Projects
![]()
No projects found
Investors
New
DAO Treasuries
DATs
Lend / Borrow APRs
Chains
Categories
Spaces
🟩 🐶 Compound Developer Community Call | New Markets, Integrations, & Deployments OTW
Recorded: March 19, 2025 Duration: 0:49:48Space Recording
Short Summary
The call covered various developments in the Compound ecosystem, including the launch of new markets on Arbitrum and Ronin, yield opportunities through USDS incentives, and governance discussions around security measures. Technological advancements were highlighted with updates on multi-sig security and the development of a new front end. Innovative financial products like yield-bearing Bitcoin were also discussed, alongside proposals for enhancing economic security and governance.
Full Transcription
Hello, hello, waiting a couple of minutes for everyone else to join.
All righty. Hello, everyone. Let's start with formal stuff first.
So I want to welcome everyone on compound developer community call.
It's a place where we discuss product updates and important topics.
We meet every other Wednesday at 9.30 Pacific time.
If you want to speak, raise your hand and we will give you access to speak.
And also note that this call is recorded.
We have a specific agenda after which we are going to open discussion.
According to our agenda, we have compound growth, alpha growth, shardle, or whoever is,
please go ahead. We have Seby right now on the call. He's on the conference in New York City.
probably sharp is the best thank you pastor hey guys sharddl here from the compound grid program
and alpha group there's a bunch of small updates here as well as a bunch of big updates that are
happening so we're working closely with sky for us t s market incentives on base so the sky team is
incentivizing the us ts market on base
currently at 25,000 USDS per week.
That gives us out around 100,000 USDS tokens of incentives
per month.
We're deploying them with OKX at the moment,
but we're also looking for other partners to deploy with.
So stay tuned as we update more.
We'll also push some marketing behind this very soon.
As we are also talking about Sky,
there's also a USDS market coming up on arbitram.
It has received recommendations from Gondlet.
I'm waiting for Chainlink to launch a price feed for it,
which should be around Wednesday next week.
And we should be good to go with USDS on Arbitron as well.
We also launched a Staked Comp forum post that
plans here that Pan could talk about,
otherwise Pasha would also talk about it.
And we have
the Ronin cUSDC planned rolling where Compound USDC becomes the yield-bearing stable coin on the Ronin chain
There's Seby available for more details on this topic as well.
And for incentives, there's OKX and Contango campaigns that were running on optimism.
So we may sunset these campaigns as the incentives run out.
But we'll keep you guys updated on it.
That's all the updates from my end.
I'll pass the mic to Sebi, Brian, or Kyle to speak more.
These guys might be in the event, so it might be hard to listen to them.
But the flow is all yours.
Yep, I'm at the event here.
That was a great rundown of what we have going on.
Thank you, Shardul.
Back to you, Pasha.
Thank you.
Yeah, right. If no one right now from Alphabet want to speak up.
One moment. We have Brian and Kyle.
Yeah, I think I could talk about the state comp.
We've been kind of holding that back for a number of months now and as kind of potentially ending or renewing the growth program.
It's that we'd be able to get our work out there and start a conversation and see something that the community wants to pursue.
This has been.
an interesting one, and if the community wants to pursue it,
happy to help push that project forward or not.
So we'll probably do a snapshot vote in the next week or two
to see if this is something that the community wants to pursue or not.
And depending upon that, we will help pursue it or not pursue it.
Lots of incentives had a really good meeting with Fire Bitcoin.
There's a game that we can play with that because it's now a yield-bearing Bitcoin.
with embedded yield. So there's there's some fun game that we're going to loop up on on mantle
with that and then the WVTC market on main net. There's a pretty major opportunity there.
So that's some of the things that we're looking at and happy to answer any questions.
Thank you, Brian. Yeah, I honestly believe that TAC Comp is really important considering the history
of the compound and I encourage everyone to contribute
gives your salts in terms of how StateCom shall be designed.
Wolf will also give his inputs pretty shortly.
And yeah, feel free jump on the forum.
Take a quick look. If you have any comments, go ahead.
Already, is there any other speakers from Alpha Gros?
I believe not. If not, we can, and if there is no questions to Alpha Gros,
we can move further to our next speaker, which is Compound Governance Working Group.
PGOF, I believe it's you.
Do you have any updates for us?
Hey, everyone.
Thank you for the intro.
So on behalf of the compound governance working group,
I think this couple of weeks were focused on,
firstly, getting the compound guardian proposal back up and running,
working with Open Zeppelin to basically get that reinstated.
I think the take there is that the six month guardian,
I guess, contracts expired.
And so, you know,
With seeing some, you know,
Humpy reentering governance and seeing some, you know,
general unease, I think it makes sense.
And if you, we talked with a few people as well,
thinks it makes sense to sort of reinstate
that Guardian proposal for the next six months
as effectively like a, you know, security council type,
you know, veto counsel if in case any malicious proposals get passed.
And then secondly, we are discussing different stakeholders and different delegates regarding a delegate incentive proposal that failed recently.
We are looking to see if basically it makes sense to rerun it or if something like stay comped in the future maybe it might make more sense.
So that temporarily is on hold.
I think the...
on behalf of like the compound community multi-sig, we are getting a few of those addresses across different chains shored up and should be ready to go within a couple days.
I think then we will look to move the, you know, officializing the community multi-sig proposal to an official vote.
And then, you know, that should be, hopefully, in the next couple of days, waiting on, I think, Open Zeppelin and a few people to, I guess, sign some transactions and sort of sort of that side out as well.
Additionally, looking at a few, I guess, new opportunities and new avenues, a lot of it will
come down to just, I guess, general community appetite for different, I guess, initiatives
in the future.
I know that I think, especially with some of the state comp stuff, there's a lot of, I guess,
new governance avenues that we can work on that would be pretty interesting.
And, you know, we'll look to, you know, stay involved with over the next couple of months.
Thank you.
Thank you, Pekong.
I have a question.
What do you think will be, what mechanics you want to implement to protect the governance?
Like, because, for example, right now we have a guardian, but someday it will expire.
Do you envision some further improvements?
Yeah, I mean, I think the guardian was six months.
I think it makes sense to renew it and keep it, you know, for every six months.
So that, you know, if something were to happen to the multi-sig and et cetera,
governance doesn't just get, you know, bricked up for the foreseeable future, right?
Yeah.
I think down the road, the goal obviously is to just get more governance participation and so that you don't have maybe one entity that can sort of push through a specific vote, you know, single-handedly.
I think until then, though, something like this just makes sense, right, in case there is anything maliciously passed again in the future.
Thank you. I think it's, I think it will work for us.
Has anyone have questions to the compound governance working group? Once again, if you have a question,
I'll ask for speaking permission and we'll let you in.
All right, thank you, Pekop.
We'll look to our next speaker, which is Gondlett.
Andrew, please.
Yeah, hey guys, I'm here.
Hi, Andrew.
Hey, guys.
Yeah, here to chat about Gauntless work over the last few weeks.
We provided a few updates in the forum, so I'll give you a quick rundown here.
We provided an update on interest rate curves for stable coin comments on March 7th.
We wanted to note changing prevailing market rates and the sky savings rate has continued to
Recently moving down as a .5% or so.
So we want to bring our Cablecoin IR curves in line to remain competitive there.
So we recommend decreasing borrow APRs with the kink for these table coin comments.
We also provide a few recommendations for listings for an arbitram USDS comment, mainly looking at S-staked USDS as collateral.
We evaluate some of the other collateral options, but due to liquidity and slippage constraints,
CAPREX for other collateral assets didn't really warrant listing at this time, though we know, of course, that could change in the future as liquidity profile matures.
We also provided some recommendation to top up comp rewards on base optimism and Eath for the next three months.
So that proposal has been executed so you can go clean your comp now.
We also provided some updated Sonic deployment recommendations.
We did want to note that liquidity profile on Sonic has greatly changed since we provided our initial recommendations.
So it definitely warranted a second look.
They're in the forums.
Please go weigh in and let us know what you think.
We do want the community to kind of weigh in on our recommendations in general and provide feedback.
So please, if you have questions, let us know in the forums or DMS directly and we'll get back to you as soon as we can.
Thanks, guys.
Thank you, Andrew.
I encourage everyone to go on the forum and check Alphagraph Update.
Yes, Brian, do you want to, do you have a question?
Yeah, it's not a question. It's more of a comment here. The work for Sonic has been done.
Gauntlet did the work, Wolf did the development, even though that the deal went through.
The two growing chains currently right now within the ecosystem, kind of this downturn, are Sonic and Barrettain.
So we do have a deal in the works that we passed the Gauntlet about a barrow chain deal.
We want to get their feedback before I make it public in pushing forward on Sonic while
a lot of the market is unstable or declining,
these two chains seem to have increased growth
and highly recommend that we push forward
with something on Sonic and potentially on Berachain
since we've already done the work
and have the code and everything ready.
So please comment if you feel otherwise, that'd be helpful.
I believe it's to Andrew, right?
Oh, I'm sorry. I thought that was to the community.
Yeah, community in general.
Andrew and you and I've talked about this.
Yeah, pushing up Sonic is probably for the best bet, right?
Yeah, I'm a huge Sonic fan personally.
Not Gallant's position, but my personal opinion is that it will continue to grow.
So it seems like a good opportunity, even without the deal going through.
I think there's still growth possible on chain.
Likewise. Since we already developed it, it was audited and
recommendations what's provided i think it's no brander to move forward with sonic
i wrote i helped write the uh with something on Sonic and potentially on Berachain proposal that was sent to gondlet i'm also looking
forward to a response from gondlet about that yeah i have not chatted with sye today let me follow
up with him to see where that sits in our queue and i'll get back to you guys thank you any other
questions to gondelet guys all right if no more questions we'll move to our next speaker we have a lot of
speakers today so let's just move to
WOOF!, yeah, it's as I'll represent both today. I'm Pasha, I'm CEO who we are developing compound and
infrastructure around compound. We have multiple updates and multiple things which will be deployed
and delivered to the compound governance. This in next weeks. So first off, I can start with markets.
We developed, we developed a
Brap E-smarting and running and deploy it.
Also, we developed Rattle Asset Price Oracle, which will be delivered to the forum this week.
Also, we developed the wrapper for Bunny.
Outside of that, we develop in a migrator for a while, and it's live on the web net.
I can share a link right now.
So basically what migrator do, you can migrate any position from Morpho, Spark, or Ava to compound, which is pretty cool.
You can migrate borrowing position, landing position to compound, land or borrow.
So it will be available for users pretty shortly.
Also, we developed Rewards V2.
finishing it and polishing it this week.
So alpha growth and other parties will be able to distribute rewards
from Optimism, Arbitrum, and any other guys within a compound infrastructure,
not using like Worldcraft or other guys.
However, they're also pretty important.
The next thing is front end, alternative front end, which we are building.
We integrated markets which we built and also we integrated them Bobby.
Bobby is yield optimizer for compound and hopefully our ourselves in front end will be live on main front end roughly so you all of us will be able to use it at maximum capacity.
As for sandbox, we are going in a planned base and I think in a time frame of months or months and a half we'll be able to show how compound sandbox will look like and how it will feel.
from the UI perspective so we're also updating software required specification of the sandbox
and we recently gave an update of additional scope we added because before that we plan to
have a PAD control market and right now we want to add curated market as well so for example
Gonslet will be able to create markets on compound and get the
feed distribution as well. Pretty similar to Morpho in terms of feed distribution. And let me check.
I think that's said from our side. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. If you want more
details, please go to the forum. We update in the forum every two weeks.
A quick question or comment.
Very excited to the work you guys are doing on the 466-26-Rapper for the Uniswap v4 Bunny integration.
I think that can drive a lot of activity primarily on base and eth-mainnet.
So really excited you guys working on that as well.
Thank you. Thank you so much, Brian.
I can see Jordan.
Jordan, do you want to do you have questions?
Yeah, how's it going?
It was a topic related to Sandbox because I know there was a previous discussion about possibly doing an experiment with different Oracle solutions.
I was wondering if that is going to be seen in the future.
I know we have a couple different Oracle solutions that compounds looking to use.
But I definitely think using Sandbox to kind of test which would be the best would be a good solution.
Yes, so...
Oracle selection will be up to the governance.
Governance will be able to delegate to some kind of multi-sick
and we'll be able to white list oracles.
Important to know that each market shall have same oracles
because they have frequency of updates,
which are pretty different from, for example, Redstone and ChainLink.
So yeah, we can add any Oracle community wants, Oracle provider,
It would be Redstone, ABI3, or ChainLink, we can add it.
Just important to note that one market, one Oracle provider.
Any other questions, gentlemen, and ladies?
The OAV plan that Kyle has might be interesting at the end.
Just heads up since we're talking to Oracle's.
Yeah, I agree.
OEVs.
It's great.
And I think we like abandon the conversation about OEV providers because we have multiple
parties competing between each other, like Redstone, API 3 and Chainlink.
And I think that there will be kind of initiative from these three parties to launch a snapshot
so community will be able to choose a proper direction how to move forward.
I don't know who you need to take a lead, but maybe it will be alpha growth or maybe someone
I have a bunch of information about that and I'm down to talk about it at the end.
Okay, thank you.
Yeah, I also want to highlight that we are planning to work with Platonia in terms of some adjustments,
economical adjustment to the sandbox.
Hopefully to start talking about that with Platonia this and next week.
Yeah, if no more questions to both, I think we can proceed with our next speaker,
which is Open Zeppelin.
Jared, let me give you access to speak.
Hi, Jared.
All right, thank you.
And last week or two, we posted a few reviews to the forum, including some of the most recent
proposals and the deployment of the West Market on Runnin.
We've worked with work to resolve any issues with that, and expecting that to go as planned,
we'll review the next proposal.
as it's available. I believe that was today, so we'll get on that.
We currently are reviewing the COPO price feed. We're awaiting still the final commit on the migration
scope. We've received the comment wrapper scope for estimation, and we're awaiting the final
commit on that to schedule and execute that audit. We're also reviewing the
Galva Growth Renewal Proposal and we'll have some feedback for them on that shortly.
We have a few more scopes that we've been notified about, but we will schedule those as soon as we have the
code to estimate. There's probably one outstanding update on the road to New Denver,
but it seems like we completed all of the outstanding items on that. I will make sure to update that
for the community to the years.
We've also done some recent multi-sig updates to make sure that all of the L2 multi-sigs match the signers on MayMet.
And it's pretty much it.
If there are any questions, I can answer those now.
Thank you, Jared, for the update.
Does anyone have questions to open Zeppelin?
All right, we have no more questions. We have two speakers left.
It's Plotonia and Chain Risk accordingly.
So let me introduce you, Victor, from Plotonia.
Victor, please go ahead.
Yeah, thank you very much for the intro.
Can everyone hear me?
Yes, you're audible.
Okay, great. Awesome.
Yeah, so I'm Victor.
I work at Plotonia, mainly doing research.
We're a small team of researchers who've been in the D-Sy space for a while.
I think we've been contributing steadily on the forums relatively new, but I've just gone through a bunch of different quantitative initiatives.
Hopefully by the next developer community call, we'll have review out for the
uh treasury growth strategy um in terms of covered calls that avant
guard posted and also um some additional analysis for um oev and like selection for the different
providers and yeah kyle's super happy to um speak and also excited to hear your update there too um
Also, we recently posted a kind of what we, our best guess of what we think could be the best arrangement for servicing the Dow in a proposal, just more of a temperature on the forums in terms of product research.
A lot of it goes towards the degree of uncertainty that we've kind of seen in terms of like what paths compound should take moving forward.
There's a lot of different avenues.
We think we can kind of contribute.
regardless of what the doubt ends up deciding in terms of how we move forward, whether it's, yeah, you know, or just a combination of them.
It doesn't have to be mutually exclusive, as I think Cameron's pointed out.
But, yeah, in terms of existing initiatives, such as like state comp, but, uh,
we've been discussing on compound v3, along with we're all kind of mechanism design nerds.
So we'd all very much be very interested in helping out for any initiatives for compound v4.
So I think that's maybe like a high level summary of that, but yeah, happy to take any questions about any of the work to do in the sort of
two-week sprint at this point versus the proposal.
What were your thoughts on strategy guidance?
Seems like that's related to Alpha Growth's proposal.
Is that true?
Sorry, Kyle.
Did you say strategy guidance?
Yeah, you mentioned something in your statement about how compound could approach temperature checks for strategies that are being proposed through the forums and then put to vote.
Is that correct?
Correct.
I'm not sure, but I might just not be fully understanding the statement.
I think in our eyes, I think we're not leading like any sort of strategy initiative.
It's more of we're like a research team that will provide like quantitative analysis to better help
like other service providers in terms of making these,
and the Dow in general to make these types of decisions.
We're generally believers that, you know, good research
could be helpful enabling like all the other sort of parties here,
whether it's like, you know, smart contract development,
you know, growth initiatives, risk management, all the above.
So that's kind of where we come in.
I don't know if there's, it's more like strategic advisory.
I don't know if I'm answering the question we have here.
Yeah, thank you. I think it'd be cool to talk about OEV with you.
Awesome, yeah, looking forward to it.
Should I share now about OEV?
Yes, Kyle. I think it's the best time right now.
Cool. So I've had conversations with ChainLink and API3 and Redstone.
I've been trying to find a framework for testing performance that would be accepted by each of these groups.
And my current best guess for this is as follows.
We should have isolated markets on Mainnet.
They should be USDC markets.
And I think we could use Morpho for this and do this now or soon.
We could also wait and do it with Sandbox.
What I want to get done and API3 has offered some incentives is I want to get incentives from compound
Maybe say like 150k I want to get 50k from API 3
From Chainlink and from Redstone and then each market each isolated market on mainnet gets around a hundred K and incentives and
because we want people to deposit their money in there and get liquidated so that we can
evaluate these liquidation recapture solutions. We want to have a Dune dashboard that basically
shows the amount of available liquidity like liquidation bounty, the amount that was captured,
how quickly it was captured,
We want, I think, to get some audits from perhaps Open Zeppelin if they're available,
something that would say, this is how this SVR or OEV solution operates,
and here's sort of like a high-level overview,
something that the Dow could digest afterwards to help them make a decision.
And the last piece that I think is interesting is,
As OEV is captured or SVR is captured, I personally would like to see that money flow back into the rewards contract for that.
I think we can use the decentralized front end and rewards V2 to make that possible.
And this ought to sort of set up an ongoing test until these rewards run out, which could be a while.
Okay.
And I think that would be very interesting from like a marketing perspective.
It'd be a longstanding kind of like competition that we would be facilitating.
It'd be very much at the edge of defy.
And I think it would provide a lot of data for making a good decision for what OEV or SVR providers to look for for compound.
So that's kind of my high level overview.
Okay.
I think there's a couple things going on here at the same time too.
Victor's post-a-brown insolvency buffer and some of the risks on liquidations also
start to drive some conversations around being able to drive higher collateral factors
that if the liquidations are occurring quicker and we can rely on them, either
off-chain, on-chain methodologies, whatever the way that they look in doing this test,
it could eliminate a lot of the risk around bad debt, which is like super interesting.
And that also would need to be modeled out in the future. So it's not only is this
revenue generating process potentially for the Dow or compound users, but it also allows for a more competitive
risk configurations that will then drive more activity and more utilization across the entire protocol.
So I think getting that game set up between the different service providers on OAV, SOSR, and all of these games is going to be quite a project in above itself to make sure that it's agreed to the time horizons,
what's the line in the sand, what's at stake here?
So there's setting that game up properly.
into a closed game versus having the potential for others to manipulate it is also like a project in above itself, not just to see the outcomes and the analysis of the outcomes. So that seems like a fun challenge.
My next step is to write a forum post which synthesizes all of this information and then invite Chainlink APA 3, Redstone, Plotonia to weigh in on what the best structures are.
Get Open Zeppelin involved if possible.
Gauntlet have them weigh in.
This is what I would like to see happen.
And then I want to get it up and going.
Okay.
as quickly as possible.
And I want to use the decentralized front end
to kind of show it off.
It's kind of my goals.
Thank you, Kyle.
Thank you, Victor.
Thank you, Brian.
Does anyone else have questions to Platonia?
Already, if not, we will move to our next speaker,
Suripan from ChainRid.
I'll grant you access to speak.
You can go ahead.
Sudipan, you're a speaker.
You can speak.
Hi, everyone.
Sudipan here.
A few updates from our side would be that yes,
we also kind of aided to give recommendations on the Sonic side.
Super happy to see that things are now moving on that side
with contract recommendations.
Secondly, we rather see a lot of things holistically
from an economic security approach.
you know, there are a lot of, you know, research help which the Dow needs around collateral
factors. Of course, we recently talked about the OEV topic. We would love to contribute over there
as well. But, you know, generally, if we are looking at cryptoeconomic security as a whole for the
protocol, then, you know, I would.
I would encourage all the current service providers and the upcoming service providers to kind of work on each and every aspect that's possible.
Otherwise, it's almost like...
a half cooked work out there because if you are able to work on mechanism design of a protocol and able to decide mechanism design of V4 as a whole, including Sandbox and V3, then you should efficiently be able to contribute and
like driver, healthy competition among the parameters as well.
The Avey Dow has been probably the best example where, you know, multiple contributors to not only
risk management, but overall economic security as a whole, has driven a lot of value to the
protocol at the end of the day.
There have been several risk managers.
There have been several like overall economic security companies who have contributed to
the Dow, you know, we could name...
Risk DAO Block Analytica, of course,
GONTRA in the past, chaos, Lama risk now.
All of them have collaborated and worked on the DAW
at the end of the day in some of the other capacity.
So if we are inviting other service providers,
then while they should, of course, compliment,
but at the end of the day,
it shouldn't be like a half-cooked work.
We should all compete and provide the best recommendations
because
from what we saw in the example of Sonic as well.
If at the end of the day,
the Dow sees that there have been some delays on the recommendations
or the recommendations have not been very perfect as well
as being expected from that chain,
then we should have multiple providers to basically jump in
and compete to give the best recommendations out there.
It hardly matters at the end of the day
whose recommendations are going on chain.
But what matters is, you know, we should...
drive that healthy competition in the Dow.
So we have put up a proposal from our end to serve the entire economic security of compound.
You know, it's quite a detailed proposal.
We've been trying to put this up almost from the last three, three and a half four months, multiple revisions done.
This one is probably a lot more holistic.
Also, on the governance attack side, we have had previous discussions about implementing
game theoretic models out there, apart from the guardians, which Open Zeppelin has already
implemented in the DAW, where it's more like technical, but at the same time, you know, governance
a more game theoretic setup, which we have tried to convey to the DAO multiple times.
So, you know, happy to collaborate on that front as well. We've made sure that that is also
included as a part of our proposal. The proposal has been put up in the same thread where we spoke
about the Dow operational concerns as well as the pressing need of a secondary risk manager. Now, when we talk about
you know, risk manager. We usually, you know, only think about parameter recommendations and
competing on parameter recommendations, but that's not it. It's about the entire economic principles
and economic mechanism design of the protocol as a whole, where we would contribute and put up,
you know, valuable insights from our end. So yeah, that's it from my end. I would love to
answer any questions, Pichetay. Thank you, Suripan.
When do I think you will publish your proposal on the forum?
We've already put up
our proposal as a part of the pressing need of a risk manager thread that is already
there on the forum. We discussed with all the colors and a few others that whether we should
put it up as a separate thing in the proposal section. If the Dow wants that we should put it up
separately in the proposal section, we could do that. But we got a recommendation from a few delegates
to basically put it up in the same thread so that we maintain the same thread. So
Yeah, any inputs on that, happy to kind of go ahead with changes.
Got it. Thank you for qualifications for your phone.
Does anyone have questions to chain risk?
All right, if not, no one have questions.
Brian always have hand raised it confused me a little bit.
But yeah, if no one have questions.
We can go ahead.
I think we do not have speakers, but I see on a forum that Cameron wanted to present Compensator.
I know that there is no screen sharing option on X, but Cameron, if you want to speak up,
please raise your hand and I will give you an X.
Hey, everybody.
Okay.
Hello, Cameron.
Compensator is still in development, but it's going out for preview right now.
I basically, it's a work in progress.
You guys will see me finishing it up this week and over the weekend.
And so if any delegates are interested in offering rewards,
you'll be able to do so from your profile page.
And yeah, let me know if you guys have any questions about it anytime I'll be active in the Discord.
One thing I'm wondering is the timeline if Oz can confirm about the review of the contracts.
Hey, I saw your message in Discord. I appreciate you submitting the scope there.
I don't have the schedule for you yet, but we will finish the estimate and schedule that with you shortly.
Thank you. I prefer to, yeah, I prefer to review the final version.
But we should have the estimate for you before the end of the week so we can get you in the schedule.
If you think there's a significant amount of code that might change from the estimate, we'll just quickly estimate again before we start.
But if you're expecting to have the final commit for us by Monday, then we can plan ahead for that.
And I'll follow up in Discord.
with the schedule proposed.
Okay, you consider that last commit as the final one, the Bump version.
So if there's any changes required in the review, you can let me know, but we can say that's
the last one right there.
Okay, so the rest of the changes are not contract changes?
Exactly.
Yes, exactly.
Appreciate that.
Thank you.
No problem.
Question from my side is, is there any of the gift community codes and write codes to take a look?
Yes, and I can definitely say it. So on this, like I'm just trying to keep it a little bit private because it's still a work in progress.
But like for example, the banner illustrations, they should be done in a day or two. But the code is 2025. So if any of you guys want to check it out,
and report any bugs you might see or anything like that, let me know.
But yeah, that's the code, 2025, the year of Compact.
Yeah, that's it.
All righty guys, not anyone who have questions to Cameron so far?
Already, if not, I give you some time if you have any open topics you want to discuss.
Please feel free to raise your hand and speak.
I like what Brian put forward or what alpha growth put forward for state comp is a lot of,
I like how they're bringing kind of the opportunity to the community to discuss.
And it's a lot of, it's a heavy lift, it seems like.
So like I'm still thinking about how I could possibly slot in there.
I don't think like a lot of that stuff is,
up my alley but we're also working on a lot of this product stuff already so the capacity maybe
isn't there personally so yeah i will i have thoughts but i haven't shared them yet about all that
stuff but it's it's i like to see bringing that opportunity to the community and hearing that
discussion being ignited
I agree. We'll also give some inputs. My main input is shall we make a liquid stake comp,
which will accrue value against comp, or shall we just distribute directly,
rewards directly to the comp stakers without issuing any extra token?
I think it's the main question for myself and Wu, and we'll bring it up to a forum.
All right, gentlemen, ladies, do you have any further topics to discuss?
Alrighty. If not, I want to say thank you to you everyone to joining and participating in this call. I think it was very fruitful and I wish you the great rest of your day and see you in two weeks on the next call.
Host
Compound Growth
from
Compound
