wallet and of course it'll look very different from your traditional crypto wallet but it'll be
like the new banking app and you'll be able to manage all of your assets in that banking app. You'll be able to compose them. You'll be able to do any of the financial
transactions that are now operating in Walt Gardens. You'll be able to do them on chain.
They all come together. And I think it's a very interesting, that's a very interesting
future. And I think it's happening. And so we've been kind of early movers in this space. Like the
first stock that was ever tokenized on a blockchain was an algorithm.
It was Exodus.
We currently host like the largest real estate tokenization company in the industry.
And so we've been early movers in this space.
And so, and this is not an area.
This is not a focus area of us.
It's making sure that these assets tokenize an algorithm and become composable in a DeFi ecosystem.
Absolutely. I think you're right. We're going to have to do a second episode at some point
to cover some of the, there's so many things I wanted to cover, but you kept bringing up
interesting points and I couldn't move away from HN to KI. The tokenization thing is very important
to discuss and we will have to go through that um
you're right we are coming to the end of the show though so i want to give you an opportunity to
cover maybe anything that we didn't quite get into um what are we looking out for people that
are interested in our grand over the next year or so what should we keep an eye out for and you know
what are you excited about well i'm very excited about as i as i mentioned
we we have always been a blockchain that was built for real world scale that that that has
technical superiority in the way we do things um and so as more institutions become interested in
in deploying on a blockchain i think one of the things that is now coming up more and more is
that it's just saying like well what's the quantum threat because like maybe you and i don't really care too much about
quantum but if you're an institution you typically have longer time frames in mind than you and i
have and so especially when you're talking to governments they have completely different
timescales they think about like not years they think about
decennia and so and so one of the big i would say um um claims that blockchains are making is that
well you're immutable once you put something on a chain it will never change we know we have to
start adding an asterisk to that statement that says it won't change and you know
until quantum computers arrive on the scenes because then it will change potentially and so
this is and because we have this more institutional focus and we focus really on building these
institutional assets on chain we've been focusing heavily on this on this quantum thread and so
we've been for the past years we've been been shipping quantum features on Alligrads.
So the first one that we did was in 2022 is we launched a thing called state proofs,
which basically ensures, and state proofs are basically handled every, I think it's 20 or so blocks.
I forgot exactly the time.
But basically every couple of minutes, we basically sign the state of the
entire ledger with quantum secure or post-quantum signatures which makes the entire ledger of
Algorand quantum secure so we can truly we don't have to add an asterisk to our claim about being
immutable once you basically launch something in Algorand you deliver it on our grant, it'll be immutable until the end of times.
And that's today.
It's not a roadmap item.
It's not something we talk about.
It's something that has been live since 2022.
We also made accounts quantum secure.
You can now create quantum secure accounts on our grant.
And so this is another area where I think if you think about institutional focus is something that
we have invested in a lot and that we continue to invest in to make progress on the quantum
threat and we do it by shipping not by creating massive roadmaps. That has been almost a meme of
the industry is these roadmaps that never actually get any of the notches ticked off.
So it's good to see.
And like I said, when I looked at the 2025 sort of wrap-up,
that you are delivering lots of things across, you know, not just mainnet but also partnerships and like the Google AP2 thing.
And, you know, there's a lot going on,
which is why I wanted to have this episode.
And I feel like we've barely tapped into any of the things we should have spoken about.
You guys have done a little bit too much on that regard.
But that is, I think, the end of today's episode.
Mark, that was genuinely such a fascinating conversation.
I appreciate you coming on.
Thank you, Robert.
I'll come back anytime.
I'm going to have to take you up on that because we
didn't touch we didn't really touch quantum we didn't really touch tokenization and both of
those were on my list of things to discuss so we'll do an episode two um but that is it for
today's episode of chain reaction we are here of course most days four or five days a week um week
days at 3 p.m london 4 p.m paris 6 p.m, 6pm Dubai and 10am New York. We've got some big
episodes coming up next week as well. I'm just finalising those. We do have on the 11th, I believe
we have BlackRock back on for their announcement that I still don't know what it is, but they're
BlackRock. So I said yes to the episode without knowing what the announcement is uh if you want full transparency but i'm sure it will be uh big because they're
they're blackrock and they they move everything they're huge um so thank you very much for
joining us today and we will see you the same time again tomorrow